RemarkableFormal4635

It's not just that "billionaires benefit so it's bad", it's that it actively hurts the working class in favour of billionaires. I can't touch in your other talking points because frankly they aren't relevant in this conversation.

Unfortunately, that is a fabrication that the left have created. The modern left is pro migration. Ask yourself - who stands to benefit from lower wages and increased worker competition? The answer is people who are already wealthy AKA billionaires. The billionaires have done an excellent job convincing everyone that the left is actually against the billionaires, but the reality is that the entire mainstream spectrum is owned by them.

Yes! To build a narrative that things are bad so that left-wing grifters get elected and make billionaires even more money, All sides of the mainstream political spectrum are owned by the billionaires, don't be so biased.

How about we tax the land and also allow investment, maximising the flow of capital into the country and also into the state/the people.

>There is also a lot more to the story, which makes it clear that the implications of the bill as passed would mean farms being swallowed up by major industrial agricultural companies. Which would be terrible for all of us who don’t have farms or posts on the board of major industrial players. I'm gonna need a source on that, and another one explaining why that's a bad thing for consumers. Big companies tend to be more cost efficient than little ones thanks to integration and supply chains etc

>Think about a family business - the parents and children all directors, and they have some capital assets tied up in the business. Then the parents die. Do the children pay inheritance tax on their parents' part of the business? No. A quick Google search suggests that they do, except for small businesses that qualify for business relief >Farming is a unique type of business, where farms are passed down through generations. They may be asset-rich, they may drive a nice car and live in a big house, but the majority of them work bloody hard. Why should the family farm/'business' be ripped apart because they didn't structure it as a limited company? Asset rich my ass nobody cares how wealthy they actually are, that's just a ridiculous appeal to sympathy >Perhaps they should do just that - in which case GIVE THEM TIME TO RESTRUCTURE. Ok, let's give them a delay then, not no IHT >This government is so desperate to harm people that it isn't thinking straight. The benefits of removing IHT relief for farmers outweigh the cons. It only existed in the first place so that the wealthy could have an easy tax loophole, and to buy voting points because people are ideologically in love with farmers.

All benefits would instantly have to be cancelled

Making noise above a certain decibel reading for a certain period of time should result in atomisation.

So my argument sounds valid, unless you write it backwards and incorrectly, in which case it sounds stupid?

Repeating my argument backwards doesn't make it apply the other way around, that's not how logic works. The actual concept is to enforce laws. The possible implications is that the laws would then somehow become tyrannical.

So your problem is with possible implications and risks rather than the actual concept

But they can trust each other to follow the common law that keeps us all safe, and they can trust that they will be held to that standard by their fellow citizens.

People aren't perfect, as in people break the law by accident and don't deserve to face consequences?

Sounds like a great idea for cost efficient law enforcement then

That's better than some places. I think in the UK we can report assholes that splash pedestrians with puddles

If laws were perfect, then yes, and that would be a good thing.

A society where people are held to the laws that the people have decreed? A society where rules that keep people safe are enforced instead of being ignored by assholes?

Found a slightly battered one for 27p in a co-op once

Ok I mean wtf? All this is gonna do is make people less likely to take the train. They should offer properly secure bike storage with insurance for a fee

Wow, I did not know that grocery taxes were even a thing. Is that on top of VAT? A grocery tax here would be a political nuclear bomb for whoever added it. "X PARTY HATES EVERYONE WHO NEEDS TO EAT FOOD"

Firstly you need to understand how electricity is billed There is a fixed rate per day + a charge for each KWH used. Work out your rates known as tariffs, and you can work out what's happening. Probably best to switch providers to get better tariffs

I think it's too lenient. There's no real consequences. Getting expelled just means switching to a new school where they can also behave like shit. It's tragic that just a couple troublemakers can really wreck things for everyone else

Maybe not exclusively but it would be predominantly male. A: you can't just conscript the whole population or the country will shut down, B: call me a misogynist but on average/generally men will be more aggressive and stronger for fighting purposes.

Not sure. Labour is doing well at the moment. 0.7% gdp growth in 3 months, halved immigration, more NHS appointments. If they keep this up, hopefully by next year people will start to realise that reform UK is not the way.

Kinda depends by what means you register it ig

She's just a moron, best possible outcome is maybe she gets told off (nothing will happen)

Idk about policies but good work mate 👍

It's easy as long as you have done appropriate research and handle parts carefully.