Web developers that have no clue how things work.
Posted by JoeyJoeC@reddit | talesfromtechsupport | View on Reddit | 15 comments
Should be a short one, I was just forwarded an email chain between a web developer, and one of the owners of a company which we recently started providing IT services for.
A web developer designed a new website for our client. The web developer decided that since their old email address, info@example.com was receiving so much spam from being listed on their website, that they abandon it and use a new email address instead (enquiries@example.com).
In the meantime, we've just migrated their mailboxes to Microsoft 365 and decided that we should keep the info@ mailbox, and redirect it to the new enquiries@ mailbox, since the better spam filtering from M365 will filter out the spam.
1, The web developer emailed to say that we didn't need to migrate their emails as the old website didn't have a certificate and was using HTTP, but since the new website will have a SSL certificate and will use HTTPS, that it's secure and they shouldn't get anymore spam.
- Our client responded to say that since we migrated them to M365, they've seen a 95% reduction in spam, therefore they're happy to be MIGRATED BACK to the old email server since the spam issue has been resolved.
I'm shaking my head. We usually have these kind of strange issues with web developers. We've had issues in the past where web developers change our clients DNS nameservers because they created a new website, and then tell our client that that's the only way for the new website to work. Completely breaking other services. We do try to keep control of domains away from our clients but they don't always listen.
glenmarshall@reddit
I have consistently said that web development requires 4 skills:
- User experience engineering
- Written communications with subject matter knowledge
- Technical platform & tools knowledge
- Editing/proofreading
It is rare that one person has all of these skills. Good web development is a team effort.
styphon@reddit
That's only 3 skills... 0... 1... 2... 3!
ljb2x@reddit
And this post is how I learned that the UK uses "enquire/enquiry" instead of "inquire/inquiry" for everything. Even my browser is underlining "enquire" as an error lol.
Kuro_Necron@reddit
TIL why the distinction between "en-US" and "en-GB" exists
ljb2x@reddit
Oh man, you're in for a treat. There are some that make sense like GB having "U"s in words (colour vs color) to things in en-US that make no sense (tyre vs tire and kerb vs curb). I love seeing all the differences considering how closely we're related.
robertcrowther@reddit
I enjoyed The Prodigal Tongue which went into why these differences exist.
ljb2x@reddit
I'll check that out! It's always interesting to me how our language has split over the years.
JoeyJoeC@reddit (OP)
We also have Centre here in the UK, for me, I think it's weird.
ljb2x@reddit
The one that gets me is even in the states we alternate between "theater" and "theatre" and both are correct! Though for me, a theater is where I watch a movie and theatre is a stage play.
Also, gray vs grey. Different colors if you specify them in design, both accepted here, but with "gray" being the preferred American spelling.
KelemvorSparkyfox@reddit
An ex referred to them as "en-Simplified" and "en-Traditional" respectively.
J_Blue1@reddit
We use both, but it depends on the context. You might enquire about a quote. But a lawyer may pursue a line of inquiry. Generally inquiry is used in more formal contexts.
roostangarar@reddit
I would personally always use enquire, unless it was something formal like the police or goverment. Then it would be inquire.
ljb2x@reddit
That's what the site I found said as well. I'd make no distinction between formal and informal for them. Interesting!
Wells1632@reddit
Remember, info@
is RFC 2142 compliant. :)Noch_ein_Kamel@reddit
I always mail my files to ftp@ :-)