Explain Toyota vehicle line up for me.

>Companies make a range of offerings to allow for minor differences in consumer tastes. After 2008, GM axed half of their brands, and the hindsight takeaway from that was that they were cannibalizing their own sales by producing models that weren't distinct enough from each other to justify their own existence, and what followed was a period of relative slimming of each lineup that typically had only one offering in each segment per brand. Now we've drifted back into old habits and we have a single brand offering four different two-row midsized crossovers, one is slightly more off-roady, but not off-roady enough to compete with their actual body-on-frame SUVs, one is slightly more luxurious, but not luxurious enough to compete with their higher end sister brand, one is slightly larger, but not large enough to compete with the three row crossover. The overlap between models and segments is vast and the niches are microscopic, and being that a car is the single most expensive thing most people own next to a house, it's good to stay informed when you're on the market. Consider the controversy right now with Doug DeMuro criticizing Buick's overcrowded lineup and the particularly bad value some models present compared to others, it's a topical subject and discussion isn't unmerited.