Anon got what he asked for... But at what cost?

a. I didn’t mention bimodal. I mentioned binary, which is the first thing you said. b. These “psychological differences” are not actually defining of sex. Rather, they are traits commonly shared (but not always) between members of the sex. It’s the same reason acting feminine doesn’t make you a woman and acting masculine doesn’t make you a man. >It's in that sense that a trans woman is a woman. No, because then we would define woman as one with femininity, and you *really* don’t want to do that. >And it's only through a complex sociological and neurobiological lens that defining a woman is possible. That’s a fun way of saying “I’ll take away the entire definition of the word while hoping the connotations remain and force everyone to agree, even though I myself cannot define it.” >"Female" as a classification of person and not a classification of sex phenotype actually only holds muster for high school biology. You sound stupid when you use it thusly. “Female” would be a classification of both person and sex. Classification: “the action or process of classifying something according to shared qualities or characteristics” So yeah, when we say someone is “female” because they hold the shared traits of female, that would be classifying a person. Or are we going to change “classification” to mean nothing as well?