TheaterFire

Drop in ocean pH might kill everyone in the 2090s! (Paper last revised 05/2022)

Posted by BattleGrown@reddit | collapse | View on Reddit | 211 comments

Drop in ocean pH might kill everyone in the 2090s! (Paper last revised 05/2022)

Reply to Post

211 Comments

Fickle_Meet@reddit

OH NO!!!
View on Reddit #28108930

deleted_by_reddit@reddit

[removed]
View on Reddit #15849536

collapse-ModTeam@reddit

Hi, dovercliff. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/17u8bv6/-/kda81ir/) was removed from /r/collapse for: > Rule 4: Keep information quality high. > Information quality must be kept high. More detailed information regarding our approaches to specific claims can be found on the [Misinformation & False Claims page](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/wiki/claims). **Please refer to the Climate Claims (https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/wiki/claims#wiki_climate_claims) section of the guide.** Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/collapse) if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.
View on Reddit #15849537

IWantToGiverupper@reddit

Ocean Acidification scares me. Did a paper on it in one of my Bio courses.. How the fuck are we LESS THAN 20 YEARS AWAY from the POINT OF NO RETURN, and we DONT HAVE ANY MEANINGFUL CHANGE?! Don't answer that, I know why. There are people being born today, that won't even be adults by the time we have the final verdict..
View on Reddit #13821393

beedlejooce@reddit

Not a popularly liked opinion, but I truly feel that anybody still having more children right now is kind of selfish. Of course it’s mainly all the people that don’t believe in the impending doom coming. But if someone understands the severity of what’s coming and you’re still popping out kids left and right that’s messed up. Basically welcoming in a soul to be slowly tortured, or quickly, but a shit existence nonetheless. It is going to be a miserable reality in 25 years.
View on Reddit #13854215

Ih2mpwtd@reddit

You might enjoy this scene. Great show BTW https://youtu.be/rcx-nf3kH_M?si=BPSO5ARkUGjZaZNG
View on Reddit #13892460

shwhjw@reddit

So sad they cancelled it in favour of creating a shitty US version.
View on Reddit #15413172

SeveralDrunkRaccoons@reddit

It's a fairly popular opinion here. And I find some support among younger people. But many of them will still have kids, because in the end we are mostly just puppets of our hormones and cultural imperatives.
View on Reddit #14160302

HandjobOfVecna@reddit

> POINT OF NO RETURN I think most collapse-aware people assume we are already way past the point of no return.
View on Reddit #13827189

SeveralDrunkRaccoons@reddit

When you factor in human behaviour and psychology, and the dynamics of human political decision-making, yep.
View on Reddit #14160253

boomaDooma@reddit

The thing about a "point of no return" is that you can have lots of them, however when you pass the first one then subsequent ones only accelerate collapse.
View on Reddit #13861949

ObssesesWithSquares@reddit

This is on another level though.
View on Reddit #13840754

voice-of-reason_@reddit

On a macro level, yes. In terms of individual tipping points, not quite.
View on Reddit #13827342

CoyotesOnTheWing@reddit

20 years from no return but only 30ish years from ALL WHALES AND FISH ARE DEAD. What the fucking fuck...
View on Reddit #13827123

Taqueria_Style@reddit

If anything ever had a chance of putting me into "and find out" phase, it's this. Well. We're going to have to do something. I mean I know everyone always talks about it but... dude we dead. Like actually right this moment now dead. Our brains just haven't caught on to the fact.
View on Reddit #13856731

CoyotesOnTheWing@reddit

Yeah, like I knew we were fucked and I'd watch things get slowly worse but I didn't think I'd witness mass starvation and complete system/societal collapse in my lifetime. I'm glad I never had children...
View on Reddit #13864174

AwaitingBabyO@reddit

I'm so sad that I did have children. I thought they were just going to have to endure the regular bullshittery of life. Not...this
View on Reddit #14092616

CoyotesOnTheWing@reddit

I hate to make you feel sad by that comment, I didn't really think about the people who have children when I said that. They still can still experience great happiness and love and can have a good life right now. This paper is more aggressive than most and not set in stone. It definitely isn't for sure going to go that fast and that bad. I like to hold on to some hope. Human ingenuity, amazing technology, the desperation of billions of people as things get bad. I think about the Manhattan project, the coordination of massive amounts of brilliant people to create something unbelievable. Yes, that was for destruction but the same effort towards saving this planet could do wonders. The next stage of civilization could/should be able to control our climate. While that seems so far away, it is within our grasp, it is within the possibility of science and our present reality. Yes, I think things will get much worse before they might start to get better/move in the right direction but things can change incredibly quickly as especially recent human history shows. For any of that to happen, humans need to exist and the next generations need to be good. I don't think humanity should go out with a whimper, stop breeding and cease to exist. We should fight for both the survival of the human race and life on this planet. Someone has to exist to do that. I see morons breeding like rabbits, good and smart people need to have children too, to slow our decent towards idiocracy. Thinking of the children in Gaza or Darfur right now, horrors beyond imagine. The spectrum of human experience is vast. Not everyone, everywhere is going to experience starvation, genocide, etc. Your children could experience a good life and be glad they are alive. The world could be a better place because they exist, because they become good people. The future is not written in stone. It is scary, yes but don't be sad you created life in an imperfect world. Life for most humans right now is better than it's ever been throughout all of our history. We've been through some dark ages, but i think that those are natural steps of evolution. What we will be experiencing is a powerful selective pressure, and we must evolve as we and all other species of life have done countless times. We survived asteroid impacts, mega volcanos, ice ages and we would not exist as we currently are if we hadn't had to fight through those times. Also personally, there are parts of me that definitely regret not having children. I won't have family as I grow old, I will likely die alone. They provide powerful human connects I won't get to experience. The joys of watching them grow up and become people. The affect I could have on the future by raising children right, teaching them to be good people.
View on Reddit #14112571

AhmadHaider@reddit

I have two questions: 1) The graph says that the point of no return is around mid-2040 but what is the likelihood of that happening well before, say, in the 2030s? 2) Once we reach the point of no return is there a period where things gradually but consistently get worse until maybe 5-10 years later mass starvation occurs? Or would we expect mass starvation to occur almost immediately after breaching the point of no return?
View on Reddit #13824054

Deguilded@reddit

Re: #1 The graph assumes RCP 8.5. If we don't do RCP 8.5 (BAU) then it'll be a bit later. But not that much. Seems unlikely to come earlier, but hey, you know what the phrase is around here... Re: #2 If the graph is accurate it's worse. Ph < 7.95 leads to explosive dinoflagellite growth. Oxygen levels dropping faster than attributable to GG emissions alone is covered in the paper. Granted, I imagine that'll take a while, but starvation is one thing - insufficient oxygen is an unrecognizable world. What survives won't be anything we know, including us.
View on Reddit #13828245

AhmadHaider@reddit

Insane.
View on Reddit #14099042

DjangoBojangles@reddit

Things are already in the consistently getting worse phase. Mass bleaching events in coral, entire penguin colonies starving to death, massive crab die off, wholesale decline of commercial fish populations, the shellfish boil during the PNW heat waves, worsening harmful algal blooms, anoxic events getting worse along coasts, the Arctic ocean was practically 10+°C all summer. The feedback loops are already turning.
View on Reddit #13844020

Classic-Progress-397@reddit

And people are STILL voting in right wing conservatives. It's baffling.
View on Reddit #14057005

Timebomb90@reddit

If anything has taught me in these 18+ years of being climate change and collapse aware, is that *everything* is happening sooner than expected.
View on Reddit #13827784

RollinThundaga@reddit

If I knew how to program I'd throw together a bot for this sub to keep a counter going.
View on Reddit #13836753

Tyranid_Swarmlord@reddit

Especially if it can be triggered by saying 'say the line' 'say it with me' etc Bonus if it invades other subs lmao.
View on Reddit #14021647

Then-Hippo-6767@reddit

Just ask ai to do it for ya
View on Reddit #13862364

malevolentslime@reddit

Exactly, because they kept giving conservative estimates so they couldn't be accused of scaremongering.
View on Reddit #13843451

Tliish@reddit

We don't need scaremognering at this point...we need *terrormongering.*
View on Reddit #13923015

Taqueria_Style@reddit

I mean don't we look scared at this point? Don't answer that. The good news is that past a certain CO2 concentration, we'll all be too stupid to be scared...
View on Reddit #13854760

dumnezero@reddit

except energy supply powered by nuclear fusion
View on Reddit #13839515

ObssesesWithSquares@reddit

You can't BREATHE!!! Everything breaks down evenrually, how are you constantly going to replace all those filters? It's only a matter of time until we are extinct!
View on Reddit #13840593

nomeans@reddit

1. Highly likely 2. We can expect mass starvation to occur regardless so I would say immediately
View on Reddit #13878093

RichardsLeftNipple@reddit

I'm not sure. However the oxidized iron extinction might give us a clue how fast oceanic chemistry changes.
View on Reddit #13873589

blackcatwizard@reddit

1. There is a likelihood of it occurring before 2040, but I don't have the resource or background knowledge to say anything meaningful beyond that. I do say there is a likelihood though due to the amount of warming (is that considered in these data?) of the oceans, glacial runoff which will further disrupt temp and salinity, and the NASSTA. 2. 1/3 of the planet relies on the ocean for regular sustenance. Combine that with massive crop failures worldwide (happening now, but will continue to get worse,) and suddenly A LOT of southeast Asia will not have reliable and regular food sources. Projections for a while have been that the ocean will be depleted by 2050. I think it's a safe assumption to ramp that timeline up just like everything else.
View on Reddit #13836298

No-Kangaroo-669@reddit

Every 10 years we're told we're 10 years away from the point of no return. Stop it.
View on Reddit #13963202

IWantToGiverupper@reddit

Oh, okay. Sorry. Back to work boss.
View on Reddit #13996269

ribbitthefrogg@reddit

i will try to make the most of the remaining moments we have but it's absurd how a couple of narcissists will eradicate most if not all life on earth.
View on Reddit #13952649

billcube@reddit

Brb getting a f*ckload of baking soda.
View on Reddit #13826002

Mistborn_First_Era@reddit

Baking soda is like 7 ph. You can drink that fine. Cook it into baking powder is a bit better, CaOH calcium hydroxide is probably the best for marine life. >!Reef tanks rock!<
View on Reddit #13836006

possblywithdynamite@reddit

Aaaactually… by sheer coincidence I drank 1/3 cup of baking soda diluted in water yesterday and I got extremely sick as a result. Called poison hotline, was worried about kidney failure, but luckily the weird human body has a fail safe for this situation and that is evacuate all fluids IMMEDIATELY. Pretty wild. 10/10 do not recommend.
View on Reddit #13860081

Mistborn_First_Era@reddit

1/3 cup is a shit load, glad you are ok. I usually add 1/4-1/2 tsp to a single drink if I feel acidic symptoms or gas. Basically very cheap 'tums' medicine.
View on Reddit #13860437

ORANGE_J_SIMPSON@reddit

It works but it tastes like Satan’s Jizz
View on Reddit #13874646

Mistborn_First_Era@reddit

Tasted like sugar water to me, must be a jizz lover lol
View on Reddit #13899599

Solitude_Intensifies@reddit

Some will pay extra for that.
View on Reddit #13881439

No_Perspective_4641@reddit

Baking soda increases the pH to 9, that's the joke...
View on Reddit #13850928

baycenters@reddit

Oh that's what baking powder is
View on Reddit #13850456

Riordjj@reddit

There is not enough lime in the world to even change it back.
View on Reddit #13879385

Accurate-Ad-8988@reddit

It’s gonna be like that Futurama episode when they drop a massive ice cube into the ocean every year to stop global warming but instead with a fuck ton of baking soda.
View on Reddit #13842244

PandaBoyWonder@reddit

Cover the cube with baking soda, the white powder will reflect more sunlight! Checkmate
View on Reddit #13852961

kakapo88@reddit

Not to worry. We’ll all just go to Mars.
View on Reddit #13837380

marbotty@reddit

Why go to Mars when Earth can turn into Mars?
View on Reddit #13837830

kakapo88@reddit

Actually, it looks like we’re going to turn our world into Venus instead.
View on Reddit #13848054

michael-streeter@reddit

Elderly hydrologists working for the petrochemical industry have explained their calculations are there's not enough carbon on Earth to make it runaway like Venus. No need to worry about that. But this really does worry me.
View on Reddit #13858385

sjgokou@reddit

I’ve always said, our first goal for cleaning the environment would be building massive Plants (not actual plants 🪴) that are near the ocean or on the Ocean. Think of a massive protein skimmer and refugium. The protein skimmer removes the proteins and trash. The refugium filters the waters. We always take a portion of the water and filter it through a RO type system that replenishes it with fresh minerals and salt.
View on Reddit #13849073

Taqueria_Style@reddit

How much money do 8 billion corpses use? We dead. Fuck the financials, do it. \*Do it\* - Palpatine voice.
View on Reddit #13856963

Straight-Razor666@reddit

we're screwed, sorry to say. Just get ready for it, and expect it to happen sooner than later.
View on Reddit #13845281

marbotty@reddit

Not only no meaningful change, it’s not even discussed openly outside of niche subs like this one or on fringe-y type media channels. But the good news is nearly 200 people have seen/upvoted this post, so I’m sure word will get out
View on Reddit #13837748

nommabelle@reddit

[The paper](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3860950) included in the submission statement is not peer reviewed and may be misleading or wrong. [This comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/17u8bv6/comment/k943wkp/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) asserts this is similar to the "90% of plankton are dead" widely debunked article from last year, which is covered in [this article](https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/no-the-oceans-are-not-empty-of-plankton/). The humble mod team doesn't have a good view on whether this particular data and paper is true, which can be said of a lot research shared in this sub. However ocean acidification is certainly occurring and worthy of discussion, even if this new work isn't peer reviewed. We are opting to allow this to stay up with that justification, and this disclaimer
View on Reddit #13857891

effortDee@reddit

Thanks for everything you do mods!
View on Reddit #14196296

ConfusedMaverick@reddit

I thought I had seen it all, made my peace with what was coming, and could no longer be shocked. This gave me a wave of nausea. JFC.
View on Reddit #13843549

Fox_Kurama@reddit

Yeah, a lot of us here probably got solace in that whatever survives humanity's collapse and possible extinction and whatever violent tantrum we throw on the way out would be able to start things up again, perhaps with some surviving humans who eventually might manage to make a civilization again once the world stabilizes again (and be conveniently lacking most of the fossil fuels so as to mitigate what damage they can do next time around). Ocean acidification is one of those "there may not even be a next time for the life that would otherwise survive humanity's near/extinction" things. That is the issue. It is easier to take peace in what is coming when you can imagine that whatever survives will diversify and make the world pretty again after we go.
View on Reddit #13954222

Accurate-Ad-8988@reddit

How creditable is this paper? This reminds me of a similar post from about a year ago titled “our empty oceans” that discussed something similar and was partially discredited by a few marine biologists. It may have been the same paper.
View on Reddit #13839599

Fox_Kurama@reddit

There are potential issues with the paper, though any news source that would probably do far more to damage the accuracy via leaving words out than any issue with the paper itself. However, the ocean ph IS going down, and there is a large amount of research spread out all over on what this can do to different species of ocean life, due to the fact that people like aquariums and have had to do research on stuff like this to optimize their ability to keep fish as pets or city museum/zoo exhibits and such. Ocean acidification is a huge issue that even we here seem to feel uncomfortable to talk about relative to just the usual "oh, its fine, its only the entirety of human civilization and 99% of humans that will die, and next time we make a proper civilization we won't have most of those fossil fuels to mess up the planet with!" Even if the whole toxic atmosphere stuff never actually happens, the loss of all life that requires the ocean to be above a particular ph is... bad news to put it lightly.
View on Reddit #13954058

Grognard68@reddit

So, are the last humans going to be some Billionaires that are going to be sealed up in artificial environments? ( on Earth or in orbit) I feel both sick & enraged...)
View on Reddit #13823965

ribbitthefrogg@reddit

just like those dystopian future movies. as a kid i always imagined myself being one of those kids running around in the space ship or something , now i realize the plan for me was to be decaying in some landfill or something, how could i deem myself worthy to be among the space colonizer people , like i deserve life as a human right no matter my position in the hierarchy, we been bamboozled folks, it's the ultimate troll of the century, the supposed "future" did NOT have us common peeps in mind lol. I almost feel stupid for believing.
View on Reddit #13953756

cantthinkofgoodname@reddit

Take solace in the fact that once it all comes crashing down, the billionaire class is going to learn that their security teams have little need for the billionaires themselves
View on Reddit #13858421

HandjobOfVecna@reddit

Depends on if you consider billionaires human
View on Reddit #13827981

Grognard68@reddit

Human? Billionaires like Kim Jong Un , Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk *probably* are ( well, self-centered & egotistical humans). Mark Zuckerberg? Absolutely not!
View on Reddit #13831416

BradBeingProSocial@reddit

Just pour pumpkin spice latte into the ocean. That will keep it basic.
View on Reddit #13848486

Fox_Kurama@reddit

Now see, these are the kinds of jokes we need to get ourselves some nice laughs on the way out.
View on Reddit #13953747

SRod1706@reddit

The straight pH line bothers me. PH is logarithmic. This assumes the actual change is increasing logarithmically too. While possible, it seems unlikely to match.
View on Reddit #13827412

BattleGrown@reddit (OP)

I think these kinds of observations are the reason for the straight line: [https://ocean.si.edu/conservation/acidification/ocean-acidification-graph](https://ocean.si.edu/conservation/acidification/ocean-acidification-graph) I have seen similar graphs, you can see the seasonal variations but the general trends turns out to be linear.
View on Reddit #13827598

Mission-Notice7820@reddit

8.11 Hawaii annual average in October 1993 to 8.05 Hawaii Dec 2021. I can't find any more recent data but am quite curious to learn what the last couple years has done to that chart. Didn't look great, wouldn't be surprised to see 8.02 or 8.03. Given what we've seen in these two years from various other data sources around increases of atmospheric CO2, the decreased albedo due to the cleaner ship emissions, and the 2021-2022 Tonga volcano eruption, it would be surprising to me to see anything above 8.05, not that it can't be the reality of course. Just, would be an interesting move that would bring more questions if so. Personally I think 8.02 to 7.98 is a likely range for there to be very observable large events, such as all those crabs, dolphins, whales, fish, penguins, ....uh..yeah all that stuff. So I'm thinking we're there. Most people don't think a 0.06 adjustment to anything is completely earth shattering, it's hard to comprehend the relationship between measurements if one doesn't really comprehend the system itself that the measurement is evaluating. In a large, dynamic system, predictability is based upon balance of all forces. As there arise imbalances in whatever form, the predictability correspondingly decreases. This dance plays out until there has been significant enough change to stress the parameters that keep the system operating as it had been. Compromises are made, or forced. Often, they're little things, like how much rain gets dumped somewhere, how much wind an area gets, building up to more major things like erratic temperature ranges for periods of time that confuse plants, etc. Eventually, you get a large enough change that nothing within the system can withstand the phase change. A critical mass is found and the system picks a direction and goes there, everything in it be damned. It becomes a new system in the process, with new parameters. Maybe some forms of life survive that transition, maybe some don't, maybe all don't, not really for us to know right now, but quite likely something that almost everyone alive today will find out if they're not scheduled to pass away for another 10 years.
View on Reddit #13876743

Fox_Kurama@reddit

>Most people don't think a 0.06 adjustment to anything is completely earth shattering While not one of the favorite recurring remarks on this sub (relative to the clear winner of "faster than expected"), the noting of how humans at large often mess up the most due to failing to actually understand exponentials is nonetheless a general theme as well.
View on Reddit #13953715

SRod1706@reddit

Thank you for the information.
View on Reddit #13834438

audioen@reddit

It's partly because the needed change is so small, in the order of 0.1 pH units. The smaller the change, the better simple linear approximations are.
View on Reddit #13884177

yomajkel@reddit

It's all about the scale. If the scale takes in the logarithmic growth (and pH does), the line will appear straight. See the last pair of graphs here https://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/latest/user-guide/when_to_use_a_logarithmic_axis.htm
View on Reddit #13842005

skjellyfetti@reddit

I feel so much shame just knowing my existence and involuntary participation in capitalism has killed our ecosystem.
View on Reddit #13828104

LightingTechAlex@reddit

The average person has almost no say in the matter. Even if said person does everything in their power to not contribute to the problem. The sickly wealthy are the ones who should feel global shame. They have forced the common people's participation in this monstrous system, draining the planet of resources without any care about entropy.
View on Reddit #13841332

ribbitthefrogg@reddit

and these feces factories we call rich "people" produce pollution that thousands of normal people can't manage to, you're not the one who should feel ashamed for just existing. These abominations who have the most power should be ashamed of not being aborted as it would literally be a grace to humanity.
View on Reddit #13953556

dumnezero@reddit

> forced the common people's participation without resistance
View on Reddit #13854191

finishedarticle@reddit

>capitalism has killed our ecosystem. The Soviet Union was not capitalist but it was *industrial* and its environmental record was even worse than the West's. "Sustainable Development" is an oxymoron - you can only develop at the expense of the environment.
View on Reddit #13844643

darkarchana@reddit

It is not about Soviet Union, if we view each country as a company literally everyone plays capitalism including China probably until war broke off which turned into which country stronger rather than which country gets more profit. So yes, the principal of capitalism where profit is first is truly the main culprit.
View on Reddit #13868874

Didjsjhe@reddit

The Soviet Union is not the end all be all of everything that’s not capitalism. If what we need is to reduce development, commit to „degrowth“ as some people are calling it, I don’t think a capitalist system is going to be compatible with that. Capitalism requires continuous expansion and extraction to maintain itself. A command economy could coordinate to limit production and emissions as one of its goals. Direct control over the means of production would give it the ability to choose the best practices instead of the bureaucratic process of regulating businesses to follow those processes which has failed to limit emissions completely. I think what we need is for food and product production to change from a global supply chain to more local production because that would reduce shipping emissions by so much. I’d be interested in what else you have to say but I don’t see how capitalism can sufficiently regulate business or take climate action because that would be directly opposed to its goals of maximizing profit, extraction, and exploitation. Destruction of crops is a perfect example of this, whether it’s potatoes, milk dumping, or oranges doused in gasoline, for profit farming turns abundance into a problem!
View on Reddit #13854077

DestruXion1@reddit

Lenin was turning in his embalmed display at what the Soviet Union became, that's for sure
View on Reddit #13867208

ItyBityGreenieWeenie@reddit

This is what scared me the most a long time ago. We are changing the pH of the oceans. Let that sink it. As an undergrad, a simple back of napkin calculation showed it happening. The rate is striking. How could do such a thing happen in merely two centuries? When asking biologists about effects, they said some creatures won't be able to grow their calcium-carbonate dependent skeletons. Others warned of drastic changes to the atmosphere should the oceans significantly change. I looked up 'Canfield Ocean' and 'anoxic event' and was scared to death. Geologists told me not to worry, peak oil would do us in before we did any real damage which would then take a long time. Well, now here we are and the tipping point may be only 20 years away. Oh, this is only a hypothetical... so no politician would ever risk their career talking about a hypothetical. There are profits yet to be had! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean\_acidification
View on Reddit #13821112

hobbitlover@reddit

The answer is to become the politicians - join parties, pick candidates, and influence platforms. Voting is not enough anymore, we need to knock on doors, get on the phone, show up at debates and ask questions, drive people to the polls. We need to elect people that back the science.
View on Reddit #13839282

progfrog@reddit

what we need to do will get me banned from reddit, so I'm not saying anything...
View on Reddit #13845646

ribbitthefrogg@reddit

pigs like to make their living conditions a pigsty. but this time it's the whole earth. and the pigs have a few billion dollars and human skins. it's an insult to real pigs actually because at least they contribute in some way to the nature.
View on Reddit #13953407

dharma_barrel@reddit

Lmao good luck. Regulatory capture has already occurred.
View on Reddit #13908974

ObssesesWithSquares@reddit

To win, you need to sign your soul away to the most corps.
View on Reddit #13841293

Pristine_Juice@reddit

Or be assassinated.
View on Reddit #13844374

Toni253@reddit

Fucking bullshit. We've done this for decades and centuries. Voting is useless when all parties are capitalist and the system outlaws anti-capitalist parties. The only thing that can help us is a large scale, violent revolution.
View on Reddit #13844360

Taqueria_Style@reddit

I thought peak oil would do us as well. Then we found tar sands. Game over, man.
View on Reddit #13858116

BattleGrown@reddit (OP)

Submission Statement: The image is from the report named "Climate regulating ocean plants and animals are being destroyed by toxic chemicals and plastics, accelerating our path towards ocean pH 7.95 in 25 years which will devastate humanity.", which can be viewed here: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract\_id=3860950](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3860950) The image shows how phytoplankton bacteria can enter a phase of runoff growth due to dipping ocean pH levels. This is collapse-related because an environmental cataclysm of this scale is not compatible with human habitation of planet Earth.
View on Reddit #13818127

ribbitthefrogg@reddit

im gonna need a LOT of weed for that one ,this ain't worth going through sober.
View on Reddit #13953082

Deguilded@reddit

I'm going to be cribbing a lot from the paper. Hope that's okay. First, some of the text under that same graph: > The Red Line maps data from peer-reviewed papers to provide a historical pH profile from the 1940’s to the present day (references [6] [8 ] [1] [8] [9][10][11][4][12][13][14]). IPCC data has then been applied to provide a projected pH profile. We have used the IPCC’s **Representative Control Pathway (RCP)8.5 or “business as usual” model** for the burning of fossil fuels). These data suggest that we will reach an ocean acidification pH tipping point [15][16], beyond which it will not be possible to recover most carbonate-based life forms by 2045. The IPCC states that at pH 7.98, half of all remaining carbonate-based marine life will be negatively impacted, a pH of 7.95 will have more serious consequences. > The Blue Line maps a drop of around 40% of marine plankton from the 1950s to 2010 [6][17]. NASA reported a decline of 1% year on year from 1998 to 2012 [7]. The extrapolation forward from 2020 is based on the BIOACID report and the simple fact that calcium carbonate minerals will start to dissolve. Plankton and carbonate-based marine life cannot adapt to dissolving. The projected end point is more than 80% loss of all marine life and a tipping point at pH 7.95. Gotta chuck this out there, too. The paper spends some time talking about the fact the forests are the planets lungs, and expressly calls it a myth. It asserts that had we not fucked the ocean, we might not even be experiencing climate change, because the ocean would still be able to "compensate" for us. But we *are* killing it, and with it, ourselves. The paper basically says, unless we address the oceans *as well as the air* we're going to die anyway. > While reducing carbon emissions to net zero by 2045 will buy us some time, it is not going to prevent the loss of most marine life. Even if, by some miracle, the world achieved net zero by 2030 instead of 2045, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations will still pass 500ppm and oceanic pH will still drop below pH 7.95 – a tipping point. The only upside here is that it might buy us time to wake up and address chemical and plastic pollution by giving us an extra 5 to 10 years to address the problem. Finally, the very blunt conclusion: > Humanity is balancing on the edge of extinction, and **we cannot see any possibility of human society surviving beyond the next 50 years** unless action is taken over the next 10 years to stop toxic chemical and plastic pollution. Invisible nature is what really matters: bacteria, fungi, and plankton are the life support system for the planet, and within the next 25 years they will be gone unless radical change takes place.
View on Reddit #13823503

Desperate-Strategy10@reddit

I'm sorry if this is a stupid question; I'm kinda reeling over here from all this - is this report detailing exactly what is currently happening, and what is most likely to happen as time goes on? Or is this a "worst case scenario" type of prediction? And actually, now that I'm retaining the ability to think at all, does it really matter either way since we're not going to make the enormous changes necessary to save even a few of us..? Is all of this just straight up telling us that there is practically no hope, and we are all - every single one of us - going to be dead or dying by 2060ish? Somebody please tell me I'm misunderstanding somehow...
View on Reddit #13844735

Stop_Sign@reddit

Well on the one hand we're doing better as a world than RCP8.5 suggests, as a 2.0 degree world is still possible. On the other hand there are significant issues with the IPCC report models that in general downplay the issue (by things like not including feedback loops). It's hard to say what will happen, but it really doesn't look good. I do think we'll be seeing very large mass deaths that start climbing into hundreds of millions, if not from this than from the other effects of overconsumption like minerals running out, resource wars, and the tipping points that are part of climate change. What a lot of people are relying on is technology that doesn't exist yet. Which, to be fair, is a real possibility. There's a chance AI or quantum computing or bioengineering or something exolodes within the next 20 years into something that radically changes the human experience, and various solutions or problems can come out of that, depending on how it plays out. Maybe an AI invents a way to cheaply clean the air, or maybe it invents a way to control everyone to force us to live in balance. The chance is there, and not insignificant. I process this with the wisdom of stoicism: be aware of the things in your control and the things out of your control. I can personally try to prepare by saving money as things get more expensive, living in areas without water issues, and voting for people who I think prepare us better for the future. But, ultimately I'm not optimistic.
View on Reddit #13850467

Karahi00@reddit

>What a lot of people are relying on is technology that doesn't exist yet. Which, to be fair, is a real possibility. There's a chance AI or quantum computing or bioengineering or something exolodes within the next 20 years into something that radically changes the human experience, and various solutions or problems can come out of that, depending on how it plays out. Maybe an AI invents a way to cheaply clean the air, or maybe it invents a way to control everyone to force us to live in balance. The chance is there, and not insignificant. I'm not attacking you, I come in peace. *b u t* It isn't a real possibility and the chance is 0. Cleaning the air is the perfect example. &#x200B; Imagine you had a vial of, I don't know...soy sauce. You pour this soy sauce into a bathtub full of water. Now the water is a bit different, it's slightly off - color. You decide this was a mistake and resolve to clear the water of soy sauce. In a perfect world you could just tilt the vial back to its starting position and all the soy sauce would gather back up into it as if time was reversing. This is not a perfect world. This is a world of entropy. This is a world where time has a single direction. So how do you return the sauce to its rightful vessel? You don't, unless you're prepared for heavy sacrifice. It is a simple matter to take something of low entropy and make it high entropy. It's a simple matter to take a dense fluid and make it diffuse. It require no effort nor thought. You can do so by accident. The reverse is a leviathan task. The amount of energy and effort you would require to scour the water of its delicious, fermented soy-based contaminants is so great it feels plainly pointless. Might as well just draw new water and dump the old. That would be ideal anyway but we've no more water left in the reservoir. "At least we aren't dumping anymore soy sauce," we content ourselves. ...Right? We have o n e atmosphere. We cannot dump this one and start anew. It is incomprehensibly massive and we have billions of barrels of oil being dumped into it per day. Most of it diffuses into the world's oceans. The remainder is dispersed amongst the very air we breath. &#x200B; In order to accomplish this task, we require a billion personal cars sputtering through metropolises sinking the very ground they lie upon with their titanic weight. Millions of factories. Billions of men and women working around the clock, 24/7 for a couple hundred years. The amount of material we move per year outpaces that of the Earth's natural processes. We've enveloped 40% of the Earth's habitable land with farms. We've killed or eaten half of the fish in the oceans. These impressive feats are sometimes likened to divinity. We're the effective gods of the world known as Earth. We are an incomprehensible, eldritch power beyond the realm of sanity to all of Earth's lower forms. We terraform the planet and shape it to our liking as a matter of daily existence. These feats, doubtless titanic, amount analougsly to the act of pouring the little vial of soy sauce into a bathtub, just on a larger scale. I want to be crystal clear to you: what you suggest is *beyond* the realm of the gods. It is the equivalent of turning back time. It is pure delusion. Perhaps it is out of desperation that some researchers bother. Naivete besides. I sometimes think this may just as well be why others are so enamoured with the promise of AI and the so-called singularity. If creating our problems was an act close to god-like power, then perhaps we can solve them too, if we create the ultimate intelligence. There is an unspoken prophecy in the techno-optimist canon in which we seem destined to create God in the machine to save us from ourselves. &#x200B; This is fiction. The only salvation we have is to accept that we really fucked up and try to minimize the damage. How soon can we stop pouring the fucking sauce in the tub? We need to ask ourselves how we can salvage biodiversity. Can we build an ark of sorts? How do we save as many people as possible? Techno-optimism is a desperate, infantile fantasy borne of our own self-destructive hubris. Real solutions are going to be ugly and humbling to humanity's self-image.
View on Reddit #13919752

WithaK19@reddit

It's gonna invent whatever the fuck was going on in The Matrix and tell us it solved the problem.
View on Reddit #13879171

Stop_Sign@reddit

Upon further review, this paper is **not peer reviewed** and should not be taken as truth
View on Reddit #13911970

Deguilded@reddit

I am not a scientist, or remotely qualified. Let me lead with that. It's talking a bit about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification and it seems to be a very real thing. The assertion is that if we don't address the oceans as a separate and unique problem with independent solutions (i.e. ignore them in favor of doing things that clean up the air) then we're screwed. From that wikipedia page: > Under a very high emission scenario (SSP5-8.5), model projections estimate that surface ocean pH could decrease by as much as 0.44 units by the end of this century, compared to the end of the 19th century.[86]: 608  This would mean a pH as low as about 7.7, and represents a further increase in H+ concentrations of two to four times beyond the increase to date. This seems to more or less agree with the paper. So what does screwed mean? I'm... not entirely sure. Wikipedia talks a lot about economic and first nations impacts, but not a lot about life "in general". This is the part where "i'm not an expert" comes into play, because i'm not. The answer seems to be in the abstract of the paper itself: > There is no doubt that tiny ocean planktonic plants and animals are key to regulating our climate, but this keystone of the planet’s largest ecosystem seems to be ignored as one of the tools to address climate change. Every second breath we take comes from marine photosynthesis, a process which also uses 60-90% of our carbon dioxide. Now that we have lost 50% of a key climate regulator, surely it is time to stop, take a fresh look at ocean chemistry and biodiversity and ask ourselves some fundamental questions: Why have we lost this level of marine life? Why is the decline continuing? What does this mean for our climate and humanity?
View on Reddit #13845900

Taqueria_Style@reddit

I mean I always read it as this: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5TqD5xf0ic](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5TqD5xf0ic) Not that fast but basically. Lose all the plankton we are so fucked.
View on Reddit #13857780

eclipsenow@reddit

Maybe not Soylent green - but Seaweed green? Or [Solein](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/nov/24/green-technology-precision-fermentation-farming)? FEED 12 BILLION PEOPLE while REPAIRING the oceans from just 2% of the world's oceans. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/01/sea-forest-better-name-seaweed-un-food-adviser The seaweed powder can be a food supplement that goes in everything from dairy to bread. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833522000302 The dried seaweed protein yield per area (in the ocean) is 2.5 to 7.5 times higher than wheat or legumes (on land). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221823/ Also remember they grow shellfish like oysters, scallops, and muscles in baskets under the seaweed lines. Floating barges out in the deep ocean can pump nutrient rich water up from the deeps and grow even more food or biomass. (But this method is more expensive.) https://theconversation.com/how-farming-giant-seaweed-can-feed-fish-and-fix-the-climate-81761
View on Reddit #13870476

Mission-Notice7820@reddit

I keep a saltwater aquarium. Checks out. We fucked.
View on Reddit #13827168

ConfusedMaverick@reddit

You mean you have seen the impact of these (tiny looking) changes in pH first hand? Do you have to keep the pH in a really narrow window to keep everything alive?
View on Reddit #13843987

Mission-Notice7820@reddit

Yes, salinity, ph, and a lot of other factors are involved, levels of nitrates, phosphates, ammonia, calcium, magnesium, etc, etc. Generally speaking, below 8.1 things start getting noticeably worse. You see, the harsher the water is, the more difficult it is for creatures whose survival depends heavily on carbonates to replenish/harden their shells. See - https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Ocean+Acidification%27s+impact+on+oysters+and+other+shellfish#:~:text=For%20oysters%2C%20scallops%20and%20other,down%20and%20death%20rates%20rise. We are already seeing the effects of prolonged levels below 8.1 which has been on a consistent downtrend below that since 1995. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1338869/average-global-ocean-ph/ The thing about large complex systems is that there are always these key pillars that keep the whole thing glued together, and if you start messing with those pillars, the system starts trying to correct more and more until it just can't and all hell breaks loose. You can see a different kind of example like this using the space shuttle Columbia disaster as a comparable situation. The hole caused by the foam might not have been a big deal in various locations but because of where it was on the wing leading edge, it allowed superheated plasma to pour into the wing, spreading the heat stress around until it started causing sensors to fail, and structural changes to the wing that started having greater aerodynamic effects. Eventually, even with advanced and precise correction attempts by the computer, way faster than any human could do, the system lost enough of its pillar controls to catastrophically fail. No amount of compensation by the other systems was enough at that point, because the key pillar keeping the entire structure in adherence with parameters fit for human survival, were now gone. Same same, just look around the earth and you can find many other examples of this.
View on Reddit #13853692

ConfusedMaverick@reddit

The pH change seems numerically really small (I know it is logarithmic, but still...). I hadn't realised the scales were so finely balanced - such profound repercussions from what looks like tiny changes in pH. Good simile with Colombia, thanks.
View on Reddit #13854880

Mission-Notice7820@reddit

Yeah, you see this with terminal illness as well like cancer, or bad burns, viruses, etc. The human body can compensate for a long time, far beyond what you might think is possible, until it can't anymore, and then shuts off. Our oceans are in this now. The overall system has had so many different wrenches thrown into it, that it's reaching a point where the levels of compromise required in various planetary subsystems, are becoming not enough to prevent larger systemic shifts, that are...incompatible with shareholder profits.
View on Reddit #13856347

Tliish@reddit

Soylent Green is *people*!
View on Reddit #13922881

ukluxx@reddit

I’ll be 91. Nice
View on Reddit #13920183

sandiegokevin@reddit

2090 is \~73 years in the future. Most of us will be dead for other reasons, long before that.
View on Reddit #13920074

Graymouzer@reddit

Another article on ocean [acidification](https://wraltechwire.com/2023/08/25/overlooked-doomsday-risk-the-gigantic-risk-from-ocean-acidification/).
View on Reddit #13918259

liminus81@reddit

Bet it happens faster than expected
View on Reddit #13821806

BattleGrown@reddit (OP)

A lot of people call the lead author an alarmist doomsayer, so it is probably already the "fast than expected (tm)" scenario. Other sources expect 7.75 pH around year 2100.
View on Reddit #13821956

BenUFOs_Mum@reddit

Well he did do a "study" in 2022 and reported that plankton levels in the Atlantic had decreased 90% which was all over the news and this sub. But it was completely wrong.
View on Reddit #13828928

leopoldrocks@reddit

While I am skeptical of the author too, the news stories actually inflated his claims. He did a survey in the EQUATORIAL Atlantic, not the entire Atlantic, and found much less plankton than he expected. In his paper he mentions that more research is needed to verify this claim and that the plankton could be migrating differently due to a variety of factors, and that could be why he didn’t find the expected amount of plankton in the equatorial Atlantic. Nowhere did he claim the entire Atlantic is devoid of plankton. I’ve done some research into the guy and his paper that have left me overall skeptical of the guy, but he did not claim what you think he claimed.
View on Reddit #13901261

Mazzaroth@reddit

He was misquoted by the Sunday Post. See [Update 8:52 am EST, 7/21](https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/no-the-oceans-are-not-empty-of-plankton/)
View on Reddit #13866001

marbotty@reddit

This is important context, and a bit reassuring. Hopefully he is wrong again
View on Reddit #13838107

BenUFOs_Mum@reddit

I wish this sub would stick to mainstream scientific predictions, which have been extremely accurate up until now. But the sub often focuses on fringe figures or organisations like the GOES foundation here who are making the most apocalyptic predictions, and have often be wrong a lot before. The mainstream predictions are bad enough but this sub really wants human extinction by next Tuesday.
View on Reddit #13839358

SkippingSusan@reddit

Are there mainstream scientific predictions about this specific issue?
View on Reddit #13846242

BenUFOs_Mum@reddit

I'm not a climate scientist so take what I say with a fistful of salt. But I've been reading a few papers today and it looks like the ocean Ph forecast above is right if we follow the RCP8.5 scenario which is often called the business as usual scenario but is essentially impossible to do even if we tried due to the size of known fossil fuel reserves. I think the bigger sticking point is putting the ocean life tipping point at a Ph 7.95 I can't find much to back that up.
View on Reddit #13852138

spk2629@reddit

It’s a chilling thought to realize that those being born now have very little hope of reaching old age. And on the heels of that, whether things happen “sooner than expected” or somehow just beyond the conservative estimates— its impact on humanity is the same. The sixth mass extinction will be complete, with us all collectively joining the dinosaurs. It’s so fucked up. I’d love to say, “Sorry, we tried!” but we know “We” didn’t. Not when it mattered, not while there was the possibility of profit.
View on Reddit #13827263

etheran123@reddit

This is why I don't understand how people can still morally justify having kids. I cant see a way that my standard of living stays consistent during my life time, even with the more conservative estimates on what climate change will do. Let alone a hypothetical child being born in the near future.
View on Reddit #13860010

Armouredmonk989@reddit

We can still tell them we killed the biosphere for chicken nuggets better to be honest right!!!!!
View on Reddit #13844542

liminus81@reddit

7.95? Those are rookie numbers. We need to pump those numbers up (or down, in this case)
View on Reddit #13826593

Le_Gitzen@reddit

Oceans fizzing like Coco-Cola 😎
View on Reddit #13828133

TheCambrianImplosion@reddit

In terms of what is expected, how fast would you say it is?
View on Reddit #13855752

otterbotherer@reddit

Doesn't pass the sniff test - CO2 concentrations have been higher than current levels in geologic history (c. 25mya) without the loss of all carbonate sea life. Things are bad enough without this nonsense making everyone collapse aware sound like crazy people.
View on Reddit #13886772

-Planet-@reddit

I'll already be dead. Not my problem! Weeeee!
View on Reddit #13885183

Mistborn_First_Era@reddit

Graph is spooky, pH on the right is Linearly decreasing. >!pH is a logarithmic function btw!<
View on Reddit #13835844

audioen@reddit

Does that matter if historical measurements actually say it is linearly decreasing? I'll also note that the change of pH needed to bring disaster is in the order of 0.1 units now. Continuous functions are the better approximated by line segments the smaller these changes are. Reduction in pH should be slowing down because each fixed increment takes about 10 times more H+ ions dissolved in the water, sure, but that sort of argument would better apply for change from 9 => 8, then from 8 => 7, which is 10 times more difficult. unfortunately going from just 8.05 to 7.95 or something like that is apparently already enough to bring a disaster.
View on Reddit #13884517

Wevvyj1111@reddit

Yes, this is how abrupt mass extinctions work. Everything dies.
View on Reddit #13880911

DurtyGenes@reddit

IMPORTANT: This is a version of an [already-debunked article](https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/no-the-oceans-are-not-empty-of-plankton/) from last year that was thoroughly purged from this sub. Same authors. Same ulterior motives. Same bad science. While it seems like it is in a peer-reviewed journal, the "Environmental Science Research Network" is an "open access repository for environmental science and other related areas of research including biology, chemistry, ecology, engineering, geology, and sustainability." In other words, it's not a legit journal but it can be used to make things look legit.
View on Reddit #13849560

BattleGrown@reddit (OP)

Did you read the update at the top of the link you posted? Howard Dryden was misquoted for internet clicks. Of course everyone knows that 90% of plankton are not dead, but he's not just making stuff up. Going through proper channels or not, the work is based on observation. I bet we will start seeing credible research soon enough on this issue.
View on Reddit #13853166

Frog_and_Toad@reddit

Thats not the only problem. Making a chart that predicts sealife collapse within a timeframe is very suspect. Theres no hard line based on Ph that plankton dies out, its based on the species. Some species may actually do better with lower Ph. You're correct that there is a dearth of research about the effects of ocean Ph on plankton. More basic research is needed. But you can't just plop your boat in the ocean somewhere and make some measurements, and then make a projection like that. If it gets peer reviewed or otherwise is confirmed by further research, then i'd give it more credibility.
View on Reddit #13856530

BaccaPME@reddit

No my guy. He’s saying CARBONATE based life. Carbonate is carbon dioxide dissolved in water at basic pHs and associated with sodium, making it insoluble. Most species with hard shells use it for their structure. When the pH of the water decreases below a certain level (logarithmic scale so the change happens very VERY fast as you approach that value) the carbonate turns into CO2 again and the creature literally dissolves. Anything based on carbonate for structure will have a VERY similar pH value for this to occur.
View on Reddit #13878841

Frog_and_Toad@reddit

Mod says its removed, but I'm still seeing it.
View on Reddit #13856052

collapse-ModTeam@reddit

> We have removed the post accordingly.
View on Reddit #13855127

Future-Cancel-8015@reddit

Jeez that's a new one. Yikes
View on Reddit #13820565

MakeTotalDestr0i@reddit

I posted papers about this years ago. i dont get why people ignore this one so much. also 600ppm CO2 makes people stupider . even without climate change there are serious problems from CO2 pollution.
View on Reddit #13826985

CodaTrashHusky@reddit

do you still have the papers or the posts from years ago?
View on Reddit #13865445

MakeTotalDestr0i@reddit

the ones about CO2 and cognition are in /r/doomsdaycult ask the redditor MrVisible from that sub and he will tell you about it all.
View on Reddit #13878422

MakeTotalDestr0i@reddit

they are probably in /r/MakeTotalDestr0i or /r/collapsademic or /r/CollapseScience
View on Reddit #13878383

CaptqinDave@reddit

What do you mean by makes people stupider?
View on Reddit #13841105

MakeTotalDestr0i@reddit

It causes cognitive impairment.
View on Reddit #13850966

CaptqinDave@reddit

I just looked it up. Climate change really fucks us up so bad on so many levels
View on Reddit #13851420

ConfusedMaverick@reddit

As co2 levels rise, people's cognitive abilities measurably decline (at least beyond a certain threshold, 500ppm iirc)
View on Reddit #13845398

Pristine_Juice@reddit

Point proven.
View on Reddit #13844534

CaptqinDave@reddit

I guess it's the typical "I can't see it, it doesn't exist" mentality. Forests are green and convert CO2 -> we need to protect them. But we can't see marine life. The ocean could be completely dead and barely anyone would visually notice.
View on Reddit #13841085

v6_6v@reddit

I've personally been banging this drum for 15 years. Once ehux cant form because of acidity, the base of both the marine food chain and the atmospheric oxygen chain is gone. The oceans are going to Auschwitz the whole earth. Very little will survive, including plantlife. It might not take til 2090. Could be 2050. Could be sooner. But this is what's coming. "Nice" to see this idea gaining traction. Sucks that its happening. Have an exit plan, and equip for it in case you need to take the moon door. Hope whatever comes next is more optimized than we are for cohabitation. I hope AGI happens in the next 5 years and skynets us all and gives the biosphere a slim chance of avoiding the fate we're writing for it.
View on Reddit #13868081

cra3ig@reddit

It's the little things you overlook that'll get you . . .
View on Reddit #13820152

DestruXion1@reddit

It's a little thing you might have heard of... it's called THE PERMIAN TRIASSIC EXTINCTION
View on Reddit #13866976

Armouredmonk989@reddit

We didn't over look it we swept it under the rug Archams broom.
View on Reddit #13844425

ActRepresentative248@reddit

That will do no good for the economy.
View on Reddit #13827832

Taqueria_Style@reddit

Quick buy more carbon indulgences
View on Reddit #13861782

ObssesesWithSquares@reddit

That's the scariest thing. Once profits become affected, there's a good chance they might even reverse this, and continue to progress towards making life eternal and miserable.
View on Reddit #13841736

AnotherFuckingSheep@reddit

So what you're saying is we can flourish in the new world as long as we turn ourselves into dinoflagellates!
View on Reddit #13820563

Taqueria_Style@reddit

Dino flatulence what?
View on Reddit #13861722

TheQuestionableDuck@reddit

welp that answered the question and the answer is no we did not passed the great filter. we are all gonna die but at least life go on only slightly get kicked back somewhere from a few million years to 100 million years of evolution because we caused the next extinction event that might be equivalent to the great dying. at this point my trust in humanity not ending itself is lower than the possibility of the neighbor cat can understand human language. all i can do is wish for the next sapient species is founding out our existent and never go down our past.
View on Reddit #13859178

fuggingShitDamn@reddit

Good!
View on Reddit #13856085

collapse-ModTeam@reddit

Hi, BattleGrown. Thanks for contributing. However, your [submission](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/17u8bv6/-/) was removed from /r/collapse for: > Rule 4: Keep information quality high. > Information quality must be kept high. More detailed information regarding our approaches to specific claims can be found on the [Misinformation & False Claims page](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/wiki/claims). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/about/rules/) for more information. You can [message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/collapse) if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.
View on Reddit #13855045

coyoteka@reddit

Just to be clear, the linked report is not a peer-reviewed work -- it is posted on SSRN which is an open-access preprint publication wherein anyone can publish whatever they want without peer-review. This doesn't invalidate anything but is important to understand the distinction between science and someone's observations/interpretations. The plot shown titles the primary y-axis "Marine life percentage survival %" but is actually plotting an estimate misunderstood from the cited studies. They are showing a 1% decrease of total living phytoplankton, but the study (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09268) estimates an annual decline of **1% of the global median**. This is a vastly different quantity! They state "The projected end point is more than 80% loss of all marine life" which is not supported by any of their citations! I won't even bother going past this point in the paper. It is extremely important in the age of disinformation that people think critically and examine information rather than just believing what they see in the nicely packaged image or soundbite. It's especially important for those aware of the serious and likely apocalyptic problems we face as cohabitants of Earth. So there's no confusion, ocean acidification is definitely one of the direst climate catastrophe issues we face. I just make this plea in the hope that more people will apply critical thinking to information they come across, especially information that confirms already held beliefs. Thanks for coming to my ted talk.
View on Reddit #13854936

hopefulnotoptimistic@reddit

To be fair, I'm not sure that paper is taken all that seriously. Here's a brief comment from Eliot Jacobson and a note in the replies about dubious commercial interest behind the paper. [https://twitter.com/EliotJacobson/status/1448720561572499468](https://twitter.com/eliotjacobson/status/1448720561572499468)
View on Reddit #13821472

dumnezero@reddit

Fuck, it's those "GOES Project" people again. Bamboozled!
View on Reddit #13854511

gatohaus@reddit

All I see there is Jacobson saying “not” with no explanation. I like the guy’s statistics but just denying something without explanation does not a valid argument make.
View on Reddit #13825515

sornk@reddit

Twitter stopped showing replies if you've not logged in. If you're using the reddit app try opening the link in a browser if you're willing to log in
View on Reddit #13843952

Deguilded@reddit

I read that as: "this is NOT too long to read". Which is to say - you should read this. Where's the disagreement?
View on Reddit #13828377

Taqueria_Style@reddit

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCzD3ONQsmM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCzD3ONQsmM)
View on Reddit #13853642

bigtim3727@reddit

Pour a lot of bleach in the ocean 🤔🤔🤔🤔 But this is something that is def extremely concerning, more so than people realize
View on Reddit #13853080

cursedonidemon@reddit

is this shit fr?? oh my god lmao it just keeps getting better (and by getting better i mean worse in every way possible.)
View on Reddit #13847611

OddLiving8822@reddit

2090? We (humanity) will be long gone
View on Reddit #13844206

alienssuck@reddit

Meh. Aliens will invade before then since we're surrendering our native rights to Earth by destroying the ecosphere.
View on Reddit #13843068

SimulatedFriend@reddit

Don't worry guys, if science has taught me anything it's that we're going to reach this point "much faster than expected". So cheer up!
View on Reddit #13841041

LatzeH@reddit

Phew, I was afraid I wouldn't get to die in my lifetime
View on Reddit #13841219

culezz@reddit

Definitely feeling some major anxiety over this. Trying to chill out a bit, but hey, was the paper ever published?
View on Reddit #13840479

Nebih@reddit

All these companies will be net zero by 2050 so we’ll be fine! Just like how they were fine at Chernobyl because it only read 3.1 sieverts
View on Reddit #13839723

Odd_Awareness1444@reddit

The Permian extinction II
View on Reddit #13839473

dumnezero@reddit

looks like 2086! going to put that in my calendar. It's good to have goals, you know?
View on Reddit #13839449

BadAsBroccoli@reddit

Babies born this year will only be 77 in 2100. Keep pumping out those little workers.
View on Reddit #13838794

Pitiful-Let9270@reddit

No, it will kill everyone in the 2090s. It might kill the everyone in the 2050s
View on Reddit #13837964

ApocalypsePenis@reddit

This is all due to the parasites running the big corporations. The free energy tech exists it’s just locked away.
View on Reddit #13837530

Ruby2312@reddit

The paper claim the tipping point is 2040ish. I find this highly offensive so who’s with me. Together we can reach it by 2035, maybe even 2030
View on Reddit #13819801

Pineappl3z@reddit

Considering the paper was published in 2021 & no action has been taken, I think we're well on our way to blowing past the action phase of 5-10 years.
View on Reddit #13837387

The_Doct0r_@reddit

I'm throwing my bid in for next year.
View on Reddit #13833048

billcube@reddit

Maybe there is money to be made there to mix some petrochemicals to create fake fish meat. After "Beyond meat", I'm creating "Below food"
View on Reddit #13826071

balerionmeraxes77@reddit

Not the "net zero by 2050" I was thinking about
View on Reddit #13824962

BattleGrown@reddit (OP)

I laughed hard to this, thanks xD
View on Reddit #13825835

lev400@reddit

Let’s go!! I mean we have already bloody started..
View on Reddit #13819915

VictorianDelorean@reddit

Ocean acidification is a geological marker for mass extinction. It’s one of the chemical signatures we look for in rock layers to identify periods of mass death.
View on Reddit #13837385

exterminateThis@reddit

Lol. Dead long before that
View on Reddit #13837191

goldenbeans@reddit

Better start building cities under glass bubbles
View on Reddit #13836371

oluies@reddit

B25F-1620 Marine Biomass Regeneration: Modelling Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm22/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/1146049
View on Reddit #13835477

oluies@reddit

https://youtu.be/u7jETRJrkmk?si=44g6wbYBj5tGbSU1
View on Reddit #13836219

Deskman77@reddit

« we thought we might start a chain reaction that might destroy the entire world » « I believe we did » The end
View on Reddit #13835994

Darkhorseman81@reddit

Good.
View on Reddit #13833364

Negative_Divide@reddit

Nooo, my slow, miserable spiral! It's all I had.
View on Reddit #13833334

WorldsLargestAmoeba@reddit

We will just find a substitute for the ocean... ... oh and fisheries... oh and oxygen itself... oh and food and stuff... quote: an economist probably....
View on Reddit #13831134

jedrider@reddit

I've already been starved and succumbed to heat exhaustion and now they want to poison me to boot, by 2090, of course. One theory of mankind's survival says that we were forced in small bands to the ocean shores and that is how we survived climate change in the past. Too bad, that may not be possible this time around.
View on Reddit #13830030

Warstorm1993@reddit

Soo... The Permian extinction Aka the great Dying. But Human edition ... now, I'm depress.
View on Reddit #13828445

Chunky_cold_mandala@reddit

You can search from past threads in collapse, this graph and it's publication have been discredited. Sure, ocean acidification is a problem but this graph is more speculation than model based projections.
View on Reddit #13827965

Stoned_Lumber@reddit

But... Technology and stuff../s
View on Reddit #13821593

voice-of-reason_@reddit

Why don’t we recapture all the carbon from the air? Surely it can’t use much energy I’ve never heard of entropy! /s
View on Reddit #13827399

billcube@reddit

Don't have kids, your whole lineage will have disappeared long before, problem solved, back to the dancefloor.
View on Reddit #13826147

Tsquare1984@reddit

Sooner than expected!
View on Reddit #13823956

anaaaaak@reddit

2090s? That’s optimistic!
View on Reddit #13823605

CitizenLuke117@reddit

I'm sure we can accomplish this "sooner than expected. " Go, Team Humanity!!!
View on Reddit #13822841

robertDouglass@reddit

Howard Dryden is very active on LinkedIn. Go see what he thinks about microplastics. https://www.linkedin.com/in/goesfoundation?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=ios_app
View on Reddit #13822043

StatementBot@reddit

The following submission statement was provided by /u/BattleGrown: --- Submission Statement: The image is from the report named "Climate regulating ocean plants and animals are being destroyed by toxic chemicals and plastics, accelerating our path towards ocean pH 7.95 in 25 years which will devastate humanity.", which can be viewed here: [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract\_id=3860950](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3860950) The image shows how phytoplankton bacteria can enter a phase of runoff growth due to dipping ocean pH levels. This is collapse-related because an environmental cataclysm of this scale is not compatible with human habitation of planet Earth. --- Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/17u8bv6/drop_in_ocean_ph_might_kill_everyone_in_the_2090s/k91xgv5/
View on Reddit #13819212