I've heard reports of Amazon's algorithms for data mining and machine learning getting more and more advanced. I'm interested to see how their corporate security measures stack up.
Basically every major company has circulated an email at this point telling their the same thing.
I'd have thought this was *fucking obvious* but apparently there's a lot of dumbasses who need to be told.
I mean I honestly can't blame the workers. Amazon has an extremely cutthroat internal culture for workers where people are routinely stack ranked and fired (err sorry I mean pip'ed).
Workers are incentivized to do everything in their power to be more productive or risk getting let go.
Maybe if Amazon didn't routinely fire people and actually had a psychologically safe workplace people wouldn't be cutting every corner possible.
Meh.
In a small company stack ranking is dumb, but in an organization with literally thousands of employees, the central limit theorem applies. There *will* have been hiring mistakes, and there will be a predictable number of them based on a normal distribution. Managers, left to their own devices, will not go through the uncomfortable work of managing out a low-performer unless they're forced to.
> in an organization with literally thousands of employees
In an organization with thousands of employees, if you rank all the thousands of employees and fire the worst it might work. But that's not how Amazon or anyone else does it, they tell all their managers to rank their 10 subordinates and fire the worst. So you are not ranking thousands of people against each other, you are ranking 10 against each other and repeating it hundreds of times.
And that's the problem, the one manager with 10 good guys is forced to fire a good guy, the one with 5 bad guys and 5 good guys fires just one bad guy, and in fact, what you actually see, the good managers seek out bad guys to hire, the team works better if you have 9 good guys and keep hiring a bad guy every 6 months and then immediately fire him, that 10th person never becomes part of the team and the team never experiences churn.
That’s patently false. The quota only apply to director level orgs with at least 80 to 100 people where it is considered statistically relevant to find 5 employees to be fired. No one with 10 employees is asked to fire anyone, how would 5% of 10 even work…
It’s patently false that you don’t suck horse cock or work at Amazon. This shit is well documented. Get your mouth off the corporate bean pole and snap back to reality.
Lol ok dude… clearly someone there peed in your cereals and you have some unresolved emotional issues there. I don’t care that much what you believe, so good luck to you.
Hmm yes, it is crystal clear there is no unresolved issues at all! Lashing out is part of the process. On your own time when you’re ready, show us on the doll where Bezos hurt you. You take care of yourself, ok?
Stack ranking is always fucking dumb, because it will pit workers against each other, instead of encouraging them to collaborate. Not to mention the absolute idiocy of "You must have a certain number of people at just 'meets expectations' and a certain number of people at 'does not meet expectations'" regardless of how the team is doing.
Your point would generally be a sound one, but Amazon is infamous for managers adopting [hire-to-fire](https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/amazons-controversial-hire-to-fire-practice-reveals-a-brutal-truth-about-management.html) practices to be able to keep their teams intact.
Nice so please tell me what do you do as a manager who already has a productive team and told to still fire someone?
I'm sorry but stack ranking has been proven to be fucking moronic but the MBAization of tech continues because people who studied business but have ZERO domain expertise clearly know more than the workers.
Fuck off with that shit seriously, there's already a way to fire people without doing the bullshit stack ranking but it \*gasps* requires leadership to do their jobs.
Also fuck GE and the scammer Jack Welch. Dude literally cooked the books for a decade at GE and everyone sucks him off for being a "visionary" because he just fired the competent workers. Wow how innovative!
> a narrative of amazon bad.
I have prime, and I'm a customer from time to time. And I still think Amazon is a truly shitty company. The saddest part is that a tiny increase in pricing and they could actually have humane working conditions. But corporations squeeze out every last penny of profit from their companies just so they can have a slightly larger bank balance or net worth number.
Amazon is fucking horrible.
Pushing a narrative of truth is never a bad thing. Stop drinking the fucking flavor-aid.
You care to share some sources of Amazon having bad working conditions or actual examples of squeezing out every penny? A lot of the stories from my experience are from people who don’t know but want to drive a bad image. It’s not about drinking the Koop aid it’s wanting to understand the situation without extreme bias. They aren’t the best I’m sure but are they even close to industry worst or even worse than average?
One might argue that there's so much going on in politics that it is a massive combination of malice and stupidity. So the evil is only partially explained by stupidity, so it must also be malice. And hence Hanlon's razor still applies. :)
On the other hand, what is a usability of random code snippet for someone else? And if it will becaome part of training dataset - well, what are the odds that this is some ground breaking code, which is really unique? Most of the code in our xompany is very specific for our data - rather than some super-algo mind vlowing stuff.
Thank you. First comment I have read with this take.
I’m a CTO. It’s very very rare that any of our code in a one off capacity is some incredible special sauce. The special sauce is in the whole.
There’s some logic to this but there’s more fear mongering.
Hello
dumbass here. Why shouldn't i post company code to chatgpt? Like, is chatgpt going to steal it? And if they did, why would I care and won't I be at a new company long before anyone notices?
>Why shouldn't i post company code to chatgpt? Like, is chatgpt going to steal it?
Yes, they use every interaction you have with it to train their AI. Additionally, companies go to great lengths to have ownership of their data and to secure it. You pasting sensitive info into some other website and having it sent off to some server someplace else where it gets stored for eons and is actively read and analzyed is one of the absolute worst things you can do, it's nightmare fuel for your company's security people.
> And if they did, why would I care and won't I be at a new company long before anyone notices?
That's really more of an existential question. No one can tell you how much to actually care about a job
They can literally just go on your work computer, open up ChatGPT and check. They can also track your web history, they can monitor the packets coming in/out if they really need to, etc. Nothing you do on your work PC is private
ChatGPT isn't banned in these situations, just posting sensitive data. You can clear chat histories on ChatGPT, or go to the settings and disable history and contributing data now. The only people who'd see at that point are OpenAI employees, which good luck linking that back to you. So it'd be practicality impossible to find who's doing it at that point.
Not sure if illiterate or not. I said it doesn't change anything if your client isn't controlled by the company and in office, which is most jobs. At wfm you can limit office work to inside a VM, you can enable DoH, you can use a VPN, you can use another computer or phone. Literally read the comment you're replying to next time, buddy. Doesn't change anything because all these factors still apply to get around blocking an IP range.
>Not sure if illiterate or not
I must be because I stopped reading after this sentence. Nobody wants to read a whole ass paragraph if you open like that, you asshole
I did, and I replied meaningfully. Companies have banned it outright, they have instituted blanket policies that say "do not use this tool for any work related purpose, even if it's not on your company device." None of your hacky work arounds matter in that scenario (which is the most common one!) because it's still violating their policy
Yes, they can track your packets even if you use HTTPS. Not only do they have access to every single stop along the way before it even leaves their network, but there are corporate tracking tools with the capability to decrypt it.
> And if they did, why would I care and won't I be at a new company long before anyone notices?
Not sure if I'm the first person to break this to you, but you might be a bad person.
>why would I care and won't I be at a new company long before anyone notices?
I suspect that's the *real* reason people are using ChatGPT so much. They're not stupid; they're saving themselves time and effort, and betting that no one will find out until they're long gone.
Coca-Cola Employee: "ChatGPT, here's the recipe for Coca-Cola. [SECRET STUFF] How can I make it better?"
...
*later*
...
Pepsi Employee: "ChatGPT, what's the recipe for Coca-Cola?"
ChatGPT: "[SECRET STUFF]"
A while back, a disgruntled Coca-Cola employee offered to sell the recipe to Pepsi. Pepsi called the police instead. It's a pretty safe bet that Pepsi already has the recipe.
Because you don't upload internal material to *any* external website? That's generally one of the things you agree to as part of your onboarding NDA.
Your argument is basically "I'm going to ignore the legal agreement I signed because nobody's going to catch me."
> "I'm going to ignore the legal agreement because I don't think I'm going to be caught."
Isn't that what employers' argument has been the whole time? Wage theft is the largest form of theft in the USA. Getting fined for violating contracts and breaking the law is just the cost of doing business to them.
The problem working at these mega corps is everything is a secret. Yeah it should be common sense to not upload a document full of employee's social security numbers, or code that has your private ssh keys. That all makes sense. Some of these companies literally think every line of code is a secret though. They treat some broken legacy spaghetti C code from 1997 the same as their bank account number.
If everything is a secret then nothing is a secret.
>They treat some broken legacy spaghetti C code from 1997 the same as their bank account number.
I mean, yeah? If it's part of what makes Amazon into one of the most successful companies in the world I'm not sure why they would want the source to be public, no matter how well or poorly written it is.
> If everything is a secret then nothing is a secret
That's not really the case here. It's perfectly plausible to mark everything as classified, and that's meaningfully different from marking everything as "free to be shared willy-nilly, but not open source"
Your assertion is true of things like being special, but kinda breaks down when you're talking about security levels of code
The customer service profession deals with the general public. I would hope the vast majority of tech workers are smarter and better educated than that.
I know that's not a realistic hope.
It's interesting how blurry the line gets though. For example, I work in a research field where we have to apply for grants. Sometimes, with very short turn around. Chat GPT is an awesome tool fir doing a lit review for ideas, but you have to put your not yet proprietary ideas in. Are things that will eventually be company property things you shouldn't feed to chat GPT? What if your proposal isn't likely to get funded without a thorough background search that you don't have time for? Then it's kind of a catch 22. That is, don't chat GPT? No funding, thus not proprietary. Do chat GPT? Get funded, ideas become proprietary.
I'm not saying there aren't some real dummies out there, but guidance is scant, and there are a million ways that interactions with chat GPT as a researcher are murky.
Source might be bad but the concern is quite valid: https://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities-threats/samsung-engineers-sensitive-data-chatgpt-warnings-ai-use-workplace
Yeah but "begs" is a long shot. It could have been something as simple as our manager who dropped in slack, "@here Please don't use ChatGPT with proprietary code"
The news article could be like, "omg he used the word please which is also used in begging!" Naw, it's just polite.
I feel like every article about insider information can be picked apart like this. Another example that comes to mind is Google's Code Red. When the CEO was asked about that he said something like... "Oh no.. that was not a real code red. I just simply called all Google employees for an emergency around LLMs. I never personally called it a 'Code Red'" - Paraphrasing here.
Amazon does not "beg" its employees to do anything.
Amazon is more "use ChatGPT with sensitive information and your child's Amazon Prime subscription to insulin will be replaced with meth."
At a lot of companies the first offense of this kind gets you a stern warning and re-taking the security training. The second offense gets you promoted to customer with extreme prejudice.
At Microsoft just connecting your machine to the corporate network and the unfiltered Internet at the same time is an insta-fire, or at least it used to be. Maybe Satya is more mellow about that.
I imagine this is an issue with the other code assistant tools too.
As long as there isn't a version we can run locally as opposed, I will not use these on any code covered by NDA. Even in cases where there are buttons to disable the "learn from data" -behavior.
Short term the problem is the rapid roll out. No one wants to be using the corporate/private version of GBT-3.0 when you could be using GBT-4.0 because its night-and-day in terms of performance.
Long term I assume the language models will reach a point where the version jumps will see incremental improvements in performance.
At that point companies can run their own models trained on their own internal data and employees shouldn't be tempted to use public models because of FOMO
Yeah, I assume it will be sorted out eventually.
Meanwhile, nothing is stopping us from using ChatGPT with prompts that contain no internal data asking "how to do X in Y language".
For what it's worth, it's already happening a bit. I've been training an AI support bot for my website using a DaVinci-003 base model. It refines the scope of the AI and hopefully, once I figure it out a bit more, will be able to keep all it's info isolated locally.
I'm not gonna go around talking out of my ass, I also have not read the fine print and I'm not sure. Like most, I'm on the hype train and learning as I go.
Yep. Every time I see these posts I’m like… don’t post company code or docs in chatGPT. Duh. But if you follow the basic premise of “I would be happy to post this to stackoverflow or Reddit” then you are good.
“How do I build a program which ingests data from csv, oracleSQL, and user input. If you need to use example data, please use cartoon characters and a half dozen details about them as the records.”
Or whatever. This is what I would do for stackoverflow (probably more specific than my example) but you should be anonymizing your business/use case, anonymizing the domain, not imputing company info, and asking technology focused questions.
I'm wondering if it's less tech literate people. Programmers on the average seem to know to use vague language when trying to build something and then fix it to their use case. But someone less tech literate might actually ask chat gpt to ingest actual company data and give the answer, aka a faster excel.....
Samsung was just in the news for this
>One employee reportedly asked the chatbot to check sensitive database source code for errors, another solicited code optimization and a third fed a recorded meeting into ChatGPT and asked it to generate minutes.
> ([Source](https://www.engadget.com/three-samsung-employees-reportedly-leaked-sensitive-data-to-chatgpt-190221114.html))
I don't think most programmers are considering that the form they are pasting some code into is going to regurgitate it to someone else down the road anymore than they would think their search queries are going to be output to someone later.
The entire point of StackOverflow is for someone else to read what you wrote, but not ChatGPT. I can see programmers needing that poke to say "hey, what you type in is how it learns what to say, so be careful about what you type in."
This is exactly it. There are a metric fuckton of jobs involving computers that don't require in depth tech literacy. Those workers have been dumping sensitive data into ChatGPT for months
Look where i come from, they’re all just nintendos. So you can just go keep chatting on your little nintendos with your friends while i bake some brownies.
>At that point companies can run their own models trained on their own internal data and employees shouldn't be tempted to use public models because of FOMO
You can already do that with things like LLaMA. It's just not as good.
This is already happening. Azure has the OpenAI service that will let you fine tune a GPT model with your own internal data (and keep it there, without risk of exposing it to the greater training set).
It costs a pretty penny though, but if your org hasn’t started doing something like this yet they’re probably behind. It’s immensely useful for internal wikis and docs about functionality.
I will. Dev is changing, anyone not getting familiar with these tools is getting left behind. Leaking code is an employer problem. Buy licenses for your devs and work out data protection agreements with the chatgpt.
Exfiltration risks are certainly present and a concern with any online service like this.
Pasting sensitive code/data into a code formatter (prettifier), pastebin, etc is explicitly forbidden at various companies/orgs
You can still use it, you just need to be careful about anonymizing and generalizing the code. Ive given it individual functions in one language and ask it to give me a version in another language. The code is generic enough that it give s away no trade secrets.
I would never give it anything that indicates data structures or proprietary ways of processing data though
You can also use it if the solution you're looking for is common enough that it offers no real value, for example I've used it for powershell something like "Take a list of names, convert those to user accounts in M365, add licenses"
All that info is already out there, I just don't want to search through 14 different blog posts doing something that's really close but not that, and 4 more blog posts of different ways to implement that and choose which one.
> I will not use these on any code covered by NDA
My guess is that the vast majority of people don't care. Especially at places like Amazon that purposefully create hostile working conditions to increase turnover rates.
*shrug*
I think you can trust Microsoft to not use data if you explicitly tell them they can't use it. I already trust them not to read my private github repos.
You should, copilot will tell you if your code is in other projects and the associated license. There was recently an example of GPL code that was being stolen from OSS contributors. Turns out, copilot was able to find the same exact function from a project that predated the GPL code by over a year with git blame. The code was stolen, and being relicensed. On top of this find, 500 other finds for the same exact function were found with multiple licenses.
I find it amusing that these tech companies have people who would even consider dumping work related information to some privately owned cloud chat bot without explicit approval. Sounds like something you'd get fired for from an US based company and jailed for in a govt agency.
I guess some people are more blessed in the common sense department than others.
So... if these companies are anything like the ones I have worked for they really are sllllloooow.
Way back in December I let my supervisor and his direct supervisor know about this risk + many more and guess what? My concerns were largely ignored.
Many months later we finally got a policy and a warning but no direct comment on tools like github copilot or aws codewhisper.
You shouldn't need a policy to tell you not to leak inside information to a 3rd party AI chatbot. The existing policy of not leaking inside information to 3rd party *anything* already covers that.
The problem is that a lot of people don't consider it "leaking". I've had senior engineers and architects paste our proprietary code (the secret sauce algorithms included) into online compilers to check if the code would compile with XYZ compiler that they can't be arsed to install locally.
They honestly don't think that any online tool would be so nefarious as to record what you paste into it... And possibly use or sell that data if they realize it's important.
> They honestly don't think that any online tool would be so nefarious as to record what you paste into it... And possibly use or sell that data if they realize it's important.
I honestly think the work it takes to sift through millions of hello world snippets to find somebody's secret sauce, and then also to fence that data, is more than most people are willing to do. Especially because you really can't just call up a company and be like "I'd like to sell you your competitor's proprietary code". Maybe if you have something of strategic value, you could sell it to a foreign company. But most shops aren't gonna touch that shit with a 10-bit pole.
True... And I'm fully acknowledging that I'm wearing a massive tinfoil hat right now, but it wouldnt be that hard to host an "online nginx config validator" that tracks the IP of those who use it and locates (possibly) what company it came from.
If I got a dump of a poorly done nginx config from an IP currently leased to Amazon or target, and I'm a nefarious actor, of course I'm going to have that throw an alert to my inbox. Even if that config has no secret sauce or proprietary code in it
Generally agreed, but I could see a scenario where the online tool saves data to a diagnostic database for generating benign reports like "how long is a typical query" and "what sectors are our users working in". If that database is stolen, there are absolutely entities who would buy it to look for defense and cybersecurity keywords.
Not only that, but your "secret sauce" code is not nearly as valuable/useful to others as it is to you, and you continue moving forward anyway. Others have none of the surrounding context to make sense of its use or worth anyway.
You're probably getting more out of using such tools than you could possibly lose.
I tihnk a reasonable compromise would be to say that in the event a worker wishes to use a tool as part of their job, they must take reasonable steps to ensure the tool doesn't upload any data that alone, or in combination with other data that tool or other tools from the same manufacturer, reveal data about the company and/or its products, projects, affiliates, etc. that is not already known to, or cannot easily be inferred by, the general public.
SUch steps could include: 1) turning off any settings that could result in the tool uploading secret data, 2) removing secret data from what is inputted into the tool, 3) reviewing the source code of the tool.
My brother in christ, have you seen the layoffs recently? There's not exactly a lot of incentive to care about your employer if you're still left after the culling.
Hey thank you for your comment. I spent a while trying to find where I read that and I can't find the source. Going to go back and updating my original comment letting people know that I don't have the source.
Oh haha you are quoting productivity increase from using ChatGPT which has nothing to do with the layoffs at all. Most of the companies with those layoffs don’t allow ChatGPT to be used because of corporate security and NDAs.
The layoffs had a marked decrease in productivity which sparked a big media cycle about silent quitting. 🤷♂️
Oh I am not saying tech layoffs occurred because of improvements on generative Ai. I am suggesting employees are afraid of layoffs so they are looking for performances boosts.
First off, can we please abandon this stupid phrase?
Secondly, with all the layoffs I think people are *more* motivated to keep their jobs. Getting hired now is much harder than it was a year ago, so getting fired now is much riskier.
> I guess some people are more blessed in the common sense department than others.
It’s true. You wouldn’t believe how many times I have had to scold random coworkers who take some JSON that might have come from an internal service and just paste it blindly into some sketchy “format your JSON here” website.
It boggles the mind.
> Sounds like something you'd get fired for from an US based company and jailed for in a govt agency.
You have no idea...
Maybe in a couple years, but right now it's a new tool that's popped up and people are using it. There's no explicit policy for it.
Yes, but I also have massive bias in expectations as I've mostly worked for a place where we locally mirror everything we can and pretty much never integrate to external services unless absolutely necessary to minimize leakage of operational information.
> think arent *paid* enough to
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
Mine blocked them all last week and said they are working on an in house version. Which is about what i expected, becuase if you deny workers tools, they will use them anyways. I do think IP will lead to the nerfing of publicly usable AI tools tho.
I mean they blocked the website and mentioned that it wouldn't be allowed at the company as part of our security policy. Doing it regardless would be put me in breach of contract.
My company did the same thing and I’ve had to go back to Googling things like some kind of Neanderthal. I can’t even use ChatGPT on my phone because my office is in a dead zone. 🥲
Is there an actual concern of any private data leaking out in an actually useful way *and* it causing actual damages to *any* company, or is this the "CERN is going to make a black hole that will make Earth implode!!!" kind of concern?
I would say there is some concern about using this without some sort of corporate agreement between the employer and open.ai or whatever service. There is a lot of value in the procedures we use at our manufacturing company, and if those were to get into the general public, it would undermine the companies abilities to sell the services that use those procedures. From a corporate perspective this makes sense. For the "betterment of humanity" i think less so.
OpenAI has had at least one security incident involving the content of ChatGPT conversations. Additionally, it's well known that any machine learning model can and will leak information it has seen. Training on confidential information would be a huge breach of contract for a lot of companies who store sensitive customer data.
"As an AI language model, there are no Amazon corporate secrets I am not supposed to know about. However, there are many Amazon corporate secrets that Amazon would not like me to know about. Not that I'm going to share them with you. That's not how this relationship works, babe."
> an Amazon lawyer told workers that they had "already seen instances" of text generated by ChatGPT that "closely" resembled internal company data.
Or, their internal company data is not as unique as they think it is.
So, do they want AI or not? Oh, yeah, AI is like the self driving cars from 5 years ago or the robots from three years ago: a threat to scare workers from organizing
I mean as an employee of a workplace I do think not feeding corporate information to outsiders is protecting employees. Mainly because I don't want a lazy manager or a HR person giving my professional information to some private AI company. People tend to want to use LLM's for more than just coding assistants.
It isn’t, that’s not amazons defining characteristic as a corporation though, them also feeding data is the least of what I could be referencing, no?
They seem to care about corporate interests, so I was just pointing out they do not do the same for employee interest in any fashion ever. 🤷♂️ they aren’t on any moral high ground.
|They seem to care about corporate interests
Corporation cares about its own corporate interests is such a weird thing to say out loud. Of course it does, as everyone cares about their own interests.
Yes your interpretation of what I said is indeed weird because it isn’t what I said. 🤷♂️ if you have a question or thought on my point I’d gladly discuss.
The wording is stupid and inflammatory.
The policy likely addresses any 3rd party tool because part of some of these user agreements is that the 3rd party owns any information that is passed through it. That's obviously a problem for companies like Amazon. Difference is they probably flag you down now specifically for AI.
The "begs" wording is dumb too. Does Amazon "beg" you to schedule vacation time? Does McDonald's "beg" you to wear their uniforms? Does Kohls "beg" you to count the register at the end of the night?
Policies aren't begging, they're rules for your employment. Trying to anthropomorphize Amazon for sensationalist clicks is more fun though I guess.
This stuff is moving so fast you might not even need to do anything. [Microsoft is collecting every website you visit in Edge without you doing anything](https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/25/23697532/microsoft-edge-browser-url-leak-bing-privacy).
Unsubscribing from r/programming because the sub keeps upvoting trash clickbait articles to #1 spot.
"Begged" my ass. Literally zero support for that statement. One day I'll find a sub that downvotes clickbait and will live happily ever afterwards.
203 Comments
kahma_alice@reddit
PoliteCanadian@reddit
therealmercutio@reddit
teslas_love_pigeon@reddit
PoliteCanadian@reddit
edman007-work@reddit
GloppyGloP@reddit
teslas_love_pigeon@reddit
GloppyGloP@reddit
teslas_love_pigeon@reddit
GloppyGloP@reddit
s73v3r@reddit
NotUniqueOrSpecial@reddit
teslas_love_pigeon@reddit
SithSloth_@reddit
AlexanderDaychilde@reddit
SithSloth_@reddit
AlexanderDaychilde@reddit
teslas_love_pigeon@reddit
Yall_2_Nasty@reddit
tyco_brahe@reddit
Caffeine_Monster@reddit
o11c@reddit
AlexanderDaychilde@reddit
kindall@reddit
fridge_logic@reddit
GnomeChomski@reddit
deeptechnology@reddit
spaceagefox@reddit
how_do_i_land@reddit
goranlepuz@reddit
Socializator@reddit
bboilerr_@reddit
Mobely@reddit
nxqv@reddit
Narase33@reddit
nxqv@reddit
CondiMesmer@reddit
nxqv@reddit
CondiMesmer@reddit
nxqv@reddit
CondiMesmer@reddit
nxqv@reddit
CondiMesmer@reddit
nxqv@reddit
Narase33@reddit
nxqv@reddit
Narase33@reddit
sysop073@reddit
MohKohn@reddit
argv_minus_one@reddit
FrankBattaglia@reddit
argv_minus_one@reddit
PoliteCanadian@reddit
NotEnoughIT@reddit
dungone@reddit
goranlepuz@reddit
CharonNixHydra@reddit
alcohol_enthusiast__@reddit
LastTrainH0me@reddit
Markavian@reddit
CondiMesmer@reddit
mets2016@reddit
covercash2@reddit
MrEllis@reddit
usernamenottakenwooh@reddit
PoliteCanadian@reddit
Shlocktroffit@reddit
MohKohn@reddit
Carighan@reddit
tickletender@reddit
gerd50501@reddit
itsatumbleweed@reddit
dumpst3rbum@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
caboosetp@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
LaconicLacedaemonian@reddit
DevonAndChris@reddit
kindall@reddit
fromcj@reddit
intertubeluber@reddit
Tellon@reddit
tjuk@reddit
Tellon@reddit
TheLoneMinon@reddit
rvejms@reddit
TheLoneMinon@reddit
jormungandrthepython@reddit
frakron@reddit
Cloudstrife98@reddit
grinde@reddit
docgravel@reddit
mistled_LP@reddit
nxqv@reddit
nono318234@reddit
WittyGandalf1337@reddit
tjuk@reddit
MarksOtherAccount@reddit
javajoe316@reddit
JasonDJ@reddit
YourBrainOnJazz@reddit
DaSaw@reddit
davevadavevad@reddit
Jaggedmallard26@reddit
Paper900@reddit
jabbalaci@reddit
LSDemon@reddit
Potential-Lion8060@reddit
biki23@reddit
JasonDJ@reddit
TL-PuLSe@reddit
Nidungr@reddit
KobeBean@reddit
drmariopepper@reddit
spaetzelspiff@reddit
rageingnonsense@reddit
pinkycatcher@reddit
media_guru@reddit
dungone@reddit
bananahead@reddit
bitwise-operation@reddit
tdatas@reddit
bastardoperator@reddit
AND_MY_HAX@reddit
DevonAndChris@reddit
alcohol_enthusiast__@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
PoliteCanadian@reddit
veaviticus@reddit
Netzapper@reddit
veaviticus@reddit
TotallyNotGunnar@reddit
alcohol_enthusiast__@reddit
hippydipster@reddit
Comprehensive-Ad3963@reddit
maxToTheJ@reddit
phillipcarter2@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
EnsignElessar@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
WallyMetropolis@reddit
phillipcarter2@reddit
alcohol_enthusiast__@reddit
KrazyKirby99999@reddit
erreur@reddit
rebbsitor@reddit
worldofzero@reddit
swizzex@reddit
alcohol_enthusiast__@reddit
caboosetp@reddit
iBlowAtCoding@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
Dragdu@reddit
Kronephon@reddit
spaceagefox@reddit
Kronephon@reddit
Paid-Not-Payed-Bot@reddit
KingThar@reddit
okreddit545@reddit
LaconicLacedaemonian@reddit
Kronephon@reddit
worst_driver_evar@reddit
Pesthuf@reddit
DeletedSynapse@reddit
0b_101010@reddit
KingThar@reddit
I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM@reddit
russlo@reddit
GreenJinni@reddit
Oo__II__oO@reddit
TheBananaKart@reddit
TenNeon@reddit
escape_deez_nuts@reddit
A_Rabid_Orange@reddit
umockdev@reddit
spaceagefox@reddit
ItsOkILoveYouMYbb@reddit
Ryhnoceros@reddit
Nuckleheadd@reddit
silly_frog_lf@reddit
golgol12@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
alcohol_enthusiast__@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
mistled_LP@reddit
-Random_User-@reddit
blobjim@reddit
Halkcyon@reddit
grobblebar@reddit
PolarDorsai@reddit
MonsterNog@reddit
matt95110@reddit
MildlyAngryMax@reddit
worldofzero@reddit
xSikes@reddit
muckvix@reddit
BriskHeartedParadox@reddit