Anon is mentally ill | TheaterFire

[-]

HikeMyPantsUpJohnson@reddit

The Avengers are perhaps the most powerful squad in the entire galaxy. Captain America had his bodily chemicals rebalanced completely and he's buff as hell with a shield he can throw at you and cause who knows how much damage to your bones. Iron Man's gold and titanium alloy synthesis suit gives him dense armour and an equally dense fist with which to punch bitches. Thor is a literal Norse God with a hammer that no one but him can lift (forget Endgame and the first Thor film, for the sake of argument they didn't happen). He can harness lightning at will. Hulk is, well, Hulk. Hulk get mad, Hulk smash. Together, just these four Avengers could rule over any settlement with an iron fist. Yet there is still absolutely no way any of them could beat this shit out of me.

Reply

[-]

natrual_screaming@reddit

“I’m not a cuck” you already know it’s gonna be the cuckiest word ever put to screen

Reply

[-]

Moncomb@reddit

"I'm not gay" -gayest shit you will every hear

Reply

[-]

Zeranvor@reddit

Is it possible that porn is making more men develop a cuckolding fetish? After all, you’re getting off to another man’s sexual activities. Not anti-porn, just a curious thought

Reply

[-]

TaxIdiot2020@reddit

No because the man isn’t fucking your wife/gf retard.

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

I think porn in general causes more fetishes to develop. Obviously tons of people still get fetishes normally, but i think there’s a non insignificant amount of people with fetishes who only have those specific fetishes because they got bored of everything they once thought was super hot. That’s why imo regular periods of no fap is essential. Even cutting down from masturbating daily to masturbating a couple times a week can cause a huge difference in your sex life, especially if you’re in a committed monogamous relationship, if you have to go to an actual person to get the sexual fantasy you’re looking for instead of constantly having access to videos of said fantasy, it’ll make it so that experience is 20x better and also completely fuck up your brains reward system. Of course there’s issues with that theory, but imo my point remains that a lot of weird fucked up shit like this would be prevented if people just watched porn like 60% less and jerked off half as much.

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

Porn making fetishes develop is physically impossible because fetishes are something you are born with and develop naturally. You just "Discover" them through porn by getting a boner content that includes it. It's like thinking that watching enough femboy videos can make a straight person gay.

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

Do you have any evidence at all that fetishes are something you’re born with?

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

...i don't think one needs "evidence" to prove something that's factually true. Like, again, you think a straight guy can start liking to suck cock because he watched gay porn?

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

“That’s factually true” source: I made it the fuck up. If it’s factually true then I’ll wait here for a source for everything I asked you to prove, it should be nice and easy if it’s so obviously true. fetishes and sexuality are nowhere near the same thing… like the fact I even have to explain this to you is genuinely baffling. That’s like if I said smoking causes cancer and you were like “oh yeah well what about gigantism can smoking cigarettes cause that”

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

Well, i think the burden of proof is on the accuser? You're saying porn causes kinks but i've never heard this in my entire life. Well, outside of the Sunday Church in my neighbor but they also say videogames turn kids violent, so there's that. Anyways, this kind of logic simply doesn't follow, where do you think BDSM porn and bedroom play came from? These have been popular way before video or photo porn became a thing. Compare this to things like scat which were scarcely talked about until the internet came forward. And that's without getting into the fact [most people show signs of kinks during their childhood](https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/standard-deviations/201805/growing-up-kinky-research-shows-how-kink-identity-is-formed%3famp), before puberty and sexuality develops and they touch Pornhub. To put it in simple terms: Kink-based pornography was created in a reaction of the demand for it, not vice-versa.

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

I love how you’re comparing a new fetish to newfound violent tendencies. You just can’t help yourself making false equivalences. Also why is the burden of proof on me? I specified throughout all of it it’s just my opinion and how I think, you’re the one saying everything you’re saying is objectively true lol. Yes I’m aware. That’s why I also specified that it wasn’t common place and that most fetishes are gained normally. The fact that people show signs of links doesn’t counter what I said at all tho, because again, I specified that most fetishes are still gained naturally. I just don’t understand why it’s such an impossible concept to you that an over abundance of porn can lead to you being interested in something you weren’t interested in before. Again, that doesn’t counter what I said, because I never ever ever said that kinks ONLY come from watching too much porn, so you saying that means nothing lol. All I did was say that it happens. I never said it’s the only way it happens.

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

"I love how you’re comparing a new fetish to newfound violent tendencies. You just can’t help yourself making false equivalences." How is it a false equivalence to point out how the same people making absurd claims regarding pornography are the same ones arguing for the influences of videogames on violence? Isn't it the same thing in the end of the day, the psychological effects of media? "Also why is the burden of proof on me? I specified throughout all of it it’s just my opinion and how I think, you’re the one saying everything you’re saying is objectively true lol." Oh, so you want the *carte blanche* to state a opinion and argue without having to go through the burden of having to prove your own points? Screw you dude, you don't get to state "The moon landing is fake" for example and them when people complain you just go "Well, thats my opinion y'all, why so serious?". You made the point, now prove it. "The fact that people show signs of links doesn’t counter what I said at all tho, because again, I specified that most fetishes are still gained naturally. I just don’t understand why it’s such an impossible concept to you that an over abundance of porn can lead to you being interested in something you weren’t interested in before." Your argument doesn't make a single drop of sense, so most fetishes are gained naturally but some of them are acquired through porn? Where does that even come from? That not only doesn't follow but would be biologicaly nonsensical, like saying we have a natural tendency to enjoy BDSM but piss is something we have to "develop" through multiple viewings of golden shower. "But you’re making the claim that you can ONLY get kinks from birth, that it is completely impossible to get new kinks, which is just moronic, especially since you can’t back it up." I never said that. I however did state that most cases of kinks develop through your childhood and puberty, which follows what i already explained: That kinks are something you happen to have as part of your nature and are simply "developed" as time goes on, alongside things you find to be fun from your childhood that end up being translated into a more "sexual" manner as you grow up. At most porn could make you "realize" you find something to have a sexual effect on you, but not "develop" a new kink from the blue. This is flat out in the study i sent you, which i can only guess you didn't bother to read through since this is already explained there.

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

Because sexual attraction and violent tendencies are nowhere near the same thing… like… are you trolling? Are you seriously asking how that’s different? Well, yeah, if I’m just giving my opinion on a topic then yeah I don’t really need a list of licensed sources lol. If you’re coming out swinging saying “IM OBJECTIVELY RIGHT AND YOURE WRONG AND DUMB” then yeah, that needs more sources than the guy just giving their opinion. You’re the one saying my opinion is objectively wrong, you’re the one who needs to provide evidence, I’m just providing a theory. “You made the point, now prove it.” You haven’t either lol. You should come to the argument with sources already prepared if you’re gonna start talking like you’re objectively right you dumbass. It doesn’t make a drop of sense if you’re a complete moron, which you apparently are if the very simple concept I’m trying to explain to you is apparently too difficult for you to grasp. Most fetishes are developed outside of a porn addiction and I’m saying a porn addiction may cause additional fetishes. And see, I’m back to my previous point now: why is it biologically nonsensical? Fetishes are a psychological thing, if you’re gonna start throwing shit out like “biologically nonsensical” that’s the kind of thing you really need a source for lol. “Fetishes are something you were born with” a direct quote from you, word for word. Like do I even need to say anything else? You just got caught in a lie and are backpedaling lmfao. And again, no study you send can prove that porn addiction cannot cause new fetishes to develop, and neither did your literal summary of said study: not to mention, I never disagreed with literally anything you just said, I said outright that the majority of fetishes are gained naturally, so you’re just saying things I already know. I also know that nothing you said proves you can’t develop a new fetish “out of the blue.” If you’re gonna be a dickhead, at least try harder.

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

"You’re the one saying my opinion is objectively wrong, you’re the one who needs to provide evidence, I’m just providing a theory." Just because i'm using more "agressive" language doesn't change the fact it's ultimately my opinion against yours, if you admit you don't have factual sources for your opinion based on mine which are, just admit you are wrong - that's it, there's no shame in just going ahead and realizing you have no actual proof. "You haven’t either lol." Dude i literally gave you a link to a psychological study while giving you a biological explanation behind kinks, not my fault you wanna deny it and act like i'm lying. "It doesn’t make a drop of sense if you’re a complete moron, which you apparently are if the very simple concept I’m trying to explain to you is apparently too difficult for you to grasp. Most fetishes are developed outside of a porn addiction and I’m saying a porn addiction may cause additional fetishes." It doesn't make biological sense because how would most fetishes develop outside of watching porn and some develop while watching it? How does that work? Explain. Give sources. If you're making balsy claims, them prove it. "And see, I’m back to my previous point now: why is it biologically nonsensical? Fetishes are a psychological thing, if you’re gonna start throwing shit out like “biologically nonsensical” that’s the kind of thing you really need a source for lol" You realize psychology and biology are one and the same in this case, right? One develops a certain psychological inclination for a kink because they have a biological propensy to it. "And again, no study you send can prove that porn addiction cannot cause new fetishes to develop, and neither did your literal summary of said study: not to mention, I never disagreed with literally anything you just said, I said outright that the majority of fetishes are gained naturally, so you’re just saying things I already know. I also know that nothing you said proves you can’t develop a new fetish “out of the blue.” Do YOU have proof that watching some scat porn can cause someone to develop a scat kink? Again, i'm waiting until now for any source to back up your opinion. Otherwise, again, your opinion is just that, a opinion, and you PIDOOMA any points you could make. Again, the burden of proof of you making a statement and expecting ME to find "counter-arguments" to it is absurd, it's like saying that the big bang was created by a giant invisible alien named Blorg and them going "Yeah, now prove to me Blorg isn't real!" and them mocking me when i can't find any study that "proves" Blorg's non-existence.e I also would suggest avoid using the term "por addiction" because it's a loaded term and it's controversial whether porn addiction is even a real thing. "If you’re gonna be a dickhead, at least try harder" Yeah, you're the one making absurd statements without proof and i'm the dickhead here, sure.

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

“Based on mine which are” lol no they aren’t though. That’s my entire point. You keep saying shit like that without anything to back it up, and I’m not. And you’re doing it again. You’re calling it nonsense without anything to back It up. I’m aware that there are potential biological reasons for fetishes. First off, did you know that the whole thing with the wires crossing in the brain is a theory too? Meaning that it’s not confirmed? It’s a theory? Same thing with the conditioning theory. It is a theory. It is not confirmed. They are theories for what causes fetishes but no one can say for certain, because they are theories. Because maybe it’s psychological? You develop the rest of your fetishes in other ways, then you watch too much porn and get bored of them so you move on to different things. It’s not a difficult concept to grasp, im amazed you’re struggling so much with it. As for the proving, I’ll wait for you to do that first lol. Again, that is purely a theory that’s meant to potentially explain fetishes, but it is not fool proof and it does not explain all fetishes. When you find a foolproof theory that can flawlessly prove and explain every fetish known to man and how it’s caused biologically, then you can make “balsy” claims like that lol. Again, that’s why I’m saying it’s just a theory I have… that’s the part you’re not getting here. I have a theory, you’re saying the theory is objectively and factually incorrect, yet you cannot prove it, so why are you bothering to argue? What’s the point of arguing against someone else’s entirely personal theory if you literally know you CAN’T disprove it? What do you stand to gain here beyond wasting your own time? It’s my personal theory and you are physically incapable of proving it wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt, and I’ve fully acknowledged that it’s strictly my personal theory based purely on my experiences and knowledge of fetishes and porn addictions, so I really don’t have anything to prove here lol. “Porn addiction” does not refer to a literal physiological need for porn, which is why some people don’t recognize it. It’s just a colloquial term for people who consume porn to the point that it negatively affects their lives severely, primarily their sex lives and relationships. You’re the one talking objectively like every single word that comes out of your mouth is undeniable scientific proof even though you have just as many sources as I do, so yeah, you are a dickhead. You finished yet? Or are you gonna keep arguing against something you know you can’t actually disprove just so you can hear you self talk and get the last word?

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

"Same thing with the conditioning theory. It is a theory. It is not confirmed. They are theories for what causes fetishes but no one can say for certain, because they are theories." Theories do not refer to things that are ambiguously true but for explanations for that which is most likely and logical to be happening. Your "argument" here is as valid as someone going "WELL ISN'T THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION JUST A THEORY?" yeah, it is, now, if you wanna contest it, surely you have a better explanation, don't you? Or to take the meaning of the words scientific theory from a dictionary: "a coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation". "It’s not a difficult concept to grasp, im amazed you’re struggling so much with it." Stop saying that "it's a difficult concept to grasp" just because other people don't agree with you, FFS. "As for the proving, I’ll wait for you to do that first lol." WHY WOULD I DO THAT WHEN IT'S ON YOU TO PROVE ME THIS? "Again, that is purely a theory that’s meant to potentially explain fetishes, but it is not fool proof and it does not explain all fetishes. When you find a foolproof theory that can flawlessly prove and explain every fetish known to man and how it’s caused biologically, then you can make “balsy” claims like that lol." ????? What? You realize how convoluted this is right? By that logic one could simply deny that the Big Bang happened because we don't know exactly what came before it. I'm not even going to bother responding to the paragraph after this because you're reitarating a already dealt with point. "“Porn addiction” does not refer to a literal physiological need for porn, which is why some people don’t recognize it. It’s just a colloquial term for people who consume porn to the point that it negatively affects their lives severely, primarily their sex lives and relationships" Them it's not a addiction, you dumbfuck. Addiction is defines as "the fact or condition of being addicted to a particular substance, thing, or activity." Don't try to shove the square peg in a round hole and them act shocked when people can't recognize it. "You’re the one talking objectively like every single word that comes out of your mouth is undeniable scientific proof even though you have just as many sources as I do, so yeah, you are a dickhead. " I never said that. "You finished yet? Or are you gonna keep arguing against something you know you can’t actually disprove just so you can hear you self talk and get the last word?" I'm waiting for you to slap me with that proof that porn can make you develop kinks.

Reply

[-]

Few_Category7829@reddit

“ ...i don't think one needs "evidence" to prove something that's factually true. “ are you high, obtuse, or merely sleep deprived? Since when was that how ANY OF THIS works? Since when did anything that is “factually true” fucking fall from the sky without evidence? This is not mentioning how you equate sexuality with fetishes, and more so, are you implying the existence of a “gimp gene” or a “piss yourself gene” as opposed to the common sense solution that these things are merely things people have come to subconsciously associate with sex and pleasure through life experience?

Reply

[-]

Cowboycaotico@reddit

Well, since you mentioned that: Yeah, it's very likely a "piss gene" does exist (of one is to simplify how biology works) since the majority of the population starts to manifest signs of their kinks [way back in their childhood](https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/standard-deviations/201805/growing-up-kinky-research-shows-how-kink-identity-is-formed%3famp). Is it weird? Yeah, but i don't choose how the human mind works. Also, you point out that kinks are things that people tendi to associate in a subconscious manner with sex and pleasure through life experience... but wouldn't that be a form of biological conditioning? You don't just start enjoying being tied up just because you saw that happen to your favorite superheroes in the Saturday Morning Cartoon.

Reply

[-]

huntcharade@reddit

Maybe. Hard to say if it’s porn causing these fetishes, or porn showing people what fetishes are out there, and it turns out they were always into it but didn’t know it existed. At the same time I don’t think this is a cuckolding specific thing, it applies to all fetishes out there. People are just developing more fetishes in general, be it feet or armpits or whatever. Either way the result is the same so.

Reply

[-]

TaxIdiot2020@reddit

OP is mentally ill since they think this is a greentext.

Reply

[-]

LoadOk5992@reddit

"I'm not a cuck." Proceeds to describe detailed cuck fantasy...

Reply

[-]

ConquestOfMankind@reddit

lol exactly - took a lot of sentences for him to just go back and forth saying “I’m not a cuck” and “I am a cuck”

Reply

[-]

thebiggestleaf@reddit

That's 4chan stories in general. "I'm not gay" immediately followed by the gayest shit you'd ever read.

Reply

[-]

PlatinumBall@reddit

but they're not gay. They just like men

Reply

[-]

TheStylemage@reddit

Or dislike women (taking after ancient Greek).

Reply

[-]

lucydoosydoo@reddit

i’m not gay but i just got done blowing the entire hockey team coaches included

Reply

[-]

SipoteQuixote@reddit

He's not a cuck....yet. Afterwards he'll be a cuck and either love it or immediately regret everything and won't know what to do. I remember a video where it was a 3some and you can see the white dude start getting upset even though he's part of the action. Funny but... almost sad like seeing a homeless clown.

Reply

[-]

Aggressive-Tiger-209@reddit

Im not gay but i have a fantasy of being forced down by a big burly black man and have my intestines to be factory reset.

Reply

[-]

smokeyphil@reddit

"No you see this is slave-cucking a completely different thing you see modem day cucking is does nothing for me it needs to have like literal chattel slavery for me to get off." See its completely reasonable guys.

Reply

[-]

JulianFlores99@reddit

Thomas Jefferson before signing the constitution:

Reply

[-]

TruthOrBullshite@reddit

He banged his slaves, not the other way around like anon wants

Reply

[-]

NeverMonday1126@reddit

You don’t know that, history gets twisted over the years

Reply

[-]

CarbonKnight_@reddit

Anon is Adam22

Reply

[-]

Scrimmybinguscat@reddit

Who is Adam22?

Reply

[-]

Sarge_pepo@reddit

Guys whose wife made a porno with a black dude and he promoted it and acted like he wasnt getting cucked

Reply

[-]

LeMeowMew@reddit

to be entirely fair he is also a porn star and has probably banged an uncountable amount of women so at that point it sounds only fair

Reply

[-]

Rip_a_fat_one@reddit

Anon

Reply

[-]

memecynica1@reddit

"I'm not a cuck but" Ya okay

Reply

[-]

majudarah92@reddit

That sounds like cuckolding just with extra steps

Reply

[-]

muktadutt@reddit

He wants to be Mandingo's wife

Reply

[-]

Ale4leo@reddit

Not content with being just a cuck, Anon also fantasizes about being a slave owner.

Reply

[-]

CarlosimoDangerosimo@reddit

Fake: Anon isn't a cuck Gay: What anon truly wants is the BBC all to himself

Reply

[-]

Feanerian@reddit

“Im not a cuck“ *most cuck shit you’ll ever read*

Reply

[-]

syphilitic_venom@reddit

Usually what happens when you preface what you have to say with "I'm not X"

Reply

[-]

Hokenlord@reddit

I forgot this was 4chan and I read the first sentnec and was like "woah you're going into the *negatives* brother"

Reply

[-]

Aggressive-Tiger-209@reddit

Im not gay but i have a fantasy of being forced down by a big burly black man and have my intestines to be factory reset.

Reply

[-]

KhaleesiXev@reddit

And now all of his porn needs to be custom

Reply

[-]

WantonKerfuffle@reddit

That's gotta be one of the most specific fetishes I've ever read.

Reply

[-]

arbiter12@reddit

>When your wildest fantasy can be described using the "categories" page on a pornsite. At least use the "tag" page. At 15 concurrent tags, you enter patrician territory.

Reply

[-]

big-cum272@reddit

Anon is racist.

Reply

[-]

wheresmylife-gone222@reddit

So thaaat's why the South lost....

Reply

[-]

rezmeihaveghorn@reddit

Y’know, I think I will smoke again today, not right now ber definitely again today.

Reply

[-]

AvgRedditUser12@reddit

Anon is a textbook example of what porn addiction does to a mf

Reply

[-]

glossyplane245@reddit

Internet porn is one of the worst things to ever happen to humanity

Reply

[-]

49x15@reddit

F@gg0t

Reply

[-]

AvgRedditUser12@reddit

indeed, anon forgor to say the part of the story where he also gets that bbc

Reply

[-]

OneWorldly6661@reddit

“I’m not a cuck, but” >writes the most cuck shit ever

Reply

[-]

Gahnondawyehoh@reddit

Reads like this was written in Donald Trump's voice

Reply

[-]

HeirAscend@reddit

>I am not a cuck >**but** It’s over boys, pack it up.

Reply

[-]

Overall_Leek_6317@reddit

Not sure if Anon is racist or cuck, but he's definitely gay.

Reply

[-]

xX-BLACK-SOUL-Xx@reddit

He's all 3

Reply

[-]

redstercoolpanda@reddit

>Not sure if Anon is racist or cuck Why pick only one? Lets chose both.

Reply

[-]

MrFels@reddit

I'm not a [x]. But [most x thing possible]

Reply

[-]

dincosire@reddit

Many such cases

Reply

[-]

UnknownAspectt@reddit

That'll be difficult to work out there's a lot at play there. Lol.

Reply

[-]

Sheeeeeeeeeb@reddit

Whats at play here? Why did he become such a degenerste?

Reply

[-]

UnknownAspectt@reddit

I have no fuckin idea. Maybe he's just a fat cuck whose body is weak and he knows he can't satisfy his wife right

Reply

[-]

Wild-Independent-109@reddit

Isn’t that every cuck ever?

Reply

[-]

UnknownAspectt@reddit

I think physically strong people just throw things off more easily. But I can't imagine a woman doing that to me and not wanting to seriously hurt her. What I've seen in BDSM communities is the cuck is a psychological masochist and the woman is an emotional sadist. In relationships like that people keep eachother weak. Actual health, I believe, overthrows most perversions of sex. Part of why the Catholic Church is so heinous. They exalt weakness and piety and so perversions grow accordingly.

Reply to Post

71 Comments