Has becoming collapse aware changed your retirement planning?

Posted by atascon@reddit | collapse | View on Reddit | 58 comments

In most western economies there is a pretty standard approach to retirement planning. This tends to revolve around maximising your income early on at the expense of other things, maxing out your pension, buying a house, and long term/'safe' investing. Look at any of the FIRE subs as an example and you will find pretty rigid flowcharts demonstrating this.

Behind that are some major assumptions about these instruments being available in the future and that the tradeoffs people are generally encouraged to accept are worthwhile for returns in the distant future. What if pensions and the assets they hold become worthless?

For those of us in our 30s, 40s, and even 50s, there are some serious questions about how fruitful this traditional approach will be going forward and whether we should be prioritising different things.

This leads to a few possible approaches:

Personally I'm doing a combination of all three. I've made a career switch which significantly lowered my earning potential but I now work in a much more meaningful job. I've significantly upped my risk appetite in terms of investing.

Curious how others are approaching this question. Also fully appreciate that many people are in financial survival mode and not all these options are feasible.