The problem with 'It's overconsumption, not overpopulation'
Posted by Vardaman_S_Fish@reddit | collapse | View on Reddit | 3 comments
Submission statement: This essay explores why the current dismissal of overpopulation concerns in favour of focusing solely on "overconsumption" or "ageing demographics" ignores the fundamental realities of ecological overshoot. The piece argues that modern techno-industrial society functions as a dissipative structure; it is heavily reliant on a hyperconnected, fragile system that maximises our vulnerability to systemic shocks. By drawing on historical precedents like the Maya and biological examples such as the St Matthew Island reindeer, the text illustrates that human ingenuity and technology cannot indefinitely outpace planetary limits or the laws of thermodynamics, noting Jevons paradox in particular. This is highly relevant to the subreddit because it challenges mainstream techno-optimist narratives, positing that an acceptance of demographic decline and an end to continuous growth are necessary to avoid a much harsher, involuntary correction driven by ecological collapse and resource depletion.
eilif_myrhe@reddit
As of now, no country has developed the policy framework that gets fertility rates back to equilibrium rates. So, unless something major changes, demographic decline will happen irrespective to our acceptance to it.
DenseBeautiful731@reddit
¿Por qué no los dos?
collapse-ModTeam@reddit
Rule 2: Posts and comments which appear to be marketing, self-promotion, surveys, astroturfing, or other forms of spam will be removed.
Self-promotion or surveys of value to the community may be allowed on a case-by-case basis, if the moderation team is informed first via mod mail.