Great for retro systems. I have collected a few and have some of my dad's going back to the 70s. Have a few from the 90s as well. You can actually buy/sell these on retro computing sites.
Q4OS Trinity has a minimum RAM of 512 MB. It’s basically Debian but for old hardware and with TDE. You can download it here: https://www.q4os.org/downloads1.html
This submission has been removed due to receiving too many reports from users. The mods have been notified and will re-approve if this removal was inappropriate, or leave it removed.
This is most likely because:
Your post belongs in r/linuxquestions or r/linux4noobs
Your post belongs in r/linuxmemes
Your post is considered "fluff" - things like a Tux plushie or old Linux CDs are an example and, while they may be popular vote wise, they are not considered on topic
Your post is otherwise deemed not appropriate for the subreddit
Well, it depends on lots of factors, but I will answer... No
It's not enough.
I have an old laptop running a Linux distro (Linux Lite) , but I expanded RAM to 1.5 GB.
Sure if you don't use a Desktop environment, you may have less RAM. But this kind of RAM are usually coupled with very old 32 bit CPUs.
And 32 bit support is being abandoned, so...
You have at least around 10 more years, and likely a little longer with 32-bit support on SLTS kernels, which they made 6.12 a SLTS. At most you have under 2038, as it then hits the unix time controller limit.
You can run some WMs on 512 as well. TinyWM runs on 200KB, but is limited. Stepping up to usable, you have JWM, IceWM, Fluxbox, Openbox, etc. all under 15MB and some down to 5Mb ram. The problem of course becomes apps, mainly browser. Even then there are options, albeit limited.
I loaded Linux a while back on one of my treo systems with 256Mb RAM and was able to load up and even browse the web. No watching videos mind you.
For your PC running Linux? Yes, as long as you use a light weight desktop environment and don't have any memory-hungry apps, this will probably be enough.
To run a modern web browser? No. This is not enough ram to run a modern web browser and visit most sites.
Damn, you rocking an old Pentium or Athlon? If you have 2 sticks of that, you can actually do stuff with it. Just don't expect it to be fast, or handle a modern DE. XFCE or something like that might work (slowly)
Damn, you rocking an old Pentium or Athlon? If you have 2 sticks of that, you can actually do stuff with it. Just don't expect it to be fast, or handle a modern DE. XFCE or something like that might work (slowly)
Installing same packages on different distro will result in (aprox) same RAM usage. What makes you believe Arch is different than others in this regard?
littlestdickus@reddit
If it's good enough for a Raspberry Pi 1 it should be good enough for you.
0riginal-Syn@reddit
Great for retro systems. I have collected a few and have some of my dad's going back to the 70s. Have a few from the 90s as well. You can actually buy/sell these on retro computing sites.
pomcomic@reddit
HE'S GOT RAM, GET HIM!
BiteTheAppleJim@reddit
Second coming of jesus.
CivilizationMaster@reddit
Q4OS Trinity has a minimum RAM of 512 MB. It’s basically Debian but for old hardware and with TDE. You can download it here: https://www.q4os.org/downloads1.html
0riginal-Syn@reddit
Had Arch 32 running on a retro system of mine with 256Mb with JWM on top. They recommend 512Mb, but it worked actually pretty well.
AutoModerator@reddit
This submission has been removed due to receiving too many reports from users. The mods have been notified and will re-approve if this removal was inappropriate, or leave it removed.
This is most likely because:
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Dinux-g-59@reddit
Well, it depends on lots of factors, but I will answer... No It's not enough. I have an old laptop running a Linux distro (Linux Lite) , but I expanded RAM to 1.5 GB. Sure if you don't use a Desktop environment, you may have less RAM. But this kind of RAM are usually coupled with very old 32 bit CPUs. And 32 bit support is being abandoned, so...
0riginal-Syn@reddit
Pretty sure OP is just joking, but...
You have at least around 10 more years, and likely a little longer with 32-bit support on SLTS kernels, which they made 6.12 a SLTS. At most you have under 2038, as it then hits the unix time controller limit.
You can run some WMs on 512 as well. TinyWM runs on 200KB, but is limited. Stepping up to usable, you have JWM, IceWM, Fluxbox, Openbox, etc. all under 15MB and some down to 5Mb ram. The problem of course becomes apps, mainly browser. Even then there are options, albeit limited.
I loaded Linux a while back on one of my treo systems with 256Mb RAM and was able to load up and even browse the web. No watching videos mind you.
cookie99999999@reddit
What motherboard do you have? If it's actually a DDR2 board you can just buy bigger sticks and max it out for very cheap
NoLemurs@reddit
For your PC running Linux? Yes, as long as you use a light weight desktop environment and don't have any memory-hungry apps, this will probably be enough.
To run a modern web browser? No. This is not enough ram to run a modern web browser and visit most sites.
Emergency-Ball-4480@reddit
Damn, you rocking an old Pentium or Athlon? If you have 2 sticks of that, you can actually do stuff with it. Just don't expect it to be fast, or handle a modern DE. XFCE or something like that might work (slowly)
Emergency-Ball-4480@reddit
Damn, you rocking an old Pentium or Athlon? If you have 2 sticks of that, you can actually do stuff with it. Just don't expect it to be fast, or handle a modern DE. XFCE or something like that might work (slowly)
Mikicrep@reddit
for arch ye and even for some other distros too
trofosila@reddit
Installing same packages on different distro will result in (aprox) same RAM usage. What makes you believe Arch is different than others in this regard?
itastesok@reddit
Sure
External_Finding_761@reddit
lol nice DDR2 stick there, should be perfect for your 2005 build. 512MB will definitely handle opening firefox and maybe one tab if you're lucky
Michami135@reddit
I've run Linux on a fraction of that.
pythosynthesis@reddit
You to double it if you want to get a smooth experience. Suggest you at least triple it, just in case.
sahui@reddit
Is it the comedians hour now?
Extreme_Mention_1492@reddit
It's enough to throw away.
Any-Gain-2577@reddit
ofc
Classic_Result@reddit
If the table it's sitting on wobbles, then it could be useful
xeoron@reddit
NO... my primary machine has 32GiB
Pleasant-Shallot-707@reddit
512 MB?
What are you using this for?
LocationReady788@reddit
512mb non sono molti, dipende da cosa devi farci girare come sistema operativo
genxer@reddit
Ah IBM FRUs -- that takes me back
It could be enough depending on what you're doing.
darkbyrd@reddit
It can be