Funny thing about this is, there is conflict of state institutions. Sure, the court could in theory call the in-party election invalid, but high board of elections openly said courts decision is not binding as there is no legal reason for it to be, and they are the higher authority so they decide whether the party could proceed to elections or not. Court sent them their decision exoecting them to enforce it, but they refused.

So on one hand, according to board of elections, courts decisious doesn't mean anything and in-party elections were right, so they recognize the party leadership. On the other hand, a court overruled to change party leadership and police is trying to enforce it.

Constitutionally, both the court and the police are breaking the law, trying to enforce a decision that is not legally binding. Higher courts will eventually overrule against the lower courts decision. Government is only trying to buy time so that they can create a faux case against current party leader and legitimize this court decision.

Worst case, CHP will either form a new party or join with SHP probably form an alliance with ZP.