You need to expand your perception to the entirety of the “prohibition” era if you’re going to cite some of the variables and draw a conclusion.

All variables need to be considered. The government strong arm of the early 1900s wasn’t just a targeted attack on “freed slaves” and “colored people” it was a Hail Mary of control based governance in the wake of exploding technological advancements and military arms races due to world conflicts and instability in the economy.

They went after more than just the guns, they went after alcohol, cigarettes, commodities/freedoms/vices everyone bought into in a country where individual freedom was unparalleled. They used many excuses to do this much the same way they do today using the “save the children” approach for extreme gun control and iron fist regulations on internet anonymity.

Also, the civil rights act “era” was 30-40 years later in the post WW2 period. Until that period, segregation and racialism was mostly a southern problem the fed had no interest in solving.

I’m not saying you’re completely wrong, you’re just overlooking the larger equation. Racial politics are only one piece of a much larger puzzle used to keep us ALL under control. Case in point, it’s not as though the NFA or prohibition era policy only applied and oppressed black folks. It restricts everyone BUT the governing class and their personal military power in the form of cops and agents.