People dont get emotionally compromised over strangers that they had zero controll of.  

You assert this as if it is self evident. It is not only not self-evident, it is not even relevant.

You assume "emotionally compromised" is the only standard of relevance. You are not reading carefully to note that is not what is under discussion.

You are also moving the goalposts. Now you say "emotionally compromised". Other times you use "bothers" or "don't care". Which is it? Not that I expect you to have a coherent and intelligent answer to that question; your answers are not showing a rigorous evaluation of the situation and a clear standard.

Higher IQ people wont care about this moron jumping into the planes engine. 

This is how I know for sure that you don't understand human behavior. First, you inflate the importance of IQ. Educated people know it has huge limitations. Second, you seem to think that IQ has anything to do with the emotional impact of such situations. That shows you don't understand what IQ actually is. And that you don't understand the relationship between intellectual intelligence and human behavior.

You say these things as if they're true. Not only are they not true, you don't explain why they're true.

If I were more rude, I'd say you're making stuff up. I'll be charitable and conclude that you are speaking of your own experience of life, and you are not mature enough to understand that your experience is not the experience of all humanity.