The Japanese started just like the Chinese?

Posted by QBM7@reddit | askcarguys | View on Reddit | 49 comments

Hello everyone,

In the recent years we have been seeing a lot of Chinese cars on the roads and the media. Heavy marketing, a lot of options, low prices..etc.

Can we go back to how some Japanese luxury brands started? Low prices, competitive options to western cars, heavy marketing. Marketing was so pushed that some brands didn’t even sell their first model in their home country but instead in the market where they wanted to promote themselves in… aka Lexus. The name itself doesn’t have a relevant meaning.

Don’t take this debate as hate view towards Asian cars because obviously each automaker has their customer. But till this day, despite all the experience that Japanese cars have gained through the years you can still feel the difference when riding in a premium European made car and the most luxurious Asian car available, cars started there so they have over 100 years of experience it’s as simple as that.

To the owners of the Asian cars, specifically what they call “luxury” Asian cars, why Asian? If you live there i understand, but overseas, why? And how do you compare it to the European equivalents?

To help you understand how I view them, I see the Japanese market or Asian market in general a every economical market, luxury is understated and not so important because their culture itself is beautiful and full of grace so they don’t really need the extra luxury in their lifestyle, therefore their “real cars” didnt even focus on luxury At the first place.. Toyota, Nissan,Kia,suzuki. But when there’s a brand who is trying to copy and indeed started as a copy cat to Europeans just to compete, it becomes silly. Stay in what you should be producing why make something that you don’t need?

On the other hand the west didnt have much luxury in their culture but instead they admired it and therefore adopted it. In results they produced luxury vehicles.

I don’t know give me your opinion?