TheaterFire

Syria sees improvement in press freedoms amid worldwide decline

Posted by BabylonianWeeb@reddit | anime_titties | View on Reddit | 23 comments

It's the only Middle Eastern state where press freedom is improving not declining unlike rest of the Middle East.

Reply to Post

23 Comments

Diego12028@reddit

Probably because the bar is so low for them that it really wasn't all that difficult to see improvements. It still is nice to see though.
View on Reddit #84935860

big_cock_lach@reddit

It’s gone from the worst in the Middle East to being above average for the region. Yes, part of it is because the bar was so low, but there does seem to be a genuine push to support journalism which is seeing it doing better than a lot of countries in the region. This sub seemed to hate this regime, but by all accounts it seems to be much better than the Assadist regime. It’s still deeply flawed, but it seems to be handling the aftermath far better than comparable countries like Libya and Iraq. Time will tell if they continue on the promise trajectory and become a stable democratic country, or if they’ll become a new dictatorship. I have potentially naive hope that it’ll become a democracy, but the real proof will be in the next elections when they have them. The current ones demonstrate a good step in the right direction though, but they’re also understandably deeply flawed.
View on Reddit #84943487

Beat_Saber_Music@reddit

So far in spite of its origin in Al Qaeida, it seems to have genuinely become a more readonable state actor, definitely driven by their need to run Idlib for years. It's no utopia certainly, bit definitely a big improvement compared to the systematically corrupt Assad regime running on drug trade (captagon). Even the outcome of the Kurds with the collapse of the SDF has seemed surprisingly good so far. The Druzhe situation on the coast is better than expected, as it's more local independent factions doing atrocities rather than a state driven push
View on Reddit #85002513

Not-reallyanonymous@reddit

More reasonable by slaughtering anlawite families and a few other minorities? The reasonability of ethnic cleansing? Right. I guess it would be reasonable by the perspective of the US and Israel.
View on Reddit #85099839

Beat_Saber_Music@reddit

What I'm refering to is that there's no systemic genocide. There are of course the massacres, but it's not a genocide.
View on Reddit #85108960

Not-reallyanonymous@reddit

ethnic cleansing guys, nbd, it’s not genocide so chillll, they’re reasonable I promise
View on Reddit #85130159

Beat_Saber_Music@reddit

The Syrian situation is infinitely more complicated than most people think. The current government has brought some normalcy and stability to the country. However at the end of Assad's reign they had to just allow many former Assad regime people to keep their posts as the HTS had ruled Idlib around one city, so they simply had not enough men of their owm to govern all of Syria reliably. Then Assadists start massacres and the likes in Latakia of the Alawite region trying to cause trouble for the new government having hidden there during the Assad collapse. The new government having not had time to build a proper nation wide army had to deplpy more unreliable forces to put down this possible revolt by former regime loyalists with the unfortunate violence and massacres that followed in reprisal, because the Assad regime had been so brutal, plus historic tribal grievances as well. The government proceeded to restore proper order in the area and put a stop to the bloodshed after it was no longer handling having to restore order to much bigger cities. It's a patrern common in civil wars, and frankly compared to other civil wars emds the Latakia massacres were very limited. In China the communists killed up to hundred thosuand civilians in Changchun alone. In Congo the aftermath of the Rwandan genocide saw hundreds of thosyands of hutu refugees massacred by the advancing Rwandan Tutsi forces. It doesn't excuse the Latakia masscres, but the government couldn't afford for Assad loyalists to say seize Latakia and respark the civil war again, which probably would've been worse. Also there is the Druzhe area of Suwaida which was protected from government forces by the Israelis. It has now devolved to a drug cartel area where former Assad regime people are running the Captagon drug trade, while just a few days ago Jordan bombed the region to hit these drug operations. In the northeast we saw also the collapse of the Rojava government which lost much of its legitimacy after the HTS proved itself to be a viable government, and in addition Arab tribes under the Rojava rebelled against it now that an anti Assad Arab regime was in charge. In addition to this, the new governmwnt has engaged in lots of negotiations with the Kurds to reintegrate them into the central state. Syria is a lot more messy and complucated than one massacre tells. Same as how El-Fasher, Rwanda, Katyn Forest, Auschwitz or the sack of Rome by the Spanish didn't happen in some isolated vaccuum.
View on Reddit #85131569

Not-reallyanonymous@reddit

Dude you’re literally whitewashing massacres and hand waving them under the guise of “it’s messy and complicated.” Not to mention blatant lies. It wasn’t “assadists” causing the massacres to “cause problems for the new government.” It is well documented that the “General Security Service” (which filled much of its ranks with people involved with groups associated with Al Qaeda, as they were loyal to and enthusiastic about the new government lead by Al Qaeda associates) and the HTS (itself a former Al Qaeda associate that officially disassociated with Al Qaeda to start receiving direct US support to fight the Assad government) were the perpetrators of the massacres. The new government did blame “Assadists” for the massacres, as they sat on their asses and ignored prosecuting journalists and human rights groups referring them specific documentation on know perpetrators. The Assadists that ended up going towards prosecution in the claims they were involved in massacres ended up being charged for crimes related to insurgency against the new government’s own militants/security forces, not for crimes against Alawites. So what the fuck is wrong with you? How’re you so deranged to be whitewashing and hand waving the murder of families and children?
View on Reddit #85135465

_Antitese@reddit

because the other "regime" had the most powerful country in the world trying to coup it, this one has it's support. It's easier to have "more freedom" like this.
View on Reddit #84956949

HockeyHocki@reddit

>This sub seemed to hate this regime Because this regime prevents Iran supply their proxy terror groups.  The golden ring in the axis of resistance was broken 
View on Reddit #84954295

NetworkLlama@reddit

I am right there with you. I still see a *lot* of room for improvement, but a very complex situation wasn't going to get fixed in a few months. I am still cautiously optimistic, but I'm also fully aware that it could take a nosedive at almost any moment.
View on Reddit #84948903

thebolts@reddit

Do you consider press freedom in Saudi or the UAE any better?
View on Reddit #85065695

Interesting-Neck-747@reddit

In 2024 Syria was ranked below north Korea  the only country that was ranked worse than Syria was Eritrea 
View on Reddit #85015025

meister2983@reddit

It's actually above average now for the middle East, which is impressive
View on Reddit #84941977

RealAbd121@reddit

Yeah, from below NK to above india and Turkey. Give how security and actual every day economy and safty of people is a big weight into the score, the score will probably keep climbing up more assuming not actual backsliding on the political side.
View on Reddit #84937345

schadenfreudender@reddit

Who would have guessed a few years ago, that Syria will have press freedom, while Israel is systematically murdering journalists. When a government kills more journalists in a couple of years, than the rest of the world in 20 years combined, it is not an accident.
View on Reddit #84955328

Interesting-Neck-747@reddit

I bet that Syria will rank better than Israel next year, Syria now is very close to close the gap
View on Reddit #85015305

BabylonianWeeb@reddit (OP)

Lmao Zionists are downvoting this comment here's upvote from me
View on Reddit #84955967

Besmirching_Badger@reddit

The press freedom index is literally just vibes. It's whatever the contributors 'feel' (i.e. a whole bunch of biases), so even if literally nothing has changed you can see big swings in sentiment based on geopolitical events.
View on Reddit #84967780

there_is_no_spoon1@reddit

Well, when you get rid of the guy who imprisoned and killed journalists that were critical of the government, that kind of thing will happen. Kudos to the Syrian journalists still holding the line! And to the Syrian people turning things toward a more democratic country! Keep up the fight...it's worth it!!
View on Reddit #84950011

Johannes_P@reddit

Honestly, Syria is among the few countries in the region I'm optimistic about.
View on Reddit #84963644

Johannes_P@reddit

Weeks after the fall of Assad, I read an article about journalists in state media bitterly complaining about how they were unable to do proper journalism and how, since December 2024, they could be proper journalists. Happy to see that Syria will improve.
View on Reddit #84963464

_Antitese@reddit

I think that it just goes to show how useful those freedom ranks are. Which is: not useful at all, just like the freedom index from the heritage foundation. Most of those things are just absolutely subjective.
View on Reddit #84957137