Time to adopt Idaho Stop?
Posted by Inciteful_Analysis@reddit | ebikes | View on Reddit | 36 comments
Decades ago Idaho allowed cyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs. Somewhat recently, Delaware did the same. And found that cyclist collisions in intersections dropped 23% over a 3 year period. Accidents at large only dropped 8%. Is it time for other states to follow?
QueerVortex@reddit
Sometimes it’s hard to see the driver through the windshield. As a driver, what is the best way to signal to bicyclists that yes I see you and please keep going cuz I can wait a extra second
bla8291@reddit
The best thing to do is to be predictable. For me as a cyclist, if I come to a 4-way stop and you're already there, I expect you to go before I do, which will let me get through the intersection without stopping. While the sentiment of letting cyclists go first is nice, not all drivers will do that, and cyclists aren't generally expecting that, so it breaks the flow/removes certainty that would otherwise be preserved if you just went when it was your turn. Uncertainty means I'm coming to a stop.
2bluewagons@reddit
I wish everyone’s brain works the way yours and mine does on this matter. I find it silly that I get annoyed when someone is just trying to be nice and let me go. Just do the thing we all expect and there will be harmony.
Odd_Eggplant8019@reddit
if you have the right of way proceed cautiously and don't stop. the worst thing is waving someone through because you are trying to be nice. It also can potentially make you liable if you wave someone through and there's an accident. then you're just slowing everything down.
If the cyclist has right of way just make eye contact and nod slightly.
DecentParsnip42069@reddit
The Idaho stop only applies if the intersection is clear. If you are present as a driver, it is supposed to be normal stop sign rules, and you treat the cyclist as a vehicle. Although given how many cyclists will roll through anyway, wanting to let them go first is understandable. Unfortunately there is no easy way to be predictable about that. You can wave them through. Personally as a cyclist I always stop and follow the rules of the road, even is someone tries to wave me. As a car driver you should know never to trust someone waving you into a lane/intersection, always look for yourself and only proceed when you know it's clear
NewsreelWatcher@reddit
During 2020 I developed sciatica and had to sit on a bench halfway between buying groceries and home. There was a four way stop I could observe while waiting for my pain to ease. It was an unusual street with a bus, ambulances, fire trucks, bicycles, police cars, you name it. Everyone just slowed and proceeded if there was no one blocking the intersection. Everyone except bus drivers. I realized that stop signs are a lie. We treat them no differently from yield signs. I suspect they exist mostly as an excuse for police to go on a fishing expedition even as the police ignore stop signs themselves. In France, intersections often have no signs at all. Everyone yields to the person on the right by default.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit (OP)
I think the case for bicycles treating stop signs as yield signs is significantly different than that for motor vehicles.
Bicyclists struggle to come to a full stop without falling over. Coming to a full stop greatly increases the amount of effort and time required to resume and clear the intersection (noted in video). This is likely a large contributor to increased accidents.
Bicycles in motion can also be easier to see (noted in video). And a bicyclist hitting a motor vehicle is primarily a threat to just their own health.
Taijoker@reddit
If you're thinking about cycling safety, I'd recommend a helmet... Lots of evidence they work great.
NewsreelWatcher@reddit
The excuse against examples where doing it differently works is always “We’re not that place”. It gets harder to wave away the evidence when more and more cities do it and the same results are repeated.
Fryphax@reddit
This is just how I ride. Stop signs are yields, red lights are stop signs.
badhabitfml@reddit
Same here in my city. Cars hit bikes all the time because of it.
It works, but don't be an idiot about it and don't be mad if you get hit by a car when you do it. Cars are going to expect you to follow the same rules.
throwaway_2_help_ppl@reddit
Don't be an idiot = follow the actual rules.
Too many cyclists think that these laws mean they can just blow through intersections without slowing down or even looking. And then get mad when they get hit.
Yield = slow down, proceed cautiously if no other traffic has right of way
Red light = stop and then proceed if there is no other traffic.
RoundSyrup4424@reddit
Well said. This is just natural to do in most areas! Especially early in the morning before the sun is up and the roads are nearly empty!
ralphiooo0@reddit
I couldn’t imagine cops where I live caring either.
nobikeno@reddit
Where t f is your helmet!
RoundSyrup4424@reddit
Right?! I agree with most of what he argues, but it's hard to take him seriously while not wearing a helmet.
sjmuller@reddit
He has an excellent video on that topic as well. https://youtu.be/rhzH6mEpIps
rewt127@reddit
I just dont really agree with the guy regardless.
Here is the reality. I do not personally wear a helmet on my bicycle. But also, im not gonna sit here and pretend "oh im on a separated path so im not really at risk". If I hit gravel in a turn and lose the rear? There is a real danger of brain damage.
A friend of a friend had serious brain damage from a crash on a dirt bike at 10mph going down to check his mail. Dog jumped out in front of him, he grabbed a handful of front brake, tucked the front, highsided. That was the end for him. 10 mph.
I accept the risks of not wearing a helmet. I dont always even wear one on my motorcycle. I think the issue is that too many people try to blame the dangers on external sources. Instead of just "yeah, its dangerous. Im ok with that".
godver3@reddit
Does this actually make much of a difference in practice? I assume cyclists are already doing something similar to this.
KuumaPeruna69@reddit
Idaho: bicyclist injuries from traffic crashes declined by 15%
Delaware: crashes involving bicyclists at stop sign intersections fell by 23%
Relevant Study:
badhabitfml@reddit
I wonder how this compares in rural VS urban parts of the state.
Rolling a stop sign in the city is a fast way to get hit by a car if it isn't a 4way stop.
Glyph8@reddit
Well, that would be on the cyclist, just as it would if they were driving a car. You shouldn‘t be rolling a Yield, if there is a car coming. The rule is, treat a Stop as a Yield - you can only roll it, IF it’s clear.
And treat a red light, as a stop sign - you can roll AFTER stopping, AND making sure it’s clear.
rewt127@reddit
I dont understand how the stop sign one makes much of a difference seeing how that is the way everyone, regardless of method of transport, treats stop signs.
Cars, bicycles, motorcycles, we all California stop at stop signs. Slow to a rolling stop, check the intersection again, accelerate. This just codifies that bicycles are allowed to do it. When everyone else just does it.
The stop light one I can see how it would reduce collisions. Its just further down the same train of thought as filtering.
degoba@reddit
Yes. In Minneapolis cops ticketed cyclists pretty regularly for rolling stop signs. Now they don’t
stormdelta@reddit
OP's post listed stats showing it helped, so yes.
Making it law helps encourage people to do it when appropriate, and provides pushback against idiot entitled drivers that don't understand why these laws are being passed.
Colorado also has a similar law now.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit (OP)
Not having to worry about a ticket for slow rolling a stop signs would be a benefit. Even for those already doing this.
SilverSolver2000@reddit
We have it in Utah now. It's awesome.
Odd_Eggplant8019@reddit
but you have to wait 90 seconds at a red light.
https://highwaysafety.utah.gov/bicycle-safety/
SnuffyMcfluff@reddit
Colorado also has this stop system. It is great.
dariansdad@reddit
I just watched this yesterday (sometimes the algo gets it right).
I am waiting for a ticket for rolling a stop on my bike and taking it to court. I'm in California, BTW, where we coined the term" California Stop". Not the same thing but it gives context to my position as well as supports the data.
Quercus408@reddit
I'd prefer to call it a California stop, but yes, this should be a more widespread thing.
Joaquin_Portland@reddit
I would too, but Governor Newsom vetoed a bill that would have allowed it a few years back.
Veggyhed@reddit
Over the years it's a spread to several States. There's years of evidence of it being safer for cyclists now
Engin1nj4@reddit
I agree and do this as well. Why doesn't my mans wear a helmet tho?
OreganoD@reddit
I do this already anyway
hysys_whisperer@reddit
Washington has this and it's great.