Taxpayers might pay millions more to fight wildfires as jet fuel skyrockets
Posted by ObjectiveDark40@reddit | PrepperIntel | View on Reddit | 38 comments
While the title is about paying more it's also important to read the full article, here are some highlights I feel are relevant.
Last year, those planes burned through about $50 million worth of jet fuel. Every fire season is different, but if this year is the same as last season, that fuel bill would almost double to nearly $100 million.
And that the budget this year is for $7 million less than last year.
Also the droughts impacting the entire west.
L'Esperance has his eye on oil imports heading into California, where most of the jet fuel used across the West is refined. The California Energy Commission is reporting the lowest stock of jet fuel at refineries in more than two years.
Also, not part of the article, but Canada is well known to assist the US in fighting fires but perhaps we are not on as good of terms with them as we once were. Not sure how that might impact their willingness to help.
Friendly_Shopping286@reddit
Ain't it cheaper just to pay people to rake the forests?
dnhs47@reddit
Lightning doesn’t ignite the forest floor, it ignites trees.
The only way to “rake the trees” is to cut them all down, and then we’d be really surprised to see oxygen levels fall.
“You can’t believe that science shit, and who does math anyway?” -all of MAGA
GriffinNowak@reddit
I think a lone tree burning in the forest wouldn’t ignite surrounding trees
dnhs47@reddit
"a lone tree ... in a forest".
Words mean things. You can have "a lone tree," you can have a "forest," but you can't have "a lone tree in a forest".
Definition of "forest": "a dense growth of trees and underbrush covering a large tract".
"A lone tree" is not part of a "dense growth of trees" and therefore not part of a "forest".
GriffinNowak@reddit
“Lone” in this context means one…
dnhs47@reddit
Yes, that's what "lone" means.
"Forest" does not apply to a "single tree" any more than it applies to a "lone tree".
GriffinNowak@reddit
If a single tree burns in the forest I don’t think it would ignite trees next to them.
Random_182f2565@reddit
But Israel needs that money more!
fragrant-final-973@reddit
Cool. How much jet fuel are we burning in Iran daily?
America first, right?
ExplodinMarmot@reddit
Why do you hate freedom so much?
fragrant-final-973@reddit
Either you dropped this /s or you're in a cult. I really can't tell anymore.
One_Dragonfruit_7556@reddit
Can you explain /s?
I'm unfamiliar
-sussy-wussy-@reddit
Sarcasm. Because it doesn't translate well through text, since you can't hear the voice tone. And also, for every 9 people who mean something ironically and sarcastically, there will be 1 who is genuinely insane. Just look at Q and its origins.
hurfery@reddit
Only dim people need the /s.
Tone of voice is not a reliable indicator of verbal intent btw.
One_Dragonfruit_7556@reddit
Thank you for explaining
ExplodinMarmot@reddit
Sorry, my bad. I assumed the /s was obvious but, yeah, you really can’t tell anymore.
Wers81@reddit
Money for war not but not anything that benefits Americans.
Annihilator4413@reddit
Millions a day, minimum. And that's just jet fuel, nevermind the fuel the Navy and ground crews use...
HewSpam@reddit
For you guys that have never been robbed or stolen from before, this is what it feels like
abstrakt42@reddit
Don’t forget lied to and gaslit.
Notyourpal-friend@reddit
Could have saved untold billions on jet fuel by not attacking Iran, or arming Israel. But it's an issue once it's helping save American homes.
Wers81@reddit
This is one of a multitude of reasons I’m joining the maydaystrong and connecting with those calling for a general strike.
We the people are the ones getting screwed while the billionaire corporations are making more and more as we lose ours.
Phaeron@reddit
At what point does it become more economically feasible to run pipelines instead of yearly major endeavors requiring large mobilizations to move water over an area?
I wonder if this is a question for TheyDidTheMath…
ObjectiveDark40@reddit (OP)
I mean they sort of already do. But you need water to pump water.
Just look how much of the US is in a drought.
https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/CurrentMap.aspx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Aqueduct
https://www.kvpr.org/environment/2013-10-13/californias-water-supply-a-700-mile-journey
stu54@reddit
You'd need pipes to everywhere. Usually fires happen in the places where fire took the year off last year.
fragrant-final-973@reddit
History says billions.
$200 million to go 50 miles in this project - https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2023-11-09/dry-california-city-wants-to-build-50-mile-water-pipeline
Phaeron@reddit
Thank you. That number is staggering… and stupid… wow.
MrD3a7h@reddit
I thought Rump was going to rake the forest and solve wildfires?
OePea@reddit
Well ya that's what jet fuel does, it sky rockets
Round-Medicine2507@reddit
A very long hose would be cheaper
Familiar-Garbage-305@reddit
Sorry man fraction loss exists…
Round-Medicine2507@reddit
Water ≠ Water!
thefedfox64@reddit
Even infrastructure would be cheaper
xXShunDugXx@reddit
Isn't next year's fire budget damn near 0?
fragrant-final-973@reddit
Everyone knows only woke states burn ^^/s
03263@reddit
I'm sorry guys, I just don't have the money. Good luck I'll pray for rain.
fragrant-final-973@reddit
Sorry, you're not rich enough to dodge paying your fair share.
Beautiful_Cost_5430@reddit
Yay