4/29/26 Parafield Airport, Australia, Plane Crash Footage
Posted by Shoddy_Act7059@reddit | aviation | View on Reddit | 65 comments
First off, apologies for the news reporting in the video. So far, this is the only footage we have gotten of the crash (and I had to trim down the original 7NEWS Australia broadcast to only include the actual crash footage).
Secondly, this crash killed the two people on board a DA-42 aircraft when it slammed into a hanger, and up to 10 others inside said hanger have been injured.
PutOptions@reddit
Engine out on takeoff in a twin... aren't folks trained to take it straight out on runway heading? Identify, verify, feather? Any turns should be away from the dead engine?
I_am_lonely_cheese@reddit
As a former Flight Training Adelaide student, I am really shocked at this. My thoughts are with the families.
Connect-Astronaut593@reddit
is it actually from FTA cause i really doubt that
The-Convoy@reddit
Yes and it also crashed into their own hanger I believe
Jazzlike_Climate4189@reddit
Just returning the aircraft.
Electrical-Energy851@reddit
I get you're trying to make a joke here, but two families lost people today. It might be three if the worst injured doesn't pull through. Have a bit of humanity and save it for a less public space
Jazzlike_Climate4189@reddit
People handle grief differently, some use humor.
LaddieNowAddie@reddit
The emotionally intelligent person knows when to make a joke and when to say nothing.
Jazzlike_Climate4189@reddit
Everyone in this sub is so emotionally unintelligent they can’t even handle a joke! The downvotes just prove my point.
3minence@reddit
Or we can downvote you, and tell you that you are wrong.
bigcitydreaming@reddit
It wasn't humorous, and this isn't the setting to practice your humor.
Electrical-Energy851@reddit
You're absolutely correct, some do use humour and so I hope your grief passes soon. I'm still praying I didn't lose a friend today please forgive my not seeing this as very humourous
I_am_lonely_cheese@reddit
When I attended they were the only ones with a DA42
Electrical-Energy851@reddit
Still correct, I don't know if the uni uses them for MECIR (if they even offer it) but regardless they'd just hire time like they do with the 40's
Electrical-Energy851@reddit
Yes it was. YQP is the airframe, it was booked for circuits on the air work system. Landed on hangar 54 as well so it's not unlikely the injured would be the maintenance team
KeyboardGunner@reddit
https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/569718
wt1j@reddit
What’s the DA42’s ability to maintain altitude on one engine?
pls_call_my_base@reddit
Single engine service ceiling on the jet-A "dash 6" models is up around 15,000 feet usually. They have no problems maintaining altitude or even climbing with good technique. Lose an engine right after rotating and all bets are off, though.
CessnaBandit@reddit
Early TDI models struggled, later NG are ok maybe 300fpm or more on a good day unless you have more than 2 on board then you’ll not climb
Random61504@reddit
I just started my multi training and I am flying them. They can maintain altitude just fine. I fly the diesel -VI though, not sure if it is any different with the other variant, which I believe that one was.
LaddieNowAddie@reddit
Damn...
"Ten people on the ground were injured, including one with life‑threatening burns, two with serious injuries, one with minor injuries and six affected by smoke inhalation."
Johnatron2000@reddit
OP should pin this to the top
Shoddy_Act7059@reddit (OP)
I'd love to, but we cannot do that in this subreddit, I believe.
Micesmoi@reddit
Damn. I know we are probably a few years from coming up with something but this commercial pilots need a safety escape like fighter jets. It can’t be certain death every time something go wrong
SackOfCats@reddit
I would love to have an ejection seat in my 737.
Good luck everyone else!
SeeYouOn16@reddit
Lol, (looks out the window) hey is that the pilot? Just give everyone on the plane an ejection seat. What could possibly go wrong?
Micesmoi@reddit
Not a bad idea honestly. Give the pilot master switch to all of them. We might be on to something
SeeYouOn16@reddit
Imagine being in the bathroom and hearing a boom and coming out to everyone on the plane being gone.
Aksds@reddit
Would make you shit your self, sad it’s gone already
itsaheem@reddit
hahahahahaha rofl. Best
MonsieurReynard@reddit
Rapture hits different at 35k feet
qzy123@reddit
Actually, this is a terrible idea. Airliners have (minimum) two engines for this reason. Creating escape systems would dramatically increase the weight (fuel) and the complexity (fallibility, maintenance) which would mean astronomical ticket prices. The now-empty hull would crash uncontrolled into whatever was in front of it. Not to mention ejection seats aren’t exactly safe.
Micesmoi@reddit
Flying EV will revolutionize all of aviation.
SilentSpr@reddit
Flying EVs are horrible inefficient in terms of weight because batteries are heavy as hell compared to the amount of energy they store. The working models already struggle with range and endurance as is, I’m sure adding ejection seats won’t help the matter lol
Micesmoi@reddit
It can only get better. And it will we can’t deny it. We can’t assume we are forever stuck with today’s technology. Though I agree ejecting seats for passenger seems impossible today, but not forever!
747ER@reddit
Yes, that’s how technology works. Why wouldn’t conventional fuels get better over the same length of time?
Micesmoi@reddit
Improvements all around is guaranteed that is true! But I wouldn’t bet on specific time length for neither.
SquakinKakas@reddit
Mmm yes, placing explosives under every passenger seat sounds like a great idea. /s
Also, I think you've got a severe misconception of how survivable ejections are, let alone the practicality of re-engineering aircraft fuselages to allow for ejecting without causing massive headaches in other departments...
MonsieurReynard@reddit
FA: Captain, we have a drunk and unruly passenger in 17A!
Captain: gotcha covered
LearningT0Fly@reddit
There's still time to delete this.
Micesmoi@reddit
Do you normally delete/take it back, when most disagree with you?
itsaheem@reddit
looks to me exactly like the Fairchild B52 crash. banked too steep too low, unloaded a wing. and then it's a rock
The-TDawg@reddit
As soon as it started playing that was my first immediate flashback!
itsaheem@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Accelerated_stall.gif
as the bank angle increases, so does the stall speed.
google tells me that : "a 60-degree bank increases stall speed by 41%"
41% higher stall speed is a lot huh -- if the stall speed in this aircraft was say 70 knots at level flight, then a bank angle of 60 degrees would mean the stall speed is now gonna be 98 knots
Brossar1an@reddit
I flew these 42s at FTA for a stint, sad to see, possibly a Cathay cadet. Light twin engine failure is no joke if that's what happened (and it looks like it) unlikely it would've been simulated at that altitude so possibly the real deal. IIRC they fly IO-360 so contra-rotsting meaning there is no critical engine.
mason_mormon@reddit
In multi right now. You have to be on top of your stuff but my conclusion is that after their MEL ride nobody keeps up with proficiency of OEI and Vmc operations. This is the only way to explain the majority of light twin crashes. This crash looks like straight up loss of directional control and from quite a high altitude, easily over obstacle clearance.
Hodgetwins32@reddit
It doesn’t look like that multi ride will go well for ya
BLKHLK@reddit
RIP, hope those injured recover swiftly.
I wonder if they over banked on the takeoff turn while slow? Maybe an engine failure? In my experience flying the DA42 that plane loves to stay airborne. The turbo diesel engine has great performance on that airframe, even in single engine ops.
Jugganot51@reddit
That variant had the IO-360s from what I saw on the aviation safety website. But I agree with the diesel sentiment.
CaptainTomTexas@reddit
Where I instruct, we have the 360’s on it as well. Arguably it’s more forgiving than the diesels because there is no critical engine on it. It’s quite a forgiving platform.
Annual-Advisor-7916@reddit
Would you mind explaining why the diesel engines are less forgiving?
BLKHLK@reddit
The critical engine is the big thing. If you don't know: It's basically the engine causes the most adverse conditions if it fails. Sounds like the IO360s were counter rotating props so they cause similar conditions whether the left or right fails. On the diesel the props both go the same direction. On this aircraft the left engine is the critical engine. So if it failed you'll need more control inputs and power to maintain coordinated flight than if the right engine failed. The higher power used the more control inputs required with minimal input being required when the operating engine is pulled to idle to land. Feathering the dead engine helps a ton too. I would say the benefit to the diesel DA42 is that you have one lever each for the control of the engines. The fadec does all the prop pitch, mixture, and rpm controls from the one lever. From what I've seen the IO360 has 3 levers per engine: prop, mixture, throttle.
revcor@reddit
I have a few questions if you don’t mind:
Do the props both turn the same direction BECAUSE they’re Diesel engines? i.e. Is there something about Diesel engines that precludes them from being in a counter rotating configuration?
Am I understanding correctly that one engine being “critical” is a function of both engines having the same rotation direction (as opposed to being a direct side effect of running on diesel)?
Would you, or anyone, be able to elaborate a bit on how/why the loss of one engine would have a different impact on flight characteristics than the loss of the other engine?
BLKHLK@reddit
Don't mind at all. I'm a bit rusty but I'll explain the best I can. It is not because they are diesel. A lot of twin engine aircraft have engines that rotate the same direction. It tends to be cheaper. It simplifies design costs, manufacturing costs, maintenance/part costs, etc. For example: Instead of needing a left or right dipstick to check the oil its the same dipstick for both sides.
You are correct that the critical engine is a function of both engines rotating the same direction. Has nothing to due with them being diesel. The acronym I remember from my flight training is PAST - P Factor, Accelerated Slipstream, Spiraling Slipstream, and Torque.
P-Factor: The descending prop blade produces more thrust than the ascending blade when you're at high AOA. The left engine has the shorter arm from airplane CG. So the right engine still operating will cause the greater yaw and require more control input.
Accelerated Slipstream: The descending blade of the prop causes the air on the wing to be further out and back which causes more drag on the right wing. While the descending blade on the left causes air to hit closer to the aircraft CG.
Spiraling Slipstream: The airflow produced that hits the rudder by the left engine failing does not help with control while the right engine failing helps.
Torque: The props rotating produce torque. In a single engine operation you "lift the dead engine" to help counteract the roll induced. If the left engine dies the torque produced by the right engine causes the left wing to drop so you require more input to lift that engine. If the right engine dies you require less input.
Hopefully that makes some sense. It's been a lonnng time since I've studied OEI operation. If you look up airplane critical engine there are a ton of good diagrams out that there help explain it and simplify it.
CaptainTomTexas@reddit
The one lever is a lot more convenient. Both engine options do automatically feather though when there is a failure. Or in theory, SHOULD feather.
UniversalInsolvency@reddit
What's feather, precious?
Annual-Advisor-7916@reddit
Thanks for the explanation, I've never heard of that before!
Does the diesel version allow to feather the engine? Since you said pitch is controlled by the fadec?
Fulcrum58@reddit
I don’t have any experience on a da42 or have a multi engine rating but from what I understand, the IO-360 versions have counter rotating props which means there’s no critical engine
Annual-Advisor-7916@reddit
Thanks, I wans't aware that the two version are different in this regard.
BLKHLK@reddit
I actually had to go back and research this. For whatever reason I remember the DA42 having counter rotating props. I trained with the AE300 engines. Turns out I got it mixed up with the PA44 I trained on before the transition. The PA44 has counter rotating props but single engine it is a monster to fly. Probably didn't help that I trained in a hot location at high alts. Needed every bit of power it could give and you were still slowly falling out the sky. I remember the DA42 requiring significantly less control input and power to maintain level flight or even climb - even with the critical engine dead. I didn't have to literally stand on the rudder like I did with the Seminole.
Electrical-Energy851@reddit
Yea I'm pretty sure they run avgas, I've not seen the refuellers use a different truck for the twins
bonnies_ranch@reddit
Looks like the classic engine failure on take off, while the DA42 is very forgiving in that scenario compared to other twins it's still not impossible
blinking_lights@reddit
Here is a further update from a reputable source. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-29/two-killed-in-light-plane-crash-at-parafield-airport/106622644
SnooDucks9173@reddit
Close to where i live, breaks my heart, RIP both on board
post-explainer@reddit
Please provide a source by replying to the message that was sent to you. Failure to respond to that message will result in the automatic removal of this post. Please feel free to reach out to the mod team through modmail if you have any questions or concerns.
r/Aviation is trialing new measures to prevent karma farming. Please feel free to provide feedback through modmail. Thank you for participating in the community!