So, first a note: the article we are responding to was originally published by The Australian. That article stated that more than half the members of the Hellentic Choir voted against working with the Sydney Jewish Choral Society due to "Political Reasons". The Australian Hellentic Choir has responded with this statement: Australian Hellentic Choir – Music of the World. Ultimately, we are arguing about whether people are racists because of something that they didn't actually happen.

Israeli is also not an ethnicity. I feel like you're kinda lost in your own analogy.

Really? There's no ethnic group associated with Israel?

The Zionist regime of Israel is more morally repugnant than the Nazi regime for two main reasons:
- A Jewish state with such a unique Jewish history is intimately familiar with the horrors of mass murder and genocide. This burden of knowledge creates a burden of responsibility.
- As human civilisation at large, we have undergone a lot of political and moral evolutions since WWII, and as such we now uphold ourselves and each other to even higher moral standards.

Holocaust: 4 years and 96% of Jews in Nazi custody were killed.

Armenian Genocide: over two periods up to about 80% of Armenians were killed.

Rwandan Genocide: 100 days, 520,000-702,000 or about 80% of Tutsis were killed.

Srebenica genocide: Over the course of a few days, 8,372 men or boys - comprising 100% of "military age" males in the enclave, were rounded up and then shot.

Gaza: Over the course of 2.5 years, 70,000 or about 3% of the population are killed. This is about 70% of the birth rate over the previous 2 years. It is a callous way of looking at it, but if the rate of death is less than the rate of birth, genocide is unlikely to be an explanation for the conflict.

Other differences between the four genocides I listed and Gaza include:

- The genocided group were exclusively civilians.

- The genocided group were rounded up before being murdered.

- The genocided group were subject to either mass rapes on a systemic level.

Some other points:

The conflict in Gaza is urban warfare. This is not comparable to the Ukrainian conflict, where civilians are far away from the front lines. This is more comparable to the Battle of Mosul (2016–2017) - Wikipedia. Estimates vary on the percentage of civilian deaths at Mosul, but it is likely somewhere between 50% and 80%. The estimates for civilian deaths in Gaza, are somewhere between 65% and 70% based on demographics.

FYI: the calculation for civilian deaths in Gaza is based on 31% of casualties being under 18, while 47% of the population is under 18. 31/47 is 66%, assuming that Hamas does not use child soldiers, which they do.

Oddly enough, both Hamas and ISIS deployed fighters amongst civilians and protected facilities, which is why the civilian casualty rate was so high.

Israel also takes significantly more measures to reduce civilian casualties. Since this doesn't fit into your world view, I'm sure you are going to call this propaganda, so here is a BBC article recounting the experience of a Palestinian man.

Yes, I think the exclusion of anybody (Jewish or not) who endorses the state of Israel is completely justified.

While many Australians are critical of Israel's treatment of Palestinians and the conflict in Gaza, roughly 60% of Australians support Israel's right to exist and defend itself. You are thus arguing for the majority of Australians to be excluded from participating in society.