The best part of this whole thing was when the 60minutes interviewer read part of the manifesto and got Trump to admit it was about himself without prompting.
"“The so-called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr. President,” O’Donnell said.
O’Donnell then asked the president about his reaction to Allen’s rationalization that he was “no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.”
“I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would, because you’re horrible people. Horrible people,” the president replied. “Yeah, he did write that. I’m not a rapist. I didn’t rape anybody.”
“Oh, do you think he was referring to you?” O’Donnell asked, before Trump interrupted.
15/10. Absolute banger. Career highlight reel. Hang it in the Louvre. Literally nothing. NOTHING -- will ever top that moment in this reporter's career. Time to retire.
Yeah what this is so stupid lol. I don’t like trump at all but this isn’t a got him moment everyone on Reddit thinks it is. Like obviously the manifesto is referring to trump. All though idk why he got personally upset with the lady doing the interview like she was calling him that.
Its not about him denying it, but immediately going into a rant about how the interviewer is a terrible nasty person is fucking textbook.
But you can pretend you dont know what i mean and set up strawmen if that makes you happy
I don’t see how anyone needs a gotcha moment to prove Trump is a rapist. It’s kind of doing the “I can accept rape, but I draw the line at unfair journalism” meme.
Yeah, as much as I wish it was a true “got ‘em”, it’s just reasonable assumption that the manifesto is referring to him. I mean, who the fuck else would he be referring to?
I can't comprehend how this pedophile became president of America. Every day more evidence emerges that he is the most foolish president in American history, without a doubt.
Literally because Steve Bannon and Jeffery Epstein meme'd it into existence on /b/ and /pol/ as a counter-culture movement against the establishment. They have emails about this in the files. It's pedophiles all the way down.
The manifesto listed a whole bunch of targets. The shooter wasn't just trying to kill Trump. Maybe someone in Trump's cabinet is the pedo and the shooter blames Trump for protecting them. There are plenty of explanations if people actually thought Trump was innocent and not a pedo himself.
The only guaranteed targets he had listed were "Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel):... prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest." The rest are situational depending on who impedes him from getting to his real targets. Do you know who would be considered the highest-ranked official in the current administration? He also explicitly states the people there "chose to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor." I seriously don't know how you could read his manifesto and assume he could be talking about anyone but Trump.
I don't disagree with the sentiment, but you only need the bare minimum amount of reading comprehension to realize how bad of a gotcha O'Donnell had. Trump doesn't even need that context to know that a lot of people think he's a pedo, rapist, and traitor, and it wouldn't be far-fetched for someone who wants him dead to think that as well.
Trump doesn't even need that context to know that a lot of people think he's a pedo, rapist, and traitor, and it wouldn't be far-fetched for someone who wants him dead to think that as well.
Given how Trump is surrounded by yes-men and how he reportedly only watches Fox News and networks that give him favorable coverage, I'm not sure how much of a given it is that he knows how many people think he is a pedo, rapist, and traitor. Especially if he was actually innocent. You are imagining it from the perspective of someone outside his media bubble.
Part of why he won is that Latino and Arab men broke for him by way higher rates than they did in 2020. A big part of this is brown faces like Myron Gaines and Nick Fuentes getting popular in manosphere/groyper spaces.
Being brown doesn't necessitate solidarity with illegals and net takers. Foreigners with a brain know they and their parents didn't come to America to live in a place populated and governed by Hispanics and Africans. That's why they left.
If you meet people’s basic needs, they excel. This has been proven time and time again. Studies showed a 30 iq point increase (30 fucking points) among schoolchildren in rural Afghanistan after being given compulsory education and 3 square meals.
The only ones who aren’t competent frequently blame other groups. Believing in race science is a sign of low iq conservative beliefs…
So why can't these groups get education and meals by themselves? 60-90 won't build you a real civilization. Acknowledging the obvious superiority of groups that are better along every single conceivable metric and don't need handouts isn't low iq. Just because it makes nons look bad doesn't make it untrue.
They do if you stop fucking them over. Look at Africa, when neocolonialism and economic sanctions stopped ruining Ghana’s economy their starvation rate plummeted.
There are now African countries with lower starvation rates than the Philippines. And average iq in Africa might be low but it’s risen 20 points since the wars of the 90s.
The fact that intelligent outliers exist just kind of completely disproves the idea of race science. According to your ideology, black scientists and academics just wouldn’t exist and yet they do.
Race science is only “obvious” if you’ve been inundated with propaganda online for years.
Why were whites able to fuck them over with impunity? Maybe because they're better along every metric that matters? If your people are entirely subject to rhe whims of another group, your people are inferior.
Notice you said outliers. Their outliers are below average lawyers. Outliers from good groups change science and math forever.
It doesn't have to be 100% of the time for it to be true that some groups are less intelligent. I probably could find a giraffe that was shorter than a human. But that doesn't change that giraffes are taller than people.
Whites fucked them over because they were desperate for resources and wealth. The black plague started a slow but inevitable process leading to settler/extractive colonialism. The Aztecs and Iroquois, for one, had agricultural and architectural developments way ahead of Europe; Tenochtitlan was a bigger, more developed city than London in the 1400s, and the Iroquois farming techniques were centuries ahead of American colonists. But neither of them dedicated their entire efforts on war and conquering, because they had different belief systems.
Personally, I think geography influences behavior more than anything and that’s why Europeans were so desperate to colonize half the world, and it also explains why the other half wasn’t prepared for their invasion. But genetics? Hell no.
“White outliers change the world”? White outliers are the most marketed engines of change, sure. There’s a reason why you’ve heard of Edison, but not Latimer, and a reason you haven’t heard of people like Jerry Lawson who more or less invented the concept of a video game console, or
Garett Morgan who invented fucking traffic lights.
Edison created a phonograph (ripped off of a French inventor) and gets praise for centuries, while Robert Fleming invented the modern acoustic guitar & hasn’t had any praises sung.
I didn't ask you the motivation, I asked why they were able to. It's because they were better along every single metric that mattered at all. White people invented 90%+ of everything useful. Cope harder.
If Europeans and Africans switched places today, you'd come up with a million reasons Africa has geographical advantages and Europe has geographical disadvantages because you'll always make excuses for incompetent peoples instead of just admitting some groups are better than others.
Why do I need to cope? I’m white. My ancestors built the Roman Empire but you don’t see me being an asshole about it.
Did yours? Aren’t you one of those brown racists, that you defended earlier?
Yeah, if Europe and Africa swapped places then I would be advocating for Europeans. Because like I said, Geography is a greater predictor of what a civilization prioritizes; Africans didn’t need to mechanize farming or transportation because it simply wasn’t necessary.
If you dropped a bunch of Europeans into 1200s Kenya they wouldn’t invent the same things that they did in our timeline because the needs of the land are different.
I dont care if they hate me, I align with them more than leftists on every issue. My values aren't determined by which group likes me more. And from my experiences, the most woke leftists hate me more for my values than the most racist rightist does for my race.
There's some pretty racist right wingers but yeah I can see how someone would hate another more for their ideological convictions than for something superficial like race
I take it your values are something like rugged individualism and neoliberal capitalism ?
I don't know what these terms mean cuz im uneducated. I cam only describe my values by plainly stating them. But to make an attempt, I guess im socially very conservative, and economically I am against the level of social benefits and implementation we currently have. If that is rugged individualism and neoliberal capitalism, sure I guess. Im not against universal Healthcare and education, but I am against freeloaders. I dont believe in a system where 4/10 people pay in and 6 only take in perpetuity.
you're against the level of social benefits in the US ? you must deeply despise the European welfare systems then.
you do realize that these systems help stabilize fluctuations in the job market and help people that aren't complete intentional freeloaders pick themselves back up right ? the benefit this brings for society likely makes up for the few who abuse the system.
If you're not against single payer health insurance and state funded education then I guess you're a rare case for a conservative (atleast considering most conservative parties policies in the developed world). You do realize that conservative parties are against both of those to varying degrees right ?
Europe is subsidized by the US' generosity and they are taken advantage of by foreigners who cause harm to the population. I am okay with social benefits that help people, but safeguards should exist to ensure the people receiving them are capable of and in the process of moving towards self-sufficiency. I am for social benefits to a nation of people who all contribute and all benefit. This example may be stupid, but if me and my 9 friends pitch in for a pizza and we get a bigger one cuz of the deal, and sometimes one guy is short and we cover him and I can trust they will do the same for me, that's okay. But we have a system where large groups of people do not net contribute positively at all during their lifetimes. I do not want to share my money, which is a representation of my time and energy, which is essentially my life force to subsidize ungrateful and non-contributing people, who in many cases, are not only not useful, but actively dangerous and harmful.
Eurpe isn't subsidized. Europe is capable of fending off Russia by themselves. The insane US military budget goes into a lot of bullshit (including non public black budget stuff). and US contractors know there's a lot of money in the budget so the US spends more money than they need to.
also health insurance costs in the US are HIGHER than in the EU so that part isn't going into the military budget.
Also sure as fuck not all of the US military might is going into protecting Europe.
But we have a system where large groups of people do not net contribute positively at all during their lifetimes.
which at least in part is a result of conservatives refusing to invest in education for disadvantaged social classes. a generous welfare system and proper education could FIX this in the long term.
I do not want to share my money, which is a representation of my time and energy, which is essentially my life force to subsidize ungrateful and non-contributing people, who in many cases, are not only not useful, but actively dangerous and harmful.
I get not wanting to share money with "good for nothings". But have you considered that having safety nets in place also helps prevent these people from existing in the first place ? poverty breeds crime and people can be born into poverty.
Safety nets also benefit the average person by making them less exploitable... your boss can fuck you over more if you're down on your luck as soon as he lets you go.
the absence of social safety nets gives the powerful A LOT more power over the average person.
also I'd assume the numbers you've seen on the issue of net contributors and net receivers are probably skewed half truths (I'm obviously not conservative and highly distrust conservative media which you probably get your information from)
Poverty is not the primary factor for crime. Those people just do that.
Whether Europe is hypothetically capable of defending herself or not doesn't change the fact that they are only able to sustain these social benefits partially due to being generously helped by the US militarily.
Education wouldn't fix these people. They aren't capable.
Poverty most definitely is the primary factor for crime. Education fixes a lot of things. It can allow children to become better than their parents.
Europe can sustain social safety nets perfectly fine with proper budgeting while also having functioning militaries. They don't even make up a large part of the budget (that's retirement systems).
Agreed. But propaganda is powerful and social media use is at record highs. When every single social media platform’s owner is involved in the Trump campaign… you can see where things go.
Read better. This is about laws to protect non public figures based on how statements made them feel. This would not be a false light claim. Also most states just treat it the same as defamation actions.
I’ll try. What act are you taking about? Her asking a question and not making a false statement? So asking a question is now treason? How is she lying?
So you are saying that anyone asking a question to a public figure that you think is being asked as a gotcha because the person asking must already know? Isn’t a reporter supposed to ask questions directly to people? Or should reporters just report on what they personally assume to be the case?
You are intentionally being dense. Everyone knows the shooter was targeting Trump and that the manifesto was written specifically about Trump. She is asking him to react to the manifesto in that context. Then, she pretends that we have no idea who the manifesto is about when she asks the “Oh, so you think this is about you?” question. She did this to make him look like he’s actually guilty of what the manifesto said. She is actively trying to argue in favor of an assassin’s manifesto by painting the president in a false light mid interview. She is evil. Trump should prosecute her for treason.
Oh boy. I’m sad you get to vote. Btw I agree it was a stupid question but saying it’s treason and having absolutely no reasonable logic to support it says a lot about you.
It was not a stupid question. It was a malicious question. She knew she was lying. Intentionally lying about the president is treason. It is betraying the government of the United States.
I agree. “Journalists” are the enemy of the people. Their entire business model relies on lying to piss off Americans because that will generate more clicks than their competitors.
From the journalists who don’t get sent to prison for lying. The same way you get your alcohol from registered bars and not someone selling moonshine out of their bathtub.
Linking to Wikipedia is not explaining it. I need you to explain directly what you are talking about so I know you’re actually a serious person.
On top of that, please explain to me why someone like this should be in prison simply for reading a manifesto aloud to the president. Do you not care about free speech and freedom? Sounds pretty unamerican.
Because she is intentionally lying about what she just asked the president so that people can clip it out of context and make him look guilty. What is so hard to understand about this?
Definitely would like to juxtapose this comment with what is undoubtedly something someone like you would say: “the left just calls anyone they don’t like a nazi”
I keep seeing this point being made but he was rushing the white house with multiple guns- does he really need to write Trump's full name to understand he was targeting him?
There are only 2 ways to think, and once you pick your side, you have to agree with them on literally every issue ranging from abortion to economics to gun rights.
Literally the same energy as “why do conservatives get mad when I say we should kill all nazis? Pretty telling if you ask me. It’s not like I’ve been calling anyone to the right of my politics a nazi since 2016”
Me when I don’t understand what a manifesto means in the context of someone writing it before attempting to kill another person:
You thinking this is a “slam dunk” is equivalent to me drawing an outline of a Pokémon who is very clearly Pikachu, asking someone who they think that Pokémon is, they answer Pikachu and then I reveal it was Pikachu and reply with “Lmaooooo you thought the Pikachu outline WAS A PIKACHU?!?!!! Gottem!!!!” That’s not a slam dunk, you just don’t understand what a manifesto is lol
The manifesto listed pretty much everyone in the entire administration as a target except Kash Patel, this guy was after whoever he could get and still "failed miserably".
Who the fuck else would he assume it's referring to. Anyone but brainlets looking at this would laugh that guy out of the room if he thought he was special for that.
And also, to be fair No.2: Trump will always, and I mean always assume everyone is talking about him, regardless of whether or not that’s the case. That’s just how his narcissism works. The reporter could’ve told him about how great his last batch of Girl Scout cookies tasted, and Trump would’ve taken credit for it. He can’t compute anything not relating to his own greatness
I mean to be fair, they interview the President about a lot of things that aren't about him either.
I will say though, I saw the initial news post when this happened and then didn't follow up anymore (im not from the US, no one died so I didn't realise there'd be more to it), and from what our news reported it didn't seem like he was the target? They also evacuated J.D. instead of him (or before him, at least) so I'm very confused now reading all these comments.
I understand of course that he could be a target, don't get me wrong, but the way the news was reported back when it happened it didn't seem like he was
I dont know why everyon'e acting like this is some big own lol, it doesnt even matter if he straight up comes out and says he's a pedo cuz he's still going to be the president till he dies
To be honest, this a dumb "gotcha" moment. Obviously, the shooter was referring to the president. Pretending otherwise is just playing dumb.
And I'm of the camp that this either a false flag operation or was allowed to happen to help Trump in the polls. Don't feed further into the Trump persecution narrative by buying into these dumb moments.
Tbf if he had a friend or two to go with they would have gone much further. The security on the footage was so relaxed and they all focused on the first guy running that a second person could have shot them all in their back.
Not saying it would have been enough to reach Trump or anyone important but it's true that security wasn't so efficient
The unserious reason why I think this was staged is leftist shooters are usually a more competent breed. The ceo, kirk, those were at least successful kills. Meanwhile the only people to take shots at trump have been...let's say they're not sending their best.
Never tribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. Why think it's a false flag when the simplest answer is the security never in a million years would think somebody would rush the WHCD. They let complacency get the better if them. even the failed assassin said the security was lackluster.
Cuz if the security was really just incompetent I'd expect a success lol. Maybe Americans are all insane now but you'd think a politically motivated assassination attempt to require some premeditation. "Rushing security" is what streakers do.
Anyway I know it almost certainly isn't staged but it's fun to speculate
Believing it very much is Reddit, because it shows a love for buzzword shit instead of what the actual antichrist was described as, and also because Reddit hates any mention of Christianity yet constantly tries to reference the Antichrist, which again, they have no actual knowledge of. Kinda like how they worship the pope when he does left wing things and then decries religion as the single worst thing for humanity ever. It’s all extremely Reddit.
Be happy when big organised religion does something for the betterment of the world while considering big organised religion a net negative on the world.
This upsets /u/einsatzpoopen. We must of course feel only one way about something at all times.
Sad that the Chuds have to actively use AI driven Bot farms to digitally scream over actual conversation. This shit is wild. It’s like watching a plane crash and the pilot is yelling “NUH UH!”
He’s light-skinned. Unrelated, but funnily enough, people found videos of him and the Vice President’s wife working in a program together. Also unrelated, but people said lightskins are down by two points bc of this guy missing his shot and bc of what Klay Thompson did. Anyway, this shit was staged and yet again failed, and every right-wing account immediately hit send on tweets about needing a ballroom bc of this all at the same time.
funnily enough, people found videos of him and the Vice President’s wife working in a program together. Also unrelated, but people said lightskins are down by two points bc of this guy missing his shot and bc of what Klay Thompson did. Anyway, this shit was staged and yet again failed, and every right-wing account immediately hit send on tweets about needing a ballroom bc of this all at the same time.
funnily enough, people found videos of him and the Vice President’s wife working in a program together. Also unrelated, but people said lightskins are down by two points bc of this guy missing his shot and bc of what Klay Thompson did. Anyway, this shit was staged and yet again failed, and every right-wing account immediately hit send on tweets about needing a ballroom bc of this all at the same time.
Reading_username@reddit
The best part of this whole thing was when the 60minutes interviewer read part of the manifesto and got Trump to admit it was about himself without prompting.
“Oh, do you think he was referring to you?” O’Donnell asked, before Trump interrupted.
15/10. Absolute banger. Career highlight reel. Hang it in the Louvre. Literally nothing. NOTHING -- will ever top that moment in this reporter's career. Time to retire.
Big__Country__40@reddit
FlareBlitzCrits@reddit
Not a banger at all, assassination is awful, and obviously the assassin was talking about trump because he tried to get to him.
impulsikk@reddit
Shooter tries to kill Trump... then writes a manifesto.. i wonder who the manifesto is about...
gbuub@reddit
They’re taking any wins they can cuz they can’t do anything about Trump
BipolarMadness@reddit
"You shouldn't be mad that I am accusing you of something! Getting angry about it proves that you did it!" type shit.
But what do I expect from the platform full of people that calls anyone a nazi for the most dumbest of reasons.
TheSecretLifeOfArai@reddit
Yeah what this is so stupid lol. I don’t like trump at all but this isn’t a got him moment everyone on Reddit thinks it is. Like obviously the manifesto is referring to trump. All though idk why he got personally upset with the lady doing the interview like she was calling him that.
Vollnoppe@reddit
Because guilty people tend to be defensive
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
You raped four hundred pepple today.
Confirm > true Deny > defensive > guilty > true
Stupid logic
Vollnoppe@reddit
Its not about him denying it, but immediately going into a rant about how the interviewer is a terrible nasty person is fucking textbook. But you can pretend you dont know what i mean and set up strawmen if that makes you happy
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
He's like that with reporters all the time. If he was uncharacteristically polite, you'd say he was nervous and THAT was evidence of guilt.
Diezelbub@reddit
Their silence is also suspicious. They must be a hardened serial rapist that knows how to work the system.
Zwaylol@reddit
I don’t see how anyone needs a gotcha moment to prove Trump is a rapist. It’s kind of doing the “I can accept rape, but I draw the line at unfair journalism” meme.
DevilDoge1775@reddit
Yeah, as much as I wish it was a true “got ‘em”, it’s just reasonable assumption that the manifesto is referring to him. I mean, who the fuck else would he be referring to?
Efficient_Award77@reddit
12 new photos of Trump in Epstein's files
I can't comprehend how this pedophile became president of America. Every day more evidence emerges that he is the most foolish president in American history, without a doubt.
airfryerfuntime@reddit
wut
coltrainjones@reddit
Did you just post a link to chatgpt thinking it would say whatever question you typed into it on your end?
gman8686@reddit
I'm amazed it has upvotes, reddit cattle (or bots) at it again
Diezelbub@reddit
"Lap it up now, fact check it never" is pretty much reddit's moto
2gramsbythebeach@reddit
Bro 😂😂😂 it's literally a link to chatgpt to generate 12 new photos
elliotcook10@reddit
This kinda makes me sad in the same way when I watch my parents try to work their phones or extend their laptop screens
JustChillin3456@reddit
Certified reddit moment 😎
G1azedDonuts@reddit
My Chud in Christ, tell me you did not just link a ChatGPT response as "evidence".
FirstProspect@reddit
Literally because Steve Bannon and Jeffery Epstein meme'd it into existence on /b/ and /pol/ as a counter-culture movement against the establishment. They have emails about this in the files. It's pedophiles all the way down.
sadacal@reddit
The manifesto listed a whole bunch of targets. The shooter wasn't just trying to kill Trump. Maybe someone in Trump's cabinet is the pedo and the shooter blames Trump for protecting them. There are plenty of explanations if people actually thought Trump was innocent and not a pedo himself.
airfryerfuntime@reddit
It didn't list any targets, it just described Trump by using the words pedophile, rapist, and traitor.
Aluminum_Tarkus@reddit
The only guaranteed targets he had listed were "Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel):... prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest." The rest are situational depending on who impedes him from getting to his real targets. Do you know who would be considered the highest-ranked official in the current administration? He also explicitly states the people there "chose to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor." I seriously don't know how you could read his manifesto and assume he could be talking about anyone but Trump.
I don't disagree with the sentiment, but you only need the bare minimum amount of reading comprehension to realize how bad of a gotcha O'Donnell had. Trump doesn't even need that context to know that a lot of people think he's a pedo, rapist, and traitor, and it wouldn't be far-fetched for someone who wants him dead to think that as well.
sadacal@reddit
Given how Trump is surrounded by yes-men and how he reportedly only watches Fox News and networks that give him favorable coverage, I'm not sure how much of a given it is that he knows how many people think he is a pedo, rapist, and traitor. Especially if he was actually innocent. You are imagining it from the perspective of someone outside his media bubble.
airfryerfuntime@reddit
I've pointed this out several times and had some very angry redditors yell at me.
Like who the fuck else would the guy be talking about? Lol.
MeBeEric@reddit
Trump didn’t even know the letter was about him lmao what a chud. Media literacy is so dead.
TribeWars@reddit
I read the comment three times, thinking i missed something. Silly me for giving the benefit of the doubt.
no_4@reddit
Agreed it's not a "got em" at all.
But it is a really funny line. And you know, standards for journalism are very low, so take what you can get.
Lil_BigNut@reddit
It’s on the same level for me as “President Trump, what do you say to the Americans who are scared?”
“I say you’re a terrible reporter”
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
tries to kill the President
"this is my letter about how I want to kill a pedo"
"What do you think about this letter?"
"Im not a pedo"
"HE WHO SMELT IT DEALT IT GOT HIM NOW BOYS"
libs are so desperate
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
not as desperate as people who vote for Epsteins best friend to be mean to brown people
ShinyArc50@reddit
Most of the voters were brown themselves. No one’s more racist than the swarthiest of Latinos
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
I know plenty of non caucasians are racist af but Trumps voter base was still majority white wdym.
ShinyArc50@reddit
Part of why he won is that Latino and Arab men broke for him by way higher rates than they did in 2020. A big part of this is brown faces like Myron Gaines and Nick Fuentes getting popular in manosphere/groyper spaces.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
and they're all idiots.
no truly self respecting colored person with an IQ higher than room temperature would vote for a guy who screws them over and who's party hates them
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Being brown doesn't necessitate solidarity with illegals and net takers. Foreigners with a brain know they and their parents didn't come to America to live in a place populated and governed by Hispanics and Africans. That's why they left.
ShinyArc50@reddit
I know self sufficient immigrants, upper crust from the oil industry who had to flee Venezuela.
And they don’t really care if government is done by “Hispanics or Africans” as long as the people doing the governing are educated and confident.
This country ran a lot better under Obama, a black man, than EITHER of the last 2 presidents. Trump and Biden both did shit jobs.
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Educated and competent? Then it won't be either of those groups. Look at the entire world ever for evidence.
ShinyArc50@reddit
If you meet people’s basic needs, they excel. This has been proven time and time again. Studies showed a 30 iq point increase (30 fucking points) among schoolchildren in rural Afghanistan after being given compulsory education and 3 square meals.
The only ones who aren’t competent frequently blame other groups. Believing in race science is a sign of low iq conservative beliefs…
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
So why can't these groups get education and meals by themselves? 60-90 won't build you a real civilization. Acknowledging the obvious superiority of groups that are better along every single conceivable metric and don't need handouts isn't low iq. Just because it makes nons look bad doesn't make it untrue.
ShinyArc50@reddit
They do if you stop fucking them over. Look at Africa, when neocolonialism and economic sanctions stopped ruining Ghana’s economy their starvation rate plummeted.
There are now African countries with lower starvation rates than the Philippines. And average iq in Africa might be low but it’s risen 20 points since the wars of the 90s.
The fact that intelligent outliers exist just kind of completely disproves the idea of race science. According to your ideology, black scientists and academics just wouldn’t exist and yet they do.
Race science is only “obvious” if you’ve been inundated with propaganda online for years.
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Why were whites able to fuck them over with impunity? Maybe because they're better along every metric that matters? If your people are entirely subject to rhe whims of another group, your people are inferior.
Notice you said outliers. Their outliers are below average lawyers. Outliers from good groups change science and math forever.
It doesn't have to be 100% of the time for it to be true that some groups are less intelligent. I probably could find a giraffe that was shorter than a human. But that doesn't change that giraffes are taller than people.
ShinyArc50@reddit
Whites fucked them over because they were desperate for resources and wealth. The black plague started a slow but inevitable process leading to settler/extractive colonialism. The Aztecs and Iroquois, for one, had agricultural and architectural developments way ahead of Europe; Tenochtitlan was a bigger, more developed city than London in the 1400s, and the Iroquois farming techniques were centuries ahead of American colonists. But neither of them dedicated their entire efforts on war and conquering, because they had different belief systems.
Personally, I think geography influences behavior more than anything and that’s why Europeans were so desperate to colonize half the world, and it also explains why the other half wasn’t prepared for their invasion. But genetics? Hell no.
“White outliers change the world”? White outliers are the most marketed engines of change, sure. There’s a reason why you’ve heard of Edison, but not Latimer, and a reason you haven’t heard of people like Jerry Lawson who more or less invented the concept of a video game console, or Garett Morgan who invented fucking traffic lights.
Edison created a phonograph (ripped off of a French inventor) and gets praise for centuries, while Robert Fleming invented the modern acoustic guitar & hasn’t had any praises sung.
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
I didn't ask you the motivation, I asked why they were able to. It's because they were better along every single metric that mattered at all. White people invented 90%+ of everything useful. Cope harder.
If Europeans and Africans switched places today, you'd come up with a million reasons Africa has geographical advantages and Europe has geographical disadvantages because you'll always make excuses for incompetent peoples instead of just admitting some groups are better than others.
ShinyArc50@reddit
Why do I need to cope? I’m white. My ancestors built the Roman Empire but you don’t see me being an asshole about it. Did yours? Aren’t you one of those brown racists, that you defended earlier?
Yeah, if Europe and Africa swapped places then I would be advocating for Europeans. Because like I said, Geography is a greater predictor of what a civilization prioritizes; Africans didn’t need to mechanize farming or transportation because it simply wasn’t necessary. If you dropped a bunch of Europeans into 1200s Kenya they wouldn’t invent the same things that they did in our timeline because the needs of the land are different.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
Homie the republicans hate you people.
You can try all you want to differentiate yourself from "the bad ones" through individual merit.
In the eyes of the average white conservative Karen you're still the same as the hoodlums
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
I dont care if they hate me, I align with them more than leftists on every issue. My values aren't determined by which group likes me more. And from my experiences, the most woke leftists hate me more for my values than the most racist rightist does for my race.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
There's some pretty racist right wingers but yeah I can see how someone would hate another more for their ideological convictions than for something superficial like race
I take it your values are something like rugged individualism and neoliberal capitalism ?
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
I don't know what these terms mean cuz im uneducated. I cam only describe my values by plainly stating them. But to make an attempt, I guess im socially very conservative, and economically I am against the level of social benefits and implementation we currently have. If that is rugged individualism and neoliberal capitalism, sure I guess. Im not against universal Healthcare and education, but I am against freeloaders. I dont believe in a system where 4/10 people pay in and 6 only take in perpetuity.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
you're against the level of social benefits in the US ? you must deeply despise the European welfare systems then.
you do realize that these systems help stabilize fluctuations in the job market and help people that aren't complete intentional freeloaders pick themselves back up right ? the benefit this brings for society likely makes up for the few who abuse the system.
If you're not against single payer health insurance and state funded education then I guess you're a rare case for a conservative (atleast considering most conservative parties policies in the developed world). You do realize that conservative parties are against both of those to varying degrees right ?
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Europe is subsidized by the US' generosity and they are taken advantage of by foreigners who cause harm to the population. I am okay with social benefits that help people, but safeguards should exist to ensure the people receiving them are capable of and in the process of moving towards self-sufficiency. I am for social benefits to a nation of people who all contribute and all benefit. This example may be stupid, but if me and my 9 friends pitch in for a pizza and we get a bigger one cuz of the deal, and sometimes one guy is short and we cover him and I can trust they will do the same for me, that's okay. But we have a system where large groups of people do not net contribute positively at all during their lifetimes. I do not want to share my money, which is a representation of my time and energy, which is essentially my life force to subsidize ungrateful and non-contributing people, who in many cases, are not only not useful, but actively dangerous and harmful.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
Eurpe isn't subsidized. Europe is capable of fending off Russia by themselves. The insane US military budget goes into a lot of bullshit (including non public black budget stuff). and US contractors know there's a lot of money in the budget so the US spends more money than they need to.
also health insurance costs in the US are HIGHER than in the EU so that part isn't going into the military budget.
Also sure as fuck not all of the US military might is going into protecting Europe.
which at least in part is a result of conservatives refusing to invest in education for disadvantaged social classes. a generous welfare system and proper education could FIX this in the long term.
I get not wanting to share money with "good for nothings". But have you considered that having safety nets in place also helps prevent these people from existing in the first place ? poverty breeds crime and people can be born into poverty.
Safety nets also benefit the average person by making them less exploitable... your boss can fuck you over more if you're down on your luck as soon as he lets you go.
the absence of social safety nets gives the powerful A LOT more power over the average person.
also I'd assume the numbers you've seen on the issue of net contributors and net receivers are probably skewed half truths (I'm obviously not conservative and highly distrust conservative media which you probably get your information from)
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Poverty is not the primary factor for crime. Those people just do that.
Whether Europe is hypothetically capable of defending herself or not doesn't change the fact that they are only able to sustain these social benefits partially due to being generously helped by the US militarily.
Education wouldn't fix these people. They aren't capable.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
Poverty most definitely is the primary factor for crime. Education fixes a lot of things. It can allow children to become better than their parents.
Europe can sustain social safety nets perfectly fine with proper budgeting while also having functioning militaries. They don't even make up a large part of the budget (that's retirement systems).
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
They don't have functioning militaries.
Rich blacks commit a comparable amount of crime to poor whites. It's not about money.
ShinyArc50@reddit
Agreed. But propaganda is powerful and social media use is at record highs. When every single social media platform’s owner is involved in the Trump campaign… you can see where things go.
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
Touch grass.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
Don't worry
I grab the grass by the pussy a lot
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
"GPT write me a fire comeback for Reddit ✌️ "
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
I've never used AI in my life except to ask it if it's gonna go Skynet on us for funsies.
but go ahead and make up a strawman in your stupid little head
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
It's nor a strawman, I'm just mocking what you said. Get off fallacies.wiki.
SilliusS0ddus@reddit
I thought you were legit accusing me of using AI for a reddit comment.
guess the mockery was somewhat lost on me.
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
No just your comment was so bad it was as IF. Im sure you didnt.
bigearsforyears@reddit
I thought you couldn't vote for Bill Clinton again?
iMayBeABastard@reddit
Lmao! 3rd Fake Assassination Attempt. But the “libs” are desperate 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😊
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Who's your front runner in 2028
iMayBeABastard@reddit
Literally anyone that doesn’t have the whiff of Trumps hairy orange sack on their breath…
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
Name one
Pupulauls9000@reddit
safarifriendliness@reddit
Don’t worry, you’ll get that ballroom!
Mnmsaregood@reddit
As if the manifesto isn’t about him wtf is this dumbass comment
Running_Gamer@reddit
Reporter should be in prison for this comment. Treason against the United States. Obviously it was about Trump. That’s why she’s asking him about it.
leanorange@reddit
Literally the FIRST amendment 😭you are the treasonous one get out of our country if you don’t like the rules buddy
Debunkingdebunk@reddit
Is this the line to admit you don't understand sarcasm?
leanorange@reddit
Me and 78 other people ig
Debunkingdebunk@reddit
It's reddit, 78 people is low estamite of people missing the point.
joepasquale@reddit
I recall a time when criticizing the president wasn’t considered treason
Running_Gamer@reddit
How is this criticizing the president? She’s intentionally lying about the context of the question so she can paint him in a false light. She is evil.
SleepingPodOne@reddit
Please outline this for me because I am very interested in how the mind of a schizophrenic works
Running_Gamer@reddit
See here for example
deekfu@reddit
Read better. This is about laws to protect non public figures based on how statements made them feel. This would not be a false light claim. Also most states just treat it the same as defamation actions.
Running_Gamer@reddit
Think for more than two seconds. I am explaining why this act deserves prison, not that it currently is criminal.
deekfu@reddit
I’ll try. What act are you taking about? Her asking a question and not making a false statement? So asking a question is now treason? How is she lying?
So you are saying that anyone asking a question to a public figure that you think is being asked as a gotcha because the person asking must already know? Isn’t a reporter supposed to ask questions directly to people? Or should reporters just report on what they personally assume to be the case?
You are way in over your head son.
Running_Gamer@reddit
You are intentionally being dense. Everyone knows the shooter was targeting Trump and that the manifesto was written specifically about Trump. She is asking him to react to the manifesto in that context. Then, she pretends that we have no idea who the manifesto is about when she asks the “Oh, so you think this is about you?” question. She did this to make him look like he’s actually guilty of what the manifesto said. She is actively trying to argue in favor of an assassin’s manifesto by painting the president in a false light mid interview. She is evil. Trump should prosecute her for treason.
deekfu@reddit
Oh boy. I’m sad you get to vote. Btw I agree it was a stupid question but saying it’s treason and having absolutely no reasonable logic to support it says a lot about you.
Please stop voting
Running_Gamer@reddit
It was not a stupid question. It was a malicious question. She knew she was lying. Intentionally lying about the president is treason. It is betraying the government of the United States.
calmdownmyguy@reddit
Damn everyone who's worked for for fox news over the last 20 years had better lawyer up.
Running_Gamer@reddit
I agree. “Journalists” are the enemy of the people. Their entire business model relies on lying to piss off Americans because that will generate more clicks than their competitors.
SleepingPodOne@reddit
where do you suggest we get our news and info from? where do you!
Running_Gamer@reddit
From the journalists who don’t get sent to prison for lying. The same way you get your alcohol from registered bars and not someone selling moonshine out of their bathtub.
SleepingPodOne@reddit
That doesn’t answer my question in the slightest lol
Give me specifics bruv
deekfu@reddit
Lol
SleepingPodOne@reddit
Linking to Wikipedia is not explaining it. I need you to explain directly what you are talking about so I know you’re actually a serious person.
On top of that, please explain to me why someone like this should be in prison simply for reading a manifesto aloud to the president. Do you not care about free speech and freedom? Sounds pretty unamerican.
Running_Gamer@reddit
Because she is intentionally lying about what she just asked the president so that people can clip it out of context and make him look guilty. What is so hard to understand about this?
SleepingPodOne@reddit
What did she intentionally lie about and why should that offense equal prison time?
parker2020@reddit
False light???? Lmfao this the truth 🤣🤣🤣
lordatamus@reddit
Because, to use the same words as spoke, 'facts don't care about your feelings.'
Keep licking the boot my friend.
PissVortex9@reddit
Definitely would like to juxtapose this comment with what is undoubtedly something someone like you would say: “the left just calls anyone they don’t like a nazi”
WaalsVander@reddit
… but he was referring to Trump?
mcsmackington@reddit
I keep seeing this point being made but he was rushing the white house with multiple guns- does he really need to write Trump's full name to understand he was targeting him?
JimmyMcTrade@reddit
Crazy how echo chambers work. I went to look up this quote and right below was a video with a title saying how much trump owned her.
One side saying Trump got owned. Other side saying O'Donnell got owned.
Wild.
Lifeabroad86@reddit
Yeah, once you step back it gets kinda trippy
Ironfields@reddit
It’s trippy in a took far too much acid and now I’m stuck in a bad trip forever kind of way.
slirpo@reddit
There are only 2 ways to think, and once you pick your side, you have to agree with them on literally every issue ranging from abortion to economics to gun rights.
surferos505@reddit
It’s interesting to see the grifter algorithm work in real time
slirpo@reddit
Oh, do you think the assassin who attempted to kill you was referring to you in his manifesto?
No fucking shit
How is this considered a "banger" exactly?
CallidusNomine@reddit
This is what happens when you give old people technology.
Ssyynnxx@reddit
Yeah literally it feels like half the people in this thread are 40 years old
Shot_Policy_4110@reddit
Lol what does being forty have to do with anything here
Ssyynnxx@reddit
Unironically this
Shot_Policy_4110@reddit
Lol I'm 32, you do realize we invented green texts right? I am your preacher
Mattrad7@reddit
He refers to everyone in the Trump administration in the manifesto except Kash Patel, he was after whoever he could get.
Kvaedi@reddit
Because orange man bad. That’s it. No think, just emote.
airfryerfuntime@reddit
I dunno, dude. You sound pretty chuddy here. This is some basic bitch redditor stuff.
Hey-I-Read-It@reddit
Literally the same energy as “why do conservatives get mad when I say we should kill all nazis? Pretty telling if you ask me. It’s not like I’ve been calling anyone to the right of my politics a nazi since 2016”
Streets-Disciple@reddit
Hate trump, can’t wait to read his obituary
You’re wrote that like a stereotypical dweeb ass Millennial redditor
ChequeBook@reddit
She deserves a Pulitzer fr
i860@reddit
You'd have to be 12 years old to agree with this line of logic. Take your friggin' meds dude.
Laxhoop2525@reddit
He tried to shoot Trump, who else would it be referring to?
GoldenGlobeWinnerRDJ@reddit
Me when I don’t understand what a manifesto means in the context of someone writing it before attempting to kill another person:
You thinking this is a “slam dunk” is equivalent to me drawing an outline of a Pokémon who is very clearly Pikachu, asking someone who they think that Pokémon is, they answer Pikachu and then I reveal it was Pikachu and reply with “Lmaooooo you thought the Pikachu outline WAS A PIKACHU?!?!!! Gottem!!!!” That’s not a slam dunk, you just don’t understand what a manifesto is lol
Saliiim@reddit
Doesn't take a genius to work out that the manifesto is talking about the man that he tried to kill.
Mattrad7@reddit
The manifesto listed pretty much everyone in the entire administration as a target except Kash Patel, this guy was after whoever he could get and still "failed miserably".
9172019999@reddit
Who the fuck else would he assume it's referring to. Anyone but brainlets looking at this would laugh that guy out of the room if he thought he was special for that.
ZenPyx@reddit
I mean to be fair this guy could've wanted to assasinate like, RFK or something. It's not like most of these guys weren't at Epstein's Island.
BoarHide@reddit
And also, to be fair No.2: Trump will always, and I mean always assume everyone is talking about him, regardless of whether or not that’s the case. That’s just how his narcissism works. The reporter could’ve told him about how great his last batch of Girl Scout cookies tasted, and Trump would’ve taken credit for it. He can’t compute anything not relating to his own greatness
zuggiz@reddit
Why did they interview him if they didn't think the gunman was after him?
Seems like a pretty smoothbrain thing to think.
'Hey Mr. President, can we get an interview to talk about the shooters manifesto even though we don't think its about you?'
Xayahbetes@reddit
I mean to be fair, they interview the President about a lot of things that aren't about him either.
I will say though, I saw the initial news post when this happened and then didn't follow up anymore (im not from the US, no one died so I didn't realise there'd be more to it), and from what our news reported it didn't seem like he was the target? They also evacuated J.D. instead of him (or before him, at least) so I'm very confused now reading all these comments.
I understand of course that he could be a target, don't get me wrong, but the way the news was reported back when it happened it didn't seem like he was
steauengeglase@reddit
The one good thing about people who are always on the attack is that they happily volunteer to throw themselves off of a cliff.
Joel_the_Devil@reddit
Shits not a banger. Literally no different than how they vague troll by allegedly calling you Nazi/racist.
3darkdragons@reddit
You may not want to believe this, but Terrence McKenna predicted all this. (don’t ask how specific.)
Jeferson9@reddit
"oh do you think he was referring to you?"
Just what passes for serious journalism in 2026 🤡
Biggu5Dicku5@reddit
Yeah, that was amazing LOL 😃
Ssyynnxx@reddit
I dont know why everyon'e acting like this is some big own lol, it doesnt even matter if he straight up comes out and says he's a pedo cuz he's still going to be the president till he dies
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
It's pretty obvious who the manifesto was referring to...
FreshFromNowhere@reddit
how's the weather like at Eglin air force base?
Xalethesniper@reddit
Idk this seems like a stretch. Who else would that even be referring to?
Pandorama626@reddit
To be honest, this a dumb "gotcha" moment. Obviously, the shooter was referring to the president. Pretending otherwise is just playing dumb.
And I'm of the camp that this either a false flag operation or was allowed to happen to help Trump in the polls. Don't feed further into the Trump persecution narrative by buying into these dumb moments.
ArcticLeopard@reddit
PaulieHehehe@reddit
Kek
einsatzpoopen@reddit
You are pretty slow huh
AForestOfWaves@reddit
Was it… not about him?
thr33beggars@reddit
It was clearly about Sleepy Joe Biden and Barrack HUSSEIN Obummer
HiveMindKing@reddit
… it was obviously about him whether true or false it was silly she acted like it was even a question.
Taco-Edge@reddit
Tbf if he had a friend or two to go with they would have gone much further. The security on the footage was so relaxed and they all focused on the first guy running that a second person could have shot them all in their back.
Not saying it would have been enough to reach Trump or anyone important but it's true that security wasn't so efficient
make_reddit_great@reddit
Lesson here is sufficiently motivated jihadis could zerg rush the secret service.
youtocin@reddit
Pretty sure Jihadis are perfectly content with Trump in power since he destabilizes so much from within.
Mesarthim1349@reddit
They've more focused on the elephant next door since 2023. (The one with the blue flag)
nskowyra@reddit
barryhakker@reddit
Someone pls mod banelings and scourges to scream “Allah Akbar!” right before they blow up.
Taco-Edge@reddit
Something like that yeah lol
BilleyBong@reddit
But it's staged!!!
pre_nerf_infestor@reddit
The unserious reason why I think this was staged is leftist shooters are usually a more competent breed. The ceo, kirk, those were at least successful kills. Meanwhile the only people to take shots at trump have been...let's say they're not sending their best.
Malaca83@reddit
Kirk wasn't a leftist, was a professional hired by Israel. Just look up the shit Kirk was saying about Israel recently before his death
MindYoBeezWax@reddit
Never tribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. Why think it's a false flag when the simplest answer is the security never in a million years would think somebody would rush the WHCD. They let complacency get the better if them. even the failed assassin said the security was lackluster.
Fun1k@reddit
And he was fast as fuck on the video, too.
pre_nerf_infestor@reddit
Cuz if the security was really just incompetent I'd expect a success lol. Maybe Americans are all insane now but you'd think a politically motivated assassination attempt to require some premeditation. "Rushing security" is what streakers do.
Anyway I know it almost certainly isn't staged but it's fun to speculate
WalnutSizeBrain@reddit (OP)
Something something presidential level security. Or maybe trump has plot armor
einsatzpoopen@reddit
It was a Reddit post manifesto he’s right on that
Longroadtonowhere_@reddit
Calling Trump the Antichrist was very Reddit, but actually believing isn’t.
He’s, mixed, you might say.
lonewanderer21@reddit
Bro you're on Reddit right now. Redditors complaining about Reddit is the most Reddit thing there is though.
X_crafter@reddit
redditors be like "redditors be like" when they the redditors that be like!
Longroadtonowhere_@reddit
People here sure taking my mixed race joke way too seriously.
einsatzpoopen@reddit
Believing it very much is Reddit, because it shows a love for buzzword shit instead of what the actual antichrist was described as, and also because Reddit hates any mention of Christianity yet constantly tries to reference the Antichrist, which again, they have no actual knowledge of. Kinda like how they worship the pope when he does left wing things and then decries religion as the single worst thing for humanity ever. It’s all extremely Reddit.
Grenyn@reddit
Be happy when big organised religion does something for the betterment of the world while considering big organised religion a net negative on the world.
This upsets /u/einsatzpoopen. We must of course feel only one way about something at all times.
einsatzpoopen@reddit
Oh it doesn’t upset me, just makes yall look slow.
Grenyn@reddit
It's just such a lame thing to say. You can call anything Reddit and dismiss it.
You're doing some cookie-cutter Reddit hating which is just as much a typical Reddit thing to do.
einsatzpoopen@reddit
Lol ok
Kicooi@reddit
Why are other people on this website obsessed with speaking in the third person?
Longroadtonowhere_@reddit
My bad, he quoted Revelation on Trump’s “Jesus” photo and didn’t call him the Antichrist.
So, he basically avoided exactly what you said a redditor would do.
LemonFlavoredMelon@reddit
What I don't get is what the plan was after if he supposedly won. Then what?
He'd have to be on the run forever, he'd never be able to sit down and rest on his laurels because there'd be a nationwide manhunt for him.
He'd have to hide to find something to eat, he'd have to use cash for hotels he constantly goes to...
And if he has friends, they'd end up being bribed because of how much of the loose morals people like this would had if they associated with him.
I don't see how he'd see it as a 'win'.
sports_sports_sports@reddit
I think he expected to be killed or seriously injured in the attempt. The plan was martyrdom.
LemonFlavoredMelon@reddit
Imagine your life being so shitty that you're willing to throw it away for something like this.
Ancient-Honeydew9555@reddit
Lots of people dislike him but don't try hard enough to change his condition
Morphling69@reddit
This is a pretty weird one.
Doesn't he say in his manifesto or whatever that - While he doesn't want to harm anyone else, he will if it's necessary to reach his target(s)?
Seems a bit odd he never fired off a shot if he was so committed to ruining his life.
GodofSad@reddit
I'm sorry but I've read more than my fair share of shooter manifestos and they are ALL reddit posts.
RymrgandsDaughter@reddit
why is his shirt off?
Kl3en@reddit
Why is his body white and his face brown lol
seanthebeloved@reddit
He probably wears a shirt when he goes outside.
TinyWabbit01@reddit
Obviously he was whitewashed by Reddit
TinyWabbit01@reddit
That's what happens when you work at chipotle
SuckEmOff@reddit
Pepper spray
BilleyBong@reddit
Everyone on Reddit is saying it was staged though!
0cc1dent@reddit
It was
boxofrocks14@reddit
Why be so racist
Invulnerablility@reddit
Why is he wrapped in tin foil?
Ok_Two_2604@reddit
That’s not where he shoves it.
AttakZak@reddit
Sad that the Chuds have to actively use AI driven Bot farms to digitally scream over actual conversation. This shit is wild. It’s like watching a plane crash and the pilot is yelling “NUH UH!”
ironbeagle99@reddit
dude is so close to the point and still missing it
tacosarus6@reddit
"So I just did a thing" ass manifesto.
THEPIGWHODIDIT@reddit
Did the shooter brown face for the attack?
UNKNOWN_746@reddit
it’s a tan probably
perfumedDolphin@reddit
People downvoting you don't have a clue how melanin works
MightyTurianEmpire@reddit
He’s light-skinned. Unrelated, but funnily enough, people found videos of him and the Vice President’s wife working in a program together. Also unrelated, but people said lightskins are down by two points bc of this guy missing his shot and bc of what Klay Thompson did. Anyway, this shit was staged and yet again failed, and every right-wing account immediately hit send on tweets about needing a ballroom bc of this all at the same time.
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
Post the videos.
MightyTurianEmpire@reddit
nvm i fell for it again award
torinato@reddit
Turning this into a copy pasta
MightyTurianEmpire@reddit
make sure to add klay thompson eats eggs after 11AM somewhere in there
torinato@reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/greentext/s/0ibDfafLsE
shwaamon@reddit
Manifesto posted on Reddit instead of 8chan? Lol
Laxhoop2525@reddit
Says a lot that he even managed to get as far as he did after 2 attempts have already been made on Trump.
Mattrad7@reddit
Engineer.
Invented new braking system for a wheelchair that wouldnt lock the wheels and would stop the chair using the ground as leaverage.
Best idea to assassinate the president was to Naruto run past like 20 secret service agents and it even kind of worked for a second.
Aurora428@reddit
Was bro trying to murder trump for buying out all the stock on his foundation
Dynomadz@reddit
Wait I thought they killed the guy
digidado@reddit
Right wing dirtsheets claimed that at first.
torinato@reddit
funnily enough, people found videos of him and the Vice President’s wife working in a program together. Also unrelated, but people said lightskins are down by two points bc of this guy missing his shot and bc of what Klay Thompson did. Anyway, this shit was staged and yet again failed, and every right-wing account immediately hit send on tweets about needing a ballroom bc of this all at the same time.
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
Post the videos.
torinato@reddit
Klay Thompson didn’t post any videos, it was an IG story from Megan Thee Stallion about how Klay Thompson wasn’t the man she thought he was.
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
So who are the "people" and what videos of him did they find?
torinato@reddit
The people are Golden State Warrior Klay Thompson and musical artist Megan Thee Stallion? Do you live under a rock?
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
You just said they didn't post any videos.
torinato@reddit
Klay Thompson eats eggs a before 11am
SuspiciousOobs@reddit
He's eating eggs with the Vice Presidents wife??
OcelotSlight7892@reddit
It really is a Reddit post
TheRicFlairDrip@reddit
this happens when you're Jenkinsmaxxing in 2026
alex_shrub@reddit
Trump paid him $20
ArrakeenSun@reddit
Wild seeing a Little Rock news page here
spiritofporn@reddit
Do we know his reddit account yet?
OCD-but-dumb@reddit
i find it funny he had time to make a post about how easy it was to get in before he actually started lol
torinato@reddit
funnily enough, people found videos of him and the Vice President’s wife working in a program together. Also unrelated, but people said lightskins are down by two points bc of this guy missing his shot and bc of what Klay Thompson did. Anyway, this shit was staged and yet again failed, and every right-wing account immediately hit send on tweets about needing a ballroom bc of this all at the same time.
tornessa@reddit
Why is your comment an exact copy paste of the comment by u/mightyturianempire ?
NightIsMyName@reddit
You not see the comment where he says he’s turning it into a copy pasta?
torinato@reddit
it’s not exact, i took out a few words at the beginning.
Check_Me_Out-Boss@reddit
Post the videos.
the445566x@reddit
Avg Redditor take on how they’d do it
ZenPyx@reddit
Nah, this guy had a gun, not an honourable bladed weapon like a katana from a stripmall.
NibPlayz@reddit
Anons instantly believes the government is always innocent and the victim in every scenario
ur_moms_boy-toy@reddit
Why not? Assuming the previous attempt wasn't staged, he's lucky to be alive.
Substantial_Bet_1007@reddit
Dont people think its inside job? I am being for real %100 thats something trumo would do, i know from my country that he is fucking and wanna be
Beebah-Dooba@reddit
They really Chipotled him
spookybaker@reddit
False: Flag
Gay: “shove it into my mouth”
Flashy_Narwhal9362@reddit
"Alright, times up, let's do this... LEEROOOOOOOOOOOOY JEEEEEEENKIINS!"