What happened to all the blockchain developers and the hype?
Posted by Majestic-Taro-6903@reddit | ExperiencedDevs | View on Reddit | 127 comments
Few years back there was crazy hype around blockchain. Every other day it was this is the future, decentralization will change everything.
People were jumping into it like anything:
- Blockchain developers
- Blockchain architects
- Even blockchain managers
- So many conferences and meetups
Now suddenly it feels very quiet.
What happened to all those folks?
Did most of them move to AI/ML now since that’s the new hype?
Or are companies still working on blockchain but without all the noise?
Genuinely curious how that whole space looks today compared to a few years ago.
OllieOnHisBike@reddit
The uses for a very slowly performing distributed database are limited...
rcls0053@reddit
Yeah, took a long time for people to realize blockchain is great for trust, but very slow for reading data. It has one single use case. You don't need it for insurance or logistics or.. because you can trust the entities operating in that space. You don't need a zero-trust blockchain for that. It would also cost a lot of money to have everyone migrate to a blockchain, and you need that for it to be of any use.
Nobody will migrate. So it remained as a tool for finance, where it's suffering from mass exploit. Con men ruined half of it's reputation from the start.
psaux_grep@reddit
It’s not great for trust either.
It’s like TOR, where if you control more than 50% of the nodes you can break the security.
With blockchain if you control more than 50% of the compute you control the truth. Ie. your fake transaction can be vetted over a real one.
rcls0053@reddit
Yes, that's where the "everyone needs to migrate to blockchain" comes from. It doesn't work without it. The network is too small and has a major risk of someone taking over it entirely.
edgmnt_net@reddit
It works just fine right now and we're very very far from "everyone".
northrupthebandgeek@reddit
Controlling more than 50% of the compute (or backing funds, in the case of proof-of-stake) for any of the mainstream blockchains is exceptionally hard to do, though, to the point where I don't know of a single instance of that ever happening.
Professional_Hair550@reddit
It will happen if everyone mines to Blockchain. AWS, Google, Microsoft will throw all their servers to it and try to own it. Then will start charging people.
edgmnt_net@reddit
That already requires some sort of collusion between 3 major competitiors and not just independent operation.
Although, yes, I agree capital concentration and computing power concentration make a possible threat. However in practical terms any such attack would likely require diverting computing resources from activity that generates money in other ways. And the more people and smaller entities mine, the harder it gets.
Deranged40@reddit
Yeah, nobody would do that unless there were a wildly large financial incentive to do so or something.
edgmnt_net@reddit
The big issue was with everybody making private blockchains or so-called blockchains that had too little to do with the original idea of a blockchain. Some people would call anything a blockchain.
"Digital signature? Nah, bro, let's slap a blockchain onto this."
Then, of course, you also had real blockchains that were somewhat legitimate, but were constructed as a scam or were worthless in other ways (e.g. mere clones hoping to capitalize on Bitcoin's success).
Also the nice stuff only extends to on-chain events or if a wide consensus is needed, where it's pretty great. But it won't help you get reimbursed if you crash your car, not on its own at least.
Cell-i-Zenit@reddit
That does not make sense, you know you can run a node locally?
pagerussell@reddit
It doesn't even solve for trust tho. It just externalizes trust onto whoever loses in the transaction. Like, if your wallet gets hacked, that's it. The end. There is no mechanism for fixing it. You're just fucked.
The only thing blockchain solves for is skirting financial regulations.
AndyKJMehta@reddit
Your physical wallet gets stolen or lost. What is your recovery mechanism?
Deranged40@reddit
I call and cancel my credit cards and debit card. Visa (maker of my bank's debit card) offers protection against fraudulent charges. So does my bank independently.
Furthermore, by bank doesn't make my ledger public.
Putnam3145@reddit
Cancel all the debit/credit cards you had in it and get new ones? This isn't revolutionary stuff.
Ok-Entertainer-1414@reddit
You physically can't fit millions of dollars in your wallet
rcls0053@reddit
Nor should you store that kind of money on a single account. You can always disperse it between multiple places, banks, shares, investment portfolios..
CodelinesNL@reddit
There's still a few people who think NFTs are going to take off anytime now.
bradsk88@reddit
Blockchain was never really that complex of an engineering concept. They were just normal engineers who happened to be working on blockchain.
alexlazar98@reddit
Having worked in blockchain for 4-5 years, yup, it’s just normal engineering with a few domain specific things. Not to say you can pick up all of it in a week. But it’s not insurmountable tech.
MatthewMob@reddit
Yep. I was one of them. Company ran out of funds, I moved on to marketing automation, now comfortably in FinTech.
CodelinesNL@reddit
Tell that to r/fintech
I'd like to have a place to discuss Fintech without all these incredibly dumb 'crypto' folks pretending they have a valuable opinion weighing in all the time.
PoopsCodeAllTheTime@reddit
Well the “fintech” term clearly work as a honey pot for those folks
max123246@reddit
A lot of grifters when it comes to finance in general for some reason. It's interesting how different communities can be just because of the topic or namw
catch_dot_dot_dot@reddit
Yeah lots of snarky comments here but I know some engineers who worked for blockchain companies and never drank the kool aid. Just a well paid job doing software dev and now they're doing software dev somewhere else.
CodelinesNL@reddit
Which is why they started making up craptons of lingo to hide this simple fact.
The same is happening with a lot of the AI "thought leaders" in this space. The data science in these models is complex. Using Claude Code, or creating an "Agent" yourself, is extremely simple. The latter is simply a single API call you need to implement.
yellow_smurf10@reddit
A lot of idiots tech bro wants to be a thought leader for whatever newest hype there is for self promotion. Once the hype dies and new hype emerge, they switch to their new grift. AI is a newest hype and we started seeing a lot of self proclaimed thought leader in AI. That being said, unlike blockchain, I can see AI has the capability to massively change the industry and majorly impact our economy and culture.
alexlazar98@reddit
They aren't idiots or grifters, not all of them. Some people just want to earn good money and chase that sweet VC capital fwiw.
metekillot@reddit
AI is a front-end autocomplete for conversation imitation, optionally with some additional linters or mathematical algorithms bolted on and triggered by sentiment and semantic analysis.
AI does not "reason". You have been misled.
kobumaister@reddit
And an atomic reactor it's just particles crashing between them. And a car is just explosions attached to wheels. Come on...
pagerussell@reddit
If AI is so much more than what OP said, then where are all the vibe coded millionaires? Where are all the vibe coded startups that are disrupting other industries?
It sure seems like a lot of people selling shovels and not a lot of people mining gold.
kobumaister@reddit
You're inferring A LOT of things from my two sentences not related with AI. That shows that you have zero interest in my opinion and just want yo jump anyone who SLIGHTLY defends AI.
As I said in another answer, saying that AI it's just a code linter in 2026 is as stupid as saying that AI will bring AGI, remove al SWE, and chabge the world.
Saying that AI is something complex means that I defend vibe code hype? No, vibe coding is plain stupid as a concept. But you, i. you hate and rage, inferred all my opinions from a single sentence. That's called prejudice and it's usually related to low intelligence.
lolimouto_enjoyer@reddit
Nah, it's related to being fed up with all the AI bullshit you can't speak out against at work so you take it out on the internet.
kobumaister@reddit
That makes a lot of sense.
metekillot@reddit
Large language models and the way they are being sold are digital skinwalkers; they sound human enough to trick you into thinking some human cognition has taken place within their communication. That is not the case. You are interacting with the ghosts of peoples' previous conversations; you are interacting with a code linter. There is no human reasoning taking place.
kobumaister@reddit
Never said otherwise, but reducing to absurdity by saying that it's a code linter is plain stupid, just as stupid as people saying that agi is coming and AI will replace all engineers, it's just in the other end of stupity.
alexlazar98@reddit
I've been in crypto from 2021 since just last week.
Everyone (including me) piled up in ~2021 because it was flush with cash from investors, there were many and well paid jobs, it being new meant you didn't need to know a lot to break in, the technology’s promises seemed amazing, etc.
It’s turned out there are a few PMFs in blockchain but it’s not as life-changing as we once thought and it certainly has a lot of shady actors (probably the majority?).
Yes, some people still are working in blockchain with a lot less noise on those few cool real use cases. But it is observably harder to get funding or a job then it used to be.
Now investors have a hard-on for AI. Even people (like me) that still believe blockchain has some very cool use cases start to think “would I be more employable in AI?”.
And, based on my limited & anecdotal data from the past 4 months of looking for a job, it seems like the answer might be “yes, I would be more employable in AI right now”
AngusAlThor@reddit
The useless tech was useless, and the devs have either found a way to hide their experience or have washed out of the industry.
ThatShitAintPat@reddit
In what ways do you perceive bitcoin to be useless (genuinely asking)
AngusAlThor@reddit
So, fundamentally, the reason a currency is valuable is because a state will do violence to you if you don't have it; Due to taxes, licences, and whatever else, you will at some point have to have some of your country's money to pay your government so you don't go to prison, and that threat (or ones derived from it) is what incentivises you to perform actions to get a given currency. Now, this fundamental relationship is obscured in complex economies by all the different ways that money moves around, but it is still the foundational value backing everything up.
Bitcoin is a currency that is not accepted by any government, and as such cannot be used for this fundamental purpose. As such, it can never function as a currency, because there is no government behind it saying "On threat of violence, this has value". As such, any value of Bitcoin is illusory, and ends up just acting as a decentralised "Bigger Fool Scam".
Cell-i-Zenit@reddit
Not true
But it already acts as such. I can buy things with it. It doesnt matter how you define currency or if bitcoin is a currency or not. There are some companies that treat it as such ergo it is not useless
Which_Tap_5927@reddit
I don't think we've seen a project deliver the full potential of permissionless electronic transactions yet but I would agree that all the scammers/grifters in the space who were just using the hype to try get rich quick have moved into the AI space
Frequent_Bag9260@reddit
They only come out when the tech industry is doing well. Now that it’s on life support they’re all scared.
Cell-i-Zenit@reddit
You cannot ask that question in a software dev bubble imo.
Blockchain from a technical point of view is too simple as a concept compared to the hype and this causes every single shitty dev(tm) to come out of the hole and say "duuuuuh a slow DB is a solution looking for a problem".
The technical solution doesnt match the hype and this causes every shitty software dev to feel superior "you just dont get it, its just a linked list, i could have thought of that".
Just take a look at this thread to see it.
I think the hype died down, which causes investors to retreat. There were some fantastic ideas and actual good technical solutions to (some) realworld problems, but they never really came to life.
And before someone asks for some good usecases:
Murky_Indication1885@reddit
They are now ai blockchain finops specialists
Sweet-Reason7098@reddit
are there still many blockchain job postings or has it really slowed down?
ooa3603@reddit
They're practically non-existent.
The problem now is the same as it was then, there's not much in demand use
psaux_grep@reddit
Blockchain is still very much a solution looking for a problem.
Wide_Obligation4055@reddit
Exactly this. Blockchain does nothing useful. AI very much does, for all the hype, AI will actually change the world. Which is obvious to any software dev whose job is now utterly changed already.
Blockchain just created currency and NFTs as fake assets. NFTs have fallen 95% Crypto will too, once you no longer get gamblers betting on it. Because crypto also serves no useful purpose, so it will die out, like the technology behind it.
Spare-Dragonfly5606@reddit
I don’t know buddy, monero is the currency of the dark web. Seems like it’s got a pretty clear use in some cases
Wide_Obligation4055@reddit
Yeah not sure it being the currency that enables crime is a selling point unless you are a criminal. Although the current US regime has backed it heavily ... as I said a fine vehicle for fraud and corruption.
Spare-Dragonfly5606@reddit
Anyone interested in anonymity. Not just criminals, but dissidents, asylum seekers and journalists. Plenty of use cases for that sort of thing
Wide_Obligation4055@reddit
The thing is it doesn't actually evendo anonymity, because it was never designed to. So if you have the resources of a state you can read all the block chain transactions a coin has ever been involved in, access the crypto exchanges trace that to user identities then trace that to people. It's just harder than doing the same with false identity bank accounts etc, but actually the records are built in, so given the right tech and resource the main hurdle is unregulated foreign crypto exchanges Vs regulated bank. Which is nothing to do with the tech, Blockchain or Crypto. Unregulated dodgy banks, trading and asset exchanges are the same issue for tracing normal money.
Spare-Dragonfly5606@reddit
Have you researched monero or are you just tarring crypto with one brush? Because monero and some of the other privacy coins do exactly what you claim they can’t
Wide_Obligation4055@reddit
Ok thanks for the info, sure monero encrypts the block chain and obscures the transaction paths etc. So it is designed for criminal activity, sex trafficking minors etc.
That adds a privacy layer to the Blockchain, which would require government military intelligence level cryptographic cracking, ie quantum compute. But that has nothing to do with Blockchain as a technology, you could equally well have a fully encryption wrapped money laundering system using non crypto if you are aiming to create a system to enable crime.
Western-Climate-2317@reddit
You’re just spewing buzzwords lmao “government military intelligence level cryptographic cracking” “fully encryption wrapped money laundering system”
Wide_Obligation4055@reddit
I am? Ok whatever, in plain English, none of this has bugger all to do with Blockchain. Blockchain was not designed for anonymous transactiins, exactly the opposite in fact.
IsaacHasenov@reddit
It was always like, show me one proposed use for blockchain that a database can't do faster, easier, and a thousand times cheaper
AndyKJMehta@reddit
Don’t forget quantum!
sweetnsourgrapes@reddit
The funny thing about that which doesn't get much air, is that quantum computers need to be supercooled to like a couple degrees above absolute zero.
That requires helium (also used to supercool components in MRI and other things). The world doesn't have much helium. One estimate I heard was that the helium we currently have could make about 5 quantum computers at the moment.
lubutu@reddit
There would be absolutely no reason for "quantum desktops" in any case — quantum computers are exponentially better than classic computers only in very specific applications. I genuinely think they will change the world, but they will remain in the realm of HPC.
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
They moved onto quantum or are you just dunking on them for it being nonexistent so far? Academics seem to believe quantum will be useful primarily to attack those that did not harden their security to it in time. I would think the problem there was pretty obvious.
OP_will_deliver@reddit
quantum bros downvoting you
notfulofshit@reddit
They put that AI on the chain yo
OattBreaker91@reddit
Pussy on the chainwax!
Bicykwow@reddit
They've rebranded as "AI visionaries" and are posting every 15 mins to LinkedIn, insisting that anyone who even looks at code is going to be "left in the dust". 24 hour agent swarms all day or bust.
Page_197_Slaps@reddit
If my LinkedIn feed is any sort of evidence, every single person on LinkedIn is now an agentic AI expert with many years of experience.
Business_Ad_9799@reddit
the real answer
Putrid-Tutor-4461@reddit
i had something similar with the VR hype a few years back
Tricky_Acanthaceae39@reddit
Now watch it happen with AI
TheTacoInquisition@reddit
The grifters made their money and moved on, so the block chain companies stopped.
Blockchain was forever a solution in search of a problem. I didn't meet a single blockchain developer who wasn't really quite junior, so I'm assuming they got more experienced and realised jamming blockchain into the mix was actually pretty bad engineering and quietly rebranded themselves.
No companies and no developers means no conferences, so yeah, it all vanished.
AI is the current hype train, and while it's vastly more useful, it'll die down to a more sensible business-as-usual murmur in the coming years, just like cloud stuff, container stuff and a lot of the data stuff has. Then the new shiney will come along and we'll rinse and repeat.
mikolv2@reddit
I did a lot of blockchain work, as freelance work in addition to my regular 9-5. Nothing happened, I never believed or cared about it but people were paying good money and then hyped died down and work stopped coming in. I still have the same 9-5 and things are going well.
General-Jaguar-8164@reddit
N8n consultants
Defiant_Alfalfa8848@reddit
They got rich and retired
stedmangraham@reddit
Turns out nobody actually needs a giant immutable database that grows forever and gets shittier as you use it
SippieCup@reddit
hey now. git is quite useful!
upon-taken@reddit
Hey now. UserId is quite useful!
engineered_academic@reddit
Mostly the money moved on to other things when NFTs flopped hard. Blockchain development has also pretty much reached its zenith. Like LowCode/NoCode before it, a flash in the pan where lost of money was made and lost.
Dokrzz_@reddit
I’m not sure there’s a single day where I have to spend time working in a codebase that I don’t trawl through old commits
raughit@reddit
At work, all the time. I work on code bases over 10 years old, most people aren't there anymore. Fortunately, there was almost always a common template for commits into the master/main branch. Reading of the context in which some change was made is invaluable.
SippieCup@reddit
quite a lot… like multiple times a day, every day, along with basically every line of code i scroll through and gitlens telling me when that LoC was added, who did it, and what the commit message was.
Then there are all the Code reviews, git blame, rebasing, merge trains, etc.
My point was that git is basically a blockchain without the financial assets on it or the PoW.
FatedMoody@reddit
Yes and no. I mean I assume there is some kind authentication by trusted authority which decides if you’re allowed make commits no?
SippieCup@reddit
yes, the git repos you are pushing/syncing to auth through ssh. but you can do whatever you want locally, like blockchains.
but my point wasn’t that it is 1 to 1 with blockchains. Just that it is very analogous to them in function, every commit building off the last as an immutable chain (with the obvious ability of rewriting history if you have enough permissions. in bitcoin that would be a 51% attack, which at the end of the day, is just permissions at scale).
FatedMoody@reddit
Yea I guess having local branch is really like level 2 protocol where you can make a bunch of transactions/ commits and then merge/reconcile back into master/main chain. Though yea like you were saying git really isn’t immutable. With enough permissions people easily can do git push —force
ThatShitAintPat@reddit
Once a week for me. As the project goes on you need to understand the context of the change. What was the PR number, let me look that up. JIRA ticket was linked. Let me look that up. Thankfully even though it was 4 years ago I was at this company and remember what happened. Safe to delete. Buh bye.
stedmangraham@reddit
I use it all the time. Git blame to find who might know about a component, going back after a failed proof of concept, going back to make hotfixes etc
stedmangraham@reddit
That is a funny comparison, but git is purposefully very flexible and there’s a good reason we don’t use it for anything other than a few hundred MB of text most of the time
UralBigfoot@reddit
Actually immutable append only trustless database is pretty useful
doradus_novae@reddit
Every single consumer only cared about getting rich.
You'd make cool things and then you get shit all over if you didn't one thousand x investments because the same herd of get rich quick idiots who ruin everything ruined it, so what's the point
lily_de_valley@reddit
They're now the Generative AI SMEs. Not kidding, in serious. Most blockchain and NFT team of my company are now working on Gen AI or LLM.
Ok_Belt4351@reddit
funny how quickly the trends shift in tech
Responsible_Cut_4351@reddit
is blockchain still being used quietly?
rjm101@reddit
We are currently in a crypto bear market which happens every 4 years and in the bulk phase the companies in this industry always over hire which leads to cut backs when inevitable bear market follows. This market literally operations on 4 year micro cycles based on the Bitcoin halving. People tried to say this is no longer relevant last year but it clearly still is.
Fantastic_Ad_7770@reddit
I actually know someone who was a blockchain engineer who does stuff on the consensus side.
There’s still a lot of places which still deal with blockchain technologies, and depending on what part you worked on, the concepts do transfer to traditional distributed systems(things like sharding, leader election, sidecars, etc) since blockchain when it comes to proof of stake is just a distributed network of web servers.
He ended up doing a contract regarding some p2p app, and worked at a normal web company as a full stack engineer before going back to another blockchain company for a bigger compensation package, all while building his own app on the side.
HowTheStoryEnds@reddit
Good use case and economically viable are 2 different things though and I doubt the AI companies are charging even break-even pricing right now.
CodelinesNL@reddit
They're either in r/fintech now pretending to be real companies, or are now pretending to be AI experts.
Connect_Craft5691@reddit
how did you come across this topic
Appropriate_Bid_3384@reddit
a lot of them pivoted to web3, still some quiet projects around
So_Rusted@reddit
i sure know what happened to shitcoin ceos. They're all over my feed pushing ai automation consultations
northrupthebandgeek@reddit
About a year ago I actually got an interview with a blockchain development company (based in France, I think?). Didn't get the job, but was still interesting to learn about their server infra.
lord_faulcrox@reddit
Things have consolidated to Stablecoins, Tokenized RWAs, payments prediction markets, and increased DeFi integration with TradFi.
Applications like supply chain, decentralised voting, nfts, metaverse failed to deliver on the hype.
auto_off@reddit
Best answer imo of all these, it’s just boring tech now for most. Nobody cares about reducing transaction costs by x% or cross border finance. Hypes just gone and it’s becoming normalized.
rudiXOR@reddit
They are all developing AGI or working with OpenClaw to create a passive income, spending more time and money on it then th y earn.
bluetrust@reddit
My neighbor was a blockchain devguy and got laid off in like 2023. He works for Starbucks now I think, like corporate Starbucks, not at a supermarket.
_Solaire@reddit
Former Blockchain dev here. I learned a lot about distributed technologies, software development, networking, cryptography and many other technical skills. And I learned about the hype cycle. This was a little less than a decade ago when I started my professional career.
I went back to real software development (SaaS products) for a couple years and work as a senior DevOps engineer now. I've used AI a handful of times but didn't want to be part of yet another hype and it's output is just not good enough for me at this time.
A lot of the people I worked with have switched to the AI hype and some were big fans of the metaverse for a bit. But to be honest, they never understood most of those technologies and were never critical thinkers.
The_Northern_Light@reddit
lol
is this a serious question?? how "experienced" of a dev do you have to be to ask this question?
Kersheck@reddit
not sure why most people are replying with a quick snarky comment instead of answering in good faith
afaik most of the defi space consolidated around stablecoins (circle, usdh, tether), trading platforms (hyperliquid), and prediction markets (poly)
stablecoins are by far the most useful, it takes all the good parts of crypto (instant international settlement of money transfers) without the volatility or complexity that prevented the average person from touching it
Zenin@reddit
Oh the irony, considering so-called stablecoins are in designed to facilitate currency duplication and ultimately hyperinflation. They're arguably the largest grift by far of all the crypto token shenanigans.
Naive_Review7725@reddit
it will pop up again when bitcoin hits ATH
guardian87@reddit
So, never? More and more of the gambling is moving to prediction markets instead of crypto.
Drevicar@reddit
They are all billionaires now.
Buttonwalls@reddit
It was all grifters. They have moved on to AI non-sense now.
According-Rice-6202@reddit
I truly think now is a good time to understand how it works as domain knowledge can take time. I am not an evangelist in any form - the technology is incredibly underrated from a utility perspective right now Ai amplifies this.
People often write blockchain off as a fad and just speculation however many fail to recognise that there is no other programatic financial system with the same liberty.
‘Ai agents’ can create wallets automate transactions and most other financial action with blockchain.
Ai agents cannot set up a bank account and easily automate transactions with tradfi.
I am summarising here but look at companies like moreta and various others already allowing usdc deposits and spending with no bank.
I mention the above as I think blockchain tech is only gonna grow and learning it now is worth while.
ThatShitAintPat@reddit
As people continue to lose money with moltbot, smart contracts and code to limit currency usage through automated usage will probably solve problems.
bwmat@reddit
I work for a company that makes database drivers, and other related software
A bit before Covid hit, one of the employees from India was asking me about ideas around building a driver 'for the blockchain'
They didn't really make it clear Wtf the point of such a thing would be, but I didn't share my incredulity with them, but in any case, never heard anything about that again lol
nsxwolf@reddit
Blockchain is completely useless and once all the free money dried up it became impossible to deny.
ThatShitAintPat@reddit
Not completely useless. For actual commerce it does have potential it’s just really not that exciting. Is putting gold in a safe or getting cash from an atm exciting? Do we need apps built on that?
kobumaister@reddit
It was a solution searching for problems, and most of them (if not all) had a better solution.
ThatShitAintPat@reddit
Yes
roynoise@reddit
NFTs happened, which were the same scam. Now ai is here, which is the same scam (albeit much, much worse).
Visa5e@reddit
People realised it was a solution looking for a problem.
All the use cases where you might want to use Blockchain are already covered by existing solutions.
Even if Blockchain offered incremental improvements, it's simply not worth ripping up things that already work.
Swiftzor@reddit
Same as like 80% of all the other “this is the future” technologies, they move to the next grift. Like the only recent one that I can think of that wasn’t like a massive grift is cloud, but blockchain, AI, NFTs, and crypto all come to mind. There’s probably a lot more too, but the number of genuinely important game changers that aren’t just integrated without noticing in your day to day are honestly pretty minimal.
ryanstephendavis@reddit
They never went away, went low-key when the hype died and they will be very important not that LAM-based agents will start using cryptocurrencies to make transactions.
TwisterK@reddit
Afaik, there are three situation right now, some of them still relying on the fund from investors and they being pressed to show some kind of ROI to continue getting the funds from investors, some of them run out of funds and they go back to fintech company that actually make money, and some of them juz go chase another trend, AI.
According-Rice-6202@reddit
Im here they hate us though
1bigfreakingnerd@reddit
All junk
anarkhist@reddit
It was all a rug pull operation.