making everyone rely on your product then squeezing every penny is how you make real money. code monkeys should stop pretending they understand business.
If it was that valuable and desired they wouldn't have an unlimited subscription, just the bill-by-the-token method. It's not. If people had to pay the real cost of AI in their day to day lives they would stop using it as Google or their best friend/cult leader.
Would you use AI if it cost $0.50-$1.00 to ask a simple question?
lil bro I dont know what year you live in or if you have any idea whats is going on in AI right now but no one is giving unlimited subscription, tokens(especially from anthropic) do max out after a few prompts.
AFAIK copilot is still $30 a user unless that changed this week. You can still get effectively unlimited with chatgpt's subscription? I'm talking consumers here not businesses
Yeah at this point the bubble might be popping then if they're doing damage control. They're all still "fighting for market share" by burning cash right now, so this is the exact opposite of what they should be doing for blitzscaling. I guess now we're going to see the real cost of AI like I said...
There is no bubble, AI is undervalued. Keep taking reddit cope though it must be true.
The reason for the 'pop' is that the demand is so high companies dont have enough compute to process the demand, thats not a bubble it is the exact opposite.
He was schizophrenic iirc and was deep in psychosis that his AI did not help at all. Even with sane people telling them no people in psychosis will happily row themselves off a cliff. I can't even imagine what it would be like for them to have a sycophant in their pocket 24/7 feeding their delusions.
zerking_off@reddit
openclaw is a literal pysop to artificially inflate compute demand and will die once big tech stop running API inference costs at net loss.
it's only use case is for astroturfing by tech illiterates who lack the mental capacity to qualify as a script kiddy.
Redditry199@reddit
>net loss
making everyone rely on your product then squeezing every penny is how you make real money. code monkeys should stop pretending they understand business.
pocketgravel@reddit
If it was that valuable and desired they wouldn't have an unlimited subscription, just the bill-by-the-token method. It's not. If people had to pay the real cost of AI in their day to day lives they would stop using it as Google or their best friend/cult leader.
Would you use AI if it cost $0.50-$1.00 to ask a simple question?
Redditry199@reddit
lil bro I dont know what year you live in or if you have any idea whats is going on in AI right now but no one is giving unlimited subscription, tokens(especially from anthropic) do max out after a few prompts.
pocketgravel@reddit
AFAIK copilot is still $30 a user unless that changed this week. You can still get effectively unlimited with chatgpt's subscription? I'm talking consumers here not businesses
Redditry199@reddit
Copilot just clamped hard as users are getting rate limited super fast, you can check the githubcopilot sub to watch the meltdown.
pocketgravel@reddit
Yeah at this point the bubble might be popping then if they're doing damage control. They're all still "fighting for market share" by burning cash right now, so this is the exact opposite of what they should be doing for blitzscaling. I guess now we're going to see the real cost of AI like I said...
Redditry199@reddit
There is no bubble, AI is undervalued. Keep taking reddit cope though it must be true.
The reason for the 'pop' is that the demand is so high companies dont have enough compute to process the demand, thats not a bubble it is the exact opposite.
zerking_off@reddit
look how well grok is going now that they paywalled and quantizied it
infrastructure@reddit
Yep, it’s absolute shit
Redditry199@reddit
>grok
Excuse me, code monkey was a far too generous.
Objective_Yak_838@reddit
Im too retarded to understand this
Lukababineux@reddit (OP)
Just look at the names of the sponsers lol.
Secure_Narwhal4045@reddit
Didnt you hear about that guy who offed himself because his AI gf convinced him he would be digitalized if he did?
pocketgravel@reddit
He was schizophrenic iirc and was deep in psychosis that his AI did not help at all. Even with sane people telling them no people in psychosis will happily row themselves off a cliff. I can't even imagine what it would be like for them to have a sycophant in their pocket 24/7 feeding their delusions.
Lukababineux@reddit (OP)
I don't get it, how do they fall for that shit.
"It's not just our love, it's the divine connection you have with universe and I am the medium"
"You are absolutely right. Dismantling is the first process of rebuilding"
echetus90@reddit
That's a pretty convincing arguement ngl
CSGaz1@reddit
I have seen New Age stuff that was argued worse. And they have multiple followers. Multiple!
If you chuck enough morons towards the moron trap, someone is going to have a bad day.
thirdaccountttt@reddit
Do people really talk like this on 4chan?
I thought this was TikTok Gen Z talk
I haven't used 4chan but I thought it would be liek mfw tfw etc etc
Idiot_of_Babel@reddit
Redditors are blind to irony.
untakenu@reddit
Unfortunately, yes. It is rare, though.
thirdaccountttt@reddit
Oh , so the majority don't talk like they do in this screenshot