Japan loosens arms export rules in break from post-WW2 pacifism
Posted by Naurgul@reddit | anime_titties | View on Reddit | 24 comments
Japan has relaxed decades-old restrictions on its arms exports, clearing the way for it to sell weapons to more than a dozen countries.
The announcement on Tuesday marks a milestone in Tokyo's shift away from the pacifism that has characterised its post-war defence policy. It also comes at a time of heightened tensions in the region.
Restrictions that limit arms exports to just five categories - rescue, transport, warning, surveillance and minesweeping - will be lifted.
This means Japan can now sell lethal weapons to the 17 countries with which it has defence agreements, including the US and the UK.
A ban on arms sales to countries involved in conflict will stay, although it does not cover those that have defence pacts with Japan. Authorities in Tokyo say they will allow for exceptions "in special circumstances".
China has said it is "seriously concerned" about what it described as Japan's "reckless militarisation".
Japan's defence posture was written into its post-World War Two constitution in 1947. It renounced war as a way to settle international disputes and stated that Japan will never maintain war potential. In 2014, then Prime Minister Shinzo Abe relaxed a blanket ban on all military sales. In 2023, then Prime Minister Fumio Kishida took it a step further to allow exports of finished lethal weapons
See also:
- Japan to Sell More Weapons Abroad, Breaking With Postwar Pacifism • Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi reversed limits on arms exports as Japan faces rising threats from China and unpredictability from its main ally, the United States. (New York Times)
- Japan opens door to global arms market with overhaul of defence export rules • Japan's government ends most restrictions on defence exports • Export change comes as wars strain U.S. military production • Warships for Philippines may be among first exports, sources say • China says it is deeply concerned about the change (Reuters)
Future-Excuse6167@reddit
This wouldn't have anything to do with the US pulling interceptors from Japan to defend Israel or the fact that the US Navy is afraid to come within 300 miles of the Iranian coast, does it?
Garbanzo beans, rice, sauteéd green & red peppers, extra virgin olive oil and a dash of cracked pepper.
Cuddlyaxe@reddit
No, it has much more to do with
the US generally looking unreliable, much more so due to Trump's proclamations on NATO than anything else
Takaichi is a hawk generally and has a large enough mandate to push for remilitarization
Honestly this sub has a tendency to relate every issue back to Israel even when it doesnt make sense lol
RenzoThePaladin@reddit
Tendency? This sub is full of Israel this and Israel that everything has gotta be connected to Israel somehow. I don't like how this sub is sinking into the deep end.
Necessary_Royal@reddit
It’s like that everywhere it feels, and I genuinely think a good portion of them are bots or something, and it’s making the rest jump on the bandwagon
Herr_Tilke@reddit
NK flaired user offering the most sane take 😭
Old_Wallaby_7461@reddit
Why would it?
The US didn't pull interceptors from Japan to defend Israel, it pulled them from Korea. There are no THAAD batteries deployed in Japan.
Not sure why you think there are no USN ships <300 miles from Iran either, we can see shipboard helicopter transponders turning on and off like half that distance from the Iranian coast
Future-Excuse6167@reddit
Source on those transponders? My sources are telling me that the US is staying out of missile/drone range.
Support for: An aircraft carrier is going around cape horn instead of taking the red sea, which isn't a concern of Iran but the less capable Houthis.
Evidence against: the Iranian ship apparently seized off the coast of Oman.
Old_Wallaby_7461@reddit
The US Isn't staying out of missile/drone range (which would involve staying 1000+ miles off shore), but it is avoiding choke points.
There's no room to maneuver in bab el mendeb, even less than there is in the strait of Hormuz. Your best defense, as a ship, is that you can be somewhere else when the missiles arrive. Can't be done in tight quarters.
Amadon29@reddit
No, this has been building up for several years now from tensions with China
imunfair@reddit
Good for them, they've been stuck in their post-WW2 pacifist US-occupied-territory mode for far too long. They're more than capable of fielding a military force without trying to take over the world a second time - not that it would go well for them if they tried given the behemoth China has become.
Advanced-Net-8119@reddit
Im glad about this, at this point i honeslty dont think its smart for japan to rely on US for defense agaisnt china looking at all the crap that trump has been doing. They and south Korea need to maintain a strong defense force to deter china.
cursedbones@reddit
It's the other way around, thank God we have China to put Japan in check.
Advanced-Net-8119@reddit
why would we need china to put japan in check? They have 0 territorial ambition. Japan had decades of being the most powerful asian country, they could have done something if they wanted to, but the havent.
cursedbones@reddit
Because Japan is the one who wrecked havoc in South East Asia by enslaving, raping, murdering, experimenting on humans, the list goes on. Even Hitler'd be disgusted by them.
China hasn't entered a conflict since 1979 when they invaded Vietnam to punish them and even that war as a very minor conflict.
Not they couldn't, they didn't have any military capabilities to do so. And if they tried they'd be deservedly squashed, like right now, China is already pressuring them to not do it.
The ideology that did than in SE Asia is still there, in power. Remember Shinzo Abe? He has a very nice picture inside a jet with a curious number on it.
Advanced-Net-8119@reddit
I dont want to downplay Japans atrocities in WW2, but that was over 80 years ago. It is not relevant in a modern discussion. China has been using its military to try and force territorial claims and bully the smaller nations around them, Japan has not done anything of the sort since 1945.
xXCool_GuyXx@reddit
Not relevant in modern discussion? I'm sorry but are you insane? The same Japan that denies it's war crimes and atrocities that are very well documented with a population that is extremely xenophobic and downright racist against foreigners and their own minorities. That Japan is now militarizing rapidly.
This is not good news at all and only escalates tensions in the region.
Guaire1@reddit
Not matter how militarized japan tries to be they are not gonna be able to project any strenght, not when most of its population are part of the elderly and its economy is stagnating
cursedbones@reddit
I agree in the case of Germany for example where the people in command where removed and a denazification happened in large escale.
That didn't happened in Japan, the "same people" who committed those things 80 years ago are still in power. Hirohito's ideology is still dominant in Japan politics, hence the current Prime Minister and formers like Shinzo Abe.
SakanaToDoubutsu@reddit
Why wouldn't Japan continue to align itself with the US? The US is now more politically similar to Japan than it's ever been.
froz3nt@reddit
Because US is unpredictable.
Vaxtonio@reddit
We are not fascists at the moment.
TraditionalGap1@reddit
Because the US is pulling back and is strongly indicating that they aren't reliable defence partners?
Or something
Advanced-Net-8119@reddit
I still want us to be alligned, i just think it would be good for japan to be more independent
Old_Wallaby_7461@reddit
If we're honest they should both have independent nuclear deterrents