Who Is The Mozart of the Last 70 Years?
Posted by JJQuantum@reddit | GenX | View on Reddit | 444 comments
So Mozart died in 1791 and we are still listening to his music today, along with a couple others. In 200 years are there any modern artists that people will still be listening to?
Louis Armstrong
John Coltrane
Elvis
The Beatles
Johnny Cash
Led Zeppelin
Nirvana
Tupac
Madonna
Michael Jackson
Ozzy
Taylor Swift
Anyone?
basec0m@reddit
Prince
Miles Davis
John Williams
shifty808@reddit
Prince, Kate Bush, Bjork, Esperanza Spaulding
pseudoart@reddit
Trent Reznor
frankdowntown@reddit
Mark Mothersbaugh
tranquilitycase@reddit
Duke Ellington, Prince, Tori Amos, and Hans Zimmer
Really not sure how I scrolled so far without seeing Tori. She's prolific AND was a child prodigy on the piano.
pigs-ass-n-cabbage@reddit
James Hetfield
CampPineCone@reddit
John Williams is the maestro no question.
ThePythiaofApollo@reddit
💯 if our civilization degrades to the point where we are listening to Taylor Swift and Williams is forgotten, then may the giant meteor hit the earth and usher in the next mass extinction.
jerryatrix27@reddit
Prince
Kalorama_Master@reddit
Virtuous on multiple instruments AND a large library of original work.
shartheheretic@reddit
Including a large library of unreleased work. Someone should have studied that man's brain.
SteveLivingroomCO@reddit
David Gilmour
DoNotResusit8@reddit
Elvis should not be in this list with musicians.
Maybe even Michael Jackson shouldn’t be.
Both great performers but they are artists of a different nature.
BurningVinyl71@reddit
Elvis didn’t write songs. Michael Jackson did at least.
ohnoitshimagain10@reddit
Vangelis
mjsarlington@reddit
Gene Simmons is the obvious answer.
DoNotResusit8@reddit
Yeah, just ask him
CyrusTheVirus76@reddit
James Maynard Keenan, Trent Reznor
onebeard1975@reddit
Keenan is mostly the lyricist. If we are focused on music, go with the entire Tool band, though I’m not sure if this fits with what OP is asking.
Subject-Stuff-2829@reddit
Frank Zappa.
shartheheretic@reddit
Barely anyone listens to him now. Or when he was producing the majority of his music. He has always and will always be very niche.
CrushTheRebellion@reddit
PRINCE
kcGirl_of_the_year@reddit
1000000% this!!!!
ItsNotAFraggle@reddit
This is the answer
Yochillyo@reddit
Wesley Willis
dixiequick@reddit
Only because he whupped Batman’s ass.
Skjellyfetti13@reddit
Miles Davis.
Cool_Process_5957@reddit
Billy Joel. Huge catalog of all original music, multi-generational fan base.
Illustrious-Grl-7979@reddit
Taylor Swift
MurderedRemains@reddit
Frank Motherfucking Zappa! The greatest composer of the 20th century.
carisjax@reddit
Rogders and Hammerstein; Learner and Lowe; Andrew Lloyd Webber
ManyRow1600@reddit
I was coming here to say Andrew Lloyd Webber and I would add Lin-Manuel Miranda.
FondantNervous4802@reddit
Billy Joel.
jeon2595@reddit
And Elton John.
c0l245@reddit
Eminem, with words.
CaughtALiteSneez@reddit
c0l245@reddit
Shockingly, this is very similar to what the commoners thought of Mozart!
Green_Chandelier@reddit
Is that vomit on his sweater? Mom’s spaghetti?
megar52@reddit
One shot
Lthrr9@reddit
The Beatles
jjcoolel@reddit
John Tesh?
AdPsychological8883@reddit
It is hard to compare as Mozart wrote masterpieces in several musical disciplines. For symphonic music: John Williams/Barber For staged operas/musicals: Carlisle Floyd/Sondheim/Bernstein/Korngold Piano sonatas: i dunno Choral music: Vaughan Williams-Dona Nobis Pacem, Durufle-Requiem Individual songs or sets of songs: Prince, NIN
Phishdoyers@reddit
Page McConnell
bearphoenix50@reddit
Prince
erino3120@reddit
Brian Wilson
Subjunct@reddit
Stephin Merritt.
Ok_Habit6837@reddit
Hello friend!
Subjunct@reddit
Hey there.
No_Subject_343@reddit
Tuomas Holopainen. I recommend deep dive.
Steerider@reddit
John Williams is the Mozart of today (or at least the recent yesterday, given he's retired now.)
Ghosthost2000@reddit
Yo-yo Ma, Itzhak Pearlman, Wynton Marsalis, Willie Nelson
Certain-Incident-40@reddit
John Williams is the only answer. Classical music composer who works with orchestras. He, like Mozart, will still be played in as many years.
Been_Quite_A_Party@reddit
Rich Mullins
jayjaynorcross@reddit
So many great musicians from the last 70 years - but one rises above all the others, and his name is Prince.
BigJon83@reddit
Prince
Beck
colmatrix33@reddit
Paul McCartney. In another 100 years he'll still be talked about and listened to.
icouldlivewoutbacon@reddit
Joanna Newsom
ryguymcsly@reddit
Phillip Glass
katwoop@reddit
Prince
marshallkrich@reddit
Metallica
B00bsmelikey@reddit
Irish__Rage@reddit
Was going to say Prince as well. Guy could play almost any instrument and had amazing musical talent.
ccarrieandthejets@reddit
He wrote for other artists as well and would use pseudonyms. His book of work is so vast and complex.
B00bsmelikey@reddit
Others may have more or bigger hits, but overall musical talent on top of the success, has to be Prince.
poopville_USA@reddit
Travis Barker
Mysterions@reddit
In classical, Philip Glass. He's artistically and commercially relevant, musically innovative, and he's done a good job bridging multiple formats including symphony, soundtrack, and popular music.
In jazz, Herbie Hancock or Miles Davis for basically the same reasons.
For popular music, the question is a lot harder. Honestly, for popular music artists (Armstrong and Coltrane are Jazz) beyond The Beatles, I don't agree with your list. The problem with popular music is that they are often too zeitgeisty, but because they lack real artistic ingenuity fall off the map. Or you have the opposite problem, they are really artistically relevant but fall off the map because their audience is too niche.
However, to try to answer the question, in art rock, I think Radiohead will still have a dedicated following. Both musicians and academic music has thoroughly embraced them, they cross cultural lines, and they are pretty prolific in wide range of well-regarded projects.
For straight Top-40, Mariah Carey, definitely. All I Want For Christmas is You, is a Christmas standard at this point. And as long as there's Christmas and people who speak English and celebrate Christmas, people will listen to that song.
Rap is the hardest choice of all because nearly by definition - because it's very much a young person's musical form, changes so rapidly. Tupac probably, but I wonder if he's not prolific enough. Overall, probably Wu-Tang. They're artistically relevant, wildly prolific (including side projects), and cross cultural lines.
Another band I think will continue to be important is Parliament/Funkadelic. Maybe less in a people are actively listening to them way, but they'll be considered important from a musicology point of view, and because they are so incredibly prolific, there will be a lot to pour over. James Brown for the same reasons.
texas-playdohs@reddit
This is probably the most complete answer I’ve seen here. I’m not sure about Radiohead (I’m just not crazy about them, but you may be right), and I’m not into Mariah at all (though you are on solid ground with your rationale). You could make similar arguments for Sinatra (because he literally invented pop star), Duke Ellington (because he essentially invented the art of recording), Sex Pistols, velvet underground, or ramones (because of the outsized influence punk had on popular music, or any number of blues or country stars, like muddy waters, buddy holly, Carter family, woody Guthrie, Robert Johnson, Hank Williams, etc. (for similar reasoning). Without these guys, it’s hard to imagine Radiohead, Beatles, stones, or even Mariah existing.
Mysterions@reddit
They're a "musician's band". They're remain relevant because debating the time signature of Pyramid Song is something aspiring musicians will do.
I totally agree with your analysis by the way. In fact, I think I'm going listen to my grandfather's Carter Family records right now! And you know, what got me into music in the first place was listening to a 45 of Hank William's I Saw the Light, as a young child. It's really the first music I can remember. Fantastic stuff.
texas-playdohs@reddit
Yeah, I get it. I know their reach was far beyond my particular tastes, and certainly give them more credit than flaming lips, another band that holds the same space in the heads of certain fans for modern concept pop rock bands. In contrast I might add Zappa, or yes, Pink Floyd or rush, but hard to imagine yes or rush without king crimson, and again, hard to imagine king crimson without ornette Coleman, Coltrane or miles, or even the Beatles or The Who for that matter. I think the best answer is dipping back to the origin points, which well exceed that 70 year mark, because while there’s always innovation, the evolutionary leap from folk and blues to rock, country and jazz are arguably bigger than any of the leaps that happened after that. And just to undermine my own point, that folk and blues derived from more ancient musical forms that came from Europe and very obviously Africa. There are precursors to their modern offspring in early field recordings of people that never heard of Robert Johnson that obviously played music that influenced him, even though he likely never heard or knew of them firsthand. What a wormhole this question really is.
Ok-Yogurtcloset-2291@reddit
Daft Punk
megar52@reddit
Your question reminded me of this video I saw this week showing the top selling artists. Made me realize how much of an impact some of them have on us. I think you should include Eminem
skye_888@reddit
Hans Zimmer
Salt-Ostrich9731@reddit
In Canada, Gordon Lightfoot is already part of the fabric. If Canada stands people will be listening to Gordon.
In the US, Willie, Dylan, JC, and, if there's any justice, Kristofferson.
fruskydekke@reddit
Stromae
Jacques Brel
Would include Edith Piaf also, but I don't believe she was a songwriter.
Fine-Philosophy8939@reddit
Jon Batiste
DMGlowen@reddit
John Williams.
_WillCAD_@reddit
John Williams.
imthatguykyle@reddit
Matt Mahaffey
Miles
Zappa
Bernie Worrell
Quincy Jones
Pat Metheny
Jacob Collier
Louis Cole
xCASINOx@reddit
Prince
fingernmuzzle@reddit
Frank Zappa is the Stravinsky
maryjayjay@reddit
That made me laugh. I respect Zappa and Stravinsky immensely, but I just don't like the way their music sounds
CaptainGlanton27@reddit
Johnny Greenwood.
Prince.
Tabitheriel@reddit
Your list is crazy! Since we are talking about artistic self-composed music, it's only fair to mention Duke Ellington, Miles Davis, John Coltrane or other jazz greats. Or look at John Williams, Howard Shore or other modern composers.
When it comes to rock musicians, the only ones you mention who COMPOSE music by themselves without help would be Paul McCartney and Prince (both of whom can, and do, play every instrument). You forgot Kate Bush.
The rest? Even Taylor Swift, who writes excellent lyrics, gets help in writing her music, and others are interpreters and performers. Elvis did covers of other people's music, and Madonna is a singer, dancer and performer, NOT a composer.
Source: I studied music composition and I write, arrange and produce my own music, playing 7 instruments (www.tabitha-elkins.com).
Luder09@reddit
Trent Reznor
CommunicationHappy20@reddit
Solid answer. Him and Mike Patton are freaky musical geniuses.
Global-Ease1269@reddit
Came here to say Mike Patton. Most people don't really realize how much music over the last several decades he has his hand in. He has really crossed all genres.
theimmortalgoon@reddit
Was going to say this.
It’s probable that nine inch nails won’t be listened to as much in thirty years. Though still possible, they’re still in my most listened list.
But his very successful transition to doing scores probably cemented his status as someone people will be sampling, listening to, and using for a very long time.
I’m not going to say it’s wholly unique, but when you’re watching a show you know if it’s Reznor/Ross and if you’re wrong, you know that it’s swine executive who said, “We can’t afford Reznor. Give this movie something that sounds like him.”
kramwest1@reddit
I listen to their Soul score fairly often. It amazes that it’s the NIN guys, but then it doesn’t amaze me. They are incredibly talented.
docfallout22@reddit
Prince, easy answer. Played 20 or so instruments while being a virtuoso guitarist, pianist & believe it or not, drummer.
Wrote, arranged and produced virtually everything for himself while also doing the same for The Time (except Jesse’s guitar play because their styles were very different), and who the hell knows how many credited (and many cases uncredited) songs foe others. Oh, and he literally put an album out every single year for nearly 4 decades + whatever he DIDN’T release.
CaptainGlanton27@reddit
I'm not ever nor ever was a Prince fan, and I have to agree with this answer. First name that popped into my head.
But comparing anyone to Mozart is kind of tough.
National-Stretch3979@reddit
It's Prince by a landslide. I would also put Coltrane and Miles Davis in there as musicians, but if you really know Prince's body of work, and the fact that he played every instrument at an extremely high level, wrote all the songs, sang all the songs, produced all the songs - there really is no comparison. The Beatles as a band have an incredible body work, especially from a songwriting perspective, but none of them, individually were the musician Prince was and not the performer. MJ was an incredible pop star, did not write most of his hits, and played no instruments.
OptimusWang@reddit
David Grohl also fits that definition, though he’s known more by his bands than his name. Dude is insanely talented.
National-Stretch3979@reddit
Yes he is. Case in point though, Dave said forget guitar, piano etc., Prince was a better drummer than he was.
Sometimesunaware@reddit
Those are my three, Prince was a genius. Miles was Miles, Coltrane, I have no good words to describe how I feel about some of his art.
Beneficial-Panic-193@reddit
chris thile
OptimusWang@reddit
As a late X’er, Willie Nelson. Along with all of the country hits he wrote and sang, he wrote songs for Aretha Franklin, Elvis, Dolly Parton, Cake, Ray Charles, Snoop Dogg and others I can’t recall off the top of my head. I’m not even a fan of country music, but Willie kills it all as a songwriter.
grimmless@reddit
Prince, Trent Reznor, Mike Patton
Large_Pop_6232@reddit
Jonny Greenwood - Radiohead
so2017@reddit
Greenwood + Yorke
Comprehensive-Tea677@reddit
In 200 years there’ll be nothing left for anyone to listen to except for the whirring of surveillance drones
kramwest1@reddit
We’ll be banging out melodies on all of the plastic garbage surrounding us.
brzrkr76@reddit
Biggie. Mariah. Metallica.
this_kitty68@reddit
You lost me with Taylor Swift.
Chancevexed@reddit
That's incredibly short sighted. Jane Austen is now considered one of the most well-known writers in the English language, with her work studied and adapted globally, but in her time she was considered mediocre with limited scope.
Given how prolific Swift is it's not unimaginable that her work enjoys longevity despite being sneered at much the same way Austen was.
this_kitty68@reddit
Gag me with a spoon. Swift is pop vomit. Austen is pure genius. There is no comparison.
dolwedge@reddit
Igor Stravinsky died in 1971. Although his biggest "hits" are from longer ago... He will definitely be listened to in the future.
kramwest1@reddit
Henry Mancini
Prince
And obviously John Williams as most have said
I would argue Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross, too. Not just for NIN, but for their film score work. Disney’s Soul is not popular, but still stunning, and I think they have yet to hit their peak.
NeverDidLearn@reddit
Trent Reznor has somehow become the unsung darling of Hollywood. So many NIN fans have absolutely no clue how much work he has done “behind the scenes”.
SlapDaddyWhack@reddit
Led Zeppelin
BruceTramp85@reddit
Ok-meow@reddit
Prince/ Jack White both masters of their craft
kramwest1@reddit
I honestly think we’re only just beginning to hear Jack White’s potential. If he starts composing film scores…OMG!
rangeo@reddit
John Adams
Leonard Bernstein
Prince
Commander-of-ducks@reddit
Duke Ellington
OldFitDude75@reddit
Weird Al
Competitive-Feed-294@reddit
Mozart was a composer. He didn’t just write songs, he arranged symphonies. The only one we can compare to him is Prince.
-Granby-@reddit
Why only Prince?
We can't compare Frank Zappa? He composed for orchestras.
Competitive-Feed-294@reddit
Zappa can be Salieri. OP asked for a comparison to Mozart, the most popular composer of his time. Prince wrote music for 3 generations of pop artists and completed film scores. His arrangements are part of global culture. Zappa was cool & all, but I don’t think children in Botswana can name a Zappa tune.
wheelsfalloff@reddit
Johan Strauss eclipsed Mozart in terms of popularity in their respective times...
-Granby-@reddit
I'm not taking away from Prince but I feel Zappa was the better composer. Prince composed pop music. Zappa was much more diverse. Either way I don't really want to get into a Prince vs Zappa debate. In the end the question was who will be listened to in 200 years and I don't think Prince or Zappa or The Beatles or anyone else will.
They are all great but each year their listeners are less and less.
Jillian2000@reddit
When was the last time you heard a Frank Zappa song played in public?
-Granby-@reddit
Does not matter. More popular does not mean better or more diverse. I feel like Zappa was a better composer than Prince and it's not even close. I'm talking the types of music he composed. The instruments he composed for. The complexity of the music. I'm not talking popularity or accessibility. I am talking compositionally.
If you want to judge based on who is popular and who gets played in public more then I guess Bad Bunny is a better composer than both Zappa and Prince right?
Big77Ben2@reddit
John Williams…
Ambitious-Concern-42@reddit
He was also a phenomenal performer, playing violin and especially piano masterfully. The piano concerto is basically his invention.
theyFOOLEDmeJerry@reddit
Richard D. James
HRShovenstuff1@reddit
Nice! Also your username is fantastic.
Historical-Ad-1067@reddit
Paul Hindemith
Habeas-Opus@reddit
So some of his stuff, incredible, but did Mozart also have like total stinkers that were barely tolerable for either the musicians or the audiences that we just don’t hear about? Because Hindemith sure does. Both definitely have a love for the horn though.
Historical-Ad-1067@reddit
Well, Mozart did have compositions that HE thought were throw away, but hey man, a cats gotta eat. And some are his well known. I refer to Hindemith because his treaties on compositions pretty much define 20th century music, until we get into more, uh, noise avante garde Lamonte Young, Yoko Ono type of performance art
ayaruna@reddit
John Williams. End of discussion
regeya@reddit
John Williams.
tommymat@reddit
His music has accompanied some of the greatest stories and visuals.
If I play the Imperial March you instantly think the person is evil.
If I play the Jaws then you immediately anticipate something bad about to happen.
regeya@reddit
I suspect that in 200+ years, orchestras will still be playing Star Wars and Schindler's List.
ron_spanky@reddit
Danny Elfman
baycenters@reddit
Falco
largos7289@reddit
Dude it's Prince always was. Not only did he write alot for what other singers where singing, he also sang them. People just never appreciated him because he sorta got off the rails there for a while.
MissNancy1113@reddit
He was in a battle with Warner Brothers and lost a much loved and wanted child. We didn’t understand back then but we do now.
ExtraAd7611@reddit
Paul Simon
Bob Dylan
nosmelc@reddit
John Williams.
TheAngelsCharlie@reddit
This is the correct answer.
Melodic-You1896@reddit
John Williams
AUCE05@reddit
Nickleback
wormee@reddit
Stop
attaboy_stampy@reddit
CommunicationHappy20@reddit
The only acceptable reply.
AUCE05@reddit
Sounds like you are through with standing lin line to clubs you will never get in.
literalsupport@reddit
😂
Yarga@reddit
Stevie Wonder
antbaby_machetesquad@reddit
Agree. A child prodigy, proficient in all manner of instruments, and a hugely popular innovator who has influenced a wide range of genres.
MissNancy1113@reddit
Prince Roger’s Nelson
minsandmolls@reddit
Ennio Morriconne
Wide_Insurance_5310@reddit
Rush comes to mind
stuhstutter@reddit
Brian Wilson
Chance-Ant-452@reddit
Stevie Wonder
Hey_Laaady@reddit
The Beatles.
carisjax@reddit
First of all there is a descrpensey in the base of your question. I do not know people who are still listening to any recordings of him actually playing anything, but his written works are still preserved. So are you asking who is the greatest composers of the last 70 years?
bkills1986@reddit
You took the question too literally. Isn’t it a given that OP was referring to Mozart’s works because he died before recording technology existed? We’re still listening to Mozart’s works over 200yrs later.
carisjax@reddit
Yet every example he gave is of a recording artist, and no people who are known for their work as a composer primarily see another post where I brought up Rodgers and Hammerstein, Andrew Lloyd Webbet and Lerner and Lowe. The fact that they are not as talented as performers does that make them as worthy for consideration as Elvis who was neither a lyricist nor a composer?
Sabres00@reddit
John Williams and EVH
WinonaBoy@reddit
First name came to mind was Burt Bacharach. Second was Paul McCartney.
bzee77@reddit
Eddie Van Halen was actually referred to as “The Modern Mozart.”
Technical_Debt_Life@reddit
This was the first thing that came to my mind. The man was a savant!
Eleutherlothario@reddit
Eddie Van Halen. He launched the 80's in 1978 with the release of eruption. Thousands of kids heard that and wanted to become guitarists.
attaboy_stampy@reddit
rico277@reddit
Max Martin, maybe? I mean he’s written the popular music everyone listens to since the mid-90’s.
don_teegee@reddit
Don’t you mean Amadeus?
livinginfutureworld@reddit
Freddie Mercury
beermaker@reddit
John Williams.
geoffrey2970@reddit
John Williams. No idea why he’s not on your list.
Rowgal1@reddit
Prince
IcyMathematician2668@reddit
Charlie Parker
gamecatuk@reddit
John Williams 100%. One bar is enough to get the motif.
Jillian2000@reddit
Maybe as a composer but he doesn’t have the all around talent of Paul McCartney or Prince.
jasnel@reddit
I believe that this is the correct answer.
Itchywasabi@reddit
Not in the list… but it is Freddie Mercury for me.
GetGoatedYourself@reddit
Rather him vs Swift any day
Odd-Anywhere2130@reddit
Buckethead
EstimateAgitated224@reddit
I would say you would have to pick a genre of music. GenX is really a mix of everything from rap to rock, and everything in between. I think MJ and TS have the broadest audience. Others like Tupac and Nirvana were more niche.
brainmeds@reddit
Jerry Garcia. Now, let the downvotes commence!
Most_Maintenance5549@reddit
Done.
brainmeds@reddit
😂
MartinMcFly55@reddit
Phil Collins
tnic73@reddit
there isn't one not even close that's why we still remember his name
snackingsnek@reddit
This is the answer. Nobody is even close. In 1770, during his first trip to Italy, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart attended the Holy Week services in the Sistine Chapel, where he heard Gregorio Allegri’s Miserere. This choral work had been reserved exclusively for the papal chapel since the early 1600s, and copying it without permission was forbidden with threat of excommunication. The restrictions gave the piece an air of mystery and prestige, with its performance tied to the solemn rituals of Good Friday. Despite the ban, Mozart relied on his exceptional musical memory to transcribe the work after hearing it once. Mozart’s transcription did not immediately strip the Vatican of its control, but it did allow the work to spread beyond Rome. He was 14 years old.
One_Key1694@reddit
Prince and only Prince
srl214yahoo@reddit
The immediate answer that came to mind was The Beatles.
But Mozart "along with a couple others?" There are a ton of classical music composers who are still listened to (classical referring to the overall category of music and not the time period). Bach, Beethoven, Handel, Haydn, Ravel, Verdi, Vivaldi, Debussy, Schubert, Schumann (just to name 10 right off the top of my head. Some of them are not 200 years old yet but they will still be around. And you may not be a church person, but there are plenty of traditional hymns that have survived that are from the 19th century and even some from the 18th. I'm quite sure "Amazing Grace" will still be sung 200 years from now. That's another genre that have survived.
Excellent question for discussion and fun to think about!
BobasPett@reddit
More specifically Paul McCartney.
Secret-Asian-Man-76@reddit
Jeff Lynne
-Granby-@reddit
I don't think there is one. There should be but I just don't see it.
Even with the Beatles for example. We think the band and the members and the songs are common knowledge but they're not. Not anymore. They have not faded into obscurity but they will. My daughter's friend was over a few days ago. I picked her up and we had the radio on. I don't know how it came up but I asked her if she liked the Beatles. Had no idea who they were. Had no idea who Paul or John is. There are a lot of people like that.
Kids don't listen to the radio anymore. With the radio you would come across songs from various artists and then get turned on to one. Same with MTV. Don't exist anymore.
They listen to shit on Youtube or Spotify where the algorithm curates lists of similar shit for them so they don't get to experience anything else. This girl for example listens to vocaloid I think it is called. Still not sure what it is but it is pop music with some anime shit I guess. So that's all she knows. Her suggested bands will never be the Beatles.
Hoosier100s@reddit
There are more young people like your daughter than you might realize. My own Gen Z daughters, for example, but not just them. I’ve been around Millennials and Gen Zers my whole career working at a college, and the Beatles have been a constant among them. Certainly not all of them, but not everyone listens to Mozart either. We are already 60+ years after the Beatles first became a thing, and my 20-something daughters will for sure listen to them their whole lives, so maybe another 60+ years. If they pass on that appreciation to their kids, we’d have people listening to Beatles music for 150 years or more (which I would do myself, but, alas, biology). I think what the Beatles have going for them is that they are so accessible musically and easily enjoyed by casual listeners. Not sure I’d say that about e.g. Bob Dylan, who is at least as important as the Beatles (if not more).
carisjax@reddit
On that note, I was unusually among my high school classmates in the 1980s knowing who Ethel Merman was and identifying her as a favorite singer? You think many 15 year olds in 1983 knew a Broadway legend from the 1930s to 1950s that wasn't in show choir?
-Granby-@reddit
More than I realize sure but it's year it will be less and less, not more. We are 60 years after the Beatles and fewer people listen to them now than 30 years ago. 30 years from now I don't think our Grandchildren will be listening to the Beatles too much.
carisjax@reddit
Yes, the radio was so important to getting Mozart's work out and preserved. I mean his work is nowhere on the internet. It isn't like anyone can hear his work. That is why the question of what the OP is actually intending by his question is important. Mozart's significance was as a composer to the general public. We can not actually listen to his playing today, but we know what he wrote.
I haven't seen Elton John here, prolific and talented artist, who I bet has songs known by your daughter, but she may not know he did them. He may end up standing the test of time for The Circle of Life, more than for Crocodile Rock, but I would lay good money he will still be known in 200 years.
CountHonorius@reddit
Agreed. The younger generations identify the songs, resonate to them, but don't know their names or the performers. Much like our own generation with instrumental numbers of our childhoods - we recognize them, but can't always identify them - have usually heard them in elevators as Muzak or in offices.
Few-Boysenberry-7826@reddit
Of your list, maybe Michael Jackson and The Beatles. Franz Liszt was the rockstar of his day in the 1840s. Look up Lisztomania. Before Beatlemania, it was a thing. And yeah, people still listen to his music...
But the real answer here is John Williams. You will see his name consistently mentioned through history hundred and hundred of years from now.
Bach, Mozart, Beethoven. Williams.
PinkyLeopard2922@reddit
Ella Fitzgerald is my nominee
Jillian2000@reddit
Did she write her own songs?
tango_telephone@reddit
Miles Davis
Ok_Still_3571@reddit
Thomas Newman.
Temporary_View_3303@reddit
The Beatles. We’re still talking about them and they broke up over 50 years ago.
medusamagpie@reddit
💯
wawa2022@reddit
I would say Lin-Manuel Miranda and the guy who is the composer for Hamilton. If you ever watch any of the Youtube videos on the musical theory around the Hamilton musical numbers, they're amazing because they use all these musical devices that I never even knew existed. They trace origins back to Bach and Beethoven and classical structures and of course incorporate all types of classical and popular music.
I was fascinated by all of it (but of course have forgotten it all because I'm not really musically inclined). But learning that there was so much more to music than it just sounding good was an eye and ear opener for me.
Stephvick1@reddit
Pet Townshend
Big77Ben2@reddit
John Williams But Danny Elfman is working hard to catch up.
FinsterBaby56@reddit
This is correct.
ZuphCud@reddit
Bob Dylan
Round_Ad8947@reddit
Who is his nemesis—the modern Salieri? That starts the ball rolling.
Child prodigy. Poor but scrappy. Constantly producing. Daddy issues.
Prince?
Competitive-Feed-294@reddit
Salieri had an inferiority complex & ended up in asylum = Brian Wilson
CB_Chuckles@reddit
Miles Davis and Jimmy Hendrix come to mind immediately.
JustaCynicalOldFart@reddit
Prince
lilolered@reddit
Gonna mix things up and say John Coltane.
incogneeetoe@reddit
The Beatles in general, and Paul in particular.
In the 1960s music in the classical tradition had moved so far away from popular music, it had become unapproachable to the average person. Meanwhile, technology was advancing, both in the studio and in performance, so you see the Avant-garde starting. And at the same time popular music had suddenly become a huge industry, mainly aimed at the boomer generation, the largest ever, who had disposable income.
The Beatles brought all of that together in one act.
- They took inspiration from music in the classical tradition, often finding influence in Mozart or Bach, for example.
- They also had an interest in the Avant-garde, becoming pioneers in tape loops and world music.
- And, of course, they had the knack for writing extremely successful popular music. Paul McCartney has an ear for melody that you would have to go back to Bach or Mozart to find a better melodist.
They changed how music is recorded (see Abbey Road studios, etc), they changed how music is packaged (see Sgt, Pepper), they changed how music is marketed (see how they pioneered music videos), but most importantly, they changed how we perceive music. Before the Beatles, popular music was just for fun, not taken seriously. But the Beatles changed that. Suddenly Leonard Bernstein is talking about their music, professors are using Sgt. Pepper in the classroom when it came out, and Cambridge includes a guide to their oeuvre.
Other artists have claims to history, but no one artist brings together both peak popularity and critical acclaim at the level the Beatles have.
If all they had ever done was All You Need is Love live for the One World broadcast, they would still be in the history books, having played to an audience of about 700 million people, but they also have 132 weeks at the top of the album charts from a career that lasted 7 years (Taylor has 98 weeks over 20 years), 20 number 1 singles (27 if you count England), etc.
Hot_Stranger_2563@reddit
They are still stuck in their timeline, I grew up in the 70-80s and their music was considered old by those standards, hell Rolling Stones and the Who were more popular as classic rock that were still producing and doing concerts long after the Beatles split up.
-Granby-@reddit
I don't agree. They should be listened to 200 years from now but they won't be. While it is still a lot each year it is less and less. The Beatles have 36 million monthly listeners on Spotify. That's still a lot for sure but you compare then to Taylor Swift in your post so let's do that now. She has 102 million monthly listeners. While I prefer the Beatles and of course think they're music is better than Taylor's in every way possible the fact is today more people are listening to Taylor than the Beatles.
30 years from now more people will be listening to someone who is not even born yet more than they will Taylor Swift.
SpezJailbaitMod@reddit
Not to mention Wings which is just absolutely incredible as well.
WINGS!
FrekZek@reddit
Prince
dadadam67@reddit
Vince Clark, founding member of Depeche Mode, Yazoo and Eurasure.
My guess is that New Wave/Synth Pop will be the sound from the 1980’s that lasts 100 years.
JKSahara@reddit
At Mozart's level, I would say Prince.
Admirable_Tear_1438@reddit
David Bowie
blechniven@reddit
Pretty sure the Beatles. They are constantly being reinterpreted and rediscovered. Eleanor Rigby will be played forever. Other than them, perhaps Radiohead.
Big77Ben2@reddit
And they have awesome covers of their songs, see Joe Cocker.
HR-Puffenstuff@reddit
Agree, and especially with eleanor and its classical and classic vibe.
PaduWanKenobi@reddit
David Bowie
jeepster61615@reddit
Eddie Van Halen
SillyBillyCrazyDazy@reddit
Prince
Luridley3000@reddit
John Williams and Prince are the best answers I see here. Not really fair to compare one person — Mozart — with bands like the Beatles that have multiple phenomenal songwriters.
Big77Ben2@reddit
Came here to say john William.
Zelig30@reddit
Paul McCartney
Look at all the genres he has covered. Plus, every musician regards him as a god because his talent is perfect.
EddieRedondo@reddit
Stevie Wonder and Prince
1Fully1@reddit
The Grateful Dead.
linniex@reddit
Frank Zappa
HoneybeeXYZ@reddit
I'm going with The Beatles because their catalog is so broad, as is their appeal. I also think jazz will remain in the culture, though niche.
But you never know. Ask Salieri.
CountHonorius@reddit
Upvote for Salieri.
HoneybeeXYZ@reddit
A man whom we would not know if not for the play that did him dirty! Such is the fleeting and weird nature of fame.
Hatdude1973@reddit
John Williams. Composer for Star Wars and other big movies.
honkytonksinger@reddit
John Williams
siliconsmiley@reddit
Prince. Not only for songs he published, but also those that he wrote for others.
Braincloud@reddit
Prince. And you ask the day before his death anniversary. A sign (o the times), perhaps. 😎
psyco75@reddit
Queen, Led Zeppelin, Aerosmith will still be touring, and of course, Billy F ing Idol
MachineGunTeacher@reddit
John Williams
Adventurous-Depth984@reddit
Most Oscars of anyone.
AndiagoSupremo@reddit
The answer is indisputable. Even the Beetles are fading, 70s hard rock is meaningless, New Wave is gone. What still gets played and enjoyed is…Frank Sinatra. Sinatra will represent our times.
Rightbraind@reddit
He sang, but hardly wrote anything. *Beatles.
jaybate320@reddit
The mighty zeppelin 🔥
general-illness@reddit
Sufficient-Lab-5769@reddit
Absolutely.
VirtuaFighter6@reddit
I miss Eddie
TinyRandomLady@reddit
Brian Wilson
1block@reddit
If there were one, there wouldn't be a debate about who it is.
Dancinfool830@reddit
I get why you would say that, but music is documented differently now. I think most of the music in the last 60 years will stand the test of time. Prince comes to mind since he was able to play all of the instruments that were used in his songs. Not that Mozartplayed all of the instruments in his music, but he wrote the music for all of the instruments, which is where I would draw the parallel between the two
Rightbraind@reddit
Look up Paul Williams. He’s written more popular songs than most people realize! There are other good mentions here but I wanted to point him out as well.
LoathsomeGiant@reddit
John Prine
martinpagh@reddit
Daft Punk
digital_mystic23@reddit
Prince
zonayork@reddit
John Williams
But as far as popular music, it will be The Beatles and maybe Elvis.
pbenchcraft@reddit
Probably Miles Davis
Z_Opinionator@reddit
I listen to Kind of Blue first thing every morning when I sit down at my desk. People will still be listening to that record a hundred years from now.
fusiturns@reddit
Sex Pistols
sendnoodlesplease4@reddit
Bob Dylan
AndiagoSupremo@reddit
He is such a poser
maddog2271@reddit
He gets my vote as most important American musician of the 20th century and a contender for most important worldwide.
Ok-Dragonfruit-715@reddit
Prince.
allusium@reddit
/thread
CardinaLiz4@reddit
John Williams!
StepUpYourLife@reddit
And his son!
QuizDalek@reddit
AC/DC
otherpeoplesthunder@reddit
Orbital, the aphex twin
NegativeBonus699@reddit
This guy
Expensive_Card_2149@reddit
Danny Elfman Wayne Coyne
Frank_Silva243@reddit
The Carpenters.
ol__spelch@reddit
Dean and Gene Ween.
Discussion over.
Gooncookies@reddit
Stephen Sondheim
Abraham_Froman34@reddit
Prince
gangofone978@reddit
It can’t be someone who primarily doesn’t write their own music or only wrote a minority of their music, so Elvis, Madonna, Michael Jackson, Ozzy are eliminated.
FL3TCHL1V3S@reddit
WTF are you talking about? Michael Jackson wrote the vast majority of his music.
AnyaSatana@reddit
The reason why Off the Wall, Thriller, and Bad were so good is Quincy Jones. Michael and Quincy were gold.
gangofone978@reddit
He had a co-writer for a lot of his songs. Nothing wrong with that, but he wasn’t the composer and wasn’t the solo writer.
jazzlike-sounds@reddit
Quincy Jones?
QuttiDeBachi@reddit
Howard Jones
gamecatuk@reddit
Wtf you joking lol!!
QuttiDeBachi@reddit
I wanted 1st in something
Lazydaze87@reddit
Odd choice but I get it.
wizardyourlifeforce@reddit
Igor Stravinsky
ShinyWolverine@reddit
Freddie Mercury
TwinkleTubs@reddit
Jack White Josh Homme Trent Reznor
Lord_Nurggle@reddit
Dean Ween
Illustrious_Stick_57@reddit
Watching Awesome Sound on YouTube as we speak!
FiscalCliffClavin@reddit
Robert Smith of the Cure.
JackWylder@reddit
The obvious answer is Weird Al. Dude can kill it in any genre.
LeanPawRickJ@reddit
What would future audiences make of the cultural references inherent in parodies?
Probably a fault of the question, but being hugely popular and talented isn’t sufficient to make up for the vagaries of time and popular taste.
stuffmikesees@reddit
What is happening here? The answer is Prince :)
Batintfaq@reddit
Pink Floyd will stand the test of time.
mrdm242@reddit
Nobody said Falco? For shame!
heyyabesties@reddit
It's just that it's so obvious.
Pleasant_Expert_1990@reddit
Prince
Michael Jackson
dinsdale5468@reddit
Jeff Lynne
jessethecat5@reddit
Dolly Parton
tangcameo@reddit
Tori Amos
TeeDeePK@reddit
Frank Zappa
Manfrenjensenjen@reddit
That’s the answer.
Abject-Afternoon-388@reddit
Jimi Hendrix
Zwierzycki@reddit
David Bowie
Bad-job-dad@reddit
Trent Reznor
Relevant-Condition60@reddit
Where is Dylan?!
Abject-Afternoon-388@reddit
Yes, he would be first on the list for me. The lyrics the music the amount of live shows the sheer volume of his catalog and his impact on American music is unprecedented.
drinkslinger1974@reddit
Movies tend to transcend generations more than music, specifically holiday movies. People will be watching movies that John Williams scored for generations, so I think that in 200 years those scores will still be known and get people excited to watch. After that, any song in Home Alone, Christmas Vacation, Elf, etc, will become common listening for future viewers.
b_o_m@reddit
Steve Vai.
standingdesk@reddit
Paul McCartney has to be it
ChronoMonkeyX@reddit
If there's any justice, Bear McCreary.
LordChauncyDeschamps@reddit
https://youtu.be/FJK9qAUQdAE?si=KI9ZDrNdayFtULEY
Nobody likes bagpipes
oldschoolology@reddit
Prince.
LeanPawRickJ@reddit
There have always been child (or indeed, general performing) prodigies, but what keeps longevity is usually repeatability or playability.
Bach lives as a ton of his stuff is for solo instruments, and it’s always fun to try to play them on novel, or otherwise ‘not as intended’ instruments.
Orchestral work exists as orchestras need something to play.
So, what would future performers get from Prince (or most of these listed)?
Would they care that one person played all the instruments? Probably not.
Are orchestras likely to play them? Perhaps, if arranged well and presented as a suite or something.
Are small ensembles going to carry on?
Perhaps, but there’s not the standardisation with his music that you get with either the classic lead-/rhythm guitar/drums/bass (or violinx2/viola/cello/(piano)) combos, so that will limit the participants, or again be a rewritten arrangement for whatever combos are popular at the time.
Outside of the Great American Songbook genre, and perhaps WWII acts, we’ve not seen a huge upswell in tribute acts to bands that had their heyday when none of the players were alive at the time.
So my vote goes for any ‘classical’ composer (or composer for orchestra(l instruments), or singer songwriters for guitar/piano & voice.
oldschoolology@reddit
It’s not even debatable. Prince released 39 records and topped the charts for 30+ years. He’s sold over 150 million records worldwide. Prince plays every instrument and toured the world hundreds of times. Mozart would LOVE Prince. Not having Prince on your list is a travesty.
LeanPawRickJ@reddit
Calm down!
Again, there are tons of ‘huge success at the time, sold out concerts, had adoring crowds’ performers that are lost to all but those in the know (like, name some Edwardian vaudeville artists…).
As far as listening to it is concerned; great! Time will tell on that matter.
As to the participation point, I can see the nonstandard instrumentation being a challenge, especially as electric tech dies. Guitar/rock has died a death in the popular consciousness, and I’m not sure any future musicians would consider any individual instrument’s part to be sufficient in and of itself to study. So again, you’d need a band to play stuff, but who would pay to listen to it?
(Again, not intending to slight in any way the undisputed claim that Prince is tops).
I can see perhaps the 80s King Crimson stuff getting an outing for ‘rock ensemble’ performance groups, but I’m sure good time party music will have its own version of what is cool in the future, and anything with contemporary cultural references will seem odd or quaint.
Ok_Push2550@reddit
I'd argue the rock or jazz ensemble fits the bill. Kids are learning standards, like Mac the knife. I think a lot of kids will continue to learn guitar, and for that reason, beatles will endure. They have some songs that are solo instrument (my guitar gently weeps), accessible (here comes the sun), and complex (day in the life).
Habeas-Opus@reddit
Daughter’s jazz band played Yesterday for their current concert…because the kids asked for it. Beatles for sure will carry on.
REDDITSHITLORD@reddit
One of the things people overlook about Mozart, is the sheer amount of low-effort commissioned crap he cranked out. While he had brilliant work, he also made a munch of bland slop.
And to this end, I would like to put forward, one Michael Bolton.
While Mozart is far from a No-Talent Ass Clown, it's the ubiquity of his music, not it's quality, that keeps his name in the conversation.
Habeas-Opus@reddit
Hmmm…Parry Gripp anyone? Tha Cat Flushing a Toilet song is a real banger with the kids.
Zwischenzug79@reddit
Upvote for Office Space reference
jazzlike-sounds@reddit
FRANK ZAPPA
HigherTed@reddit
Came here for this! As a composer that really evolved music, none beats Zappa!
grimsnap@reddit
Miles Davis
_r_u_n_e_i_i_@reddit
Had to scroll waaay too far to find this. Anyone who says anything else is frankly clueless. And Trane was number 2.
Subject_Doubt_3778@reddit
Trent Reznor!!!
Hot_Stranger_2563@reddit
I was gonna say George Gershwin, but died 89 years ago, John Williams seems like the closest successor since his music will probably transcend rock or modern music due to shifting tastes over the years. Of course, I'm typing this from a US perspective, so ymmv.
Glad-Arugula-8387@reddit
I love Bob Marley and wish he had more time
Training-Finish-2754@reddit
Musician here- the definitive answer IS Prince. I completely get a lot of people saying classical genre icons, and I certainly would never attempt to diminish anything by them, especially the great John Williams. The thing is, the majority of his and most that create scores or thematics, is that they are commissioned to create a very certain atmosphere with a very detailed guideline to follow- so let’s not confuse genre with compelling artistry, which is our ACTUAL yardstick here. Prince wrote, created, and performed what he did simply on a burning need to do so, and the sheer volume of vaulted music composed by him that has never even seen the light of day is mind boggling- we are talking thousands upon thousands of songs that nobody has ever, nor will they ever be heard. And while we all know him as a pop icon and that was his niche and what he was most passionate about creating, there truly isn’t anything musically that man could not do- from pop to symphonic or even prog and anything and everything in between, the man SWEAT out music.
kilroykilroykilroy@reddit
This, truly.
DeusExPir8Pete@reddit
The fact Prince isn't on that list, when in reality the only name on that list should be Prince, is a travesty.
UrsaMajor7th@reddit
And Bowie, Bob Marley, and Charles Michael Kittridge Thompson IV- but Ozzy is?
There's artists listed there that do not write their own music. I have no idea what OP is trying to say.
hvacigar@reddit
Stevie Wonder
Sorreaomol@reddit
Francisco Buarque de Holanda
ChuckYeagerWV@reddit
I'll add Pink Floyd to the list.
UrsaMajor7th@reddit
🤣
MaximumJones@reddit
Zamfir: Master of the Pan Flute
CeilingUnlimited@reddit
Eddie Van Halen.
Neil Peart
KalelRChase@reddit
Fronted by Prince… what a band.
RezRising@reddit
"A couple others" 🙄
OneMustAlwaysPlanAhe@reddit
Metallica. One of the Big 4 metal innovators, and they weren't #2, 3, or 4.
raind0gg@reddit
Lol
Few_Whereas5206@reddit
Jacob Collier or Prince.
Duppy-Man@reddit
Elvis didn’t write a single song
fastballcdm2019@reddit
No one
speece75@reddit
Louis Armstrong. Far and away
marblechocolate@reddit
Hans Zimmerman
ut7227@reddit
It’s Zimmer, but I agree
AstronomerBrave4909@reddit
John Williams
Ennio Morricone
Ryuishi Sakamoto
LostBetsRed@reddit
John Williams is the correct answer.
Wyldemage@reddit
John Williams, Brian Wilson, Prince, and as much as I hate them, probably Lennon/McCartney/Harrison/Starr
TeaVinylGod@reddit
Carl Orff "Oh Fortuna" died in 1982
John Williams
Mychelle125@reddit
Kendrick Lamar won a whole ass Pulitzer
TheRealFinatic13@reddit
Frank Zappa
SmooveTits@reddit
Way too far down.
AlanLongsnapper@reddit
Elton John!
Environmental-Car481@reddit
Right?!?! 5 decades of writing music - he is definitely a legacy musician
Environmental-Car481@reddit
I’d also add Billy Joel. the Rocket man and Piano man
jaywast@reddit
Prince is usually the one musicians cite as being modern day Mozart, due to sheer prolificacy, versatility and prodigious playing of so many instruments.
LovesDeanWinchester@reddit
Stevie Wonder, period!
ZealousidealGrab1827@reddit
John Prine.
WanderYonder64@reddit
Brother !
WanderYonder64@reddit
John Prine
Icolan@reddit
Weird Al.
TheBatmanWhoPuffs@reddit
John Williams
ImCaffeinated_Chris@reddit
Came to say this. It's no contest.
VirtuaFighter6@reddit
Weird Al
sagefrogphotography@reddit
The correct answer
No-Ambition7750@reddit
Probably only instrumental works from any of the artists mentioned here. And it would be other people or computers playing it.
LocksmithGlass717@reddit
Paul/John , Noel Gallagher , Brian Wilson
yepperdrpepper@reddit
I 2nd Brian Wilson. National treasure.
wanderingdev@reddit
Queen
HairyHorseKnuckles@reddit
Danny Elfman
davidcandle@reddit
The only potential candidate is John Williams.
fnordius@reddit
In many ways so very true. Lots of work done on commission, all the way down to the signature jingles for the NBC news shows.
The only other composers I see coming as close to being performed long into the future would be Andrew Lloyd Weber, with Benny Andersson and Björn Ulvaeus (Abba, Chess and other projects) sharing third place.
FrustratedPassenger@reddit
Came here to say this
notedrive@reddit
Tom Waits
broccoli_octopus@reddit
Mozart wrote in every style. Took in, adapted and externed other artists works while still having his own style. Weird Al is the only one I can think of that fits that bill.
Dr_Drax@reddit
At first, I misread that as "Weird AI" (as in Artificial Intelligence) and was very confused 🤣
Open_Appointment1091@reddit
Prince of course
Appropriate-Kale-290@reddit
He did it all Creative genius of our time
Saw him in concert late 90s I go to many concerts and Prince was another level. Incredible presence the whole place was partying like it was 1999
forgeblast@reddit
Prince
StatisticianFun2274@reddit
Bowie
Financial_Cheetah875@reddit
John Williams is the only answer.
Enders-game@reddit
Probably. Some of the most Iconic music over the last 70 years have come from him. Star Wars and Indiana Jones alone is enough give him legendary status.
Maybe Bernstein or Zimmer, but their output is or was uneven. Zimmer has been accused of being simplistic and too similar while Bernstein was accused of being pompous and self indulgent.
Zimmer's pirates of the Caribbean and Interstellar was are some of my favourites scores over the last couple of decades and who doesn't like West Side Story?
krybaebee@reddit
There is no other.
Nummy01@reddit
Herbie Hancock!
Mother_Midnight_8819@reddit
Bo Burnham has to get a mention.
Nummy01@reddit
James Brown!
Cernly@reddit
There isn’t one.
NOGOODGASHOLE@reddit
Based on what?
Sonoran_Dog70@reddit
They still listen to Beastie Boys in the 24th century.
medic8r@reddit
Ah. Classical music.
prospectpico_OG@reddit
Michael Kamen
Thick_Journalist7232@reddit
Prince
Kitchen-Zebra-4402@reddit
Duke Ellington.
John Williams Henry Mancini
ArbainHestia@reddit
James Kirk was listening to Beastie Boys in the 2240s
prospectpico_OG@reddit
Danny Elfman
TheBetaUnit@reddit
Brian Wilson.
FluxusFlotsam@reddit
Not necessarily Mozart but he absolutely belongs in the canon of great American composers- Copeland, Gershwin, Ellington, etc.
theoneandonlyturo@reddit
Prince
Seabluele@reddit
Prince
SubjectNet1874@reddit
Really shocked to not see this more the man literally created his first few albums, played every instrument, wrote, produced, edited, and sang.
3kan3@reddit
Finally !!! I can't believe I had to scroll this far!! (Actually, I can't believe he wasn't on OP's list to begin with)
SarahJaneB17@reddit
Has to be. Child prodigy, played 20+ instruments? Basically he could pick up anything and play it. The only answer for me.
Comfortable-Pea-1312@reddit
This IS the answer.
mordicaties2@reddit
John Williams.
SomeCar@reddit
Trent Reznor and Chris Cornell.
Mr-and-Mrs@reddit
Jonny Greenwood
catcrapmakesmevomit@reddit
I'm thinking its Vincent Clarke for all his work with Depeche Mode, Yaz and Erasure.
abousono@reddit
I gotta say, he is a genius.
Alpacacin0@reddit
Obviously Max Martin
Sufficient_Stop8381@reddit
William Hung
Comfortable-Pea-1312@reddit
Trent 'Rizz ' Reznor
Zwischenzug79@reddit
From a nerdy kid just trying to get his hands on synth equipment, to learning a school band’s worth of instruments (especially the tambourine), rising through the ranks of lesser post-punk bands, to producing genre changing debut album with a career that’s seen more overhaul than David Bowie and spanning almost 40 years… Trent takes the cake and then smashes it with his guitar
Comfortable-Pea-1312@reddit
HALLELUJAH!!!
His movie scores deserve particular mention.
Zwischenzug79@reddit
I mean, hell he’s halfway to an EGOT
supertiggercat@reddit
Not Kid Rock?
whistlerphil@reddit
Trent Reznor.
AJM_1987@reddit
Stevie Wonder
Treygp420@reddit
Trey anastasio
sovereign_martian@reddit
Maynard Keenan
jojowhitesox@reddit
John Williams. IDGAF Star Wars and Indiana Jones scores are amazing.
AreYouDoneNow@reddit
John Williams
fridayimatwork@reddit
Bob Dylan
HighBiased@reddit
Frank Zappa is the technical closest
-Granby-@reddit
He would be my answer compositionally for sure. He is certainly my favorite musician. People won't be listening to him in 200 years though. Most people these days don't listen to him now. Most don't know who he is and if they do they know he has that mustache or that his kids had weird names. Nothing about the music. It's too bad.
CountHonorius@reddit
In one of Zappa's last interviews he said he did not expect to be remembered, nor did he want to.
flyingmooset@reddit
Carole King
Thirty_Helens_Agree@reddit
Y’know, hearing Lionel Richie describe Michael Jackson’s songwriting technique reminded me of that scene in Amadeus where Salieri is angrily talking about Mozart’s writing, saying that he just wrote down music that was already completed in his head, as though he was taking dictation from God.
I don’t know that MJ was as brilliant as Mozart, but he was a singular talent.
Pisstoffo@reddit
Bob Dylan
flyingmooset@reddit
Plus 1 for Bob
Ardrick_of_Eventide@reddit
Richard James
CountHonorius@reddit
Rick Jayyyymes
Thumber3@reddit
Jacob Collier is an unbelievable talent
CountHonorius@reddit
Uh...The Rolling Stones? Perhaps you've heard of them.
miniversal@reddit
Neil Diamond
DesignerAppeal1548@reddit
Hans Zimmer
Nick_Fotiu_Is_God@reddit
Lennon/McCartney
skeeterbmark@reddit
Gotta be the Beatles.
yanknga@reddit
Prince
Robviously-duh@reddit
came to say the same... Prince was a musical genius.
SnooPeanuts9509@reddit
shitpost-sociologist@reddit
Jack White. He would have been a big band director in the 1920s and 30s.
GoldenMonkeyRedux@reddit
Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead fame.
Scores PT Anderson's films and writes orchestral music.
Seriously talented dude.
kalcutter@reddit
Bob Marley