Between the ARs, at a glance I'd say the Colt M4, but there are caveats there because of the gas system. Namely, if I remember correctly, Colt still primarily uses the "mil-spec" carbine length gas system, which means the gun is essentially over-gassed. That's not a bad "problem" to have in certain scenarios, but does mean parts of the gun are being subjected to greater forces than necessary, or even than they are intended for. In a vacuum I'd have less of an issue, but here we're comparing it to a Daniel Defense AR. Even though DD's AR arguably has even more overall shortcomings due to the shorter barrel, in term of longevity I'd suspect it would last longer than the Colt. Granted it could be my own bias, but I just don't trust Colt to provide anything more than the absolute minimum, while I'd expect at a bit more out of Daniel Defense.

Also, your CZ confuses me. I assume it's a typo, but from the way your wrote it there one barrel is 10 inches longer than the other. Assuming it's a typo, being a 20" or 30" makes a bit of difference, namely solely because even as a break action a 30" as a home defense gun (happened to see you mention that in other responses) is a bit much. I mean, it could definitely work in a lot of situations, but I'd prefer something a little more versatile than a 30" barreled shotgun for home defense. Even as a 20" though, I'd personally still prefer the pump. It's the sights thing, I've winged too many critters by not accounting for the difference in windage. That's a "me" thing, you could very well be trained out of it, but that's a personal call. Does bug me though that one of your barrels seems to be a fixed cylinder bore. I'd prefer both as a removable choke, just because generally speaking imp cyl is arguably the smallest choke you'd ever need for a shotgun firing shot, some highly specialized loads or situations not withstanding. Granted there was also some controversy with slugs a few years back, and the "zeitgeist" of the time was any choke other than open cyl was bad and potentially catastrophic if it was a screw-in choke, so I'm trying not to be too critical (could have been designed around that thought). Still, I think that was a decade or so ago that people had that misconception, as imp cyl arguably improves the accuracy of most slugs (though with removeable chokes firing any slug through them will likely make them more difficult to actually remove, with which repeated shots without cleaning can become an issue).

Anyway, these are just my thoughts. Reading through this, you seem to mention skeet (potentially trap?) shooting, which has its own rules and concerns for shotguns, and at the range rifles have their own considerations as well. Case-in-point, if I was only considering range shooting I'd pick the 10/22 to out of all of your rifles. The ammo is cheaper sure, which is a consideration, but target shooting with .22lr can go so much further. People spend literally thousands of dollars chasing fractions of a percentage of accuracy improvements for .22lrs of all types (custom barrels, receivers, etc), simply because for their uses it's "necessary." While it's nothing I'd use a .22lr for, I wouldn't say they're wrong to do it. It's just that the target they're chasing isn't the game that I'm hunting.