Anon doesn't see an issue with age verification
Posted by Lukababineux@reddit | 4chan | View on Reddit | 74 comments
Posted by Lukababineux@reddit | 4chan | View on Reddit | 74 comments
ZyklonFart@reddit
If you don't see an issue with handing palantir jews even more of your data, idk what to tell you.
But you will be the first to go when the class war inevitably follows the race war.
Secure_Narwhal4045@reddit
Alive-Big-838@reddit
CheekyHawky@reddit
Name checks out
kojimbob@reddit
Who nose
CommieRemovalCrew@reddit
That's gonna be my new profile picture
Alive-Big-838@reddit
hell yeah brother
CrazyTownUSA000@reddit
That was implemented fast
Dronelisk@reddit
because it never is just about the children duh
that's just the pretext
Goonlord_005@reddit
If it was about the children, all OSs would have children controls on by default
Exposing children to this stuff could effectively be eliminated if you incude setting a pasword for 18+ content on the installation of an OS. If careless normies forget the password, oh well. Who cares?
But that's not what they do. Somehow, personal information HAS to be involved when anyone with a basic understanding of cybersecurity will tell you that's a stupid fucking idea.
Expert-Maize2747@reddit
And employment information isn’t about making sure you’re a citizen it’s about surveillance.
mischling2543@reddit
"Why can't I sell whiskey to minors? This damn communist government!"
-How you predditors sound opposing this
Lukababineux@reddit (OP)
mischling2543@reddit
Bruh it's small hatted as hell to be against protecting children lmao
Lukababineux@reddit (OP)
You are glowing
mischling2543@reddit
I'm glad people in the real world aren't this dumb. Or perhaps this selfish? Fuck the kids if it's gonna be harder for me to do my anime gooning, right? It's the Jews trying to take away my digital titties!
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
"Harder" if there are circumvention tricks that are relatively hard to find out or apply;
not hard if you just provide your identity, you just compromise your privacy.
And no this isn't like buying booze, since that's isolated while this is tied to your whole online/computer activity. If you want that to be public for you, then go sign up sure.
Anime gooning pron cooming? How about just randomly age restricted youtube video. Ooooo no an ICE discussion that's too hard better post your face so we know you're not a children & who you are
mischling2543@reddit
Listen I don't agree with putting anything other than porn behind this, but the whole slippery slope argument needs to die on this. The internet has only existed for 30 years and believe it or not people in the 1980s did not live in an authoritarian hellscape. 1984 is not an accurate depiction of what the pre-internet world was like.
Just because boomer-run governments dropped the ball on regulating the internet when it first came out doesn't mean it's some sort of nefarious scheme that they're finally getting around to it now.
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
Oh and btw you know how unregulated TV had been since its inception? Channels would increasingly broadcast content not suitable for children, and once the parents got a TV the only thing that'd stop children from looking at those late hour programs were the parents trying to control their viewing activities and bedtime.
Where were the boomers for all those many decades?
mischling2543@reddit
TV was and still is very tightly regulated. Are you just dumb?
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
The broadcasting programmes yes, watching capabilities by consumers no. Did you even read the comment you just replied to?
mischling2543@reddit
If the internet were already as regulated in content as television then there would be no need for the regulations being proposed.
Did you even think before you pressed "reply"?
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
There certainly would, because TV also features "not safe for children" pron explicit content that's expected to be blocked from children by parents without any technological tools to assist them in that goal.
At most maybe block some channels for some time intervals when they leave home or sth, but don't remember such features in the 2000s.
So yeah turns out you're still the one with the brain turned off. You know they broadcast softcore pron on TV right? And other equally explicit material not labeled as pron. Films like "Intimacy" are effectively hardcore pron, for instance.
Violent content, transgressive perverted content, all unsuitable for children and all on the TV.
mischling2543@reddit
You mean pay per view porn that is locked behind a password by default? Or are you calling shit like Game of Thrones softcore porn?
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
What password? On a 90s TV?? Game of Thrones is restricted for children due to sexual content ("softcore" but with penises elsewhere), violence, or violent surprise secks, buggerey and swearing.
It's not labeled as pron officially, but effectively it is.
And erotic flicks labeled as softcore or erotica, those are on TV.
Strip shows, nude advertisements etc., all on TV. What's the matter with you lol
mischling2543@reddit
So you were literally just talking about rated R TV shows then lmao
If you think unrestricted access to pornhub via a portable device is on the same level as seeing a tit on late night cable on the family room TV is the same thing then you're hopeless.
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
Rated R means unsuitable for children. They couldn't buy that stuff in video stores, they wouldn't get entry into theater screenings, but no tech block prevented them from catching it on TV late at night or taping it onto a VHS – neither was there any to make the parents or other adults verify their age and identity while also linking the catalogued and non-anonymized watching history to their individual face or name.
(They had to buy the TV and TV signal already, just like computer and router/modem, but this would've been a series of additional steps away from privacy – along with intrusive viewing tracking that could get traced to their apartment and family name.)
So yes, talking about rated R TV and children's easy access to it with no blocks. "Lmao".
A tit. How about long sex scenes with grinding and moaning. How about forced or violent. How about I Spit On Your Grave type stuff. How about visible PiV and blowjobs in "Intimacy" with Wormtail as the cuck. How about strip shows and phone sex ads with phone numbers.
Oh and phones also accessible btw. Dial any number on it.
What does le wild pronhub even do that these explicit transgressive movies haven't done already lmfao - what is it just the 4 letters in and official category of orpn that concerns you?
What cause home videos are like ultra next level vice but kids can watch anythihg else and it's cool?
PORTABLE DEVICE well if that doesn't make some serious difference and puts things on le next wild level then I don't know what even would.
Tired of making 1 hilarious blunder post after another while insisting I'm the hopeless stupid here?
mischling2543@reddit
The fact you're still claiming late night television is comparable to on-demand hardcore internet porn is honestly hilarious buddy (and only ever remotely plausible for the time period that overlaps with the internet's existence anyway), but you know what? The softcore porn movies you just happen to know the exact names of (🤨) should be more restricted too. The response of a normal person to bad policy is not using it to justify even worse policy.
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
How is an explicit PiV scene in a movie not comparable to explicit PiV pron buddy?
Chill with those empty noise words there – "hardcore" means they show da pennis in vageen; "on-demand internet" well yeah with TV you have to wait until it's aired, and then you can make it on-demand by recording it on a VHS or disc.
Oh sure TV and general culture was getting naughtier as the Internet and other tech kept growing. So how many decades did it take those boomers to realize that they wanted to do sth about free access to sex stuff on the TV, telephone and emerging Internet? They slow huh?
Anyway as long as you can settle on a censorious tradcon stance that's at least internally consistent across different media etc. then all is cool.
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
The fact that other things aside from what you agree are already behind this, confirms that there's a slippery slope lmfao
Do you even hear yourself talk.
What is this absolute incoherent gibberish point?
First we're not talking about a future without the internet, on the contrary.
Also no one ever mistook 1984 for a contemporary documentary, wth are you even arguing against here?
There are 2 levels to this – for 1, the internet can be one of those spooky future techs that makes surveillance and population enslavement more feasible at more extreme levels (along with cameras and mikes, instant communication, and other stuff), so people are reasonably wary of any attempts to bring about or enable such dystopian scenarios, and make things worse than the pre-internet status quo.
On the other hand however, the internet, insta-comm, and obviously AI-aided mass data storage too, also have an utopian potential – enabling enhanced resistance against power grab attempts or tyrannies, for instance.
The enhancement of anonymity is one of those improvements (not without some dark sides of course, in some types of cases), both in that context as well as in casual personal everyday ones, that people don't want to lose now. They don't want all of their internet, or their favorite parts of it, to become as controlled and regulated as stores or old media, or as traceable as phone communication.
So thanks to those "boomers dropping the ball" some improvements happened, and damn right people don't want those rolled back and undone lol
And then a 3rd level to this is that if they HAD been regulating it on a particular level since the start, there hadn't been any anonymity, everything had been ID'd and traceable and transparent since the start,
then while some might've been disappointed with that, or tried to bring about changes in the desired anonymous wild west direction, but they would've still treated it the way it is and been as wary and discreet with its usage as they've always been in public, in official or commercial interaction, in certain limited computer/internet contexts like social media or "their work computer", or to a lesser extent when on the phone.
And of course in turn, had they known that phone conversations would be logged and recorded in some archive accessible by the government and vulnerable to criminals, they would've always behaved more discreetly during all their phone conversations as well.
So then it turns out that this medium they had been using under the impression or with assurances of a certain level of privacy or anonymity, had in fact been much less so the whole time, or maybe starting at some point – and/or that there are plans to now make it retroactively less private, so all their indiscreet activities which had been recorded but so far stored in some way that was effectively inaccessible to any peeping toms or too difficult to sift through, will now become accessible, put into a searchable organized library, and get looked into.
Or a potential connection between their "medium identity" and real identity will now be made real, closing a previously protective gap and retroactively making your past actions more traceable to your real identity.
In simple terms that's like assuring someone that there's no surveillance camera in this room, in their home, and then it turns out there was. And now they're working on ways to collect and organize all that accumulated footage.
Oh hey if you live on a high enough level you can leave the curtains open no problem! Btw we've been flying drones and filming all your stuff all this time.
Hey some boomers had neglected collecting all that footage, but now we're making up for that at last so what are you grumpy about eh?
So yeah those are 3 points that you apparently hadn't been conscious or aware of before this thread, but now you ought to have caught up.
Skafandra206@reddit
People in real world are even more stupid than they seem, they are handing over scans of their IDs and faces to random companies to access porn sites!
mischling2543@reddit
How about you just don't be a degenerate and go get some 3D bitches in the real world instead
Valuable-Chipmunk784@reddit
Afraid-Exit2125@reddit
Post skin
LegallyMelo@reddit
Ah, so you're one of the useful idiots we've heard so much about.
mischling2543@reddit
Yes I'm stupid for caring more about children than reddit gooners' access to porn
BendItLikeDeclan@reddit
Post nose
Lukababineux@reddit (OP)
Shalom Rabbi and what a flawless logical argument as always.
DickManning@reddit
We must baby proof the world just so that parents don’t have to tell their kids no
LobsterNo9737@reddit
Because handing your kid an iPad is easy
DickManning@reddit
What is easy early on makes life harder later
compoundblock666@reddit
I play alot of RuneScape but as a kid I touched grass my kids will be raised the same and already crave the outdoors.
Will be taking them to the park tomorrow
Valuable-Chipmunk784@reddit
If you simply encourage parents to use parental controls on childrens' devices, then that doesn't allow you to oppress your citizens by tying their anonymous online posts to their real identity and getting them used to being constantly watched online so they don't get any funny ideas. If you think about it this way it's obvious why it's so needed.
pankakemixer@reddit
I mean I agree that more responsibility should be placed on parents but not with the conclusion of age verification being the answer
drafthard@reddit
People who actually believe that age verification is to "protect the kids" exist? lol
One-Pressure1615@reddit
I’m under no false pretenses that age verification is bullshit meant to track us and collect data.
However, website have incredibly shitty moderation and parental protection functions nowadays. So an in-between solution needs to be found or we go total 1984.
philmarcracken@reddit
more like its impossible to argue against politically. the current gov is flooded with tech illiterate morons
protecting their job and image means not disagreeing with 'protect the kids'
christianbro@reddit
You will find such idiots in other subreddits. Some are even happy the government is doing the work for them.
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
We do need to see your age identification.
You do need to see my age identification.
Mangeytwat@reddit
Because removing anonymity from internet usage is a really fucking big issue. The plutocrats have been digging at it ever since it became mainstream (IE women started using it, IE MySpace).
The goal is the ability to track every user on every platform. Right now they're using it to try to sell you bullshit and to create a dog shit industry where everyone's selling scraped data to everyone else. It's just one of those fun little games that hedge funds encourage because it generated a new circular industry that's unregulated and easily corrupted. Eventually the plan is to ' x ' where X means you get fucked over even more.
The internet is already much, much worse than it was even a decade ago, a much more invasive and at the same time sterile environment. Give it another decade. And then another.
DogSerious1971@reddit
if it was about protecting children, certain politicians and other high ranking members of society would be in jail or worse
CommieRemovalCrew@reddit
Yeah, all those politicians you disagree with would be in prison, while those you agree with would be in power.
appolzmeh@reddit
Love when people pretend anyone cares what party they belong to. If they participated no one really cares what the excuses is or what their political party is put them in a cage and throw out the key.
TorfriedGiantsfraud@reddit
lol
Ging287@reddit
I think the person who is mentioned more in the Epstein Files more than God in the Bible deserve to be behind bars. You forget they continue to cover up and not release Epstein Files. First comes the test, then comes the lesson. Why are we being led by pedophile elites and those who protect them?
Unknown_User_66@reddit
I technically dont have any issue with this, but it's a government order and enforced by people who are supposed to be operating OUTSIDE the government, so I hate it!!!!
Skafandra206@reddit
Would Anon see an issue if guns started scanning your face and asking for ID when you try to use them in the shooting range?
Hungry_Chipmunk_2588@reddit
Would probably reduce the amount of mass shootings that Americans have apparently gotten used to just being the norm
GobiPLX@reddit
This is the most schizo american comment Ive seen this month
DrillTheThirdHole@reddit
but thats what these laws are, but for computers
Skafandra206@reddit
That's the whole point lmao
deahank@reddit
Like the Lawgiver in Judge Dredd?
Mr__Castle_@reddit
This ain't Judge Dredd dude.
Skafandra206@reddit
Did you even read the post, dude?
Anon thinks it's justifiable for social media to ask for your ID or face scan just to push tha blame back to parents.
I'm rebutting that idea using thier own example.
Mr__Castle_@reddit
Mega City One hasn't even been built though.
Skafandra206@reddit
I'm more of a Cyberpunk fan, though. I'd prefer a Neo Tokyo myself.
AlphaMassDeBeta@reddit
Anon is master baiting.
CummyMonkey420@reddit
No thanks, I'm stuffed
redwalrus95@reddit
PsychologicalFix3912@reddit
Why Judaism is bad ? The answer is with the penguin
Mr__Castle_@reddit
Fucking Linux users man...
SAT0R777@reddit
Age verification is a precursor to digital ID
Skull_kids@reddit
Many such cases
Skafandra206@reddit
Anon does see an issue with age verification. They want to put the burden of responsibility on the parent (as it should be)