It's insane how that one demographic can so easily be oneshotted by propaganda campaigns if they use influencer and make it seem like other white women are also believing in said thing.
Glad someone else has finally made this observation. If you go on YouTube right now, you can see countless videos of white people just straight up calling out black people on their bad behavior.
Reality is hitting hard nowadays. White guilt, progressim, extreme feminism... etc all the bs have reach such a point and are so far away from the real problem that they are losing power.
The geopolitic context and the thing people see in the street starting to make it hard to defend some idea.
Plus outside of reddit (and whatever is left of bluesky) most social media has comments that would give the average redditor a rage induced aneurysm. Wouldn't be surprised if such stuff became even more mainstream the way things are going
White women's biggest issue right now is men talking about how lonely they are. I keep seeing incel's blamed for everything but I see so much femcel behavior normalized that it's crazy.
Yeah, genuinely these women of today are becoming the boogey men they hated from the 1900's. Overtly sexual and horny posting to anyone with ears, entitlement out the ass, think they are the hottest shit of all time, while still demanding, not asking, of certain roles from the opposite sex. It's silly to see. I thought they were smarter xd. After living for a bit, it's clear they're generally just in it for self gain. And now their ego's are sky high.
Easily the most privileged group in all of human history
but it's not a "group".
grouping together a nepo baby girl with a cashier is profondly stupid. it's the kind of divide and conquer that was set up by feminism, and is being propagated by morons (OP) and shills (see: Asmongold).
don't be either of those and recognise that this "grouping" is moronic and setup on purpose.
I think pointing to a religion is silly because there are plenty of normal Jews and loads of rich jews. We might as well put it in one class, rich people, that literally has 0 overlap. It’s simple “the elite”, which includes all races and religions with 0 overlap to the average man. It’s honestly pretty stupid just saying “Jews” instead.
Y'know what's remarkable? That every western billionaire generally agrees with the Israeli project. So weird because that idea amongst average people is very controversial and really has nothing to do with economic success...unless it actually does.
Obviously it makes money? What does that have to do with what I said? If anything - it just agrees with me further. It’s not about Judaism, it’s about rich people.
And rich people love Israel because? Love of the game? What in your mind explains the fact that no western billionaire, who normally engages in all kinds of pie in the sky "philanthropy", engages in one against the genocidal Jewish project? the ultra-rich are a problem, no doubt, and for more than one reason. They're opportunistic sell-outs and they know where their bread gets buttered. Every billionaire knows who runs the world, but you DankPotato_ think you know better.
it would be more constructive to make white people fix birth rates on their own which
If this was a real problem (it's not), the solution would be taxing the wealthy and reducing costs of goods, providing universal healthcare, lowering the cost of childcare. But somehow even for racists the underlying belief that taxation is theft takes priority over their panic over the great replacement, so they should save 100$ so a rich person can save 10,000,000$
Then again if they had critical thinking, they wouldn't be conservatives in the first place
Yes, instead of this they imported a bunch of brown people to earn more power at the expense of the average person, if these brown people weren't imported the average westerner would have amazing pay, working conditions and cheap housing.
You're genuinely a lost cause, there is a reason a political movement called "alternative right"
Yes I’m aware illegal immigrants massively increase the wealth of the 1% to make the GDP go up. Why is that all that matters ? How does that help me ?
“Basic math” cool let’s subtract 40 million illegals from country, how much less traffic would I have to commute to work ? How much more affordable would universal healthcare be ?
Why is that all that matters ? How does that help me ?
The article isn't about the GDP, it's about the government deficit and the tax base
Maybe on top of learning algebra you need to learn how to read
How much more affordable would universal healthcare be ?
Well, all healthcare costs would go down with universal healthcare based on the volume of service provided so disappearing 40 million people would actually give a single payer system less negotiating power with pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers
How many illegals care about the well being of me and my fellow country men ?
Almost all of them have significantly more empathy and care for their community than the standard conservative
Well, all healthcare costs would go down with universal healthcare based on the volume of service provided so disappearing 40 million people would actually give a single payer system less negotiating power with pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers
Yeah the immigrants really improved healthcare here in Sweden.🤥
They've been such a burden on our welfare system we don't even have free healthcare anymore and in a decade there won't be enough resources to keep all the people who need care alive, this is a statistical fact. They are fundamentally just not competent or selfless enough to keep a welfare state going.
They've been such a burden on our welfare system we don't even have free healthcare anymore and in a decade there won't be enough resources to keep all the people who need care alive, this is a statistical fact.
The cap is 250 dollars a year and it got implemented a couple years ago, 50 dollars a visit
The cap is SEK1100 (about 120 dollars) for doctors visits. The cap of SEK 2250 is for drugs, and you only pay for 100% of the cost of drugs up to half that.
This wasn't introduced a couple years ago, it has always been apart of healthcare in sweden
"For instance, in 1990 the patient cost for a visit to the doctor was SEK 60 and the cost for all prescribed drugs purchased at one occasion was SEK 65"
we imported around 1.5 million the last 11 years
Sweden hasn't even had 1.5 million immigrants total in the last 11 years, and that's counting European and American.
You're complaining about refugees, which in the last 16 years is about 500,000
"The cap is SEK1100 (about 120 dollars) for doctors visits. The cap of SEK 2250 is for drugs, and you only pay for 100% of the cost of drugs up to half that."
You have outdated sources on that
"This wasn't introduced a couple years ago, it has always been a part of healthcare in sweden"
You're right, it used to be free until a later age until a couple years ago though, dental care especially.
"Sweden hasn't even had 1.5 million immigrants total in the last 11 years, and that's counting European and American."
2.2 million swedes were born outside of Sweden, 20% of the country, not sure what source you dug up
"You're complaining about refugees, which in the last 16 years is about 500,000"
2.2 million swedes were born outside of Sweden, 20% of the country, not sure what source you dug up
Uuuh, you're the one who claimed 1.5 million in 11 years. That's 2.2 million swedes total. It went up 1.2 million from since 2002.
As I said, it's a reality that the healthcare system won't be able to keep everybody who needs it alive, prioritizations will be made in the coming decades leading to the likely otherwise premature death of older people who spent their entire lives paying tax, including mine and many other angry peoples parents.
Without immigration, the swedish born population would have remained stagnant or actually shrank since 1980.
And your entire aging population wouldn't have a tax base to continue to pay for healthcare as people like yourself and the many other parents with misplaced and uninformed anger got to the age of needing life saving healthcare
And it would be good that the swedish population sank for the average citizen
Immigrants have so far been a massive drain on the governmental budget, the taxes they pay are lower than the cost of the governmental assistance they recieve by a large margine.
Uuuh, you're the one who claimed 1.5 million in 11 years. That's 2.2 million swedes total. It went up 1.2 million from since 2002.
It went up 1.2 million since 2015, are you capable of reading graphs
This is also at the cost of immigrants having extremely vile behaviour and of native swedes becoming minorities in our own countries
Immigrants have so far been a massive drain on the governmental budget, the taxes they pay are lower than the cost of the governmental assistance they recieve by a large margine.
Lmao imagine linking the Hindustan times. I thought you were against immigration and suddenly you desperately search and the only source you find is an Indian tabloid? Hahahaha
You keep talking about tax drains when that’s literally the least of my worries
I don’t care about taxes, I don’t care about GDP
I want to know who my neighbors are, I want to not be cramped like a sardine on public transport, I want a safe clean city but all this means literally nothing to leftists like yourself
You keep talking about tax drains when that’s literally the least of my worries
You literally said "immigrants that are a net drain on our social services"
I don’t care about taxes
Very clearly do, weird lie lol
I want to know who my neighbors are
So go out and talk to them, you've commented on reddit like 75+ times in the last 24 hours
I want to not be cramped like a sardine on public transport
Then we have to spend tax money to actually build out our non existent public transportation and stop voting for conservatives who keep cutting funding for it and blocking expansion of it
I want a safe clean city but all this means literally nothing to leftists like yourself
Crime is literally the lowest it's been in like 60 years, and if you want cleaner cities like they have in Europe or Japan you're gonna have to pay taxes like they do there
The are a positive federally, negative at the state level
Yet again, objectively factually untrue. And this is all spelled out in the CONSERVATIVE source I linked you:
"Therefore, the net effect of immigrants for all levels of government was positive $14.5 trillion from 1994 to 2023 (including interest savings). Immigrants were fiscally positive for both the federal government and the state and local governments. The net federal effect was $7.9 trillion, only slightly more than the net for states and localities. Immigrants paid $9.6 trillion in taxes to state and local governments but cost those governments only $4.7 trillion—primarily because immigrants consumed less in education, government pensions, and policing. This resulted in a total fiscal surplus of $6.6 trillion at the state and local level (Table 4)."
“Commented on Reddit” yea when I’m at work or when I’m Sitting in bed at night.
You had at least 1, usually 5+ comment every hour in the last 24 hours except for an 8 hour period of time between 1 am EST and 9 am EST
If you want to know your neighbors speech some time outside talking to people instead of reading conservative slop and fear mongering
I live in a blue state (NYC) a state that has been blue for decades and our transportation is horrendous
New York, like Illinois, has some of the most build out public transport due to their rail networks. There have been many proposed high speed rail lines for the corridor from New York to DC, but funding always gets blocked by Republicans. Many larger state projects require federal funding, for which NYC is a net contributer, while nearly every red state is takes in more in federal spending than they contribute through taxes
Japan ? lol literally one of the most xenophobic nations ?
Lmao spoken like someone who has never been (I have a few times)
Also, if xenophobia and not tax spending is what magically kept their cities clean (despite extremely high tourism), why isn't the whole south sparkling? Lmao
Europe ? Definitely not London , you must mean Poland
It's hysterical that out of all of Europe, you pick the example that privatized their rail networks because of neoliberal economic policies that took over their politics after Reagan and Thatcher popularized neoliberalism and both countries standards of living plummeted
“Immigrants” you’re literally citing all immigrants not specifically illegals
It seems you’re still missing the entire crux of my argument. If immigration legal or not is so good why don’t why take in 10 million immigrants a year ? Why not 30 ?We totally could do that , imagine how much extra tax money that would bring in. There’s literally no reason to be against that unless you’re a backwater bigot am I right ?
“You commented” I have a lot of down time, I don’t work in the trades
“Talk to people !” The average person agrees with me just in the west, but globally 🤭 maybe its you who should speak to more people outside of your echo chamber
“Every red state” that’s simply due to population , more and more people leave red states to find jobs in cities
“Japan isn’t xenophobic!” Are you joking ? This is legally bad faith, They literally just elected a PM will make getting visas even harder.
“Why isn’t the South secretly racist” because Japan is actually racism . You clearly haven’t been to the south which has the highest population of black Americans
Ah yes thatcher and Reagan are the reason why the UK is acid attack capita of the world
See there's that weird kind of liberal classism again. That assumption that the poors just don't know what they're seeing in front of their eyes and that the problems can just be solved by nebulously blaming "the billionaires" "at the top" while Enlightened Individuals like that guy proudly lead the way. They're probably comfortably upper middle class (tbh that's exactly confirmed by their later response) in a field that doesn't have to deal with wage suppression coming from inflating the supply of workers or (in the case of illegal immigrants) unscrupulous bosses hiring them out so they don't have to pay for things like insurance or basic regulations. They're completely unironically advocating for the same "billionaires" they're saying really caused those problems.
Like they know the grooming gang scandals (for instance) targeted a lot of young, working class white girls who, if they went to the police, got called racist slags who needed to shut up because arresting the grooming gang members who tended to come from a certain ethnic group would cause community tensions, right? They know people like them mocked a lower class man calling out the issue because his "working class" accent made it sound like he was saying "muslamic ray guns" right?
That's exactly what I mean though. Everyone but you is just weird(gays) or a replacement strategy(browns) or weak(women)? Do you have no sense of self awareness? That's top tier delusion.
Dismiss it as as whatever redditor bullshit you like, reality is you've actively pitted yourself against the rest of humanity as a cope. You've been sold a rage bill of goods by a small group of people who are profiting immensely off your self importance.
Fascinating behaviour, this is like the "what about muh 6 gorillion" used by jews to justify whatever Israel is doing.
When confronted over a misdeed of any kind the foid will always retort with "but what about muh 6 gerbillion foids slimed by men" even though the likelihood of being liquidated is the same or more for men. "This is reparations for muh patriarchy", the foid will utter as she cries out in pain while she strikes you.
It is the only category of crime which they experience more often than men, I don't think that changes anything though. Men are just as likely if not more to be robbed, assaulted or liquidated when going out alone at night or at any other time of the day. The rates of SA become much more even anyways when only taking into consideration prepuberal kids, which proves that the foid does not abstain from 'ape due to empathy, but rather cowardice.
Going by logic, then men should be just as terrified to go out alone since they risk the same minus the sodomisation, but only international foidery uses this argument to defend privileges like spousal alimony, DEI quotas or the ability to scapegoat men for all of their problems
No, but that doesn't change the fact that women have no statistically-based, rational reason to fear going outside alone more than men unless one thinks that to be Kirk'd is inherently better than being surprise-sexed.
Also, one could make a similar argument for femicide: the amount is so low, especially when compared to the total amount of men, that it is more likely to pass from a car accident than by a male partner. In my country, and i assume in the US as well, the number of femicides is not too different from the number of false 'ape accusations or divorced fathers an heroing.
In all honesty, all ragebait i used aside, neither sex has a justifiable motivation for demonising the opposite one in that way unless they concede that there are reasons to think the same of their own. Moids and foids are made for each other.
I don't think it's worth arguing, looks like every comment has been nuh uh toward you and I don't see anything addressing your claim let alone attempting to counter it. It's a good sign since denial is the first stage, strange we have been on the first stage for 20 years now
Walking around aimlessly at night isn't the best idea for most men either. Inherently risky activity women think they're entitled to do somehow. Men are just inherently less risk averse, that's why they work the difficult jobs and have the risky hobbies. You don't see women advocating for equality in the logging or waste collection industries.
Nah this is kinda bs. Op claims white women are the most privileged but I don't think any man in this comments section would change places with a woman. Sure there are benefits but I have the privilege to walk and travel anywhere I want without fear of being raped. (Except maybe if I get sent to prison) I wouldn't trade that for any privilege white women enjoy and if you say you would you're delusional imo
it s not really dissonance, women compare themselves to top men not average men.
men will always be the lowest and the highest in the social pyramid, since it s the gender that actually takes on risk, which has a good and a bad side
it s similar to women calling men fuckboys they don t see or care for the average
Yeah a girl told me I was privileged because I'm a white man.
Literally how, my family has been poor/lower class for like 400 years. The only time my race or gender comes up is when jobs are telling me that they prioritize women and people of color.
I mean I wasn't born in India so it's not all bad, but compared to a woman or basically anyone else in this country I'm only ever disadvantaged.
NGL, I am dying from laughing, when they blame "patriarchy" in the man's problem in the society.
I guess patriarchy is the reason why people hate... For example dudes below 6.0.
patriarchy sort of sets the stage, it informs us what a manly man is, or a high status/value man is, because patriarchy is a social system that values traditional men, who fill the protector and provider roles. height works as a symbol of power and dominance, it's a thing our brains do, so society pushes these roles, and what do you know, we're all susceptible to it...
The value of a man is mostly contingent on attractive women (and the number thereof) willing to sleep with them and that is a product of the man's wealth, fitness, social ability, and genetic characteristics. So ultimately the value of a man as most people see it, is just about women's preferences. That being said you can have wealth, fitness, and genetic characteristics preferable to women but if you are a social retard then you're just a looksmaxxing creep or rich weirdo and still are of low value as a man.
are you trying to be a parody of a person? or is that really your read on what i said? i didn't say anything even remotely close to that, so im curious what part of it tripped you up so badly?
why did you put quotes around that, when it's literally not a quote? i didn't say that...
i said "patriarchy sort of sets the stage, it informs us what a manly man is, or a high status/value man is, because patriarchy is a social system that values traditional men, who fill the protector and provider roles."
The Manipulated Man felt pretty poorly written, I prefer Jack Kammer books. They come off less as disorganized ranting. "If Men Have All the Power" is one of the only books I have ever been able to finish in a single day, it's pretty dated but I genuinely loved it that much.
“The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar presents a deliberately provocative argument that challenges the common belief that women are the primary victims of social inequality. Vilar claims instead that men are systematically conditioned from an early age to tie their worth to productivity, success, and the approval of women, which leads them to accept demanding roles as providers and protectors. She argues that women hold a form of indirect social power by controlling emotional validation, intimacy, and romantic acceptance, and that this influence shapes male behavior more than laws or institutions do. According to her, systems like dating, love, and marriage function as mechanisms that encourage men to work harder and sacrifice more in exchange for affection and status, while women benefit from security and reduced expectations by maintaining an appearance of dependence. Vilar also suggests that many social norms, including ideas about female weakness and male responsibility, are preserved because they advantage women within this dynamic. Throughout the book, she portrays relationships as largely transactional and argues that what is often called love is deeply intertwined with social conditioning and power exchange. The book is widely seen as controversial because it relies on broad generalizations, minimizes structural disadvantages faced by women, and frames gender relations in a highly one-sided and cynical way, but it is often interpreted as a critique of rigid gender roles and the pressures placed on men rather than a balanced or evidence-based analysis.”
Women hold more power over men than vice versa just not physically
> Be part of one of the largest population groups on the planet
> Suffer mild inconveniences which affect literally everybody alive
> Feel victimised and that this is the fault of bigotry towards your specific demographic
> Start a socio-political movement to enact changes for your group to make things fairer for you (and you alone)
> Begin making a lot of money through 'awareness' merchandise like shirts, posters and badges
> Realise that you could actually live on this money by being a professional activist for the rest of your life
> Suddenly realise with a cold sweat that this maens your side can never actually 'win' since that would end your problems, and thus end your activism, thus ending your 'career'
> Have to choose between either being a good person and working solely for the cause knowing that you'll need to get a real job when it's all over, or working solely for your own personal gain, meaning perpetuating problems and victimhood for the rest of your life
> Pick the latter
> Double-down on the activism
> Begin claiming any criticism or hostility towards your demographic is motivated purely by bigotry, even if it was actually deserved
> Claim that any victory for your side, big or small, is good, 'but the battle is far from over!'
> Claim to be putting donated money towards helping out people within your 'minority' group when in reality it's going towards paying for your new house and shiny new car
> When called out on this, claim it's the work of bigots who are out to sabotage you, knowing the internet will eat it up every single fucking time
> Be one of the most protected, supported and coddled groups on the planet in the year of our lord 2026, while still having the absolute gaul to claim you're somehow the victim in every single scenario, even when your demographic was in no way involved, because god forbid the world talk about anything other than your professional activism career
The white woman. This is the perfect fit for them, the act of doing something they see as heroic by doing absolutely nothing at all.
But when it comes time to support all these people by participating in their horrible body fat positivity movements, shows,gaming, movies, art all of these white woman are nowhere to be seen and blame incels for everything.
This sub is like a parody of 4chan, you actually see a lot of dissenting opinion on 4chan but the nature of reddit make everyone just post things the poster think others will agree with. It's a cesspool of incels here, you have the miserable schizo of 4chan with none of the fun or occasionnal interresting discussion.
Such are the incalculable effects of that negative passion of indifference, that hysterical and speculative resurrection of the other.
Racism, for example. Logically, it should have declined with the advance of Enlightenment and democracy. Yet the more hybrid our cultures become, and the more the theoretical and genetic bases of racism crumble away, the stronger it grows. But this is because we are dealing here with a mental object, an artificial construct, based on an erosion of the singularity of cultures and entry into the fetishistic system of difference. So long as there is otherness, strangeness and the (possibly violent) dual relation -- as we see in anthropological accounts up to the eighteenth century and into the colonial phase -- there is no racism properly so-called. Once that `natural' relation is lost, we enter into a phobic relationship with an artificial other, idealized by hatred. And because it is an ideal other, this relationship is an exponential one: nothing can stop it, since the whole trend of our culture is towards a fanatically pursued differential construction, a perpetual extrapolation of the same from the other.
Autistic culture by dint of fake altruism.
All forms of sexist, racist, ethnic or cultural discrimination arise out of the same profound disaffection and out of a collective mourning, a mourning for a dead otherness, set against a background of general indifference -- a logical product of our marvellous planet-wide conviviality.
The same indifference can give rise to exactly opposite behaviour. Racism is desperately seeking the other in the form of an evil to be combated. The humanitarian seeks the other just as desperately in the form of victims to aid. Idealization plays for better or for worse. The scapegoat is no longer the person you hound, but the one whose lot you lament. But he is still a scapegoat. And it is still the same person.
no people from different races are different even across culture. it doesnt matter what culture a somalian grows up in, he'll act different from the whites
Wherever exchange is impossible, what we encounter is terror. Any radical otherness at all is thus the epicentre of a terror: the terror that such otherness holds, by virtue of its very existence, for the normal world. And the terror that this world exercises upon that otherness in order to annihilate it.
Over recent centuries all forms of violent otherness have been incorporated, willingly or under threat of force, into a discourse of difference which simultaneously implies inclusion and exclusion, recognition and discrimination.
Childhood, lunacy, death, primitive societies - all have been categorized, integrated and absorbed as parts of a universal harmony. Madness, once its exclusionary status had been revoked, was caught up in the far subtler toils of psychology. The dead, as soon as they were recognized in their identity as such, were banished to outlying cemeteries - kept at such a distance that the face of death itself was lost. As for Indians, their right to exist was no sooner accorded them than they were confined to reservations. These are the vicissitudes of a logic of difference.
Racism does not exist so long as the other remains Other, so long as the Stranger remains foreign. It comes into existence when the other becomes merely different - that is to say, dangerously similar. This is the moment when the inclination to keep the other at a distance comes into being.
Jean Baudrillard, The Transparency of Evil: Essays in Extreme Phenomena
Like dreams, statistics are a form of wish fulfilment.
Manicheism is the irreconcilable antagonism between two forces. Morality is merely the opposition of two values. In the order of values, there is always a possibility of reconciliation. The disorder of forces is irreconcilable.
When there is nothing inherently good about a certain type of person, they will instead attempt to prove others evil so that they can look good by comparison. That is the fundamental psychology behind leftists calling everyone who opposes them nazis. Subconsciously they understand that they themselves are not actually good people, but if they can stand in contrast to someone they've pinned the textbook definition of evil to, they can attempt to qualify themselves as good because of what they are not rather than what they are. Obsession with being viewed as good and virtuous rather than just living your life and being what you are also tends to stem from a guilty conscience.
This dude has never lived in a neighbourhood full of muslims and it shows. Lots of meaningless words that would melt away with sufficient exposure to the other cultures we supposedly only hate because we're idiots. What a fucking idiot.
A long time ago, kids met other kids who were different. They might not always get along, but they knew each other were real people.
Now imagine something different:
Kids don’t really know each other anymore, but they make up ideas about other kids in their heads.
One kid thinks: “That other kid is bad and scary!” → that’s like racism
Another kid thinks: “That other kid is so sad and helpless, I must save them!” → that’s like over-helping
But here’s the twist:
👉 Both kids are not really seeing the real person.
They’re just seeing an idea in their head.
So even though it looks different (hate vs helping),
it’s kind of the same problem:
They aren’t treating the other kid like a normal, real person.”
OK I have an explanation for this. So many men have certain values, want children, somewhat conservative beliefs (basically not for left/Marxist views) believe in marriage and nuclear families and don't engage in promiscuity.
Well where I live the above essentially excludes 75% of white women. But is very inclusive of Black African women, Indian women and various others.
Then realise a lot of them genuinely mean it when they say they have cultural issues with some people not ethnic ones.
I don't care whay race my partner is. Its about shared values and I will be honest. Hence in the UK there is a surprising growing demographic of Conservative white men marrying Conservative Black women.
Main reason, they want kids, they have strong family values, value education and dislike modern leftist identity politics.
It's not about race, it's about values. Eventually you realise a great many different cultures from your own share the same values.
JustChillin3456@reddit
Easily the most privileged group in all of human history
Tankirulesipad1@reddit
Not sure about past history sometimes they had like 0 say in their life
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
White Guilt has stopped. White women just haven't gotten the memo because their tiktok feed is full of orangemanbad right now.
shangumdee@reddit
It's insane how that one demographic can so easily be oneshotted by propaganda campaigns if they use influencer and make it seem like other white women are also believing in said thing.
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
The ironing of this statement.
shangumdee@reddit
What are yoi trying to say with that username?
hatchbacks@reddit
Glad someone else has finally made this observation. If you go on YouTube right now, you can see countless videos of white people just straight up calling out black people on their bad behavior.
This was unthinkable 10 years ago.
ResponsibleSeries411@reddit
Reality is hitting hard nowadays. White guilt, progressim, extreme feminism... etc all the bs have reach such a point and are so far away from the real problem that they are losing power. The geopolitic context and the thing people see in the street starting to make it hard to defend some idea.
Count_de_Mits@reddit
Plus outside of reddit (and whatever is left of bluesky) most social media has comments that would give the average redditor a rage induced aneurysm. Wouldn't be surprised if such stuff became even more mainstream the way things are going
_Empty-R_@reddit
whatever is left? did they have some mass exodus?
BrocoliAssassin@reddit
White women's biggest issue right now is men talking about how lonely they are. I keep seeing incel's blamed for everything but I see so much femcel behavior normalized that it's crazy.
trollman1234@reddit
Yeah, genuinely these women of today are becoming the boogey men they hated from the 1900's. Overtly sexual and horny posting to anyone with ears, entitlement out the ass, think they are the hottest shit of all time, while still demanding, not asking, of certain roles from the opposite sex. It's silly to see. I thought they were smarter xd. After living for a bit, it's clear they're generally just in it for self gain. And now their ego's are sky high.
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
Volcel*
Any woman can get laid or get a beta orbiter to listen to their problems.
wordjedi@reddit
So if a moderate tax cutter/deregulator wins in 2028 all woke shall cease at once?
fatfuck5@reddit
He said the buzzwords!
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
Proudly On Stolen Lands
CommieRemovalCrew@reddit
That's hilarious. I'm going to think of this every time I hear the term "LaNd AcKnoWlEdGeMeNt" from now on.
nEwBiEKC@reddit
Do you believe in your username?
_Empty-R_@reddit
women's shitty interpretations, fixations, and content aside...is he not?
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
Do you need to know everyone's genuine opinion of the world before you allow yourself to enjoy something?
_Empty-R_@reddit
no. because that isn't what I asked.
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
ok
nsaisspying@reddit
Yeah no other possible reason for orangeman news right now. It's pretty crazy how obsessed these white women are.
HitIerWasWrong@reddit
>NSA is spying name
>same account for 12 years
Virtue signaling means nothing at all these days, huh.
nsaisspying@reddit
Never did
Successful-Flan-9763@reddit
but it's not a "group".
grouping together a nepo baby girl with a cashier is profondly stupid. it's the kind of divide and conquer that was set up by feminism, and is being propagated by morons (OP) and shills (see: Asmongold).
don't be either of those and recognise that this "grouping" is moronic and setup on purpose.
bannabananabanna@reddit
The time of waifs wenches harlots and maids is nigh
TWK128@reddit
Nah. They already can't and they're still larping as the oppressed.
Waffle_shuffle@reddit
Who can afford a home nowadays unless your married, rich, or have rich parents?
Positive-Face1705@reddit
think, my fellow chuds.
who benefits from creating all this divide?
who loots from us while the common man and woman hate each other?
Pleasant-Toe8878@reddit
Go back to your cubicle and be a good drone.
Positive-Face1705@reddit
ironic
Impossible-Age-3302@reddit
🧃
DankPotato_@reddit
I think pointing to a religion is silly because there are plenty of normal Jews and loads of rich jews. We might as well put it in one class, rich people, that literally has 0 overlap. It’s simple “the elite”, which includes all races and religions with 0 overlap to the average man. It’s honestly pretty stupid just saying “Jews” instead.
Space_Lift@reddit
Y'know what's remarkable? That every western billionaire generally agrees with the Israeli project. So weird because that idea amongst average people is very controversial and really has nothing to do with economic success...unless it actually does.
DankPotato_@reddit
Obviously it makes money? What does that have to do with what I said? If anything - it just agrees with me further. It’s not about Judaism, it’s about rich people.
Space_Lift@reddit
And rich people love Israel because? Love of the game? What in your mind explains the fact that no western billionaire, who normally engages in all kinds of pie in the sky "philanthropy", engages in one against the genocidal Jewish project? the ultra-rich are a problem, no doubt, and for more than one reason. They're opportunistic sell-outs and they know where their bread gets buttered. Every billionaire knows who runs the world, but you DankPotato_ think you know better.
ThatsMySpicyPepper@reddit
Nice try IDF
Pleasant-Toe8878@reddit
Go back to your cubicle
token_internet_girl@reddit
That's literally the point of the propaganda movement. If men stay mad at trans, gays, women, and browns, who has time to be mad at the true enemies?
Rage sells better than sex, and they're being sold the belief that everyone else on the planet sucks except for them.
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
It would work better if these demographics genuinely sucked and therefore have been increasing in proportion via artificial influence
Drop your hecking wholesome bullshit
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
If this was a real problem (it's not), the solution would be taxing the wealthy and reducing costs of goods, providing universal healthcare, lowering the cost of childcare. But somehow even for racists the underlying belief that taxation is theft takes priority over their panic over the great replacement, so they should save 100$ so a rich person can save 10,000,000$
Then again if they had critical thinking, they wouldn't be conservatives in the first place
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
Yes, instead of this they imported a bunch of brown people to earn more power at the expense of the average person, if these brown people weren't imported the average westerner would have amazing pay, working conditions and cheap housing.
You're genuinely a lost cause, there is a reason a political movement called "alternative right"
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
So is the alternative right in favor of increasing taxes to lower the cost of raising a child? Or are you just aimelssly splinting racism
JustChillin3456@reddit
The people that immigrated back then were hard working WASP’s who had the same culture / values / work ethic as other Americans
The immigrants in today’s America are hyper rich Asians that come here to party or immigrants that are a net drain on our social services
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
Immigrants are a net increase to our tax base, not a drain
Here's a source from an ultra rightwing thinktank:
https://www.cato.org/white-paper/immigrants-recent-effects-government-budgets-1994-2023#introduction
You should really take that tip about basic algebra in my last comment to heart
JustChillin3456@reddit
Yes I’m aware illegal immigrants massively increase the wealth of the 1% to make the GDP go up. Why is that all that matters ? How does that help me ?
“Basic math” cool let’s subtract 40 million illegals from country, how much less traffic would I have to commute to work ? How much more affordable would universal healthcare be ?
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
The article isn't about the GDP, it's about the government deficit and the tax base
Maybe on top of learning algebra you need to learn how to read
Well, all healthcare costs would go down with universal healthcare based on the volume of service provided so disappearing 40 million people would actually give a single payer system less negotiating power with pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers
Almost all of them have significantly more empathy and care for their community than the standard conservative
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
Yeah the immigrants really improved healthcare here in Sweden.🤥
They've been such a burden on our welfare system we don't even have free healthcare anymore and in a decade there won't be enough resources to keep all the people who need care alive, this is a statistical fact. They are fundamentally just not competent or selfless enough to keep a welfare state going.
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
This is just objectively not true lol
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
The cap is 250 dollars a year and it got implemented a couple years ago, 50 dollars a visit, which is more in Sweden than the US.
We deport a couple thousand people a year, we imported around 1.5 million the last 11 years
"What kind of larping as a swede nonsense is this"
äru bränd eller?
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
The cap is SEK1100 (about 120 dollars) for doctors visits. The cap of SEK 2250 is for drugs, and you only pay for 100% of the cost of drugs up to half that.
This wasn't introduced a couple years ago, it has always been apart of healthcare in sweden
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168851002000167#:~:text=For%20instance%2C%20in%201990%20the,was%20SEK%2065%20%5B16%5D.
"For instance, in 1990 the patient cost for a visit to the doctor was SEK 60 and the cost for all prescribed drugs purchased at one occasion was SEK 65"
Sweden hasn't even had 1.5 million immigrants total in the last 11 years, and that's counting European and American.
You're complaining about refugees, which in the last 16 years is about 500,000
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
"The cap is SEK1100 (about 120 dollars) for doctors visits. The cap of SEK 2250 is for drugs, and you only pay for 100% of the cost of drugs up to half that."
You have outdated sources on that
"This wasn't introduced a couple years ago, it has always been a part of healthcare in sweden"
You're right, it used to be free until a later age until a couple years ago though, dental care especially.
"Sweden hasn't even had 1.5 million immigrants total in the last 11 years, and that's counting European and American."
2.2 million swedes were born outside of Sweden, 20% of the country, not sure what source you dug up
"You're complaining about refugees, which in the last 16 years is about 500,000"
https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/manniskorna-i-sverige/invandring-till-sverige/#Timeline
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
Uuuh, you're the one who claimed 1.5 million in 11 years. That's 2.2 million swedes total. It went up 1.2 million from since 2002.
Without immigration, the swedish born population would have remained stagnant or actually shrank since 1980.
https://share.scb.se/ov9993/data/publikationer/statistik/be/be0401/2000i02/be51st0305.pdf
https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subject-area/population/population-composition/population-statistics/pong/tables-and-graphs/foreign-born-citizenship-and-foreignswedish-background/population-in-sweden-by-countryregion-of-birth-citizenship-and-swedishforeign-background-31-december-2023/
And your entire aging population wouldn't have a tax base to continue to pay for healthcare as people like yourself and the many other parents with misplaced and uninformed anger got to the age of needing life saving healthcare
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
And it would be good that the swedish population sank for the average citizen
Immigrants have so far been a massive drain on the governmental budget, the taxes they pay are lower than the cost of the governmental assistance they recieve by a large margine.
It went up 1.2 million since 2015, are you capable of reading graphs
This is also at the cost of immigrants having extremely vile behaviour and of native swedes becoming minorities in our own countries
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
https://www.thelocal.se/20250612/immigrants-contribute-more-to-the-swedish-economy-than-people-born-in-sweden
No it did not
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
My message here was shadowbanned for insulting you too hard I think
I'll summarize: that's a crazy thing to genuinely think and you need to learn both how to view a diagram and the basics of source criticism
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
genuinely shut up, learn to read a diagram and learn source criticism. How obnoxious can one person be?
ThisPresentation5291@reddit
Every time
JustChillin3456@reddit
https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/traffic-on-busiest-la-highway-vanishes-amid-ice-raids-wild-x-video-claims-101752110711906-amp.html
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
Lmao imagine linking the Hindustan times. I thought you were against immigration and suddenly you desperately search and the only source you find is an Indian tabloid? Hahahaha
JustChillin3456@reddit
Bro criticizes the source not the article itself. Truly a reddit moment 😂
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
Lol it's a Twitter post by someone of a video they didn't record on a highway they misidentified.
You couldn't even find a fox news article to back this up because it's just not true lmao
And you desperately posted that in response to the cato institute article objectively and undeniably disproving your point about tax drains
JustChillin3456@reddit
You keep talking about tax drains when that’s literally the least of my worries
I don’t care about taxes, I don’t care about GDP
I want to know who my neighbors are, I want to not be cramped like a sardine on public transport, I want a safe clean city but all this means literally nothing to leftists like yourself
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
You literally said "immigrants that are a net drain on our social services"
Very clearly do, weird lie lol
So go out and talk to them, you've commented on reddit like 75+ times in the last 24 hours
Then we have to spend tax money to actually build out our non existent public transportation and stop voting for conservatives who keep cutting funding for it and blocking expansion of it
Crime is literally the lowest it's been in like 60 years, and if you want cleaner cities like they have in Europe or Japan you're gonna have to pay taxes like they do there
JustChillin3456@reddit
The are a positive federally, negative at the state level but as I said are simply tools of the 1%
“Commented on Reddit” yea when I’m at work or when I’m Sitting in bed at night.
I live in a blue state (NYC) a state that has been blue for decades and our transportation is horrendous. How are conservatives to blame ?
Japan ? lol literally one of the most xenophobic nations ?
Europe ? Definitely not London , you must mean Poland
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
Yet again, objectively factually untrue. And this is all spelled out in the CONSERVATIVE source I linked you:
"Therefore, the net effect of immigrants for all levels of government was positive $14.5 trillion from 1994 to 2023 (including interest savings). Immigrants were fiscally positive for both the federal government and the state and local governments. The net federal effect was $7.9 trillion, only slightly more than the net for states and localities. Immigrants paid $9.6 trillion in taxes to state and local governments but cost those governments only $4.7 trillion—primarily because immigrants consumed less in education, government pensions, and policing. This resulted in a total fiscal surplus of $6.6 trillion at the state and local level (Table 4)."
You had at least 1, usually 5+ comment every hour in the last 24 hours except for an 8 hour period of time between 1 am EST and 9 am EST
If you want to know your neighbors speech some time outside talking to people instead of reading conservative slop and fear mongering
New York, like Illinois, has some of the most build out public transport due to their rail networks. There have been many proposed high speed rail lines for the corridor from New York to DC, but funding always gets blocked by Republicans. Many larger state projects require federal funding, for which NYC is a net contributer, while nearly every red state is takes in more in federal spending than they contribute through taxes
Lmao spoken like someone who has never been (I have a few times)
Also, if xenophobia and not tax spending is what magically kept their cities clean (despite extremely high tourism), why isn't the whole south sparkling? Lmao
It's hysterical that out of all of Europe, you pick the example that privatized their rail networks because of neoliberal economic policies that took over their politics after Reagan and Thatcher popularized neoliberalism and both countries standards of living plummeted
JustChillin3456@reddit
“Immigrants” you’re literally citing all immigrants not specifically illegals
It seems you’re still missing the entire crux of my argument. If immigration legal or not is so good why don’t why take in 10 million immigrants a year ? Why not 30 ?We totally could do that , imagine how much extra tax money that would bring in. There’s literally no reason to be against that unless you’re a backwater bigot am I right ?
“You commented” I have a lot of down time, I don’t work in the trades
“Talk to people !” The average person agrees with me just in the west, but globally 🤭 maybe its you who should speak to more people outside of your echo chamber
“Every red state” that’s simply due to population , more and more people leave red states to find jobs in cities
“Japan isn’t xenophobic!” Are you joking ? This is legally bad faith, They literally just elected a PM will make getting visas even harder.
“Why isn’t the South secretly racist” because Japan is actually racism . You clearly haven’t been to the south which has the highest population of black Americans
Ah yes thatcher and Reagan are the reason why the UK is acid attack capita of the world
Nice try
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
yes
you deserve to live poorly
snizarsnarfsnarf@reddit
Brother I have an engineering degree and no debt lmao, I'm not sweating
But seriously, basic algebra. They teach it on YouTube, the same place you're getting your great replacement nonsense
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
You should be
chanbr@reddit
See there's that weird kind of liberal classism again. That assumption that the poors just don't know what they're seeing in front of their eyes and that the problems can just be solved by nebulously blaming "the billionaires" "at the top" while Enlightened Individuals like that guy proudly lead the way. They're probably comfortably upper middle class (tbh that's exactly confirmed by their later response) in a field that doesn't have to deal with wage suppression coming from inflating the supply of workers or (in the case of illegal immigrants) unscrupulous bosses hiring them out so they don't have to pay for things like insurance or basic regulations. They're completely unironically advocating for the same "billionaires" they're saying really caused those problems.
Like they know the grooming gang scandals (for instance) targeted a lot of young, working class white girls who, if they went to the police, got called racist slags who needed to shut up because arresting the grooming gang members who tended to come from a certain ethnic group would cause community tensions, right? They know people like them mocked a lower class man calling out the issue because his "working class" accent made it sound like he was saying "muslamic ray guns" right?
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
I agree, absolutely despise that type of person
token_internet_girl@reddit
That's exactly what I mean though. Everyone but you is just weird(gays) or a replacement strategy(browns) or weak(women)? Do you have no sense of self awareness? That's top tier delusion.
Dismiss it as as whatever redditor bullshit you like, reality is you've actively pitted yourself against the rest of humanity as a cope. You've been sold a rage bill of goods by a small group of people who are profiting immensely off your self importance.
Gamer_chaddster_69@reddit
I have some criticisms reserved for white men too, don't worry.
Copeception going on in your comment here
ThisPresentation5291@reddit
Every time
token_internet_girl@reddit
Good Mossad bot
ThisPresentation5291@reddit
cope
tracerspants@reddit
Having a counter argument to what the op observed would help but calling everyone chuds just makes it look more plausible lol
resentful_femcel@reddit
Lame and misogynistic, all im saying is i know women that wouldnt go out alone at night, but i know no man with the same fear
SkibididdyOhio@reddit
Fascinating behaviour, this is like the "what about muh 6 gorillion" used by jews to justify whatever Israel is doing.
When confronted over a misdeed of any kind the foid will always retort with "but what about muh 6 gerbillion foids slimed by men" even though the likelihood of being liquidated is the same or more for men. "This is reparations for muh patriarchy", the foid will utter as she cries out in pain while she strikes you.
resentful_femcel@reddit
You dont think women experience sexual violence at much higher rates? Why do u think so many women carry mace while men dont lmfao
SkibididdyOhio@reddit
It is the only category of crime which they experience more often than men, I don't think that changes anything though. Men are just as likely if not more to be robbed, assaulted or liquidated when going out alone at night or at any other time of the day. The rates of SA become much more even anyways when only taking into consideration prepuberal kids, which proves that the foid does not abstain from 'ape due to empathy, but rather cowardice.
Going by logic, then men should be just as terrified to go out alone since they risk the same minus the sodomisation, but only international foidery uses this argument to defend privileges like spousal alimony, DEI quotas or the ability to scapegoat men for all of their problems
Field_Of_View@reddit
top kek
Daethir@reddit
Do men get killed by their spouse more often than women ?
SkibididdyOhio@reddit
No, but that doesn't change the fact that women have no statistically-based, rational reason to fear going outside alone more than men unless one thinks that to be Kirk'd is inherently better than being surprise-sexed.
Also, one could make a similar argument for femicide: the amount is so low, especially when compared to the total amount of men, that it is more likely to pass from a car accident than by a male partner. In my country, and i assume in the US as well, the number of femicides is not too different from the number of false 'ape accusations or divorced fathers an heroing.
In all honesty, all ragebait i used aside, neither sex has a justifiable motivation for demonising the opposite one in that way unless they concede that there are reasons to think the same of their own. Moids and foids are made for each other.
tracerspants@reddit
I don't think it's worth arguing, looks like every comment has been nuh uh toward you and I don't see anything addressing your claim let alone attempting to counter it. It's a good sign since denial is the first stage, strange we have been on the first stage for 20 years now
KindStranger1337@reddit
Walking around aimlessly at night isn't the best idea for most men either. Inherently risky activity women think they're entitled to do somehow. Men are just inherently less risk averse, that's why they work the difficult jobs and have the risky hobbies. You don't see women advocating for equality in the logging or waste collection industries.
FuckLeRedditMods@reddit
I think it's disgusting people talk like this on my wholesome 4chan sub
OldManChino@reddit
Anon could have just said 'ive never touched a woman' and saved us all time
Field_Of_View@reddit
muh hole
wellreadwhore@reddit
Nah this is kinda bs. Op claims white women are the most privileged but I don't think any man in this comments section would change places with a woman. Sure there are benefits but I have the privilege to walk and travel anywhere I want without fear of being raped. (Except maybe if I get sent to prison) I wouldn't trade that for any privilege white women enjoy and if you say you would you're delusional imo
KindStranger1337@reddit
Nobody who isn't mentally ill wants to switch sides with the opposite gender. Most women definitely don't want to be men either.
DarthVeigar_@reddit
Just the fear of being, you know straight up killed by a pretty considerable margin.
And for reference, most rapes are committed by someone the victim knows behind closed doors at a private home, not in public by a stranger.
I_h8_normies@reddit
I’m a man and have fear of being kidnapped and raped everyday even in my own home
wellreadwhore@reddit
Constantly fantasizing about it probably doesn't help
garbagecan1992@reddit
it s not really dissonance, women compare themselves to top men not average men.
men will always be the lowest and the highest in the social pyramid, since it s the gender that actually takes on risk, which has a good and a bad side
it s similar to women calling men fuckboys they don t see or care for the average
ArtisticAcer@reddit
Apex fallacy
Khalixs1@reddit
Yeah a girl told me I was privileged because I'm a white man.
Literally how, my family has been poor/lower class for like 400 years. The only time my race or gender comes up is when jobs are telling me that they prioritize women and people of color.
I mean I wasn't born in India so it's not all bad, but compared to a woman or basically anyone else in this country I'm only ever disadvantaged.
imfinetday@reddit
There’s no point in saying any of this to them either. They will just respond with some lazy bs like
“Or maybe I’m just a good person who has empathy?”
A lot of people now just pretend to not know what you are talking about so they can avoid the real conversation
laserdicks@reddit
Yes of course. That's why the patriarchy lie has to be pushed so hard (while women are the literal majority).
papu16@reddit
NGL, I am dying from laughing, when they blame "patriarchy" in the man's problem in the society. I guess patriarchy is the reason why people hate... For example dudes below 6.0.
GlitterDollMUA@reddit
patriarchy sort of sets the stage, it informs us what a manly man is, or a high status/value man is, because patriarchy is a social system that values traditional men, who fill the protector and provider roles. height works as a symbol of power and dominance, it's a thing our brains do, so society pushes these roles, and what do you know, we're all susceptible to it...
Space_Lift@reddit
The value of a man is mostly contingent on attractive women (and the number thereof) willing to sleep with them and that is a product of the man's wealth, fitness, social ability, and genetic characteristics. So ultimately the value of a man as most people see it, is just about women's preferences. That being said you can have wealth, fitness, and genetic characteristics preferable to women but if you are a social retard then you're just a looksmaxxing creep or rich weirdo and still are of low value as a man.
JustChillin3456@reddit
So men are designed to make society easier for women ?
How terrible …
GlitterDollMUA@reddit
are you trying to be a parody of a person? or is that really your read on what i said? i didn't say anything even remotely close to that, so im curious what part of it tripped you up so badly?
JustChillin3456@reddit
“The patriarchy means men want to be providers and protectors”
One of us is lacking media literacy and it’s not me
GlitterDollMUA@reddit
why did you put quotes around that, when it's literally not a quote? i didn't say that...
i said "patriarchy sort of sets the stage, it informs us what a manly man is, or a high status/value man is, because patriarchy is a social system that values traditional men, who fill the protector and provider roles."
JustChillin3456@reddit
Yea we agree
What’s the issue ?
Usual-Ad-4986@reddit
so women are supposed to protect and provide if we abolish patriarchy, will i get a mommy dommy too?
GlitterDollMUA@reddit
whatever floats your boat
JustChillin3456@reddit
This is written in the book “the manipulated man”
aqlr@reddit
The Manipulated Man felt pretty poorly written, I prefer Jack Kammer books. They come off less as disorganized ranting. "If Men Have All the Power" is one of the only books I have ever been able to finish in a single day, it's pretty dated but I genuinely loved it that much.
JustChillin3456@reddit
Good to know 💪
volatile-solution@reddit
that is anti-women propaganda.
JustChillin3456@reddit
The book was literally written by a woman…..
volatile-solution@reddit
still but...self-hatred is also a thing.
JustChillin3456@reddit
You didn’t read the book did you ? 👀
Positive-Face1705@reddit
well enlighten us Jimothy.
JustChillin3456@reddit
Here;
“The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar presents a deliberately provocative argument that challenges the common belief that women are the primary victims of social inequality. Vilar claims instead that men are systematically conditioned from an early age to tie their worth to productivity, success, and the approval of women, which leads them to accept demanding roles as providers and protectors. She argues that women hold a form of indirect social power by controlling emotional validation, intimacy, and romantic acceptance, and that this influence shapes male behavior more than laws or institutions do. According to her, systems like dating, love, and marriage function as mechanisms that encourage men to work harder and sacrifice more in exchange for affection and status, while women benefit from security and reduced expectations by maintaining an appearance of dependence. Vilar also suggests that many social norms, including ideas about female weakness and male responsibility, are preserved because they advantage women within this dynamic. Throughout the book, she portrays relationships as largely transactional and argues that what is often called love is deeply intertwined with social conditioning and power exchange. The book is widely seen as controversial because it relies on broad generalizations, minimizes structural disadvantages faced by women, and frames gender relations in a highly one-sided and cynical way, but it is often interpreted as a critique of rigid gender roles and the pressures placed on men rather than a balanced or evidence-based analysis.”
Women hold more power over men than vice versa just not physically
Careful-Evening-5187@reddit
We'll see who's laughing when the fem-bots start rolling off the assembly line....
Kingofcheeses@reddit
So, now you don't know what the hell to do, do ya?
volatile-solution@reddit
53% of white women voted for trump.
guess which group got backlash for trump.
HonestLemon25@reddit
Nobody hates women more than other women.
volatile-solution@reddit
incel cope
HonestLemon25@reddit
You are Indian.
volatile-solution@reddit
since when did folks here start to believe in self-loathing stuff?
Algo_Muy_Obsceno@reddit
Men, who dominate in every field: “GuYs, I thINk wOmEn aRe pRiveLeGEd”
Talk about your braindead take.
JJJSchmidt_etAl@reddit
They keep adding LGBTBBQ characters to appeal to OP
twofacetoo@reddit
> Be part of one of the largest population groups on the planet
> Suffer mild inconveniences which affect literally everybody alive
> Feel victimised and that this is the fault of bigotry towards your specific demographic
> Start a socio-political movement to enact changes for your group to make things fairer for you (and you alone)
> Begin making a lot of money through 'awareness' merchandise like shirts, posters and badges
> Realise that you could actually live on this money by being a professional activist for the rest of your life
> Suddenly realise with a cold sweat that this maens your side can never actually 'win' since that would end your problems, and thus end your activism, thus ending your 'career'
> Have to choose between either being a good person and working solely for the cause knowing that you'll need to get a real job when it's all over, or working solely for your own personal gain, meaning perpetuating problems and victimhood for the rest of your life
> Pick the latter
> Double-down on the activism
> Begin claiming any criticism or hostility towards your demographic is motivated purely by bigotry, even if it was actually deserved
> Claim that any victory for your side, big or small, is good, 'but the battle is far from over!'
> Claim to be putting donated money towards helping out people within your 'minority' group when in reality it's going towards paying for your new house and shiny new car
> When called out on this, claim it's the work of bigots who are out to sabotage you, knowing the internet will eat it up every single fucking time
> Be one of the most protected, supported and coddled groups on the planet in the year of our lord 2026, while still having the absolute gaul to claim you're somehow the victim in every single scenario, even when your demographic was in no way involved, because god forbid the world talk about anything other than your professional activism career
> Be BLM founders
Sorry what we were talking about again?
sonicsynth2000@reddit
I don't mind the white race dying out because it means less white women
10poundcockslap@reddit
Jews do this too.
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AutoModerator@reddit
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have more than 25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
freedomfightre@reddit
nicojarr69@reddit
I'm also so sick of media belittling men and making them dumb
BrocoliAssassin@reddit
The white woman. This is the perfect fit for them, the act of doing something they see as heroic by doing absolutely nothing at all.
But when it comes time to support all these people by participating in their horrible body fat positivity movements, shows,gaming, movies, art all of these white woman are nowhere to be seen and blame incels for everything.
Ka1-@reddit
All these advantages and they still get paid less lmfao
Unusual_Round_1631@reddit
these comments AGREEING with this post omg I thought we're making fun of incels but I am now realizing I'm amidst the undesirables
MichaelDeucalion@reddit
It's part of the larp
i_h8_yellow_mustard@reddit
You're on reddit, everyone here is undesirable.
Daethir@reddit
This sub is like a parody of 4chan, you actually see a lot of dissenting opinion on 4chan but the nature of reddit make everyone just post things the poster think others will agree with. It's a cesspool of incels here, you have the miserable schizo of 4chan with none of the fun or occasionnal interresting discussion.
inzyte@reddit
You are part of the undesirables
angrybluechair@reddit
Still have yet to find a copy of The Protocols of the Hags of Gucci, their control over society is unmatched.
SKRyanrr@reddit
Annon might be on to something....
ludvary@reddit
where green?
QTown2pt-o@reddit
Such are the incalculable effects of that negative passion of indifference, that hysterical and speculative resurrection of the other.
Racism, for example. Logically, it should have declined with the advance of Enlightenment and democracy. Yet the more hybrid our cultures become, and the more the theoretical and genetic bases of racism crumble away, the stronger it grows. But this is because we are dealing here with a mental object, an artificial construct, based on an erosion of the singularity of cultures and entry into the fetishistic system of difference. So long as there is otherness, strangeness and the (possibly violent) dual relation -- as we see in anthropological accounts up to the eighteenth century and into the colonial phase -- there is no racism properly so-called. Once that `natural' relation is lost, we enter into a phobic relationship with an artificial other, idealized by hatred. And because it is an ideal other, this relationship is an exponential one: nothing can stop it, since the whole trend of our culture is towards a fanatically pursued differential construction, a perpetual extrapolation of the same from the other. Autistic culture by dint of fake altruism.
All forms of sexist, racist, ethnic or cultural discrimination arise out of the same profound disaffection and out of a collective mourning, a mourning for a dead otherness, set against a background of general indifference -- a logical product of our marvellous planet-wide conviviality.
The same indifference can give rise to exactly opposite behaviour. Racism is desperately seeking the other in the form of an evil to be combated. The humanitarian seeks the other just as desperately in the form of victims to aid. Idealization plays for better or for worse. The scapegoat is no longer the person you hound, but the one whose lot you lament. But he is still a scapegoat. And it is still the same person.
Jean Baudrillard, The Perfect Crime
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
no actually people are racist because different races of people behave differently
arbiter12@reddit
people of different cultures act differently.
Back in the days, race was basically equal to culture, in that it was almost impossible for an asian to "act white", or for a white to "act black".
Nowadays, we have people from formerly "performant culture", acting like "non-performant culture", while looking like "unrelated culture".
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AutoModerator@reddit
Sorry, your post has been removed. You must have more than 25 karma to submit posts to /r/4chan.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
gprime312@reddit
Some cultures are better than others
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
no people from different races are different even across culture. it doesnt matter what culture a somalian grows up in, he'll act different from the whites
QTown2pt-o@reddit
Wherever exchange is impossible, what we encounter is terror. Any radical otherness at all is thus the epicentre of a terror: the terror that such otherness holds, by virtue of its very existence, for the normal world. And the terror that this world exercises upon that otherness in order to annihilate it.
Over recent centuries all forms of violent otherness have been incorporated, willingly or under threat of force, into a discourse of difference which simultaneously implies inclusion and exclusion, recognition and discrimination.
Childhood, lunacy, death, primitive societies - all have been categorized, integrated and absorbed as parts of a universal harmony. Madness, once its exclusionary status had been revoked, was caught up in the far subtler toils of psychology. The dead, as soon as they were recognized in their identity as such, were banished to outlying cemeteries - kept at such a distance that the face of death itself was lost. As for Indians, their right to exist was no sooner accorded them than they were confined to reservations. These are the vicissitudes of a logic of difference.
Racism does not exist so long as the other remains Other, so long as the Stranger remains foreign. It comes into existence when the other becomes merely different - that is to say, dangerously similar. This is the moment when the inclination to keep the other at a distance comes into being.
Jean Baudrillard, The Transparency of Evil: Essays in Extreme Phenomena
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
ok but different races act differently in meaningful ways
QTown2pt-o@reddit
Like dreams, statistics are a form of wish fulfilment.
Manicheism is the irreconcilable antagonism between two forces. Morality is merely the opposition of two values. In the order of values, there is always a possibility of reconciliation. The disorder of forces is irreconcilable.
Jean Baudrillard, Cool Memories
LukeJaywalker0@reddit
???
Lumpy_Enthusiasm_604@reddit
So you're saying i have an AT-field?
BOUKEN-BEN@reddit
When there is nothing inherently good about a certain type of person, they will instead attempt to prove others evil so that they can look good by comparison. That is the fundamental psychology behind leftists calling everyone who opposes them nazis. Subconsciously they understand that they themselves are not actually good people, but if they can stand in contrast to someone they've pinned the textbook definition of evil to, they can attempt to qualify themselves as good because of what they are not rather than what they are. Obsession with being viewed as good and virtuous rather than just living your life and being what you are also tends to stem from a guilty conscience.
Fuzzy_Wheel_4565@reddit
This dude has never lived in a neighbourhood full of muslims and it shows. Lots of meaningless words that would melt away with sufficient exposure to the other cultures we supposedly only hate because we're idiots. What a fucking idiot.
Lumpy_Enthusiasm_604@reddit
Saargon can you get off reddit and make us a new video already
QTown2pt-o@reddit
Ew
Adept-Platypus6676@reddit
Can this be made into a Minecraft shorts ? My attention span is too limited
sprinkill@reddit
It's because everything this person wrote is complete nonsense.
ElGringoPicante77@reddit
Ah yes, the nonsense of some guy named Jean Baudrilliard, who wouldn’t have had anything to say on such a matter.
JustChillin3456@reddit
Here;
“
Like you’re 5:
Imagine kids on a playground.
A long time ago, kids met other kids who were different. They might not always get along, but they knew each other were real people.
Now imagine something different:
Kids don’t really know each other anymore, but they make up ideas about other kids in their heads.
One kid thinks: “That other kid is bad and scary!” → that’s like racism Another kid thinks: “That other kid is so sad and helpless, I must save them!” → that’s like over-helping
But here’s the twist:
👉 Both kids are not really seeing the real person.
They’re just seeing an idea in their head.
So even though it looks different (hate vs helping),
it’s kind of the same problem:
They aren’t treating the other kid like a normal, real person.”
Imtryst@reddit
Allegory of the playground
QTown2pt-o@reddit
That's a really good answer 👍🏼
make_reddit_great@reddit
Never ask a man his salary, a woman her age, or a white supremacist the race of his wife/girlfriend.
2roundabout@reddit
OK I have an explanation for this. So many men have certain values, want children, somewhat conservative beliefs (basically not for left/Marxist views) believe in marriage and nuclear families and don't engage in promiscuity.
Well where I live the above essentially excludes 75% of white women. But is very inclusive of Black African women, Indian women and various others.
Then realise a lot of them genuinely mean it when they say they have cultural issues with some people not ethnic ones.
I don't care whay race my partner is. Its about shared values and I will be honest. Hence in the UK there is a surprising growing demographic of Conservative white men marrying Conservative Black women.
Main reason, they want kids, they have strong family values, value education and dislike modern leftist identity politics.
It's not about race, it's about values. Eventually you realise a great many different cultures from your own share the same values.
um420@reddit
The biggest group of whiners is the people who whine about white women whining about everything/
girlgamerpoi@reddit
That's why you go for a white racist girl!
TWK128@reddit
Also, changing one character into a black version doesn't actually attract a black audience that would otherwise have avoided it.
The only black people that tactic would work on would only watch it if every character was black.
Hedgehog-Moist@reddit
sounds more like an anglophone country issue rather than a white woman issue
sprinkill@reddit
Saved and well stated.
kojimbob@reddit
I have certain thoughts about a certain Amendment
MaybeThisTime67@reddit
I'm going to sleep now. Goodnight 😴
JustChillin3456@reddit
Scoot over, im coming in
Vitality_VZ@reddit
I mean...
RatioTechnical234@reddit
Man, I could go for some BBQ right now
Skunkape666@reddit
I mean yeah