meanwhile grandpa is on life support in urgent care, due to a stroke or whatever the fuck, and your family has leveraged THEIR ANCESTRAL HOME(the one you think he built or paid more than 10k for) to pay for his medical bills, which are in the millions.
Houses shouldn't appreciate in value. They're just like any other commodity, values degrade with time and use. Especially the paper shacks americans live in.
Current house prices are high purely due to speculation. And speculative markets eventually face reality checks.
Houses generally do depreciate in value, the land is what gains value. The houses go up because you generally own the land underneath the house and it gains value quicker than a house depreciates.
Houses shouldn't appreciate in value. They're just like any other commodity, values degrade with time and use.
The land appreciates in value, the improvements on it(the house itself) depreciates in value unless maintained.
Current house prices are high purely due to speculation. And speculative markets eventually face reality checks.
No, it's due to a combination of scarcity and inelastic demand. Zoning laws restrict supply of housing, so there are less homes in many metro areas than people that want to live there, so the supply and demand meets equilibrium at a high price where only wealthier buyers can afford the limited supply of homes.
No, housing prices (in America and several other Western states) are high because of policy subsidizing demand rather than construction that has purposefully led to a housing shortage.
Land has value. Building a home is also more expensive now than it used to be. So you buy land that has increased in value most likely because it's close to stuff people want to be close to as well as the building already exists and is useable as opposed to trying to build something.
Some places that had huge growth during and post-covid, definitely are speculative markets (we saw this in Florida which is crashing a bit, as well as some metros in Texas).
Other places are high due to population booms and limited land (Bay area, SLC metro are both limited by terrain on either side and have limited building area that's swiftly running out). These will only continue to go up and won't have major crashes.
Lol someone missed the supply and demand class in 5th grade. There are way more ppl in need of housing than there is housing in many of the most desirable places to live.
Yes, houses do not appreciate in value because their quality increases (like a good wine would for example) but they increase because the demand increases quicker than supply.
As someone else mentioned, speculation. House flippers, would-be slumlords, AirBnBers, and in some cases large corpos have all turned the housing market into a commodity.
so.. not real supply and demand - airbnb and hedge funds hoarding homes is not why houses exist in the first place, there's not much 24 years old wanting to buy a home for airbnb and then live with their parents
The house, I agree, can often require work or modifications. The land it’s built on, though, that’s where some of the expense is coming from. They’re not making more of it, at least not quickly and cheaply.
Me on everything else: Yacht clubs and strip mining lithium to make a robot that can get tired of my unyielding ceaseless autism after 20 minutes before I reset it's memory
Fire2xdxd@reddit
Can someone sufficiently schizoid enough translate what this is even supposed to mean, thanks.
myqccountgotsca@reddit
everyone in this comment section fell for the ragebait
Morphling69@reddit
meanwhile grandpa is on life support in urgent care, due to a stroke or whatever the fuck, and your family has leveraged THEIR ANCESTRAL HOME(the one you think he built or paid more than 10k for) to pay for his medical bills, which are in the millions.
And it's still not enough.
Lythieus@reddit
Then the boomers sell the home to a corporation before moving into a retirement resort, so 100% of their wealth ends up in the hands of billionaires.
diobreads@reddit
Houses shouldn't appreciate in value. They're just like any other commodity, values degrade with time and use. Especially the paper shacks americans live in.
Current house prices are high purely due to speculation. And speculative markets eventually face reality checks.
Cormag778@reddit
Houses generally do depreciate in value, the land is what gains value. The houses go up because you generally own the land underneath the house and it gains value quicker than a house depreciates.
Consistent-Throat130@reddit
That's not what I saw in Texas where my land's tax appraised a significant figure less than the home is.
At least if the government is to be believed, the house went up in value considerably.
transistor555@reddit
So what you're saying is we need to poison the land for homes to get cheaper. Be right back. Got to go to pool supply store.
EllisHibbert@reddit
Your bank accounts going be monitored for the next couple days.
twotokers@reddit
Land is only like 20% of the total price though.
browsk@reddit
Yeah if you live in tweakerville lol
twotokers@reddit
Google Exists. It’s about 20% everywhere other than HCOL areas.
skilliard7@reddit
The land appreciates in value, the improvements on it(the house itself) depreciates in value unless maintained.
No, it's due to a combination of scarcity and inelastic demand. Zoning laws restrict supply of housing, so there are less homes in many metro areas than people that want to live there, so the supply and demand meets equilibrium at a high price where only wealthier buyers can afford the limited supply of homes.
Baron_Flatline@reddit
No, housing prices (in America and several other Western states) are high because of policy subsidizing demand rather than construction that has purposefully led to a housing shortage.
lllGrapeApelll@reddit
Land has value. Building a home is also more expensive now than it used to be. So you buy land that has increased in value most likely because it's close to stuff people want to be close to as well as the building already exists and is useable as opposed to trying to build something.
Discordchaosgod@reddit
I did the math the other day
based on purely comparative prices, my parent's house has appreciated more than 2% per year, adjusted for inflation, over the last 30 years
that is an insane rate of appreciation for a good that requires maintenance
Smurtle1@reddit
That seems low, ngl. The value should double every ~15-20 years, with lots of people quoting every 10 years (but that’s a bit extreme.)
I am in no way advocating for the bullshit that is appreciating land, but your parents home is appreciating quite slowly.
Discordchaosgod@reddit
oh, you misunderstand
they bought for 230k€
it now would sell for 1.2M€
but adjusting for inflation, it's "only" a 35% increase
BwianR@reddit
It's still low, my parent's house is over 4x after inflation adjustment, 42 years later
Real estate not as bad in Europe I suppose
Ok_Field_5701@reddit
lol not even close to true
Reading_username@reddit
Depends on market, tbh.
Some places that had huge growth during and post-covid, definitely are speculative markets (we saw this in Florida which is crashing a bit, as well as some metros in Texas).
Other places are high due to population booms and limited land (Bay area, SLC metro are both limited by terrain on either side and have limited building area that's swiftly running out). These will only continue to go up and won't have major crashes.
Wity_4d@reddit
Supply and command bubs
dance_rattle_shake@reddit
Lol someone missed the supply and demand class in 5th grade. There are way more ppl in need of housing than there is housing in many of the most desirable places to live.
CaloricDumbellIntake@reddit
Yes, houses do not appreciate in value because their quality increases (like a good wine would for example) but they increase because the demand increases quicker than supply.
Smurtle1@reddit
And because it’s not the house that’s the most important but the location (I.E. the land) the house has little to do with it most of the time.
CaloricDumbellIntake@reddit
That as well. Building a house is relatively cheap compared to buying the ground
dance_rattle_shake@reddit
Yes, duh. You're agreeing with me.
CaloricDumbellIntake@reddit
Yeah I am, I just wanted to elaborate a bit more on your point.
ContributionMaximum9@reddit
how come if birth rate is declining? south korea has awful prices (even outside seoul) with abysmal birthrate, what do you base that on?
Yeseylon@reddit
As someone else mentioned, speculation. House flippers, would-be slumlords, AirBnBers, and in some cases large corpos have all turned the housing market into a commodity.
ContributionMaximum9@reddit
so.. not real supply and demand - airbnb and hedge funds hoarding homes is not why houses exist in the first place, there's not much 24 years old wanting to buy a home for airbnb and then live with their parents
av123h@reddit
The house, I agree, can often require work or modifications. The land it’s built on, though, that’s where some of the expense is coming from. They’re not making more of it, at least not quickly and cheaply.
Pocketfullofbugs@reddit
Bought a 150 year old house first owned by the guy who owned the city's brick yard. Bricc is thicc.
ContributionMaximum9@reddit
yeah imagine saying that bread for 80 usd would be fine just because you have to respect boomer farmers.. wtf kind of logic is this
retrib32@reddit
Haha yeah fuckem got mine
Sunim416@reddit
Bait
SipoteQuixote@reddit
katherinesilens@reddit
IFuckBadDragons@reddit
What if it's not bait?
googlin@reddit
'Bate
FD4L@reddit
Anon is a neet troll.
srcactusman@reddit
Larping being a homeowner
earthhominid@reddit
Potential future home inheritor
SpaceBug176@reddit
Bold of you to assume his parents will leave anything to him.
theredhound19@reddit
He'll remain living in the basement for the next homeowner due to the excessive structural damage cost to extract his corpulent bulk
They get a house cheap and just shovel some tendies down the stairs at the creature's feeding time.
Processing img 83yd7e5280vg1...
Ultrasound700@reddit
Neet trolls usually put in more effort to their trolling. This is peak amateur hour.
RunInRunOn@reddit
I can't imagine living purely to make other people angry
BuddhaBlackBear@reddit
They’re not paying the price tho. They literally can’t lmao
SmaugRancor@reddit
myroosterprettyfunny@reddit
Is Genocide the only viable solution to the Boomer question? Experts say yes!
Thendrail@reddit
Lpfanatic05@reddit
Lpfanatic05@reddit
FullTimeHarlot@reddit
I know there was a small period of time recently where being a young chud was cool but surely that time has passed?
Wiggie49@reddit
I think I have become actively more illiterate from having read this.
Your_Drunk_Unc10@reddit
Me on food, shelter, and medicine: Ultra Stalin
Me on everything else: Yacht clubs and strip mining lithium to make a robot that can get tired of my unyielding ceaseless autism after 20 minutes before I reset it's memory
Prestigious-Fig1172@reddit
A young boomer. Boomling if you will.
ContributionMaximum9@reddit
10 iq opinion