When does "kids being kids" cross into something more concerning?

Posted by butters786@reddit | AskUK | View on Reddit | 133 comments

I’m on a family trip at Butlin’s and thinking about the nature of kid behaviour and where the lines are.

There have been a couple of incidents over the last few days, and in both cases there were no parents anywhere around.

In one, my son (younger, on his own for a moment) had two older kids come and sit next to him on a ledge, about 5 metres of empty ledge and the sat right next to him. They kept copying/mirroring him even after he asked them to stop. It sounds minor, but they kept going and laughing until he got really upset and came over to us in tears.

In another, I watched two kids (maybe 9–10) on the dodgems very deliberately target a younger asian girl who was on her own, going out of their way to repeatedly crash into her while ignoring everyone else. It didn’t feel random and was intentional and she was crying after a while of this but they continued. Again no parents in sight.

What struck me in both situations wasn’t just kids being shits, it was the lack of any pause when the other child was clearly uncomfortable or vulnerable, especially when the vulnerable child is isolated.

I’m not trying to label these kids or the examples as anything extreme, but it did make me reflect on how, even as a kid, I feel like there was some instinct to back off if someone was clearly upset, vulnerable or alone.

So I guess my question is: Is there a point where repeated targeting of someone vulnerable signals something darker just kids being kids?

Is this just normal boundary-pushing and poor socialisation? Or are there situations where the lack of empathy itself becomes the thing to pay attention to?