North Korean Small Arms (and an Anti-Aircraft Gun) Captured by the Japan Coast Guard from the Battle of Amami Ōshima
Posted by walt-and-co@reddit | ForgottenWeapons | View on Reddit | 14 comments
On 21st December 2001, the Japan Coast Guard encountered a North Korean spy vessel, the Changyu 3705, in the seas around Kyushu. After she refused an order to stop for a search, the Japanese ships fired warning shots across the Changyu’s bow. When the Changyu responded with small arms fire and rockets, a brief battle ensued in which over a thousand rounds were fired. The Changyu took a number of direct hits from Japanese autocannon, before exploding in what is believed to be a scuttling. She then sunk with the presumed loss of all hands. Three members of the JCG were wounded by small arms fire in the battle, which is also the only post-war incidence of Japanese forces engaging a hostile vessel in combat.
The wreckage of the Changyu was raised as part of the investigation, and a number of artefacts were recovered, including the weaponry pictured here. The full complement of arms on board was:
- 4x Type 88 rifles
- 1x Type 73 machine gun
- 2x Type 68 RPGs
- 1x B-10 recoilless rifle
- 1x shoulder-launched SAM of a type I do not recognise
- 1x ZPU-2 AA gun
Once the JCG had concluded their investigation into the incident and confirmed that the vessel was a North Korean ship operating illicitly, the wreck and contents were put on public display in Yokohama, where they remain to this day. The weapons have sadly been (extremely crudely) deactivated, but at least they’ve been preserved at all.
ForsakenBend347@reddit
Well if that ain't the coolest thing I've seen all day
RepresentativeFig270@reddit
The weapon on the 8-10 images is probably a HT-16PGJ.
A MANPADS made in North Korea that’s based on the Soviet Igla MANPADS.
walt-and-co@reddit (OP)
Interesting, thank you!
fendtrian@reddit
That was fucking interesting
walt-and-co@reddit (OP)
I’m glad you agree! I was surprised never to have heard of this incident before moving to Japan, you’d think a running battle between Japanese and North Korean vessels would be a pretty major part of history but seemingly not
Yokohama88@reddit
At the time it was all over the Japanese News. It was also a big deal as it took several hours for the Japan Coast Guard to receive permission to fire back despite receiving fire.
This incident lead to changes in the ROE for the Japan Coast Guard.
The Japanese government controls firearms and ammunition so tightly that they have to account for the shells after they are fired. If they withdraw 10 rounds of ammunition then 100 shells must comeback.
likesweed@reddit
Damn those look like they got crispy before sinking. Not a many ‘modern’ NK arms in the wild, cool pics
Salt-Wish5140@reddit
Everything looks rough and worn
walt-and-co@reddit (OP)
Yeah, in between the ship being hit with 20mm tracer rounds, the self-destruction explosion and then being submerged in sea water, the guns have been through a lot!
And you’re absolutely right about not many DPRK small arms being around - I think these are the first Type 88s I’ve ever seen in person.
likesweed@reddit
You took these pics? Nice. I gotta ask, did it seem like the dust covers were installed properly? They’re over the rear trunnion all fucky, and I figured it was from the Japanese bubba demill, but that latch on the back is pretty nonstandard too so I gotta ask
walt-and-co@reddit (OP)
I did indeed take them - I was in Yokohama earlier today so I stopped by to see them. The latches appeared to be correctly slotted into the dust covers, but they also seem to be sitting strangely high. They’ve been welded to the receivers, as part of the deactivation, and so may have warped during the process.
ConstantDreamer1@reddit
AFAIK that's not a Type 73 machine gun, that's a Type 82, one of if not the only examples outside of North Korea. It's more of a straight PK copy and lacks the magazine-feed option of the 73, and is probably so rare to see because the DPRK prioritized them for their own use and exported a lot of their Type 73s.
walt-and-co@reddit (OP)
Interesting and good to know! DPRK stuff is far from my speciality so I appreciate the correction!
AutoModerator@reddit
Understand the rules
Check the sidebar. It's full of resources to help you.
Not everyone is an expert such as yourself; be considerate.
No Spam. No Memes.
No political posts. Save that for /r/progun or /r/politics.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.