Saying 35x more fat is disingenuous, while it's fact, it misrepresents the more pertinent stance that drinking a glass of one type you'll consume negligible amounts of fat, and a glass of the other, virtually no fat.

The only reason the 35x (or the 9900x someone stated in an alcohol example) sounds ominous is because one of the things you're comparing is so small, so it's nonsensical to make those kind of statements. Follow that thinking through to a logical extreme, where one item has NO fat, then the other effectively has INFINITELY more ... highlights the irrationality of comparing them directly to each other.

The other comment about the difference adding up to equivalent calorie content of a kilo of fat a YEAR ... again, on the face of it that's fact yes, but since your body on average needs the equivalent energy of a kilo's worth a DAY then focusing on the milk's contribution to that, again, is nonsensical. As a low calorie content foodstuff anyway even for the boys stuff, you'll get orders of magnitude more impact from looking at other fat content foods if you're framing it this way.