Kia Confirms a New Body-on-Frame Hybrid Truck Is Coming to America within the Next Four Years
Posted by Anchor_Aways@reddit | cars | View on Reddit | 71 comments
Shmokesshweed@reddit
They're gonna have a tough time competing with the current midsize options, just like they struggled against Ford in the compact space.
DetroitLionsEh@reddit
Yeah they missed the mark a bit and the Maverick is such a good product
SonovaVondruke@reddit
Was a good product for the price. Now its. . . fine.
AmateurEarthling@reddit
Yeah I was only interested in it at the original price. Now I also have a third kid though so full size for me.
buffa_noles@reddit
all they needed to do was move Santa Cruz downmarket, especially as Maverick crept upmarket, they would have had a massive success on their hands
ethereal3xp@reddit
Kia never had a compact truck. It was Hyundai that did.
However I wouldn't count out Hyundai/Kia. They are very aggressive.
IONQ5 is already a top full EV seller. Better value, bugger than Tesla 3 and quicker charging.
xqk13@reddit
If only the IONIQs don’t have the notorious ICCU issues
ethereal3xp@reddit
This is true.
Sadly, the newer Toyota BZ might be having a similar problem. With owners having to wait on the sidelines to receive the part.
xqk13@reddit
Didn’t know that, interesting
Shmokesshweed@reddit
Either way, they're under the same parent company. I don't think it's the badge that failed them. I think it was a lack of a hybrid option and pricing.
SonovaVondruke@reddit
The Santa Cruz was a result of poor market research. The styling wasn't appealing to the target consumer, the price was significantly higher than the competition, and it gets the MPG of a midsize truck. I had been waiting for it since the concept was shown off a decade ago, but they compromised to make something with broader appeal and created something with not enough appeal to justify. I still think a unibody hybrid should be in the future of Hyundai or Kia, it just needs to be a compact utility pickup first and foremost and embrace a more function-over-form aesthetic like their newer "art of steel" design language is leaning into.
Shmokesshweed@reddit
Yeah, just about everything is off imo. The front needs to look better. Needs a hybrid. About the only thing it does better than the Maverick is the interior, and with how poor quality the Maverick interior is, it's not a hard thing to do.
SonovaVondruke@reddit
I wouldn't say it looks bad, It has more or less the same front end styling as my wife's refreshed Tucson (a perfectly serviceable SUV design) It just doesn't fit the vehicle or the preferences of the adventurous young people and weekend warriors they were supposedly targeting with it.
Shmokesshweed@reddit
I'm not a huge fan of that design language. Just a personal thing. It's not like my Maverick is winning awards, but it better fits with my idea of what "truck" owners want.
Stock_Market_1930@reddit
Exactly, Ford introduced some radical concepts in the Maverick - FWD, hybrid, and unibody. To appeal to more typical truck buyers, they wrapped it with conservative styling that screamed truck. They went overboard in some places (stamping “Ford Tough” in the plastic for example, but some of the cues (a physical key, options to add your own lighting etc to the bed, option packages in line with the real trucks) were pretty clever.
AndroidMyAndroid@reddit
The Ford badge also gives it a lot of credibility as a truck. It's a small, simple truck - essentially the return of the old Ranger.
Hyundai has no credibility with trucks in the NA market, and they introduced an expensive, gas-guzzling unibody truck with no existing customer base. At least with Ford, you can walk someone down from an F-150 to a Ranger to a Maverick, or vice versa. There's no path to or from the Santa Cruz.
Shmokesshweed@reddit
I wish they put that Ford Tough mentality into the interior plastics. They're so, so bad.
SonovaVondruke@reddit
Right. Ford understood who their target consumer was. Hyundai was trying to create a segment where one didn't exist.
General_Disaray_1974@reddit
I like to the look of the SC, and the MPG didn't bother me. It was the price that bothered me.
Ok_Two_2604@reddit
I love my SC but it only gets 1 mpg more than my Ranger with a lift and embiggened tires.
Shmokesshweed@reddit
Yeah, it's not great. My Maverick with the EcoBoost and big tires doesn't do significantly better too...but the value is in the hybrid
Lucreth2@reddit
There's a gaping hole in the midsize segment for something that can fit 2 car seats and doesn't get the same mileage as an f150. All, and I do mean all, of the current midsize segment struggles to fit car seats if the driver is over roughly 6'. I bought a Maverick because even that tiny truck had better car seat fitment. Many of the people that I know that have full size did it for kids.
CaptainGo@reddit
I thought the Ranger was alright at that
Lucreth2@reddit
Nope, literally, no joke, the mustang rear seats fit car seats better. We tried them back to back in the show room for giggles with the salesman.
Thomas_633_Mk2@reddit
The average Australian just fell to their knees in a Coles upon hearing this
Larcye@reddit
Honestly if they delivered what you said, most of the midsized trucks we have would be in life support. Now no one wants to do that becuese then it will cannibalize the full size truck market, but well KIA doesn't have that problem.
Have a cab with a usable back seat, make it a hybrid that gets close to 30 MPG and it will sell like hot cakes and put the Ranger and Colorado on life support along with most of the Taco's sales too.
Like I have no idea who is doing the market research over at KIA but they clearly know their shit. Telluride's are everywhere. the K4 and K5 are actually great and I see them everywhere. Sportage keeps on selling more and more along with the Sorento.
Lucreth2@reddit
Do you mean full size in that first sentence?
lumpialarry@reddit
I think the closest is the Gladiator for length but its very narrow and overall terrible truck for most people.
Noobasdfjkl@reddit
They aren't going to have a tough time if they do some market research and don't put out a product that doesn't make any sense. The Santa Cruz was for nobody. It was a pickup that couldn't haul anything because the bed was too small, the base powertrain was laughably underpowered while also getting underwhelming fuel economy, and was also substantively more expensive than the Maverick that did all those things better, which also had a bigger interior in almost every measure to boot.
aust_b@reddit
Exactly this. In my area of PA that is truck heavy, I see 1 santa cruz for every 5 mavericks, and even at that point everyone gets a taco or a full size truck.
kinkycarbon@reddit
Compact is gone for what we think. We’re not getting 1700 mm width trucks.
Meeganyourjacket@reddit
This thing is so fucking ugly. I hope that's a concept.
kstetter@reddit
That's the current generation of Kia's pickup
Big_Size_2519@reddit
probably there will be a kia version of the boulder and a truck just like Hyundai
kstetter@reddit
They already have a pickup?
droiddayz@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kia_Tasman
Manual, Diesel, Body-on-frame
kstetter@reddit
I know, I was confused why they're talking about it like the Tasman doesn't exist.
Thomas_633_Mk2@reddit
Unfortunately it looks uniquely ugly, because by all accounts the Tasman is quite good
aDuckedUpGoose@reddit
Four years for it to launch and four years for it to stop catching on fire? Sounds about the perfect time for me to buy a new vehicle. Here's hoping it doesn't suck!
snollygoster1@reddit
Hey, it could also have a feature that traps children because why would any safety switches be needed???
aDuckedUpGoose@reddit
It's just their commitment to a better environment.
snollygoster1@reddit
So what's the recalls look like on this? They always mess something up
Mother____Clucker@reddit
Wow, that is one polarizing looking vehicle, but I digress.
I think Kia has an uphill battle against them in the US market for such a vehicle. The Tacoma is the midsize truck to own, Ford and GM also have their contenders which sell reasonably well. I see this being like the Tundra in the US. Sure they sell okay, but Ford, GM, and Ram absolutely crush them in the full size segment.
SalesAficionado@reddit
Polarizing looking vehicle ? This thing is ugly as sin.
Mother____Clucker@reddit
See? Hey, I agree with you. It's fugly, but I'm sure someone who has recently hit their head pretty hard loves it.
SkellyJelly33@reddit
They told the designer to make it look like a busted FJ Cruiser and I think he nailed it
SonovaVondruke@reddit
The Tasman is on a whole other platform. Hyundai/Kia in the US has 2-3 entirely different pickups in development, including this new BoF platform and an Electric unibody spotted testing with an EV9 front end married to a Santa Cruz bed.
kurtthewurt@reddit
Blobfish!
Wiggles69@reddit
Some people will tell you that the Kia Tasman Ute looks like shit in pictures, but is much better in person.
They are lying, it looks even stupider in person.
TMC_61@reddit
Woof
mr_bots@reddit
Trying to beat Nissan with the new Xterra?
Realtrain@reddit
I, for one, welcome this true SUV renaissance
Now give me a little 2 door 4runner!
AndroidMyAndroid@reddit
EVs are going to bring back the body-on-frame architecture in a big way. It's much easier to package everything - battery, electronics, motors ect...- in a "skateboard" and cut it to different lengths and widths for different applications. Then you just plop whatever body on it you want. FWD, RWD, AWD - your choice.
TurkeyPhat@reddit
Honda execs hiding somewhere thinking "what a dumb idea" /s
Could've been printing money with a new Ridgeline hybrid thing but I guess the Koreans cant wait another 4 years and still make all that money for themselves.
TESTICLE_KEBABS@reddit
I still believe Subaru could have turned the Ascent into a Baja.
F0rbiddenD0nut@reddit
I hope they change the design because that thing is ugly as a motherfucker.
What happens to Kia's design team? 5 years ago they were making legitimately great looking cars. The pre facelift Telluride and K5 are genuinely fantastic looking.
Pretty much all of their new designs are blocky, oddly proportioned garbage that looks awful.
grunkfest@reddit
Hope it has a large enough box to haul a stack of 4x8 sheet goods and pull a boat on a trailer or there's really no point. I carry people in my car, I carry wood, gravel, trailers, and other large burdens in my truck. Proud owner of a 2010 Ranger with two seats which I'm not replacing until I can get something equivalent in a small truck. And please, no tiny displacement direct injection turbo engines, or giant touchscreens, thanks.
Noobasdfjkl@reddit
The pitfalls of direct injection are so insanely overblown at this point, it's getting ridiculous. The amount of motors that have actually seen legitimate problems from DI is tiny.
velociraptorfarmer@reddit
Closest you're ever going to get is a King Cab Frontier. Welcome to the 2026 midsize truck market.
SonovaVondruke@reddit
The Tacoma "xtra cab" doesn't have a rear seat anymore. They dropped the access door though, which removes a lot of the convenience I enjoy in my 3rd-gen utility package access cab.
Insomniax187@reddit
Sorry, but you're the outlier. Most people need it to be able to haul people as well as things.
Salsalito_Turkey@reddit
Don’t hold your breath.
Slideways@reddit
The regular cab truck market is dead, especially in the midsize segment.
C_Werner@reddit
Well considering that even full size trucks are getting the small displacement turbos I think you'll be out of luck. Loving my Maverick and it can do all the things you listed until the engine and screen requirements.
Fulmersbelly@reddit
I’ve seen a couple here (in Korea), and they’re quite bold in the styling department. Haven’t been in one, but on the whole, Kia’s interiors are pretty solid.
oralabora@reddit
It will probably be better than the big3 🤣
captainnowalk@reddit
I’m curious to see what HyunKia does in the space. I’m not sure they’re gonna be able to drive a huge market share, but I think they will be able to nab more than a few buyers if they make good on their interior space promises. Almost no midsize player is really focusing on that, so I think they did find a market segment they can aim at, but cost is going to be the make/break for them. If a full size is just a couple grand more, then there’s barely a point I think. Unless they add some cool extra functionality, like 4x4 standard or something? Could maybe give it more “rugged off-road” chops than a baseline F-150 XL or XLT?
Theendisnai@reddit
I think a lot of people are fixed on the challenge of penetrating the retail truck buyer segment… this has potential to be an affordable, reliable fleet truck with a better warranty than its competitors.
inconvention@reddit
Borrego redux, anyone?
Uniball38@reddit
I will believe it if i ever see it
PurpleSausage77@reddit
Surprised with the body on frame, I thought for sure it would be like a Telluride truck.