The Leviticus and Deturonomy verses your provided are both part of Mosiac law and are not binding on Christians, literally no denomination recognizes them as still in effect, this is just as dumb as the multicolored fabrics joke.

For your later 2 verses you can read this response made by someone else better than I can.

This is nothing against women, nor does this verse suggest that women are less adept at critical thinking. Context is everything with scripture; this, to the extent there are more modern interpretations of this verse which don’t always correlate with the more traditional understanding.

There is a deeper theology behind this verse Relative to Catholicism (at least), it's about the familial nature of the new Covenant which is inherent to all of God's covenants, something reflective of God's very nature. What are all of God's covenants reducible to, the covenant of marriage (of husband and wife), the first covenant that God established. God's own relationship with Israel reflects this, Israel being God's wife. It's no wonder that Christ's Church (the new Israel) is his bride, to be later revealed in her full glory at the end of time (according to Revelation).

With St Paul asserting that women cannot teach or have authority (1 Timothy 2:8-15), this is relative to the priesthood only. This is because priests (Jesus being the high priest) are acting “in persona Christi” (in the "person" of Christ), in representation of “him” (on earth) relative to his bride, the Church. In this way priests are mystically married to the Church (“her”) just as Christ is. This is why priests aren’t married in the natural sense, because they (being men) already are, to "the bride" of Christ, the Church, who is feminine. Fittingly, it’s through the waters of “Mother Church” that we are born anew spiritually, through the “waters” of baptism, typological of natural birth.

With the Church being feminine (the new Israel) "she" is the “the bulwark and pillar of truth” (according to Timothy) who effectively teaches the faithful (and the world) about Christ. In fact, it was also St Paul who taught that men and women are equal in dignity, as with Jew and gentile, in Gal. 3:28.

Furthermore, it’s more common than not to see women leading and teaching RCIA classes, the classes new Catholics are required to attend before entering into the Church. It’s also not uncommon to see women professors teaching priests about theology and other curricula related to the priesthood. Additionally, you will often find women leading/teaching Bible studies as well as serving various other leadership roles within the Church.

Lastly, there are many great “doctors of the Church” (including canonized saints) who are also women whose wisdom, experience, and knowledge of the faith have been expressed through various approved writings, teachings, and feast days of the Church.

To suggest that women cannot literally teach and must be quiet (outside the role of the priest) is absurd. If taken literally this would mean that women (including mothers, grandmothers, Godmothers, aunts, sisters, etc) would not be allowed to “teach” the faith to their own loves ones (friends and family), those who are often the most influential and effective people to learn the faith from. At least in my own experience, my mother has been a major influence to me, an inspiration that has far exceeded the influences of any homilies I’ve heard from any priest(s).

Sometimes the greatest and most effective teachers of the faith aren’t always the ones standing behind a pulpit. The priesthood is far more theological in nature than it being reducible to a mere position of authority or someone who will hopefully present an inspiring homily to us.