Were gardens of houses built in the 50/60’s bigger for growing their own produce?
Posted by LabAltruistic1609@reddit | AskUK | View on Reddit | 33 comments
I recently heard that houses in the Uk built in the 50s and 60s have such large gardens compared to today so that a family of 4 can grow their own vegetables?
I can’t find any specific reference to this anywhere. Anyone know if this was a rule or an unwritten understanding of house builders of the time, or a complete load of rubbish?
UniquePotato@reddit
Romans said you needed an acre and a cow to be self sufficient.
Think it was just the case land was cheaper and more available back then
TooHot1639@reddit
We now refer to them as women.
Ophiochos@reddit
Roman diets were very poor compared to now…
UniquePotato@reddit
Define poor. No sugar syrups, palm oils, ultra processed foods or chemical fertilisers. But They didn’t have a wide range of nutrients, and famine was always a risk
Ophiochos@reddit
Lack of semi-poisonous stuff helped but the poorest often lived mainly off bread that was so hard you had to soak it and/or hit it with a hammer. The rich of course had quite a range of stuff…
Forsaken-Yogurt-@reddit
Citation needed.
Particular-Bid-1640@reddit
Et tu, protein?
20127010603170562316@reddit
My ~1895 house has a massive long strip of garden, I don't get the point. Because of how the sun works, and nearby buildings, only about half of it is usable even at peak summer.
Now it is just a burden. The landlord wants it kept to a "reasonable standard" but did not provide the tools. So I had to buy those and do the work. For a rented place. I don't love it.
Fattydog@reddit
Why would your landlord provide tools? If you didn’t want a garden, why rent somewhere like this?
And maybe the nearby buildings weren’t there in 1895?
20127010603170562316@reddit
It was the cheapest house available at short notice after we were s21 evicted.
It's ultimately his garden, the least he could do is provide some cheap tools. I have to do the labour cutting everything back, AND then I have to pay to get the brown bin collected.
It just feels insult to injury that I have to provide all this stuff myself. And who knows, we could end up in a flat next move, and I doubt a lawnmower, strimmer, shears etc. will be very useful there.
So they're kind of a present I bought the landlord in a way.
Gauntlets28@reddit
I feel like a landlord should at least provide a lawnmower. Ours did when we rented a flat with a garden. It's not like they're cheap.
quartersessions@reddit
There's quite a few of the old villages around where I am that are cottages or houses built along a main street with long strip-gardens behind that were traditionally used for small-scale farming and even keeping a cow - which could also be grazed on common land.
Quite a lot of them have been divided up - and "newer" (ie, Victorian) houses have taken half the strip - maintaining large, long back gardens where you can still see the original outline.
AndyTheSane@reddit
Here in Somerset, that kind of long, thin garden was a common feature of cottages as it was used for rope production apparently.
Outrageous_Shake2926@reddit
I thought it was homes built in the inter war years [1920s and 1930s] that had bigger gardens.
colin_staples@reddit
Our house was built in 1935
The back garden is 70 feet long. Newer build houses in my area don't have anything like this.
The front garden is conveniently car-sized and was converted to a driveway.
Akash_nu@reddit
Same, mine is over 100 feet long.
Akash_nu@reddit
Yep! I found this to be the case as well and my house is from that era and have a considerably larger garden compared to my friend’s who bought a newer property.
Forsaken-Yogurt-@reddit
I mean, my 1920s terrace has a 1.5mx 8m concrete yard so I really think it's all relative
Maleficent-Heart2497@reddit
Yes, I live in one. 100ft by 25ft.
Prestigious-Salt-245@reddit
Prior to the sexual revolution of the 1960s it was considered bad form to want to look out of your rear window and see your neighbours in their rear window in various states of undress, so long gardens were the norm.
No-Jicama-6523@reddit
I don’t think it’s that recent!
No-Taro-6953@reddit
Yep. Many British houses built before the 1960s were designed with relatively large gardens to support household food production, particularly from the Victorian period through the interwar years, when self-sufficiency and home growing were common. this was reinforced by policy after World War I, especially under the Housing Act 1919, which funded large-scale council housebuilding with generous plots as part of the “homes fit for heroes” programme, often explicitly intended to improve health and allow space for growing vegetables. Land was cheaper, planning restrictions were fewer, so speculative builders made the most of it. Adding a large garden was cheap, and made a house more attractive to buyers. It contributed to urban sprawl, which led to green belt protections being introduced in 1938 and later in 1955.
post-1960s housing was shaped by higher land values, increased urban density, and planning approaches under laws such as the Town and Country Planning Act 1947—generally resulted in smaller gardens and less emphasis on domestic food production. Supermarkets were becoming the norm (the first Sainsbury's supermarket having opened in Croydon in 1950).
LabAltruistic1609@reddit (OP)
!Solved
BertieBus@reddit
Live in a whole town built in the 60's and all the houses back onto communal areas. So you have a tiny yard out the back and then another door via the lounge area which goes onto a large grassy area. Most of the houses the front door goes into the kitchen, some will have another door which faces onto an alley. The whole concept is terrible for today's living.
The whole concept was community living. Houses in our town of that era are mostly cheaply built/terraced.
1930's would have given you the larger garden.
bishibashi@reddit
I used to live on an estate of 2 bed houses built as council housing (probably 50% still was) in the early 30s. Small houses but all had 20-30m gardens, and were originally laid out as a small lawn area immediately by the house and then an allotment type space in the rear 2/3.
derekclysdale@reddit
We need more houses nowadays, something to do with all the breeding that took place since 60's. So gardens got smaller in new builds.
Gisschace@reddit
Yes it was, the Addison act 1919 was the first love of legislation which led to the first widespread building of local authority housing. As part of that they recommended large front and back gardens to promote health to allow people to grow their own food. Remember the sort of housing people were living in before this; small, slum type housing with little outside space and shared facilities like toilets. So this was seen as the solution to a lot of public health problems.
This continued through WWII when people were encouraged to dig for victory. Then in the 60s the trend was for denser high rise properties.
Jumpy_Imagination208@reddit
No, the gardens were bigger because the plots didn’t require so many houses.
Now, a developer has to maximise the number of houses in a plot, which means smaller gardens.
Nothing to do with vegetable growing.
Respond_Sometimes@reddit
They don’t have to put the maximum number of houses. But that brings in the maximum amount of revenue for them.
herne_hunted@reddit
The Cadbury's built Bournville with large gardens for their workers but the rationale seems to have been "... to give every man his garden where he can come in touch with nature and thus know more of nature’s God". This was 1895.
Impossible_Theme_148@reddit
It doesn't sound remotely true - it sounds a lot more like what someone now thinks would explain it, so they just stated it was a fact and other people repeat it as if it were a fact
PolarLocalCallingSvc@reddit
I can't find any references but it sounds plausible.
Nowadays we're replacing back garden space with artificial turf a d front gardens paced over to allow parking cars (and then often parking on the street anyway).
AutoModerator@reddit
Please help keep AskUK welcoming!
When replying to submission/post please make genuine efforts to answer the question given. Please no jokes, judgements, etc. If a post is marked 'Serious Answers Only' you may receive a ban for violating this rule.
Don't be a dick to each other. If getting heated, just block and move on.
This is a strictly no-politics subreddit!
Please help us by reporting comments that break these rules.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.