That’s okay Kamala would have been worse right? We’d totally be invading Iran, threatening to end a civilization and run by the most corrupt admin we’ve ever seen if Kamala were president, thank Allah we avoided that terrible timeline!/s
It would have been exactly the same. If the president that had no new wars and ran on No New Wars goes to war, the VP that initiated the Russia-Ukraine war was certainly going to war.
This is all planned by the elites. They are gaming the system for monetary gain and control while the rest of us suffer. I just wish we had never given them so much power in the first place. But we've been voting for this type of thing for the last 100 years.
It's not cope. it's the truth of how the system works. They all have one goal. Weakened individuals with the state running everything. Right and left is an illusion designed to sell central government.
But if US gets the Kharg island and controls Iran’s main oil refineries, that means they will be sold in dollar. Adding that Venezuelan oil will also be sold in dollars post-Maduro. Which means now iran and Venuzuela will fall under USA’s umbrella in addition to the gulf countries they already have. Doesn’t this strenthen the petro-dollar?
Also, turns out while china is a big importer of iranian oil, Japan and Korea are more dependent on Hormouz than China (therefore JP and Knare suffering more than China). Now many countries will look to diversify their oil supply chains. Russia will win the short run. But American companies are very likely to emerge as the next best alternative considering USA has so much oil and can provide stability. Wouldn’t this further strengthen the petro-dollar?
Netanyahu said the plan at a speech the other day, the gulf states are going to run a pipe through the dessert to is not real , and create a new oil terminal in the Mediterranean, then is not real will control a new form of petro currency, thereby attempting to undermine the importance of the Persian gulf obsolete
US hegemony exists via oil being priced in dollars and Middle Eastern oil exporters keeping/investing their money in the US via Treasury Bonds, which other countries follow suit on.
This mad war is causing rethinks, countries are earning less, spending more on defence, investing what they still can in other options (such as gold), and selling existing investments.
One of the nice things about financial media outlets like Bloomberg news is that they face significantly higher financial liability for spreading misinformation.
Most media outlets can lie or otherwise just pretend their editorial opinion is news with impunity. There is nothing illegal about lying. The only thing they really risk is professional reputation. As long as they don't violate copyright or deliberately defame somebody then there isn't much anybody can do except just to ignore them.
However with financial media outlets their content can constitute professional advise. And as such they are potentially financially liable for damages caused by people following their misinformation.
I suspect this is one of the major reasons why parent companies often split off financial reporting into different subsidiaries from their normal political news. Like with msnbc vs cnbc.
And it looks like this article was written very carefully.
I am personally fine with the petrodollar going the way of the dodo. The amount of power and influence the USA Federal government has a result of this has caused our government to operate with a high degree of delusion. Were one bad decisions after another was at least partially compensated by this sort of arrangement. Giving them the sense that they know what they are doing, when they absolutely do not.
Unfortunately it is the economy and the public that are going to most of the suffering. But it is going to happen one way or the other.
Most media outlets can lie or otherwise just pretend their editorial opinion is news with impunity. There is nothing illegal about lying. The only thing they really risk is professional reputation. As long as they don't violate copyright or deliberately defame somebody then there isn't much anybody can do except just to ignore them.
However with financial media outlets their content can constitute professional advise. And as such they are potentially financially liable for damages caused by people following their misinformation.
The virtuous loop that has seen America underwrite stability in the Middle East in exchange for Gulf states recycling their dollar revenues into US Treasuries has been broken.
The understanding traces back to 1974, when Henry Kissinger struck one of the most consequential financial deals in modern history. Saudi Arabia would price its oil in dollars and park the surpluses in US assets — Treasuries above all. Other Gulf states followed. In exchange, America provided security guarantees and a stable global order.
The US-Israeli war with Iran has fractured this arrangement — at both ends.
Start with the importing side. Since the strike on Iran on Feb. 28, foreign central banks have been net sellers of Treasuries for five consecutive weeks. Holdings at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York have dropped by roughly $82 billion to $2.7 trillion, the lowest level since 2012.
The 10-year Treasury yield, rather than falling on safe-haven demand as it has in every major recent crisis, climbed from 3.9% at the end of February to above 4.4% within weeks. The rates desk at Bank of America Corp. offered a dry summary: “Foreign official sectors are selling US Treasury bonds.”
The mechanism is straightforward. Turkey, India, Thailand and other oil-importing nations are caught in a brutal arithmetic: Oil priced in dollars has surged past $100 a barrel while their currencies weaken against the greenback. To limit depreciation — which would push domestic oil prices even higher, forcing either fiscal subsidies or household pain — central banks intervene in currency markets. That requires dollars. The most liquid dollar asset any central bank holds is Treasuries. So they sell.
The petrodollar loop requires two moving parts: dollars earned and dollars invested. Both have stopped.
The numbers on the exporting side make this concrete. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE had a combined holding of about $300 billion in Treasuries as of January. These countries are now simultaneously earning less oil revenue, spending heavily on air defense and reviewing the investment pledges they made to Washington just months ago. A Gulf official told the Financial Times that several of the region’s largest economies are examining whether force majeure clauses apply to existing investment commitments, including to the US. Gulf sovereign wealth funds are big investors in US assets. The direction of travel is now uncertain in a way it has not been in decades.
There is a longer structural story that the war is accelerating rather than creating. The share of Treasuries held by foreign investors had already fallen to around 32%, down from half in the early 2010s. Central banks became net sellers in early 2025. For the first time since 1996, global central banks now hold more gold in aggregate than US government bonds. These were slow-moving trends, easy to dismiss as noise. The Iran war is making them look like signal.
The standard reassurance is that there is no alternative to Treasuries — no other market offers the depth, liquidity and legal infrastructure that central banks require. This remains true. Foreign central banks will not abandon Treasuries wholesale. But “no realistic alternative” and “unquestioned safe haven” are not the same thing, and the Iran war is clarifying the difference.
The virtuous loop that has seen America underwrite stability in the Middle East in exchange for Gulf states recycling their dollar revenues into US Treasuries has been broken.
The understanding traces back to 1974, when Henry Kissinger struck one of the most consequential financial deals in modern history. Saudi Arabia would price its oil in dollars and park the surpluses in US assets — Treasuries above all. Other Gulf states followed. In exchange, America provided security guarantees and a stable global order.
The US-Israeli war with Iran has fractured this arrangement — at both ends.
Start with the importing side. Since the strike on Iran on Feb. 28, foreign central banks have been net sellers of Treasuries for five consecutive weeks. Holdings at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York have dropped by roughly $82 billion to $2.7 trillion, the lowest level since 2012.
The 10-year Treasury yield, rather than falling on safe-haven demand as it has in every major recent crisis, climbed from 3.9% at the end of February to above 4.4% within weeks. The rates desk at Bank of America Corp. offered a dry summary: “Foreign official sectors are selling US Treasury bonds.”
The mechanism is straightforward. Turkey, India, Thailand and other oil-importing nations are caught in a brutal arithmetic: Oil priced in dollars has surged past $100 a barrel while their currencies weaken against the greenback. To limit depreciation — which would push domestic oil prices even higher, forcing either fiscal subsidies or household pain — central banks intervene in currency markets. That requires dollars. The most liquid dollar asset any central bank holds is Treasuries. So they sell.
The petrodollar loop requires two moving parts: dollars earned and dollars invested. Both have stopped.
The numbers on the exporting side make this concrete. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE had a combined holding of about $300 billion in Treasuries as of January. These countries are now simultaneously earning less oil revenue, spending heavily on air defense and reviewing the investment pledges they made to Washington just months ago. A Gulf official told the Financial Times that several of the region’s largest economies are examining whether force majeure clauses apply to existing investment commitments, including to the US. Gulf sovereign wealth funds are big investors in US assets. The direction of travel is now uncertain in a way it has not been in decades.
There is a longer structural story that the war is accelerating rather than creating. The share of Treasuries held by foreign investors had already fallen to around 32%, down from half in the early 2010s. Central banks became net sellers in early 2025. For the first time since 1996, global central banks now hold more gold in aggregate than US government bonds. These were slow-moving trends, easy to dismiss as noise. The Iran war is making them look like signal.
The standard reassurance is that there is no alternative to Treasuries — no other market offers the depth, liquidity and legal infrastructure that central banks require. This remains true. Foreign central banks will not abandon Treasuries wholesale. But “no realistic alternative” and “unquestioned safe haven” are not the same thing, and the Iran war is clarifying the difference.
MrSt4pl3s@reddit
Annnnnnd here comes economic collapse
cathercules@reddit
That’s okay Kamala would have been worse right? We’d totally be invading Iran, threatening to end a civilization and run by the most corrupt admin we’ve ever seen if Kamala were president, thank Allah we avoided that terrible timeline!/s
DravenTor@reddit
It would have been exactly the same. If the president that had no new wars and ran on No New Wars goes to war, the VP that initiated the Russia-Ukraine war was certainly going to war.
This is all planned by the elites. They are gaming the system for monetary gain and control while the rest of us suffer. I just wish we had never given them so much power in the first place. But we've been voting for this type of thing for the last 100 years.
cathercules@reddit
Some serious cope
DravenTor@reddit
It's not cope. it's the truth of how the system works. They all have one goal. Weakened individuals with the state running everything. Right and left is an illusion designed to sell central government.
DravenTor@reddit
I guess we better start drilling double time in North and South America.
NewLeague6438@reddit
But if US gets the Kharg island and controls Iran’s main oil refineries, that means they will be sold in dollar. Adding that Venezuelan oil will also be sold in dollars post-Maduro. Which means now iran and Venuzuela will fall under USA’s umbrella in addition to the gulf countries they already have. Doesn’t this strenthen the petro-dollar?
Also, turns out while china is a big importer of iranian oil, Japan and Korea are more dependent on Hormouz than China (therefore JP and Knare suffering more than China). Now many countries will look to diversify their oil supply chains. Russia will win the short run. But American companies are very likely to emerge as the next best alternative considering USA has so much oil and can provide stability. Wouldn’t this further strengthen the petro-dollar?
The_Dying_Gaul323bc@reddit
Netanyahu said the plan at a speech the other day, the gulf states are going to run a pipe through the dessert to is not real , and create a new oil terminal in the Mediterranean, then is not real will control a new form of petro currency, thereby attempting to undermine the importance of the Persian gulf obsolete
gsts108@reddit
Marc Richs biography hinted that a smaller pipeline of this sort already exists, I believe.
The_Dying_Gaul323bc@reddit
If it does it would be for domestic use. They are now talking about a pipeline that would provide crude for transport and sale
PrelateFenix87@reddit
No if anything this makes North America and the USA the most stable region to purchase LNG and oil. And it all runs through the USA .
Redneckia@reddit
This is just the straw that broke it, the system shouldn't be this fragile
LtPitty@reddit
This is all planned so they can replace it with CBDCs. Avoid at all costs.
lovesaints@reddit
Can someone ELI5?
Topinio@reddit
bamfindian@reddit
Sensationalist doomer bullshit as usual
natermer@reddit
No, it isn't.
bamfindian@reddit
lol Nuh uh
natermer@reddit
This is very serious.
One of the nice things about financial media outlets like Bloomberg news is that they face significantly higher financial liability for spreading misinformation.
Most media outlets can lie or otherwise just pretend their editorial opinion is news with impunity. There is nothing illegal about lying. The only thing they really risk is professional reputation. As long as they don't violate copyright or deliberately defame somebody then there isn't much anybody can do except just to ignore them.
However with financial media outlets their content can constitute professional advise. And as such they are potentially financially liable for damages caused by people following their misinformation.
I suspect this is one of the major reasons why parent companies often split off financial reporting into different subsidiaries from their normal political news. Like with msnbc vs cnbc.
And it looks like this article was written very carefully.
I am personally fine with the petrodollar going the way of the dodo. The amount of power and influence the USA Federal government has a result of this has caused our government to operate with a high degree of delusion. Were one bad decisions after another was at least partially compensated by this sort of arrangement. Giving them the sense that they know what they are doing, when they absolutely do not.
Unfortunately it is the economy and the public that are going to most of the suffering. But it is going to happen one way or the other.
AlphaTangoFoxtrt@reddit
What in the clanker slop is this misinformation?
Afuera!
Rtfmlife@reddit
This is completely made up and not true.
Anen-o-me@reddit (OP)
Full copy of the article in case the Bloomberg website isn't cooperating.
Excerpts:
Anen-o-me@reddit (OP)
Full copy of the article in case the Bloomberg website isn't cooperating.
Excerpts: