I’m not so sold on the Ori ships being the winners. For me their weapons are beam weapons similar to phasers in terms of combat style, but with a slower rate of fire and a questionable power supply (when firing their beam weapons their shields wobble). So the question becomes about power of the weapon vs the D’s shields and the power of phasers vs ori shields.

Trek Shields are canonically incredibly strong, and phasers are ludicrous. Someone did the maths based on feats phasers have performed on screen and a ship mounted phaser can put out a stream of energy equal to half the energy emitted by the sun, per shot, and their shields can withstand those shots. Additionally their weapons are multi directional and are able to fire multiple shots in quick succession.

Ori weapons and shields on the other hand haven’t been seen doing enough different things to calculate their output. We know their shields beat conventional weapons, but loose to advanced weapons like Asgard beams and potentially Ancient drones. Are phasers similar enough to Asgard beams? Are they stronger? We know Ori weapons crack regular shields, but need multiple shots against stronger shields so is a ZPM powered shield stronger than a Trek shield? Well, Star Trek has shields that protect star bases, and even some planets using power generators that are commonplace and reliable. The power requirements for the Atlantis shield taxed the ZPM against the replicator beam weapon, and the size of the shield also effected power consumption noticeably, and when a ZPM was hooked up to a 304 Ori weapons could still overcome it. So we have to assume Trek is capable of higher power generation and their shields are at LEAST equal to a ZPM powered shield, but for my money I’d argue Trek shields are stronger and their power source doesn’t run out of power.

I’d say that canonically the on screen feats of trek weapons and shields actually out class the on screen feats of Ori weapons. Though I accept that is a hard sell to the SG community.