From Kevin Rose Regarding Digg
Posted by nusm@reddit | RedditAlternatives | View on Reddit | 25 comments
_I’m on Kevin Rose’s email subscription, and this is what he sent out regarding his return to Digg…_
I’m going back to digg, full-time, with new tools
I’m returning to Digg full-time, starting the first week of April. This is the company I started back in 2004, and stepping back into the driver’s seat feels both surreal and completely right.
Here’s the reality: the team that recently relaunched Digg ran head-first into one of the gnarliest problems on the internet right now - smart bots. Not the clumsy spam bots of the early web. These are sophisticated AI-driven agents that flooded the platform within hours of launch. Tens of thousands of fake accounts. The team deployed every tool they could, internal (and external vendors), and it still wasn’t enough. When you can’t trust that the votes, comments, and engagement are real, you’ve lost the very foundation a community platform is built on.
On top of that, the gravitational pull of existing social platforms is massive. Network effects aren’t just a moat - they’re a wall. Positioning Digg as simply an “alternative” to the incumbents was never going to cut it. What comes next needs to be genuinely different.
So we’re doing a hard reset. A small, determined team is stepping up to rebuild with a completely reimagined approach. And here’s the thing that makes me genuinely optimistic: advances in AI tooling have fundamentally changed how we operate. The entire team is now actively building, and we’re able to run multiple parallel efforts at once. It’s now realistic for us to prototype a number of products concurrently, which meaningfully expands our surface area for discovery. That wasn’t possible even a year ago.
I’ll continue advising True Ventures, but Digg is now my primary focus. And yes, Diggnation will continue recording monthly while we figure this out. I couldn’t be more fired up.
kaesylvri@reddit
Oh man, a whole lot of worthless in that post.
Doesn't matter what Kevin Rose does, Digg's dead and it's not coming back. What they put up was so un-Digg that it doesn't matter if they fix their supposed bot problem.
A problem they were told they were going to have with their setup right at the start.
The thing they need to fix is so deeply ingrained, it doesn't matter what names they add/remove from the ordeal because the culture itself is rotten to the core.
Gravitational pull of social media platforms... sounds like he stuffed his mouth full of ai slop before regurgitating it to an interview.
busymom0@reddit
I never visited the new Digg. What problem was it?
kaesylvri@reddit
Everything from the interface experience down to how they handled community creation, dude.
busymom0@reddit
The few screenshots I saw made it look more like a Facebook design. I use old.reddit because I like high information density.
kaesylvri@reddit
Same. New digg was even worse than new reddit.
Old reddit is the only thing that keeps me here.
busymom0@reddit
I have the design chops to make something which both you and I will enjoy but the hard part is getting enough daily active users to contribute new original content. Not sure how to solve it.
redditjerome@reddit
If you build it, they will come.
FearlessInflation92@reddit
Digg was kind of boring
Artiste212@reddit
The new dig was boring because it had few people commenting.
FearlessInflation92@reddit
Yeah that’s my point. No NSFW either ever according to their policy
penalcolonoscopy@reddit
The whole thing screams AI O_O
come-home@reddit
I just don't believe this guy has some secret sauce that was missing before. They got rekt by bots and squatters who went in to setup camp as power users/brokers. The bots are a solvable thing but the squatters are not, unless you want the first story about your new site to be about your banning of new users. It also doesn't bode confidence that their solution to rational (and completely predictable) issues is to fire a sizeable amount of their team and to start from a new, re-imagined position. They need network effects but digg does not offer a new vertical of content that isn't already covered by platforms w/ existing network effects. Amateur hour + all in on no commitment = digg 2026. And hey, I'm down for an experiment. I think more different social networks is a good thing. But digg right now feels like a rich but undisciplined person's side project.
Lob-Star@reddit
I'd certainly go somewhere that advertised and could reasonably prove there were no bots on their platform. I can't get that with current products. Seems like a new product to me. Call it OnlyHumans.
come-home@reddit
I agree, I'd like a place with proof that there are no bots, but that just can't exist w/o identity verification and a new platform which requires identity verification is not one I'd trust. A catch-22 but it is what it is.
intertubeluber@reddit
Like wholesale writing this entire message.
Stiltskin@reddit
Squints suspiciously.
FaolanBaelfire@reddit
God dammit Claude
HotTakes4HotCakes@reddit
I love how they just didn't pay any attention to the feedback at all.
Every time you say the word "AI" in a positive way, you kill my interest all over again.
topselection@reddit
I don't understand. If you can spot the fake accounts, you can remove them, and be left with real accounts.
Something tells me they were using AI to spot AI and got tens of thousands of false positives.
aVarangian@reddit
did he use AI to write some parts of this?...
zerosetback@reddit
“Network effects aren’t just a moat - they’re a wall. Positioning Digg as simply an “alternative” to the incumbents was never going to cut it.”
Certainly sounds like it.
busymom0@reddit
Was this sent on April fools day and he's hoping to fool everyone once again?
nusm@reddit (OP)
Actually it was sent a few days ago, I just got around to reading it and posting it.
GoldieForMayor@reddit
And now you know why Reddit is a hive mind mess.
r721@reddit
Same post on Substack: https://www.kevinrose.com/p/rebooting-everything