Fuck Israel

Posted by Cynical_Tripster@reddit | anime_titties | View on Reddit | 126 comments

Fuck Israel

Body Text (Optional) More like Isn'treal

Reply to Post

Reply

126 Comments

[-]

Allindur@reddit

You she's a minor.

Reply

[-]

LucidOndine@reddit

She was in 1997.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

She still is now thanks to the magic of cartoon characters not aging

Reply

[-]

Osbre@reddit

If human standards don't apply then purported age doesn't matter

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

What human standards dont apply to underage porn?

Reply

[-]

Osbre@reddit

To non humans? The ones applied to humans maybe 🤔

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Did you have a stroke writing this?

Reply

[-]

Osbre@reddit

Why am i not surprised you're not literate?

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Because you are terrible at reading/writing comprehension

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Being alive for one. And the fact that they never age. Being born and dying is a pretty core part of being a human.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

And still you will defend jacking it to a representative image of a 14 year old

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

🙄 You got her birth certificate or something? And since we are applying biological age to her, she was 14 in 1997, its not 1997 anymore.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

No i dont, unless specified its assumed the character drawn is the Canon age

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

We should apply real life standards to something that isn't real didnt you know?

Reply

[-]

BendicantMias@reddit

Everyone knows the only bad thing that matters is sexualization. Violence is perfectly fine, only sex is evil.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

That's how you know it's just moral panic, they will watch the same anime girl they complained about being in a bikini get brutally murdered and not care

Reply

[-]

DungeonDefense@reddit

I was younger than her in 1997

Reply

[-]

LastXmasIGaveYouHSV@reddit

She's 45 now, twice divorced, three kids. The older started college this year.

Reply

[-]

Cynical_Tripster@reddit (OP)

... I did not, fuck. Tbh never watched Evangelion just know about it bc I waste loads of time online.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Bro so what? She dosen't look like a kid and she is a drawing, what? You are going to check the ID of every anime girl to see which one is ok to goon too? Dont listen to their insanity, asking you to treat cartoons like people.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Nah man you shouldn't sexually teenagers

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Teenagers are human people, not cartoons, this is not a teenage, this is a caricature of a human. It dosent need to be protected from sexualization, it can't be victimized, and I could just as easily say this is an aged up version of her that is 25, that would be just as valid of a claim, it's not the official depiction of her after all, who says she can't be 25?

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

You're spending a lot of effort to excuse finding a 14 year old attractive

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

Let me correct you. You're spending a lot of effort to *protect your right of free speech and thought by not giving in to delusionals using "excuse finding a 14 year old attractive" as a strawman argument*. Its a piece of fictional art that you *claim* to depict a minor when the reality is that this piece of art leaces plenty of room for interpretation to begin with. If we break it down to what we see than it is drawn cartoon women with half her tits out not more not less. Your line of thought is very dangerous. By that logic Horror films could become outlawed because it depicts murder - lets not do this. Where theres no victim theres no crime - that would be a good place to start.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Spending a awful lot of energy to defend jacking off to 14 year olds

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

The only minor thing here is your intelligence :D blocked

Reply

[-]

slicerprime@reddit

It's not a "fourteen year old". It's pixels. Which makes makes both sides of this dumdass argument dumdasses.

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

Refreshing to find a sane reasonable and differentiated person on the internet and especially on reddit.

Reply

[-]

slicerprime@reddit

Yeah. I thought reason and critical thinking were banned on Reddit...or at least endangered species.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Thank you 😅

Reply

[-]

BendicantMias@reddit

You realize she's also a child soldier who dies brutally? Somehow that doesn't bother people. No, the only thing they make a fuss about is sexualization. Never violence.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

No that bothered me plenty. Don't put words in my mouth. Its also not relevant to the context of sexualizing a minor

Reply

[-]

BendicantMias@reddit

Oh really?! Funny how I don't see you making a fuss about that. In fact I don't see anyone doing that. Don't try and *'yeah, violence is bad, but let's get back to the only thing I really care to fight about'* me. It's always sexualization that gets you folk up in arms. There's plenty of violence in media, yet it almost never gets attacked, and never to the same extent. The pattern is pretty established by now, so don't think going all '*oh no, anyways...*' is going to get you out of accusations of selective outrage and hypocrisy. Violence is widespread in media. And no, not just sexual violence. Either fight it as frequently and with as much intensity as you do sexualization, or just shut it!

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Is there violence here to comment on or are you just trying to make a shitty Srawman? Spoilers: youre making a strawman.

Reply

[-]

BendicantMias@reddit

She's a child soldier. That got nothing from you lot. She died violently. That got nothing from you lot. Hell, she's even traumatized by violence. That got nothing from you lot. Yes, it's very much here. Spoilers: you're being a hypocrite.

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Again, where is that in the discussion? You bringing it up to distract from your creepy fixation on young teenage girls doesn't mean its actually valid here

Reply

[-]

BendicantMias@reddit

That's the whole point - it's not in the discussion. It's never in the discussion. Cos you don't really care about it. And you're the one with the creepy fixation. Hell, the pic isn't even here anymore, do you hear me complaining? I'm not arguing cos I want more pics of her, I'm arguing cos of YOU. Cos busybody moral supremacists like you fingerwagging everywhere just ruin everything you come across. I don't give a shit about this picture, or any other. It's YOU who bothers me. You'll find me attacking your ilk on a lot of other non-sexual issues as well, cos your ilk is cancer. Worse, a cancer with an ego. A big one.

Reply

[-]

indy_110@reddit

Ok let's pretend we are in a courtroom and now you are being charged with distribution of child sexual exploitation material (CSAM). https://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch12s07s01s04.php https://www.interpol.int/Crimes/Crimes-against-children/Appropriate-terminology These are terms that have plural agreement across the legal world across all jurisdictions. I just provided a definition from a state level jurisdiction and an internationally agreed definition. What your opinion is about it doesn't matter, the legal definition is what anyone with more than a single orange cat braincel uses when the litigation process starts. You don't have a sufficiently strong reality distortion field to use the "it's a cartoon defence."

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Ok, it's not illegal in the country I live in, so I won't have to worry about it, and its not illegal in the country Reddit is hosted in. It's not as clear cut as you make it out to be, and I'm glad I don't live in Australia or the UK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors

Reply

[-]

indy_110@reddit

I just provided an *Interpol* definition and you are using an international accessible platform to distribute material that will be taken as CSAM if tested in court setting.....take a wild guess which jurisdiction a case being prosecuted about a carriage service that has no fixed jurisdiction. The legal RnD world is already working on this one given the optics and loss of financial reputation if they do nothing about it.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Interpol is not a court and they dont make any laws, their dictionary is irrelevant.

Reply

[-]

indy_110@reddit

Thank you for providing the world with your amoral perspective. Are you a pedophile who's only disincentivation structure is what can legally proven in court? Very cool. There isn't a lot stopping major social media platforms from adopting Interpol standards as a baseline for posting decorum regarding consent and sexualised material, you know like a basic safety presentation every job that ever jobbed does to educate it staff and temps about potential dangers and restrictions on site. I hope you understand that the mothers have been watching all this play out. If all you want in life is to consume fictional and non-fictional depictions of children in sexualised forms...well I think there is going to be a rather large market opening up for internet histories and crypto expenditure timelines.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Run out of arguments go for personal attacks 🫩 Sure buddy whatever you say

Reply

[-]

indy_110@reddit

Alright Agent Smith. You sound like the kid that missed the point of Lollita being about a creepy old man who never grew up. I think you don't seem to understand how actual Exxon Valdez scale failures occur, we are at the point of figuring out how to contain the spill not address it. Maybe it's time to fabricate some lidocaine impregnated undergarments for all the Smith pilled babies. I'm not going to argue semantics with a child who can't control their libido. Here is a freebie from the Mormans, because we know y'all are too cheap to do anything altruistic. https://youtube.com/@thepromisedlandseries As an atheist I enjoyed it and picked up on the fact even the other side of the discourse isn't happy about any of this, frankly those guys are a lot scarier than me given their history. I think you should take the hint blaring through the Mormon horn.

Reply

[-]

okabe700@reddit

How are they amoral? What exactly defines morality? Is the act of masturbation to a drawing of a fictional character that might be a minor immoral? If so why? What is the basis of your morality here? Since the basis of western morality is usually harm reduction and happiness maximization, what harm here do you want to reduce? Are you also against people watching anime and shows that depict murders as a spectacle in fights since murder is illegal? Where do you draw the line where things that are illegal irl are also illegal to depict and/or enjoy in fiction?

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

Hey don quijote, your hunting windmills and not pedophiles. Touch some grass.

Reply

[-]

StampMcfury@reddit

And German.....

Reply

[-]

humansrpepul2@reddit

Is that like, the Alabama of Europe?

Reply

[-]

BendicantMias@reddit

No, Bulgaria is the Alabama of Europe.

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

You know "she" is fiction and not real? Anyway the girl in this picture is Basuka Langley - older sister of Asuka. Problem solved.

Reply

[-]

Robdul@reddit

Prison is real

Reply

[-]

n33dtofap@reddit

Send him to real prison for posting anime minors then

Reply

[-]

Robdul@reddit

Why do you think they built Guantanamo

Reply

[-]

Afoxinthefridge@reddit

Ugh.... It's a stupid fucking picture. Get off your high chair

Reply

[-]

PersnickityPenguin@reddit

In the US it's still a felony. Anything portraying underage including hentai anime / manga.

Reply

[-]

CiaphasCain8849@reddit

Only if a real child was used as a model or in anyway involving a real minor including inspiration.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Either real child or it has to be photorealistic (indistinguishable from a photograph), everything else is 100% legal, Ashcroft vs Free Speech, obscenity laws dont apply to art

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

Oh i just read the wiki of that case Its such a thin line between obscenity and crime tbh I wondered already how such a law could hold up especially in the US with the first amendment - cause without a victim wheres the harm to make the accused a perpetrator? In essence this was basically a thought/speech crime before. As distasteful as such "art" may be i think upholding free speech is always the right thing to do if nobody is harmed. Also tbh i'd rather have the weirdos doing their imaginery stuff then boiling over and hurt somebody and create real victims.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

You dont have to worry about obscenity, it's one of those thing's that has to be proven by the opposition, to argue a drawing has no artistical value is a tall order for a prosecutor, and when something is protected by the first amendment, the first amendment takes heavy precedence over any obscenity claim.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

No it's not, it's completely legal, Ashcroft vs Free Speech

Reply

[-]

335i_lyfe@reddit

Tf no it’s not 😂

Reply

[-]

Itshot11@reddit

![gif](giphy|mOuVjiA6qvLGB3NusU)

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

![gif](giphy|so8KXAphERsre)

Reply

[-]

foothepepe@reddit

and her mother let's her be drawn like this? she should hang her self!

Reply

[-]

ToranjaNuclear@reddit

Fuck AI

Reply

[-]

noodlessentme@reddit

AI is curing cancer numnuts

Reply

[-]

Simsima494@reddit

You know damn well generative AI and the AI assistance being used to cure cancer are two completely different things. And you know he meant the former.

Reply

[-]

noodlessentme@reddit

No, I meant the latter I could care less if it’s being used to image gen nonsense if it’s literally being used to cure cancer Be ***remotely*** serious

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

Some AI is being used to help find cures for cancer. The AI that generates sexually explicit pictures of teenage cartoons isnt doing that, all it is capable of doing is wasting water

Reply

[-]

LastXmasIGaveYouHSV@reddit

Get used to it.

Reply

[-]

CrimsonAntifascist@reddit

People got used to lead paint. And then they got rid of it.

Reply

[-]

ToranjaNuclear@reddit

Fuck this guy as well

Reply

[-]

Arcranium_@reddit

![gif](giphy|UWMqiZtcixB4MoWX20)

Reply

[-]

LastXmasIGaveYouHSV@reddit

What has Joe Biden gotta do with it

Reply

[-]

Dorkzilla_ftw@reddit

LMAO boomer gif

Reply

[-]

Arcranium_@reddit

All these kiddos are into this new-fangled "AI" thing...

Reply

[-]

Afoxinthefridge@reddit

Hey OP, don't listen to the idiots in the comments. They obviously can't differentiate between a fictional picture and real life, and feel the need to posture themselves as morally superior

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

Then nobody should be making a big deal about Epstein’s Lolita express? Also… depends on your country But in the US > Federal Law (The PROTECT Act): Under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A and the 2003 PROTECT Act, it is illegal to distribute or possess "virtual child pornography." This includes computer-generated images or cartoons that are "distinguishable from an actual minor" if they meet the legal definition of obscenity. Also > Texas: In March 2025, Senate Bill 20 was passed, making it a felony to possess or promote "obscene visual material" that appears to depict a minor, explicitly including cartoons and AI-generated images. >California: legislation has been enacted to criminalize the possession of simulated child sexual abuse material (CSAM), including anime.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

>Federal Law (The PROTECT Act): Under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A and the 2003 PROTECT Act, it is illegal to distribute or possess "virtual child pornography." This includes computer-generated images or cartoons that are "distinguishable from an actual minor" if they meet the legal definition of obscenity. This was overturned by Ashcroft vs Free Speech >Texas: In March 2025, Senate Bill 20 was passed, making it a felony to possess or promote "obscene visual material" that appears to depict a minor, explicitly including cartoons and AI-generated images. A piece of art can not be considered obscene as long as it has any artistic merit. Obscenity is nearly impossible to prove. >California: legislation has been enacted to criminalize the possession of simulated child sexual abuse material (CSAM), including anime. F*ck California

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

The protect act 2003 is because of Ashcroft vs Free Speech? How can it overturn a bill from the future.

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Its irrelevant anyways, Protect ACT 2003 dosent ban virtual images, they just ban "pandering" and "selling" it as if it WERE CSAM. The images are still legal.

Reply

[-]

Afoxinthefridge@reddit

Then it's a stupid fucking law. I get it's still a law, but don't start equating legality with morality. That's what got that to be a law in the first place. No one's being harmed in an anime photo, but what one deems obscene is subjective. And in this case, some lawmaker(s) used their own moral sense to impose their own morals onto others.

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

This is a hyperbole example, But creating an echo chamber of online groups sharing this content will eventually lead to what most would consider illegal content/actions. Additionally Japanese hentai culture is/was created due to a lack of legal availability of content. Meaning most likely some of the content is catering to someone’s desires. Where you draw that line is a personal moral judgment, but much harder when general public safety is involved. If your child in grade 8 and they have a teacher with hundred of gigs of underage themed hentai on their personal PC are you 100% confident in that teachers desires? The laws make sense for public safety. Will a DA charge an individual with one image on their browser history? No. But this law makes it much easier to build cases against predators.

Reply

[-]

okabe700@reddit

So should we also ban violence in shows and video games because they might lead to irl violence if echo chambers form? If your child is in grade 8 and have a teacher that really wanted to download hundreds of gigs of minor hentai but couldn't because it's illegal so he's just annoyed about it and you have no way of knowing that would you be confident in that teacher's desires?

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

People do try to ban violence in shows/movies/games all the time. And we have a rating system in most countries. There are lengthy lists of banned/edited media country to country. My point if you had concerns about your teachers actions towards your child AND they have a database of images, it is much easier to request action against the teacher. These laws are in place to help convict/remove predators. Not used generally as some precrime dystopian law… but who knows with how the world is shifting.

Reply

[-]

okabe700@reddit

They do, but do you? As far as I know the push for this came primarily from the satanic panic people It is, but if it's illegal the teacher might just not risk it and not get the hentai, but him getting the hentai or not doesn't change the fact that he might be a pedophile and doesn't impact his decision to act on that impulse or not, so it's irrelevant

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

Again, the law is there to use as evidence in a conviction. I’m not saying banning a something will not cause its users to stop being predators. But if a person says they were assaulted by a someone but can’t provide evidence, but the investigation leads to them finding banned materials it’s beneficial to the case. And yes, some major cases for satanic worship was used, and video games post columbine etc. Banning of most media I don’t think is ok, but a rating system is beneficial. [But hey look over the list of movies and some of the reasons](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_films) some of them seem like a rating system or warning would be sufficient.

Reply

[-]

Afoxinthefridge@reddit

Sigh... I guess concede to that. I think it's still not quite so black and white as many make it out to be, and I do get tired of the constant "yes FBI, right here" reactions over innocuous comments. 🙄

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

This content was probably removed because it was AI and not because it was underage in theme. And I guess I’m one of the idiots out there on the wrong side of r/anime_titties moral barometer. Also after the Charlie Hebdo attack 40-50% of poll in France agrees in censorship of the cartoon. And that is absolute bonkers to me. Underage porn good. Image of a historical figure. Bad. 🤷

Reply

[-]

Bradybigboss@reddit

No Epstein trafficked real women, not anime women actually. You should def care more about Epstein lol

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

That is part of the point, a fictional novel was used/idolized by a predator. However I would agree more with banning actual images and disagree with banning the novel. The novels intent was misused by Epstein. There is less gray area of mistaken intent in underage hentai.

Reply

[-]

Bradybigboss@reddit

Strong disagree, have you read Lolita? Great prose but also a sickening book. But it’s very different from cartoon women. I don’t even goon to cartoon women, I have no reason to be defending this. But I think everyone on a crusade against it is taking away from the severity of real childporn. The author could retcon the story tomorrow and say she was actually 19 the whole time. It wouldn’t change anything cause she has very few defining age characteristics, as she is a cartoon. If she was drawn to look noticeably younger I would agree with you, but she was drawn in a latex body suit. Don’t waste your time defending the innocence of an anime girl, it’s kind of parasocial. Commit your energy towards fighting real CP

Reply

[-]

40_Thousand_Hammers@reddit

1. She's a minor 2. AI TRASH GET THE HELL OUT OF HERE. 3. Theres a cannon version of her that is 19+ and you choose the 14

Reply

[-]

Blah-bla-3134@reddit

Who cares

Reply

[-]

Blah-bla-3134@reddit

So many down votes , Bro Just goon already

Reply

[-]

booza145@reddit

preach 🙏

Reply

[-]

Cynical_Tripster@reddit (OP)

Fwiw, I had no idea about the age of the character, nor have I seen the series. There's probably less than 1 hands worth of fingers of Anime that I've actually watched all the way thru, and maybe 2 hands worth of animes I've tried watching. I like anime enough, I'm just picky.

Reply

[-]

SteakJesus@reddit

ok now address the AI art Clanker

Reply

[-]

MapleMonstera@reddit

The what ?

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

It being AI shit.

Reply

[-]

MouseJiggler@reddit

Pedo says what?

Reply

[-]

The-Liberater@reddit

Is her name Israel?

Reply

[-]

Serena_Hellborn@reddit

Fuck AI

Reply

[-]

Rev-Dr-Slimeass@reddit

Ah posting sexualised images of 14 year old characters. Obviously this isn't real child porn. Just simulated child porn. Does this make OP a real pedophile or just a simulated one?

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

Lol you guys are not going to make checking anime girls ID a real thing, give it a rest, no one gives a f*ck

Reply

[-]

Afoxinthefridge@reddit

Thank you. I understand that in real life it is an actual issue, but this posting of 🚓🚨 and calling for prison over an anime photo is completely bonkers

Reply

[-]

lricharz@reddit

People have been killed over cartoons, and a large portion of the world now seems to blame the artists/publisher… but yall cool with underage anime gooning.

Reply

[-]

RakkZakk@reddit

In my personal opinion theres only a crime when someone real gets hurt - a perpetrator creates a victim. Who is the victim in this case? No victim. No perpetrator. No crime. Free speech. Your hurt tastebuds and feelings dont count. If people cant differentiate between a work of fiction and reality then thats a case for the psychiatrist and not for the courtroom imo

Reply

[-]

Zemledeliye@reddit

People need to go out and get some real problems for real, some people have too much time on their hands

Reply

[-]

Dorkzilla_ftw@reddit

Its not child porn LMAO

Reply

[-]

DieDoseOhneKeks@reddit

She's born 1997

Reply

[-]

Casually_very_casual@reddit

I am out of the loop. Why are there anime titties in this sub?

Reply

[-]

met_MY_verse@reddit

Due to the date, they’ll disappear soon.

Reply

[-]

outofmelatonin92@reddit

Posting that title while also posting a German.

Reply

[-]

Krypton_Rimsdim@reddit

![gif](giphy|IbYstjFtVvcWc)

Reply

[-]

MapleMonstera@reddit

Out of everything I’ve seen today - this is the first to cause me to stop and think…I need to know where this is from

Reply

[-]

TentacleTeacup@reddit

Evangelion. She's a minor. Absolutely incredible anime, please do not goon to her.

Reply

[-]

138151337@reddit

>please do not goon to her. ||Someone tell Shinji that . . .||

Reply

[-]

overlordjunka@reddit

It wouldnt have mattered

Reply

[-]

Dorkzilla_ftw@reddit

Rule34 man. Fantasies have no limits.

Reply

[-]

MapleMonstera@reddit

That makes sense. I watched that show years ago, It was a great anime I didn’t pay enough attention to the photo

Reply

[-]

SongFeisty8759@reddit

Her name is "Israel"?!

Reply

[-]

SithLordRising@reddit

AI or not it's a great image. Don't know the character but beats today's news

Reply

[-]

Able_Fee3181@reddit

.

Reply

[-]

JustChillin3456@reddit

🚓🚨🚓🚨🚓🚨🚓🚨🚓🚨🚓🚨

Reply

[-]

Apprehensive-Foot-73@reddit

Fuck off

Reply