Dinit, a modern lightweight system-d alternative that won't sell out to age verification.

Yes. C and C++ are the languages explicitly called out in e.g. CISA & the Five Eyes (my new band name) [The case for memory safety roadmaps](https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-12/The-Case-for-Memory-Safe-Roadmaps-508c.pdf): > Programming languages such as C and C++ are examples of memory unsafe programming languages that can lead to memory unsafe code and are still among the most widely used languages today. In attempts to mitigate the dangers of memory unsafe code in C and C++, many software manufacturers invest in training programs for their developers. Many of these training programs include tactics designed to reduce the prevalence of memory unsafe vulnerabilities produced by those languages. Additionally, there are numerous commercial and industry trade association training programs. Further, various organizations and universities offer trainings and a professional certificate for demonstrating knowledge of secure coding practices in C and C++. > While training can reduce the number of vulnerabilities a coder might introduce, given how pervasive memory safety defects are, it is almost inevitable that memory safety vulnerabilities will still occur. Even the most experienced developers write bugs that can introduce significant vulnerabilities. Training should be a bridge while an organization implements more robust technical controls, such as memory safe languages.