Yes, but it's remarkable how fast they're moving. They've beaten competitors who have been making CPUs for PCs for decades, and although they're behind with GPUs, their performance isn't bad, which means we may see a new competitor for GPUs too, given that the duopoly has shown that there is no competition. Perhaps that's why they're boycotting Qualcomm. I say boycott because I tried and used the X Elite Plus (the cheap one), the first version, and it had superb performance. It seemed like the fastest notebook I had ever tried, not in terms of rendering, but when opening windows, browsing the internet, opening documents, and many other things. Yet, in videos by YouTubers and others, it seems to be poor, described as mediocre, not to mention the battery that lasts a long time and the fan that never turns on.

A silly example: you know when you open YouTube on your mobile phone and skip forward 10 minutes and it's instantaneous, whereas on a computer you always have those little waits, but they're always there. With the Qualcomm notebook, everything is so instantaneous, it seems as instantaneous as smartphones. Another thing that perhaps some competitors don't like is that if you analyse a notebook with a Qualcomm chip, it seems that 90% of it is Qualcomm. Go to device management and you'll find Qualcomm Wi-Fi, video processor, chipset, fingerprint reader... I can't remember everything now, but I remember being struck by the fact that while you usually find various manufacturers for all the components...

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)