Drunk driving is abhorrent. And you’re a pathetic piece of shit if you do it.
Also, I hate everything about this law. The slippery slope fallacy is only a fallacy in situations where the logic is applied without merit.
I got a DUI years ago. I fucked up, it was wrong and it’s one of my biggest regrets.
I had the interlock system in my car for a year. You DO NOT want that shit in your vehicle. It’s expensive, intrusive and requires regular calibration. There is no existing technology that would be both effective in preventing drunk driving while also not being a massive pain in the ass for everyone who isn’t drunk. I’m skeptic that such a technology will ever exist. Relying on some AI to judge sobriety and giving it the discretion to shut down the car is incredibly dystopian.
Imagine it measures pupil response and some bright lights are flashed in your eyes from the LASIK grade LEDs on the road these days. Is your car going to call the cops on you?
I take medication and I fear being under surveillance and my personal data collected. i don't want AI to see if my eyes are teary and i/'m emotional or crying in my car. Or have it see me take my antidepressants
My cousin had an interlock. Went to court and almost lost his licence for longer due to the guy calibrating it registering on the system! Was lucky he had proof of where the car was at the time and he wasn't driving.
I worked at a shop that installed/ removed those systems. Boy howdy were those things a pain in the dick to get out. Especially if you're trying to start one and the reader wont capture right
Regardless of ***everything else*** wrong with this, I refuse to have my car totaled because the sensors for the hyper-specific measuring system are one-offs every year.
Does anyone even honestly believe this law is actually about our “””safety””” either? I mean sometimes they manage to sell a bill of goods to people and convince them a law is about their safety but… really??
If they cared about our safety, why not focus on punishing DUIs more harshly? Why can someone who’s had multiple DUIs even still drive at all? Why is that allowed?
This erodes civil rights and puts us all under surveillance. I'll get shit for this but while very drunk driving is a personal responsibility issue, I dont think individual drivers carry much moral blame for driving slightly impaired. As we know, you are still impaired under the 'legal limit". If society gave a shit, there would be more practical options to curb drunk driving or at least more regulations on alcohol serving establishments. A few cities have offered $5 tow your car rides. Uber frankly isn;'t practical because of the cost and logistics of getting your car back the next day. It's not the ride home from the bar that's frankly the biggest structural hurdle.
Anecdotally, it seems like *a lot* of people are quite willing to drive on a regular basis without a license or insurance. Aside from jail time or financial penalties that garnish people's wages, not sure what you can do to these people.
You want to know something. I would feel 100 times safer in a NASCAR car being driven by one of those guys on a race track then on the road with people like you.
Every safety feature and idea that car companies have and get comes from racing. They got this idea because even people driving race cars are sick of people breaking the laws and rules of the road.
I don’t hate safety features.
I hate that they are advancing too quickly to standardize across all platforms and that legislation to prevent fuck shit from happenings decades behind. So, I hate that there is a possibility of my car being totaled out for sensors that are no longer manufactured because they were produced 10 generations ago, thus are obsolete and the new ones likely are not backward compatible (and if they are they’ll charge like $45 to flash the ECU for the new sensor probably 🤷♂️).
I will argue though, that far too many new drivers rely on the driver safety suite and have no real knowledge of what to do in emergencies since the car does it all for them, thus they are inherently worse off for the technology making them safer because they are also not backward compatible with cars without such safety suites.
🤦 then tell all the auto compines that are involved in motor sports to slow down. Wait thats not going to happen. If everyone took safety as seriously as they did in NASCAR, Indy Racing, F1, are roads would be safer.
As it stand it does not matter if you think its going to fast. The amount t of people that die in on a race track is so low if thats the only people that could be on the roads there would be zero deaths every year.
How it is guys going 150 to 200 mph are better drivers then those going 45? Answer the guys going 150 fallow the rules and laws better.
I very much wish to be a part of the solution. I simply do not wish to be placed in a position where my beloved automobile is forever inoperative due to the unavailability of hyper-specific, non-standard components for one off systems that, by their own patent language, will benefit warrantless law enforcement surveillance over the end-user safety.
How much autonomy should the end-user be allowed regarding the driveline and powertrain of their vehicle?
🤦 to be part of the solution you have to understand where every safety feature comes from then. It comes from race cars.
Wearing a seat belt will save lives. Well comes from racing. Making the car take the majority of the damage racing. Buttons on the steering wheel racing. Black boxes, better handling, the list goes on it all comes from racing.
Every race cars drive is a better drive on the road then the majority of us because they understand that dangers.
They don't drink or do drugs. They don't speed because its not worth it when there is nothing to gain.
Don't like it to bad. That's F1, NASCAR, Indy racing, etc thats how we go better cars. Maybe should spend less time being mad and spend more time learn how the tech is there to help keep us safer.
Exmaple going over the speed limit on normal roads. They have the speed limits there for a reason.
Want to go fast they have test tracks for that.
Please point out where in this conversation I have advocated for track-like behavior on the road, and not just a standard for the technology so our fucking insurance rates aren’t through the roof because planned obsolescence makes parts unavailable prematurely.
I get where the tech comes from. Good for the drivers for being such resolute saints.
You have missed the entirety of my point and I wish to engage in no further correspondence.
Have the day you deserve 🫶
Or fucking around on your phone. Or driving while low iq.
With all the safety equipment and software on cars these days, frankly the car should know if you're all over the place on the road *without intrusive interior sensing*.
Now, what you do with the knowledge that "I'm currently being operated by someone on no fit state to drive"? I don't trust autonomous systems enough to safely seize control from the dumbass. And I don't believe that our own equipment should be allowed to report is to law enforcement.
Maybe add a special "dumbass alert" light on the exterior of the vehicle, to warn other motorists... (It's not a great idea, I just ran out of better ones)
There are a few cars on the road that will detect that you’re not responding, turn on the emergency flashers, and attempt to pull off the road onto the shoulder.
That works well enough. I’ve tested it on an empty road in my car by just not bumping the steering wheel when the cruise control repeatedly told me to.
It could pretty easily with the existing sensors do the same thing. That is if it has to keep bumping you back into your lane or applying emergency brakes because you didn’t slow down for the car in front or swerve you into your lane because you almost side swiped someone changing lanes, at some point it could decide you’re not paying attention and start pulling over.
It already has all of these safety features. It just has to start counting how many times it’s been triggered within a given time span.
A lot can be detected with the auto cruise control pretty much every modern car has. Since it already has a mode to match speed with the car in front and stay in your lane it could also keep track of the driver:
* Hitting the lane markers
* Braking late when the car in front is slowing down
* Speeding up late when the car in front is speeding back up
* Changing lanes when there is a car already there
* Repeated brake tapping for no reason
etc. So in a way, yes, certain types of incompetence are easy to detect today with existing technology and would catch drunk drivers as well as distracted drivers and straight up incompetent drivers.
There doesn’t really need to be alcohol detection in the car or any fancy new tech. Why is driving drunk illegal? Because you have delayed reactions and make poor decisions. Detect delayed reactions. Who cares what the cause is? If you have delayed reactions on par with a drunk driver you shouldn’t be driving.
100% incompetence detection > BAC sensing.
I'm a better driver drunk (in Forza Horizon with a sim wheel - I'm not gonna be the asshole to endanger people) than some of the old people who are still allowed on the roads.
The degree of poor/irrational/delayed reactions is also of greater safety impact than the cause of said poor performance.
And yes, in simulator-ish video games my driving gets worse after beer #2. It's kinda cool to be able to show yourself the danger and impairment without endangering anyone/anything.
It can be.
Impaired is impaired. Having a phone in your hand is impaired. Have a glass of wine is impaired.
All statistically increase chances of an accident and causing death. But alcohol is the clear and present danger , full stop.
Yes, but it’s far far far more common for people to be drunk behind the wheel than fall asleep.
You proved my point though, impaired is impaired. You were as bad as the worst drunk driver on the road.
Do you live in a country with no alcohol allowance when driving? Some countries allow a certain amount like 1 pint and you would still be under, a couple of beer with food over a couple of hours you may still be under the limit.
Using your mobile also fall in to this category.
Sad that in this stage of human evolution, we got to the point where some adults cannot be trusted and have to be monitored like kids, but if it helps then I'm up for it!
The reason people don't fight for the same draconian punishment for mobile phone use as DUI is because they know they all do it and don't want that legal risk for themselves. Only evil alcohol. Which to be clear should be treated harshly, but it's just ridiculous that you can watch tiktok and drive and it's like a $100 wrist slap in the remote chance you even get a ticket
Political [discussion is prohibited](https://www.reddit.com/r/cars/wiki/politics). However, if your post involves politics AND CARS, please consider submitting to /r/CarsOffTopic.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cars) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard of, THIS is what our politicians are up to?
They're gonna police us all because a fraction of the population does this? This feels really unnecessary unless someone has a record drinking and driving.
My coworker told me about it and I was horrified to realize this is real.
Another reason to get the pitchforks and torches. Everybody who voted this in has to go.
I have nystagmus due to birth defects. I do drive. I had a cop give me that test while I was 100% sober and I failed it. I also have balance issues and would likely fail the stand on one foot and walk the line test.
I can get behind it to a point of like... the vehicle sensing that the driver is crossing over the lines multiple times per x amount of time frame and maybe asking if medical needs alerted (medical episode) and maybe going into reduced power mode so someone cant straight leg jab the throttle and accelerate hard. But I agree it becomes a slippery slope on "freedom"
It can sometimes be entirely reasonable to drive on the center line at night. Cars will be visible from very far away due to headlights. Reflector-less pedestrians and deer not so much.
Also, my street is literally so narrow that you can't let a truck past without crossing the edge line. Really messes with a lot of self-driving features.
Many other possible reasons too. Blizzard or fresh layer of snow so you can't see where the lanes are. Sliding or getting pushed around by snow and ice at low speeds or when taking off from a stop. Avoiding a deep puddle or flooded part of road. Avoiding a big pothole. Avoiding debris in the road. Construction. Driving around parked cars on the side of road. If my car yelled at me constantly for these things I'd go crazy
I am just pointing out in a light hearted way of how a normal persons reaction to stress or adrenaline can cause physiological symptoms of things often associated with impairment
No one said anything about off their rocker. The sensors being described arent mentioning extreme states of intoxication either. They are using physiological markers associated with intoxication in a manner that doesn’t seem to have any nuance.
I get that you’re a proponent for techno surveillance, but people aren’t metrics on a chart and driving isn’t black and white.
We all know domestic violence is a lie created by women.
Oh wait it isn't? An abuser having a way to trick a car into shutting off is a bad thing? Oops, your ex-husband who just beat your face in is chasing you, but your eye lids are swelling shut! You have to look at the road to drive! Going into limp mode now. Please safely die outside of the vehicle, thanks.
I don't drink, but this does concern me as I have eye issues from birth that have given me nystagmus naturally. Nystagmus is the involuntary eye movement that cops are looking for during the pen test or "horizontal gaze nystagmus" test as it's officially called. Something like 4% of the population have eye related issues that causes this to occur in their eyes even when they are completely sober.
It would be a much simpler law to have the government seize and crush your vehicle on a second dui to stop repeat offenders from driving again. No? Why do they get the vehicle back and why are they allowed to register one at all? Don’t drink and drive a second time if you want to be able to go to work without taking a bus or paying for an uber ride
Evidence suggests harsh punishment doesn’t tend to prevent crime, it’s certainty of being caught that prevents crime… but on your other point I agree with you. Why is someone who’s had multiple DUIs even allowed to have a license at all?
There are millions of people on the roads driving without a license. It doesn't matter if you take it away if the alternative to driving is completely exiting society.
> It doesn't matter
Yes it does. Most people who get their licenses taken away do not drive. Some people do.
Plenty of cities have public transport.
And catching them driving again without a license will put them in jail and off our street for longer
It's not drunk driving scum that's ruining it for everyone. It's the over protective nannies that want to micromanage everyone's personal lives doing it this time.
No rage bait, memes, trolling, copypasta, or low-quality joke posts or comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cars) if you have any questions or concerns.*
No rage bait, memes, trolling, copypasta, or low-quality joke posts or comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cars) if you have any questions or concerns.*
No rage bait, memes, trolling, copypasta, or low-quality joke posts or comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cars) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The very idea of installing such equipment as mandatory is abhorrent and just another step in the march of nanny tech that is forced upon us. Idiots will be idiots and it only annoys the law abiders.
I'll go a step farther and say that I'm of the opinion that all the modern safety tech has just made better idiots. I think texting & driving and other generally reckless driving behaviors have been exacerbated by these features because people are leaning more heavily into trusting their cars to do the bulk of the driving for them and diverting more focus from the road because they think they have a safety net.
They will do anything to avoid actually charging bar and restaurant owners for serving alcohol to customers they know 95% of them are going to immediately drive afterwards, day after day for years.
Fuck the fuck off.
You had decades to deal with drunk driving. From introducing 0 limit as many countries have to actually enforcing the laws currently in place.
Overcomplicating cars that are already too expensive is not a way to do it.
The insurance companies are the ones that want this.
They don't care if your car shuts down because you opened a bottle of hand sanitizer, they just want to minimize payouts.
Automakers want this, because they want to move the blame for their death machines off of them, and onto the user, although when this doesn't remarkably prevent all the carnage, it might back fire on them, and, they'll have warranty/service problems like when a car stops being a car because some sensitive sensor becomes flakey, which is what normal people are concerned about.
Seems like it might be a stop gap to self driving. If a car can drive itself, it doesn't matter if the occupants are soused.
I have had a few proper “going to get someone hurt” drunks in my family and they weren’t within 10 miles of driving new cars. By the time cars with these filter down there will be a bunch of known hacks to get around the lock out.
Right? Who are these imbeciles who can be convinced that Aiden who lives in a poor suburb and drives drunk every weekend, is going to be driving a new Audi?
This shit is draconian. Can the sniff sensors distinguish between alcohol and, say, hand sanitizer?
Or for that matter, a drunk passenger in the back seat vs a totally sober driver?
They can’t. I wiped the dirty windscreen in a car with an ethylometer lock once and the thing detected it as alcohol breath. Had to leave the car in parking lock honking for 15 minutes before being able to start it to bring it inside the garage to work on it.
Breathalyzer manufacturers claim they don’t detect alcohol but some metabolite in your breath. This is total fiction. A friend brought a breathalyzer to a party, so I used it immediately before and after downing half a glass of 9% beer: blew a 0.07 before and 0.35 after.
Friend of mine had to take a trip down to the polive station because of this. Field test came back as drunk, blood test showed 0 alcohol.
He'd used some mouthwash right before they drove off.
Yes. Most alcohol molecules will react the same.
Ethanol (vodka) register the same as maltitol which is the sweetener for buble gum.
You’re not getting drunk on maltitol or methanol (which is toxic)
Imagine being a hospital worker who has to use hand sanitizer and exposed to nasty stuff all day every day.
When I worked in patient I also had a bottle of cleaner I would use on my shoes before getting in my car. I know others who would do even more like spray their seat down and their hands.
Looks like I'm not leaving the work parking lot because there is now booze in the air and on my hands.
This will drive up the cost of cars significantly, and the cost of ownership will increase as well with how often they'll fail and need to be calibrated. It's such a draconian micromanaging law with little upside since people will disable them anyways.
Would the air sensors be able to differentiate between driver and passenger? Would the fingertip sensor be defeated by gloves?
Just doesn’t seem super effective…
It's not meant to be. What it's meant to be is an overreach of power sprinkled with a little "look! We're doing something!".
There's no way this tech is ready for primetime. They can't even get breathalyzer interlocks to work reliability.
Of course because it's "for safety!" You can't speak out against it without being accused of defending drunk driving..
Don’t even grant them the premise. Forcing this shit in every car is the issue. Debating effectiveness will just get the idiots to argue for different means of surveilling you in your own car.
No skin contact = no start, would be the response to wearing gloves to defeat BAC touch sensors.
It will create a war with defeats and counter systems.
Eh they make gloves that work with touch screens. This will be like the backup camera mandate. A 320x240 camera on a 2 inch screen in the mirror meets the requirements, even though it's completely useless for seeing anything.
So there you are. You're the designtied driver. You watched everyone else having a great time then when it's time to get them home, you're stuck in the car with them because the car has no idea you're stone sober in a car full of inebriated passengers.
Or you're out having drinks when you call for an Uber but driver after driver rejects picking you up because if they did, their car would be disabled for the remainder of the night.
Fucking MADD...go figure out education is the best tool here and stop looking to control others.
Honestly I'm against this becuese why should I be punished for drunk drivers being the scum of the earth?
The simple solution to drunk driving is to make the first offense a mandatory minimum of 10 years in prison. Then a second offense is life without parole.
Throw the pieces of shit into the fucking slammer and throw away the key. DUI's will sort themselves out.
No rage bait, memes, trolling, copypasta, or low-quality joke posts or comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cars) if you have any questions or concerns.*
My brother-in-law has a theory that eventually we will all end up in self-driving cars because the insurance companies will force us into them. They will just make it too expensive for anyone to have a manual driving car.
I’ve watched a lot of bodycam videos, including pursuits, and when somebody is fleeing at 100+ mph giving zero fucks about anybody around them and putting so many people in danger the “we have the technology to remote shut down a specific car” thought pops into my head but there seems to be no technology that doesn’t get abused or create opportunities for overreach without recourse.
Adam Savage once succinctly summed up Star Wars vs Star Trek for me by pointing out SW is dystopian and ST utopian. In a utopia remote shut down would work but we’re living much closer to a SW dystopia and there’s little chance a feature like that is contained to just that (arguably positive) use case.
I’m so over new tech in cars. We lot the plot about 7 years ago. There was a golden age where systems actually helped, didn’t sell your day, and were not antithetical to self repair and long term ownership.
Fuck everything about this.
Here’s my speculation as to how this will go.
I’m assuming that the legislative barrier is overcome and thus enacted.
The easiest tech to leverage is to gauge driver’s responsiveness to dynamic driving environment. I’m talking about the number of steering corrections made per unit time, time latency in applying the brake, etc. The data necessary to make this assessment is already being gathered in modern cars, through sensors such as radar, ultrasonic sensors, video cameras, etc.
The car’s performance can be curbed based on driver’s performance score, and eventually be brought to a stop. This would be useful in not only suppressing accidents from drunk driving, but also from sleepy drivers, distracted drivers, and elderly drivers.
This is where this law will run into trouble and be scrapped. The elderlies will cry murder as their driving privileges are taken away, and they are the most politically powerful voting block. Drunk driving victims? That’s an acceptable cost for their driving freedom.
This is one of the slipperiest slopes to ever exist.
MASSIVE government overreach attempting to control your ability to even travel about and, even if you choose not agree with me there, an insane breach of privacy.
Fuck everything about this.
Let’s jsut make cars more complicated and expensive also less reliable and inevitably strand people in unsafe locations why not
Meanwhile 3+ offense drunk drivers are still driving and not in jail
Completely misses the point of DUI can be for other reasons than alcohol - cocaine, heroine, sleeping pills, and even pot could be reasons for DUI.
What’s next? Speed limiting and seat belts being mandatory?
So everyone is going to be fucked in winter. Wear gloves because its freezing and have su glasses on because thr glare off snow is obscene and tell your drunk passengers to juts nit breathe.
For one second, lets ignore how utterly shit all of these systems would be, how it's a privacy nightmare, how it will be abused, and how it doesn't make sense.
I can't wait for the minimum cost of a car to go up by $5,000.
Guess I'll cough up the $2,500 for the pump my 13 year old Audi needs. This tech is guaranteed to make your car *not* work at a moment when you need it and haven't even been drinking.
It’s also just passing the costs of drunk driving onto everyone else even more via increased car prices to cover this “tech”. It’s also one more thing to break and service - your magic air sensor has a fault and your car now won’t move until it’s towed somewhere to repair for $700-1000+.
Swerve around a pothole and now your car is bricked on the side of the road in 15 degree weather in the middle of nowhere because it thinks you’re shitfaced. How does it unlock? Is it a timer of x hours? Do police have to come verify you aren’t drunk and then have it unlocked over the air via the manufacturer?
interlock ignition devices (car breathalyzers) are already wildly inaccurate. my cousin couldn’t start his car after eating a piece of bread. invasion of privacy aside, i wouldn’t trust these things one bit.
Hi it’s you mechanic at bob’s auto.
Yes we found why your car isnt starting. A roden ate the wire in the drunk sensor. The part is 2860$ and is currently backorder since it’s a common problem.
It looks like you're posting about a currently popular topic. Your submission has been automatically removed and forwarded to moderators for review. **If** your post is about Tesla or Olympian, please see [this thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/cars/comments/9bjyvb/a_new_approach_to_teslamuskelectric_vehicle/) for details. See r/TeslaMotors and r/RealTesla for indepth discussion. Want to prognosticate about car prices? Head on over [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/askcarsales/). **YES, WE WILL REVIEW YOUR POST AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. NO, YOU ARE NOT ON A BLACKLIST.** You do not need to send us modmail immediately. Your call is very important to us and will be answered in the order it was received. No, seriously, we're all volunteers. We'll get to it as soon as possible. In the meantime, please check r/cars/new to see if there is a discussion already underway.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/cars) if you have any questions or concerns.*
149 Comments
retirednavyguy@reddit
Z32anxiety@reddit
TyburnCross@reddit
Hillary4SupremeRuler@reddit
birthdaycakeee78@reddit
mr_j_12@reddit
ReeeeeeAndClear@reddit
JustAtelephonePole@reddit
garden_speech@reddit
Llhaniii@reddit
birthdaycakeee78@reddit
Supper_Champion@reddit
JustAtelephonePole@reddit
Emotional-Water-5457@reddit
JustAtelephonePole@reddit
Emotional-Water-5457@reddit
JustAtelephonePole@reddit
Emotional-Water-5457@reddit
JustAtelephonePole@reddit
Moistinterviewer@reddit
Consistent-Throat130@reddit
zhululu@reddit
birthdaycakeee78@reddit
Consistent-Throat130@reddit
zhululu@reddit
Consistent-Throat130@reddit
RFK_Cum_Regimen@reddit
One_Maintenance6918@reddit
Moistinterviewer@reddit
One_Maintenance6918@reddit
Moistinterviewer@reddit
beck_is_back@reddit
10000Didgeridoos@reddit
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
AutoModerator@reddit
benedictfuckyourass@reddit
mschiebold@reddit
kon---@reddit
FictionalContext@reddit
b4ckl4nds@reddit
SamwiseGanges@reddit
DaughterofDorne@reddit
Humpdat@reddit
Soggy-Car-4548@reddit
blk95ta@reddit
garden_speech@reddit
thisisinput@reddit
Workity@reddit
cybae@reddit
averagemaleuser86@reddit
Shienvien@reddit
ThatOneBitch02@reddit
InsertBluescreenHere@reddit
JapanesePeso@reddit
Humpdat@reddit
JapanesePeso@reddit
mr_j_12@reddit
Humpdat@reddit
crysisnotaverted@reddit
JapanesePeso@reddit
tlivingd@reddit
ezagreb@reddit
Humpdat@reddit
Atompunk78@reddit
oiuwej0608@reddit
blk95ta@reddit
eirexe@reddit
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
10000Didgeridoos@reddit
garden_speech@reddit
This-City-7536@reddit
garden_speech@reddit
HedonisticFrog@reddit
AutoModerator@reddit
HedonisticFrog@reddit
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
AutoModerator@reddit
HauntingObligation@reddit
AutoModerator@reddit
FancyManIAm@reddit
DavoinShowerHandel1@reddit
10000Didgeridoos@reddit
WingerRules@reddit
mr_lab_rat@reddit
gsasquatch@reddit
Magnus_The_Totem_Cat@reddit
garden_speech@reddit
Left4DayZGone@reddit
julienjj@reddit
xrelaht@reddit
julienjj@reddit
benedictfuckyourass@reddit
julienjj@reddit
Justame13@reddit
Crewstage8387@reddit
biggsteve81@reddit
Justame13@reddit
Shienvien@reddit
HedonisticFrog@reddit
Klynn7@reddit
cat_prophecy@reddit
Yotsubato@reddit
mr_j_12@reddit
AbundanceLiberal@reddit
Jnaythus@reddit
AbundanceLiberal@reddit
julienjj@reddit
StandupJetskier@reddit
Magnus_The_Totem_Cat@reddit
Psycho_Loli@reddit
tagman375@reddit
Magnus_The_Totem_Cat@reddit
oboingadoing@reddit
SF_Bubbles_90@reddit
Jabin04@reddit
kon---@reddit
Larcya@reddit
AutoModerator@reddit
Castrol-5w30@reddit
WhippersnapperUT99@reddit
_galaga_@reddit
ZombiePope@reddit
Ibotthis@reddit
Yotsubato@reddit
1975hh3@reddit
nekmatu@reddit
Skeptical0ptimist@reddit
rooftop_druid@reddit
Hustletron@reddit
GenTenStation@reddit
Occhrome@reddit
xrelaht@reddit
WorkerAmbitious2072@reddit
MaybeTheDoctor@reddit
kilroy-was-here-2543@reddit
insomniaczombiex@reddit
ikilledtupac@reddit
druss21@reddit
Marokiii@reddit
crysisnotaverted@reddit
durrtyurr@reddit
Carrera_996@reddit
10000Didgeridoos@reddit
halcykhan@reddit
bashinforcash@reddit
julienjj@reddit
Durian__Gray@reddit
turboash78@reddit
AutoModerator@reddit