TheaterFire

Apple Lisa is future-proof

Posted by Current_Yellow7722@reddit | vintagecomputing | View on Reddit | 103 comments

Well, at least for a few years according to this ad.

Reply to Post

103 Comments

vintage_hot_mess@reddit

Bombed badly after the success of the Apple II and III. Paved the way for the emergence of the IBM PC.
View on Reddit #77499686

oboshoe@reddit

I was in high school and a computer enthusiast when the Apple Lisa was released. It was truly amazing. But priced at $9,995 in 1983 it was about as accessible as quantum computing is today.
View on Reddit #77140552

rabindranatagor@reddit

>But priced at $9,995 in 1983 it was about as accessible as quantum computing is today. *Apple Lisa* - $9,995 ($32,307.43 in 2025 inflation) *SpinQ Gemini Mini* ^‡ - $8000 to $9000 ^‡ ^Room ^temperature, ^2-qubit ^quantum ^computer
View on Reddit #77141852

SocialJusticeAndroid@reddit

There are personal quantum computers?
View on Reddit #77144165

rabindranatagor@reddit

They are available for consumers too, but you can't just walk into a Micro-Center, and buy it, yet. They are mostly bought by professional institutions (e.g.: Universities, educators, labs, elite schools, etc).
View on Reddit #77156113

SocialJusticeAndroid@reddit

It would be cool if we had a new “home computer” era with home quantum computers.
View on Reddit #77377038

TheThiefMaster@reddit

A 2 qubit system is hilariously useless when you can simulate an order of magnitude more with a conventional computer you already have using tools like e.g. https://quantumai.google/qsim
View on Reddit #77146443

rabindranatagor@reddit

It's already impressive that SpinQ has successfully made a quantum computer, that can run at room temperature, without having to keep the tech at near zero Kelvin, though. >A 2 qubit system is hilariously useless when you can simulate an order of magnitude more with a conventional computer you already have using tools like e.g. https://quantumai.google/qsim For now. It's just a matter of time, before they successfully upscale this to millions of qubits, in a compact form factor. I can't wait to see where this goes. :D >2 qubit system Also, this is their low end quantum computer. They have higher end ones, although those ones aren't compact, and don't run at room temperature. But we'll get there. We always do.
View on Reddit #77154953

revdon@reddit

A: I have a Qubit smartphone! Q: Can it play Crysis?
View on Reddit #77255479

Velocityg4@reddit

So, can I cluster them for a 2,000 cubit quantum computer which stomps supercomputers?
View on Reddit #77146396

Accurate-Minimum-465@reddit

not furlong
View on Reddit #77188036

Sudden-Variation-809@reddit

finally, an affordable computer that both can and can't run doom
View on Reddit #77146392

Viharabiliben@reddit

It was partially targeted to software developers. A software business would buy a few of these to develop software for the upcoming Mac which was released a year later. For a software development company this was an (expensive) but necessary business expense if they wanted to start creating software for the new Mac platform.
View on Reddit #77345055

Seacarius@reddit

Well, that Lisa would cost you $33,117.79 in Dec. 2025 dollars.
View on Reddit #77141517

wiggum55555@reddit

Same price as a specced up Mac Studio today, about +$30K. No idea if the Lisa was comparable in power against it's peers of the day. I was using C64 and BBC Micro back then. *Wild to think a $100 Pi5 of today is about 40,000 times faster and 8,000 times more RAM than the Apple Lisa.*
View on Reddit #77288188

OptionRecent@reddit

Still out of my price range.
View on Reddit #77144885

dlogan3344@reddit

There's a reason the cheapest powerhouses did so well
View on Reddit #77165448

artinnj@reddit

Wasn’t it out of date by 1984 when Apple started converting them into Macintosh XLs?
View on Reddit #77342732

carpathiaman@reddit

It’s weird, I had an Apple //e in 1983 and had little to no clue that things like the Lisa or Max existed. I didn’t even start using a GUI full time until I had a 486 with Windows 3 years later.
View on Reddit #77342218

bebizzy@reddit

Probably some Linux distros that would run on it.
View on Reddit #77339002

hegedusa@reddit

I remember “Your Computer” magazine. It wasn’t exactly highly respected. It ended up concentrating more on games as I recall. It was often technically inaccurate. I am also struggling to work out who decided that beige is a good colour for computer cases. This particular Lisa looks pre-aged, left out in the sun too long!
View on Reddit #77322497

Schrockwell@reddit

One MILLION bytes?!
View on Reddit #77137252

Mortomes@reddit

Mega cool
View on Reddit #77139110

TheseMenArePawns@reddit

I see what you did there 😉
View on Reddit #77286661

Empty-Ad-5360@reddit

Was pretty cool—my dad wrote a microprocessor book and was in good with Motorola…had a Lisa in our basement for a few weeks when it first came out. Was quite a step up from the PET and Apple II! Good memories (pun intended!)
View on Reddit #77151638

DiskaCoyote@reddit

Whoa that’s so neat! He let you try it?
View on Reddit #77272732

SnooCheesecakes399@reddit

I do love my Lisa, great little computer.
View on Reddit #77136247

rectalhorror@reddit

There's a website that lets you run LisaOS within a browser. [https://lisagui.com/](https://lisagui.com/)
View on Reddit #77137921

NoMaskNoVaxReOpen@reddit

neat. i dont do apple but, neat
View on Reddit #77267159

curlypaul924@reddit

How does it differ from the original Macintosh System Software?
View on Reddit #77184835

F54280@reddit

Multitasking. Different concept of documents. Slower. Non-square pixels.
View on Reddit #77194346

the123king-reddit@reddit

I like my MS2000 more, and it was half the retail price of a Lisa
View on Reddit #77149917

OptionRecent@reddit

I have the boot disks now all I need is the hardware.
View on Reddit #77144956

Yeegis@reddit

“Future-proof” The internal clock doesn’t even fully count the 1990s. It stops at 1995.
View on Reddit #77257557

Rude-Associate2283@reddit

A computer system is only as viable as the software available to run it and the company behind it providing updates and improvements. Apple did neither. They let it die and then dumped them all into a landfill. Shameful.
View on Reddit #77139212

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

That's not what I'd read! What about the Mac XL?
View on Reddit #77167772

Rude-Associate2283@reddit

XL? Not marketed properly. Everything got thrown into the Mac 128k and Mac 512k (Fat Mac) marketing.
View on Reddit #77255984

uberRegenbogen@reddit

Because it had no future. 😕
View on Reddit #77244476

RealOzSultan@reddit

I remember when those things went on sale they were still $7000
View on Reddit #77234256

sharpied79@reddit

Amiga enters the chat.... 😉
View on Reddit #77141289

sputwiler@reddit

- looks at price Now I understand why my dad had an Atari ST instead. The "Jackintosh" as it was known.
View on Reddit #77192315

Great-Elevator3808@reddit

Yup, I was an ST Fan in the late 80's/early 90s. One of my close friends was an Apple Mac fan who insisted his Mac Classic was a better machine. He was absolutely livid to find out that my ST with Spectre GCR ran Timeworks at least twice as fast as his Mac Classic did - and with a bigger screen (still monochrome though). He also couldn't get his head around the fact that the I/O on every other 68k based machine was based on IRQ rather than the Macs software polling.
View on Reddit #77224034

dendawg@reddit

…and promptly heads to Europe.
View on Reddit #77141499

Timbit42@reddit

Smart people.
View on Reddit #77163148

Linux4ever_Leo@reddit

Too bad it was released with the very high price of $9,995 (about $30,000 in today's money), making it a commercial flop despite pioneering features like a graphical user interface (GUI) and mouse.
View on Reddit #77204662

Servile-PastaLover@reddit

The first generation Macintosh released a year later. lmao only 128k ram iirc but at a tiny fraction of the Lisa's price.
View on Reddit #77141096

Practical-Hand203@reddit

The first generation Macintosh really wasn't very useful either, as 128K really wasn't enough a lot of vendors targeted the 512K when it released less than 8 months later, which makes the $7,600 in today's money very expensive. You needed to dole out another $2,900 if you wanted to upgrade the motherboard to the 512K model. Apple did the early adopters pretty dirty, although they seemingly simply didn't anticipate how quickly more complex software was written that required 512K.
View on Reddit #77142407

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

Appreciate the explanation! I remember a game on a floppy subtitled "for the one megabyte Macintosh" Makes me wonder when it came out.
View on Reddit #77168027

Practical-Hand203@reddit

That's the [Mac Plus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_Plus) from 1986, which saw over ten years of OS support (up until 7.5.5 in 1996). In a way, the first modern Mac.
View on Reddit #77170151

TMWNN@reddit

>In a way, the first modern Mac. Indeed. Your describing the 128K as "wasn't very useful" is too kind. Even the 512K in practice requires far too many disk swaps to do anything; one only shudders at how horrible the 128K is in this regard. /u/TrannosaurusRegina , I would describe the Mac Plus with its 1MB memory as basically the equivalent of the 640K PC with two floppy drives c. 1985: A baseline with which you can do useful work, and against which much software was designed for. In addition to the aforementioned 10 years of OS support, Apple recycled the Mac Plus hardware as the SE (1987) and Classic (1990); not until the Classic II (1991) did Apple move away from the 68000 CPU and 1MB of RAM as its lowest-end hardware configuration.
View on Reddit #77187611

F54280@reddit

> Even the 512K in practice requires far too many disk swaps to do anything I would disagree. You could do quite a lot with it in 1985, and adding a external floppy or an HD20 made it really usable. Of course, the plus was a huge step up, in particular with 4Mb…
View on Reddit #77194803

TMWNN@reddit

I was thinking of the stock Fat Mac. I agree that having dual drives made it basically usable for many use cases.
View on Reddit #77195632

grizzlor_@reddit

Now I'm curious why the Mac Plus supports 7.5.5 but not 7.5.2. Kind of amazing that classic Mac OS ran on hardware that old in 1996. It's like Windows 95 running on a 286.
View on Reddit #77175435

gihutgishuiruv@reddit

I don’t think 7.5.2 ever had a 68k release. It was only for the early PCI Power Macs
View on Reddit #77179338

NaoPb@reddit

This reminds me of the early Intel Mac Minis that had the underperforming Core Solo processors. The price was low, but you'd wish you paid more for the upgraded model.
View on Reddit #77173986

TMWNN@reddit

Apple should have waited six more months to launch its Intel Macs with Core Duo. Those six months cost it and developers an untold amount of grief over the next 15 years having to deal with 32-bit x86 support.
View on Reddit #77187662

sputwiler@reddit

To be pedantic. Core 2. Core Solo and Core Duo were still 32-bit. Core 2 (the x64 line) came in Core 2 Solo and Core 2 Duo variants. I eventually had a Core 2 Quad destkop that I ran Mac OS X on.
View on Reddit #77192194

TMWNN@reddit

Thank you for the correction.
View on Reddit #77192831

eldofever58@reddit

IIRC, Apple also wanted the first version to ship with 512K but internal edicts and a surge in RAM pricing altered that plan. I've got a 128K, and can confirm, it's just barely usable.
View on Reddit #77143106

rklug1521@reddit

>surge in RAM pricing How history repeats itself
View on Reddit #77146310

Syzygy2323@reddit

$2400 isn’t a tiny fraction of $10k.
View on Reddit #77185214

ErikTheRed2000@reddit

And if you waited another year for the Mac plus then you’d get 1 megabyte
View on Reddit #77143257

curlypaul924@reddit

Wow, is that outpacing Moore's Law by a factor of 2?
View on Reddit #77184953

CVGPi@reddit

Also, later when Lisa flopped they flashed a bunch of Lisa's with Mac software as Macintosh XL. Steve Jobs (who got kicked out of the Lisa project and joined the Mac project) was real mad.
View on Reddit #77149311

fuzzybad@reddit

This ad belongs in r/agedlikemilk
View on Reddit #77147866

mallardtheduck@reddit

In fairness, the Lisa hardware was "supported" by Apple until the late 1980s with their "MacWorks" product that allowed it to run the Macintosh OS and software up to System 5.0. Apple even sold/licensed MacWorks to third-parties who added support for Systems 6 & 7, making the Lisa "usable" well into the 90s (although you'd also need a third-party RAM upgrade). Not too bad for a 1983 machine...
View on Reddit #77194969

adamchevy@reddit

I prefer a 5170 AT. But I have always wanted to own a Lisa. I remember when they were around $2000 for a couple years. I should have picked one up.
View on Reddit #77182804

curlypaul924@reddit

I have to agree -- the PC/AT had color, a faster CPU, a bigger HD, and more RAM. But in 1983 you'd be buying an XT, not an AT. For a computer available in 1983, I have always wanted to play with a Xerox Star (or even an Alto). There is something mysterious about those early GUIs. The "luggable" Kaypro 10 is a better looking machine than any of them. The "beige era" was a weird time in computer case design.
View on Reddit #77187318

TooManyBulborbs@reddit

"Lisa is Future-Proof" yeah right, the Lisa calendar uses a 4-bit counter, it's not Y2K compliant and can't even reach 1999 or "2000" (Y2K problem was rolling over to 1900), the Lisa calendar can only handle years 1980 to 1995. https://lisafaq.sunder.net/lisafaq-hw-io-cop421_clock.html
View on Reddit #77144042

SpezLuvsNazis@reddit

“ Lisa calendar can only handle years 1980 to 1995.” Same as me.
View on Reddit #77185740

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

Wow that is bad!! I didn't know that!
View on Reddit #77168184

hdufort@reddit

It led to the Mac. It was an early iteration.
View on Reddit #77142232

mikaey00@reddit

According to Adrian’s Digital Basement, there were two completely separate teams working on the Mac and the Lisa. I don’t think the Mac was intended to be the successor to the Lisa — in fact, it competed with the Mac. I think the Mac simply came later and was more successful.
View on Reddit #77154526

curlypaul924@reddit

Similarly, Windows 2000 was the eventual successor to Windows 95, despite it originally having been developed by a different team (Dave Cutler being in charge of the NT line and Brad Silverberg leading the development of Chicago/Windows 95).
View on Reddit #77185706

teknosophy_com@reddit

The irony is killing me. That beautiful machine will long outlive the "designed to be obsolete in a year" current Apples.
View on Reddit #77137051

curlypaul924@reddit

Makes me glad they named their visual theme Liquid Glass instead of Liquid Metal.
View on Reddit #77185243

ScudsCorp@reddit

Marketing!
View on Reddit #77139149

Jasoco@reddit

It’s funny Apple tried to revolutionize personal computing in 1983, failed miserably, and came back and succeeded a year later with a product very similar but distinct. Poor Lisa.
View on Reddit #77141367

curlypaul924@reddit

I wonder if there is a connection to the Video Game Crash of 1983.
View on Reddit #77185112

Blah-Blah-Blah-2023@reddit

Similar pattern slighly earlier with the failure of the Apple /// and the repackaging of a lot of the ideas into the //e.
View on Reddit #77143322

Royal_Stay_6502@reddit

I would buy a conputer for the masses and not for the classes. But that might just be me.
View on Reddit #77184732

Ornery-Practice9772@reddit

Unlike today where apple can overprice their products & still make bank- The $10k price tag didnt fly in 1984🤷‍♀️
View on Reddit #77183885

ABeardHelps@reddit

Well, it was future proof in that they were able to turn it into the Macintosh XL and keep it on the market for a few more months.
View on Reddit #77180631

johnklos@reddit

To be fair, it could be updated to run Mac software, so the Lisa could've been useful for several more years after that.
View on Reddit #77160179

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

True!
View on Reddit #77173273

Roachpile@reddit

Was it that color when it was new
View on Reddit #77145217

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

Yes! Nice to have a reference for those who think everything was always bright white for some reason!
View on Reddit #77168274

mikegalos@reddit

By far a better computer than its successor. Apple would be a much different and better company had Lisa been evolved but (despite the Jobs-pushed Twiggy drives) it wasnt a Jobs program so he used his remaining influence to kill it in favor of the much worse Macintosh.
View on Reddit #77143308

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

Likewise with the Apple II (eventually)
View on Reddit #77168146

Bushgooher@reddit

Yes it will be. Every computer is out of date next year.
View on Reddit #77143048

TrannosaurusRegina@reddit

Except for eMachines of course! 😄😋
View on Reddit #77168097

No-Advertising-9568@reddit

Actually saw a Lisa in a junk shop, sometime in the early Nineties I think it was. They wanted about $2k, which was a fabulous lot of cash for a retired soldier.
View on Reddit #77150213

the123king-reddit@reddit

r/agedlikemilk
View on Reddit #77149784

keonyn@reddit

Heh, that certainly didn't age well. Of course, neither did the Lisa's. After watching Adrian taking his apart and repairing it over many episodes it was pretty plain just how many design flaws that computer had.
View on Reddit #77148016

Corrosive23@reddit

Adrian Black just did a multi part series about trying to restore one. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4tFqFVNf5LQ-OE8JGNMJQoVOmgkyTorC&si=-xoF8uMDaKEGn-k1
View on Reddit #77147823

710dabner@reddit

Hey, the 5mb hard drive was immense, I mean it took up the whole top of the computer.
View on Reddit #77147227

TravelerMSY@reddit

Fair enough. The future in computing is only about a one year.
View on Reddit #77146624

micjosisa@reddit

"One million bytes of internal memory". I'm sold! To think that I have been tossing around measly numbers like 16 and 32 for memory increments nowadays.
View on Reddit #77146112

mikegalos@reddit

As an FYI, that ad claims to be for the 1983 Lisa but is showing a Lisa 2 or Macintosh XL variant since it has the Sony 3 1/2" floppy drive rather than the original Lisa's odd 5 1/4" Twiggy drive.
View on Reddit #77143670

herseyhawkins33@reddit

The verge did a fascinating documentary on Lisa units being repurposed after the commerical failure for anyone who hasn't seen it: https://youtu.be/rZjbNWgsDt8?si=_kwehh1JeOWg2Tka
View on Reddit #77139288

compu85@reddit

I got to help slightly with that documentary. They did a fantastic job.
View on Reddit #77141063

ChocolateSpecific263@reddit

it was not future proof, they just didnt made money with cpu extensions and due this you could atleast use youre machine until it was too slow
View on Reddit #77140765

HernBurford@reddit

I love the marketing move that proved the computer is FUTURE-PROOF with a tear-off paper desk calendar.
View on Reddit #77140589