5070 ti is no brainer, it's an objectively better card in EVERYTHING, anyone who tell you 9070xt is better in anything is straight up lying or misinformation.

5070 Ti is faster in Raster, way faster in RT, can actually play Path Tracing well where the AMD with crumble, and has better features set allround, from better upscaling quality to much better FG to far wider game supports, and consumes less power, and also has better headroom for overclocking and undervolting, it has everything better, no compromise in anything.

And biggest deal of all, much better longevity, AMD just pulled the plug and stop support all their previous gen from new feature, including $1000 last gen flagship, while Nvidia support very long and consistent even for RTX 20 series 8 years ago, there's no telling if AMD will support your 9070XT once newer gen release in a few years, or they'll cut you off, it's a huge risk. AMD cards age so poorly that if you look at the system requirements for most new games, you'll usually see that the requirement for older gen Nvidia cards are often lower tier than AMD, like E33 recommend 3070/6800XT, or Silent Hill F recommend 2080/6800XT, etc, you see the trend that Nvidia cards that used to be lower tier than AMD back then now considered roughly equal, so in the next few years don't be surprise to see big games recommend 9070XT next to 5070 or 5060Ti, no longer compare to 5070ti anymore, because AMD age poorly. This is the same as 5700XT vs 2070 Super back then, where people vastly overhyped the 5700XT for being slightly slower in raster but $100 cheaper, and has nothing else, now that card is basically obsolete with zero feature and no support, and usually seen next to 2060/S in game's system requirements, but the 2070S aged far better and still receive new feature like DLSS4 to breath more life into it, same situation now, AMD is a trap when they don't have Vram advantage.