Tomb of Jesus

In theory yes, but there’s a lot standing in the way of any decisive declaration. For comparison, look at the discovery of King Richard III’s skeleton in 2012. To determine that the skeleton was his, experts assessed mitochondrial DNA from his living descendants, cross-referenced wounds on the skeleton with historical record of the Battle of Bosworth Field, and studied maps to identify where the monastery he was buried once stood. *That* was a huge production. Now remember that the historical Jesus died more than 1,400 years before Richard III, has no known or verifiable direct descendants living today, and while Jesus is one of the most documented people in history, that documentation comes from people who either revered Jesus as the messiah or scorned him as a threat to Roman rule or a heretic to Jewish teaching, so it’s hard to know what to take at face value. Basically, if you discovered the resting place of the historical Jesus, you would need skeletal remains that displayed evidence of crucifixion (holes in the palms and *maybe* marks on the ribs consistent with a stab wound, if he really was stabbed by Longinus or another Roman soldier on the cross), burial conditions consistent with someone who lived in relative poverty (Jesus didn’t have wealth and was viewed as a criminal by Roman authorities. He wouldn’t have an elaborate tomb, and his disciples wouldn’t build one for him because, well, that would defeat the purpose), and you would need to test the skeletal remains and other materials to make sure that he lived in the correct time. Even if you did all that, there were a ton of people who died on the cross and were buried in modest graves. TL;DR if anybody found the resting place of Jesus, good luck to them on proving it.