What Actually Matters When Picking a Motor: Hub vs Mid-Drive
Posted by krissym72@reddit | ebikes | View on Reddit | 186 comments
When I started looking at e-bikes, I kept seeing debates about hub motors vs mid-drive. I thought it was just tech talk. But after riding both, the differences actually matter - especially depending on where and how you ride.
Hub motors, usually in the rear wheel, push the bike forward from the back. They’re simple and usually cheaper. They work well for cruising, city rides, and flat roads. Most budget e-bikes use hub motors. One benefit is they don’t put pressure on your chain, so there’s less wear on the drivetrain.
Mid-drive motors sit near the pedals and power the bike through the chain. They use your gears, kind of like how a car changes gears to handle hills. That makes them a lot better for climbing, off-road riding, or carrying extra weight. They do cost more, and your chain and gears can wear out faster if you ride hard.
Here’s what I found matters the most.
If you ride mostly on flat paths or paved roads, a hub motor is usually all you need. If you ride in hilly areas or carry extra gear or passengers, a mid-drive will feel stronger and more efficient. If range matters to you, mid-drives can stretch the battery more by taking advantage of gears. But if you just want a reliable, easy-to-use ride for getting around, hub motors are great for that too.
One thing to remember is maintenance. Hub motors don’t stress your chain and gears as much. Mid-drives do, so you’ll want to check those parts more often.
I learned this the hard way. I had to push a heavy hub motor bike up a steep hill with no assist. After that, I realized the type of motor really does matter depending on how you ride.
JDRockHardFeller@reddit
Do mid-drive motors have that noticeable delay that hub motors seem to have when using the throttle?
billbixbyakahulk@reddit
My only experience is with my bosch motor, but with that one there's no delay. As soon as the torque sensor sees you're pedaling it activates.
Training-Werewolf-41@reddit
What model do you have? i have a 2023 Trek Powerfly 4 - sounds like youre describing my bike lol but in about a day or two i have an EKX X21 Max (\~50mph rear hub motor) coming for commuting. Trek for trails, EKX for commuting.
BodSmith54321@reddit
Most mid drives dont have throttles. Delay is just how the throttle is tuned. Has nothing to do with the motor.
shitCouch@reddit
For me, if you want a bike that rides like a bike, then mid-drive all the way. I'd never consider a hub motor.
Smashed-plantain@reddit
A good hub motor with a torque sensor rides like a bike too.
bradnh@reddit
Possibly stupid question re advantage of mid-drive being that they allow yoi
Smashed-plantain@reddit
They mean that the motor can take advantage of the gears. With a hub motor, it turns the rear wheel directly. With a mid drive, the gearing can help the motor.
davpad12@reddit
With mid drive you will put more strain on your drivetrain, but that's what it's made for. Replacement parts are usually cheap enough and can be done by a regular bike shop. Good luck having your hub motor or anything on the back wheel serviced at your local bike shop. Personally after owning three mid drive bikes I've never had a problem with the electrical components. It's always the normal bicycle stuff, flats, Wheels, derailers and fitment issues like handlebars and seats. I've never had a problem having any of these things dealt with at my local bike shop.
Smashed-plantain@reddit
Why wouldn't my local bike shop service a mid drive? I bought it there any they service them.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Middrives are extremely expensive to repair. Seems you've never had to have one serviced.
Hub drives are more robust provided you don't burn one out on an extended climb. And the motors are much cheaper to replace.
pinkfloydhomer@reddit
You write a lot of nonsense in this thread.
Why do you think all the best ebikes use mid drives?
cbs-anonmouse@reddit
Aren’t hub drives more likely to wear/burn out precisely because they can’t benefit from gearing, the way mid-drives can/do?
davpad12@reddit
You're right, I've never had to have one serviced. Maybe because I don't abuse them. Or maybe because the way they work makes it harder to abuse them when you can use the gears to keep the motor revving high where it's happiest.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Mid drive motors can fail without any abuse. Even just climbing a paved road. This may not be typical, but you seem to have a mistaken notion that they are bulletproof.
davpad12@reddit
Nothing is bulletproof, I'm just giving you my experience. I've seen and heard of a lot of hub drives burning themselves out because they can't be regulated going uphill. That could happen to a mid drive if you don't downshift.
krissym72@reddit (OP)
That’s a great point - especially about local bike shops. A lot of people don’t realize how tricky hub motor servicing can be if something goes wrong in the rear wheel. I’ve heard the same from mechanics — mid-drives keep things closer to standard bike parts, which makes maintenance easier.
The drivetrain wear is definitely real though, especially if you’re riding hills or hauling weight. I’ve noticed riders who keep their chain clean and shift smoothly tend to get a lot more life out of their setup.
Out of curiosity, which mid-drive models have you owned? I’ve been comparing reliability between Bafang, Bosch, and Yamaha systems for an article I wrote on my site - experiences like yours really help fill in the real-world side of things.
davpad12@reddit
Last but not least is my commuter. This is a DIY I built from a trek dual sport 3 I had but wasn't using much. I put a CYC Photon motor on it with a 25ah battery ($1600 kit). I'll get about 85 mi out of a charge with this one. The only issues I've had with this one is tires going flat or breaking spokes.
davpad12@reddit
Then there's this. My next bike when I realized each bike has a purpose. This is for what I want to play in the dirt. A super smooth Bosch performance EX powered eMTB. I've beat the crud out of this thing and it's never given me a problem I haven't caused myself. I'm on my third derailleur because I keep tearing them off in the woods. The motor is rated at 250w, but it sure feels like more. It certainly doesn't have the raw power of the Bafang, it's more of a finesse thing. If you ask it in the right way it'll do anything for you, but you've got to put in the effort as well. The other bigger bike had a throttle, this doesn't. This I got for $5,000 mark down from $6700 back in '21. Now you can get them for $2,500.
davpad12@reddit
I've had three, I still have two of them. This is my first, I had all the fears of the newbies. Range anxiety, power, tire size, carrying in luggage capacity and overall toughness because I was going to drive to the end of the Earth on this thing 🤣. So I bought this beast of a bike, the true Hummer of the e-bike world. It was All the above and way too heavy for what I realized I was going to do with it. If any bike was going to destroy the drivetrain this is it. Between the size of the motor 1500w Bafang M520 and the weight of the thing 85 lb with two batteries. The only thing I had to do was give it a new chain after about 1000 miles. It was my fault for not shifting correctly.
Gold_Factor1266@reddit
In a few words. Whats the bike for ? Commuting, get a hub motor. For MTB trails, get a performance mid-drive. I have a Bafang BBSHD and run a Sturmey Archer 3 speed IGH with a big fat KMC single speed chain. With a likely half way through its life SRAM top of the line 9 speed cassette, it wore out in days. The last cog I could use was a 20 tooth in the middle. It had the best chain line. So for a few days bike was like a single speed which worked just fine. A little extra pedaling uphill, and a little slower on the street. If I could afford the hot CYC motor, I’d definitely run it as a single speed and gears to do a little over 30 on the street. I just turned 74. It’s a blast going uphill without having to pedal. Oh, and those IGH hubs are just over 100 bucks. You don’t need a lot of gears with 160nm of torque.
Effective-Belt-9079@reddit
Get a rear fender bro
Gold_Factor1266@reddit
Like this ? It fits the GT as well. It’s been on for a month. Looking at it just now, the bike might look better with the fender on. It’s usually parked next to me in the living room.
MundaneWarthog2472@reddit
mid drive is definitely better for commuting. they have way more torque than any hub which means you wont be bogged down by hills or wind. also mid drive are way lighter than any hub and the weight is balanced in the middle of the bike which means its easier to lift and carry up or down stairs if needed.
Gold_Factor1266@reddit
I would want a mid drive for commuting. You would spend a small fortune on the drivetrain. Mid drives are great on the trail. And a 750 watt hub should get you around San Francisco with some help from your legs.
anypomonos@reddit
Dependent on the type of biking/experience you want. If you ride mostly with throttle on those 20x4 bikes - rear will give you better bang for your buck.
Off-roading or hilly riding, mid all the way but you’ll be paying for it!
MundaneWarthog2472@reddit
yeah hubs are basically those 100cc mini motorcycles that are all automatic transmission. meanwhile mid drives are manual transmission motorcycles for big boys (if you throttle only)
Erevtric@reddit
A few corrections here:
Mid drive motors also push the bike from the back wheel, that's how a chain works.
Hub motors are very expensive to maintain if they end up breaking. They might even cost you more in the long run if you're going too hard on the suspension.
Not all mid drives have multiple gears.
MundaneWarthog2472@reddit
mid drive power the chainring which pull the chain which pull rear wheel. hubs just spin the wheel independently, they dont need a chain, thats why hubs will always have less than half the torque of any mid drive of equal power
Biff1@reddit
Front hub drive. A lot of tension from motor and your weight. Snapped axles are common and then you have to scrap the whole motor.
Ok_Jello_7451@reddit
Really? I've had mine for 8 years now. No problem up steep hills either and zero issues
Less-General-9578@reddit
a small front hub drive seems to be the simple solution to me. there is a solution to protect the axle from snapping.
i am still shopping to see if anything makes sense for me and is cost efficient. looking for generic stuff, but to much complication so far. groan.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
You are largely correct on the fundamentals but you missed the nuance. You aren't the only one.
Numerous hub drives will peak well over 1000W. The Summit peaks at 1300W and the Vorsa peaks at 1400W. Most mid drives peak closer to 700W despite being more expensive. Hub drives are simpler and more robust allowing this extra power. And don't wear down the drivetrain.
In practice a high power cadence hub drive will sprint away from middrives climbing SMALL TO MODERATE hills. The hill climbing test results from Electric Bike Report confirm this. It's only when you get to STEEP hills that the middrive advantage of using your bike's drivetrain overcomes the power deficit.
For some reason many members of this forum can't comprehend there being a fulcrum point on hill climbing where the hill climbing advantage shifts between the two motor types. And instead erroneously claim that middrives are better for climbing across the board.
sergesmr@reddit
Agreed - the mid-drive location is an advantage only for gear ratios < 1 (probably < 0.95 after drive train losses)
Worried_Document8668@reddit
i would go as far as to say that it's even about hill climbing per se. It's mostly about pedaling feel when using assist or not, center of gravity, shofting feel,being able to easily work on your rear wheel and a more seamless blend of rider and motor power.
if raw numbers are a thing a high powered hub will pull ahead. in the end more watts are more watts
Responsible-Mall-991@reddit
Best advantage to front hub motor is that it means you have all wheel drive in winter!!
catboy519@reddit
If the road is slippery enough, front wheel will 100% slip. I know this because it happens on my front wheel motor ebike when I ride over snow. Though luckily the road is rarely so slipepry so I dont have much of a problem.
Cthulhaka@reddit
Being able to change out the drive ratio by putting a different belt/cog on your jack-shaft is a major advantage of mid-drive. Hub-drive is pretty much stuck with a fixed ratio.
MonzellRS@reddit
Broken chain? Hub don’t care
Broken chain? Nice mid-drive
Safe-Spot-4757@reddit
Broken hub motor, rebuild whole wheel
Broken mid drive motor, plug and play
They both have their pros and cons
stormdelta@reddit
A direct hub motor is far less likely to break in the first place.
Safe-Spot-4757@reddit
Neither break often unless the mid drive motor is too powerful for what it’s doing. (I’m looking at you dji bikes) I do see more people with broken hubs left SOL
stormdelta@reddit
Whereas I've had chains snap or slip even on normal bikes, let alone ebikes.
More moving parts = more failure points. But the bigger issue on mid-drives isn't the motor, it's the drive train.
I've had plenty of failures and degradation with chains/gears/derailleurs even on normal bikes, let alone ebikes. And you have additional things to worry about like shifting under power (yes, a good design would halt the motor when shifting but a surprising number of mid-drive bikes don't do that).
Geared or direct? There isn't much to fail mechanically on a direct drive hub other than maybe spokes if the wheel is built wrong.
Darkside_Hero@reddit
This is why it's important to go belt and IGH for mid-drive.
stormdelta@reddit
That's what I've thought, though I haven't tried it yet and I've heard some mixed results from other posters here.
I'll probably still try it next time I build a bike.
gladfelter@reddit
Only downside is that that direct drive motors require power in the 1.5kW or above range to make up for its low-speed weakness, meaning you have an unregistered e-moto rather than a regulatory-approved ebike.
stormdelta@reddit
1.5Kw is nice to have in this scenario but not necessary outside of steeper hills. And if you have steep enough hills for that to matter, odds are you need a mid-drive anyways.
But to be honest, in most of the US 1.5Kw by itself isn't much of an issue as long as you're riding responsibly, and this use case (along with cargo bikes) is one of the reasons I don't agree with the current power limits even though I agree with the speed restrictions of class 1/2/3.
True, but the tradeoff is that you can get regen braking that greatly reduces brake maintenance and adds braking redundancy.
In theory you could probably build a geared hub with a freewheel that could be clutched to only disengage for regen, but to my knowledge nobody has built a motor like that.
Scary-Hunting-Goat@reddit
Broken motor is going to be a pain in the ass either way, luckily it doesn't happen often.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
You can get the whole wheel with pre-installed hub motor for less than the cost of a middrive. So even your contrived example doesnt make a good case for middrives.
MonzellRS@reddit
not really you can just keep the housing of the hub and swap out the internals, nice try though :)
Girl_Gamer_BathWater@reddit
Oh, that's all? Easy peezy! /s
gladfelter@reddit
Have you done both? I have:
For a hub drive, it's unmount the wheel, remove the rotor, 6 torx security screws to pull out the guts of my hub motor.
That's neither more nor less challenging than a mid drive, where removing the cover can be a challenge and the required torque is often much greater.
The particulars of the bike can play a part, of course. But your sarcasm seems unwarranted.
Girl_Gamer_BathWater@reddit
First step is getting on the phone with the ebike company and getting the correct parts. Once you get past THAT step, it's all downhill from there.
O2C@reddit
FWIW, I swapped out the broken plastic planetary gears on my hub motor without any help from the manufacturer. It was a generic no-name motor, but since they just use the same stuff, it was easy enough to figure out what to order.
The hub motor is pretty simple mechanically and the parts are almost standardized at this point for 99% of the hub motors out there. If some is reasonably skilled as a home bike mechanic, fixing a hub motor is easily within their skillset.
gladfelter@reddit
I found both steps to be easy, personally. I did a writeup of the problem and Ride1Up sent me a full replacement of the guts of the motor without me having to open it up first or anything.
I agree that you're going to have trouble finding replacement parts for a fly-by-night Amazon drop-shipper, if that's what you're getting at.
Girl_Gamer_BathWater@reddit
That's exactly what I'm getting at.
Safe-Spot-4757@reddit
In my experience try that and you’ll just get error codes unless your lucky
Weak-Conversation753@reddit
Do that on your commute, bro.
far_house_truck@reddit
Maintain your chain? Nobody cares
chrispark70@reddit
". They use your gears, kind of like how a car changes gears to handle hills. "
This is the most persistent myth I hear about mid-drive bicycles. Not only is it false, but it is trivially easy to prove it false with basic arithmetic. The one exception is true mountain bikes with a mountain bike drive train. This, not coincidentally, is one of the reasons you find them most often on mountain bikes.
The simple reality is most bicycles do not have any granny gears that are less than 1:1. That is, the lowest gear on the bike turning the rear wheel a fraction of the crank. That is, no under-drive. No torque multiplication. So check the bike. If, when in the lowest gear, you are not in under-drive, a mid drive is not getting ANY mechanical advantage by going through the transmission of the bike.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
You are insane. And wrong.
ANY gearing system gives you advantage, either in speed, or in torque.
chrispark70@reddit
No, you are a moron. Being in an overdrive gear is NOT giving you advantages in anything but top speed, which I never denied.
A bicycle which only has overdrive gears (bigger chain ring than cog) is being hampered by the drive train, not enhanced when it comes to climbing.
This is a simple fact and easily verified through the most basic math. That is why people downvote instead of refuting.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
You either have never used a mid drive, or possibly never used a regular bike.
If you are on a flat, let alone up a hill, shifting down makes it easier to pedal. It requires less force, but you go slower... a gain in effective torque.
Same with a mid drive. It gets the same mechanical advantage going from 53-11 down to 36-30, which is your traditional road bike gearing.
The mid hub already has a significant gear reduction, with the motor spinning at 2000-2500 rpm to make 90rpm at the crank.
If I am going up the hill in 53-11 I would be doing 50kph. If I am in 36-30 I am doing 13kph.
Assuming a 5% grade, the wattage demand for that is 1440w 165lb rider, 45lb bike in 53-11.
In 36-30 it is 200w, same conditions.
Now, what do you think is going to overload or overheat the motor, 1440w or 200w?
chrispark70@reddit
I've been cycling near nonstop since the mid 70s when I learned how to ride a bicycle.
"If you are on a flat, let alone up a hill, shifting down makes it easier to pedal. It requires less force, but you go slower... a gain in effective torque."
And I disputed this when?
You made a nonsensical comment about how a mid drive motor prevents you from being in a taller gear. Maybe you didn't mean to say that, but I am not a mind-reader.
I already stated in a different comment that mid drive motors likely have internal torque multiplication. Internal gearing is not the bicycle's drivetrain. It is a pointless point. Nearly all electric motors have torque multiplication gearing. Via a vbelt where the driven load has a much larger pulley than the motor drive or via internal gearing. There are very few exceptions, like maybe your blender.
"So, I think you have been debunked, refuted, and fisked."
No, the shit you were floating there was a completely irrelevant diversion from the conversation, which is that a bicycle drive train does not assist a mid drive motor in torque multiplication. Yeah, under-drive works. No shit sherlock.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
This you bro?
chrispark70@reddit
The quote in full:
The simple reality is most bicycles do not have any granny gears that are less than 1:1. That is, the lowest gear on the bike turning the rear wheel a fraction of the crank. That is, no under-drive. No torque multiplication.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
And its completely wrong. The CYC photon starts with a 40:1 ratio, then you have the bike gearing.
The top gear on my bike is 1:4 lowest is 1:1. So final gear ratio entire drive chain is 10:1 to 40:1... that is 10 revolutions of the motor to every Rev of the rear wheel, or 40 revolutions per turn of the wheel.
chrispark70@reddit
"The top gear on my bike is 1:4 lowest is 1:1. So final gear ratio entire "
Your bike is very typical for a non-mountain bike. So you are NEVER in a bicycle drive train under-drive. The minimum gearing you have is 1 to 1 which is, by math and tautology, not an under-drive.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
I don't need to be. I have 1500w and 110Nm which is "under drive" to propel me along. That is the whole point, Mr. Flat-Earth.
chrispark70@reddit
Hey special boy, the issue at hand is whether or not the motor going through the bike drive train is torque multiplication, not whether or not you personally need an under-drive gear.
Frankly, I have no clue why people like you don't want to admit an obvious fact. Instead, you go down these pointless unrelated rabbit holes.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
It is torque multiplication by your definition as it is less than 1:1.
The real question is why you can't accept your own argument. As true
chrispark70@reddit
Because 1:1 is not an under drive. It's direct drive.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
But it's not 1:1! It 40:1.
And its always underdriven.
chrispark70@reddit
No it isn't. 1:1 is 1:1.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
Yes, it is, because the Motor provides the power.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
You have this entirely incorrect and shitty idea you need 1:1.
You don't. It is an ignorant and insupportable idea that is up their with the flat earth and lizard people in the center of the moon.
If are really serious, you would include the 30 to 1 gear reduction of the mid drive in the calculation and realize ALL the final gear ratios are below 1:1
chrispark70@reddit
The claim that is being made is that your bicycle drivetrain is making the bike climb better. This is categorically false in cases where you don't have an underdrive gear, like your bike.
Then, you being dishonest, want to bring gearing that might exist inside the mid-drive motor (which I have never disputed) and claim that is part of your bike's drive train.
You need less than 1:1 if you want to claim that going through the bicycle drive train is giving you mechanical advantage. It is absolutely doesn't.
A lot of people need a granny gear even less than 1:1, especially if you have a 29" /700c wheel. A 29" wheel travels 91.1061 inches per rotation. With a 1:1 ratio, ever spin of the crank propels the bike 91.1061 inches and that includes going up a steep hill. This requires enormous torque. On a steep enough hill, most people would have to get off and walk the bike up the hill. This is why mountain bikes have big granny gears. They encounter extremely steep hills.
Superb_Raccoon@reddit
You are a special kind of idiot. OF COURSE it is part of the drive train as it is providing DRIVE and POWER! If this was a hybrid car, would you claim only the gas is part of the drive train, but not the electric part? Or the reverse? No, they are BOTH part of the drive train.
Therefore, I am the "gas" motor, and the electric motor is the electric motor... both part of the drive chain.
What twists you make to prove yourself "right" when anyone with a functioning brain sees you are a flat-earther kind of idiot
You are just clinically insane thinking it has to have a underdrive, but even if it does...
IT HAS ONE as I proved.
Because you, in your urgancy to be "right" forgot about the gearing in the motor itself.
Again, not needed. Under 1:1 gearing is relatively new to bikes, they were uncommon before the 2000.
And yet, people climbed hills all the time. Pretty fucking amazing, right?
And the MOTOR provides all the torque needed. Anyone who has ridden up a hill on a mid drive knows that. If I want to burn the battery, I could use a throttle and go up a hill without ever touching the pedals with 110Nm of torque and 1:1 drive.
loquacious@reddit
Yo, you're forgetting that A) most hub drives have planetary gears and B) a wheel is a radial lever, just like a gear.
Almost all hub drives are in a constant state of overdrive because of this.
And extended range "granny gear" cassettes on mid drive ebikes are way more common than you seem to think they are. Even the ready to ride bikes usually have small 1x style drivetrains.
chrispark70@reddit
ALL, not most, not some, ALL internally geared hubs are ALWAYS in underdrive. They are NEVER in overdrive. That is what the geared in internally geared hub means. The wheel is ALWAYS spinning slower than the motor. That is what the gear is doing.
loquacious@reddit
I'm including the math of wheel disadvantage in my statement that hub drives are usually in greater than 1:1.
It's also important to remember that basically every single mid-drive out there also has it's own internal gears to increase torque in addition to the drivetrain build.
The mechanical efficiency and advantage about mid-drives is because they drive through the drivetrain and can stay in their power/efficiency band just like an ICE motor with a transmission whether or not it's technically above or below 1:1.
You do get more torque to the road with basically all mid-drives, even in extreme conditions like my fastest 46x11t gears, and it's more useful power when combined with pedaling.
Conversely hub drives all have a static sweet spot in the combination of powered drive + pedaling and speed where a hub drive has a most efficient, highest torque amount where it has to be in the right speed and gear to make use of pedal power AND motor power, because at either end of that gear range (and speed value) you're outside of the torque band of that motor and it's not getting the same kind of watts x torque efficiency and advantage that a mid-drive has.
It's a really complicated stack of variables because it's not just about sheer mechanical torque at the axle, and if you discount all of those variables it's not a real world measurement or assessment.
This is how even relatively underpowered EU legal Bosch mid drives can be used on cargo bikes and stuff because they're able to use their watts to deliver more power to the road where it matters.
chrispark70@reddit
"I'm including the math of wheel disadvantage in my statement that hub drives are usually in greater than 1:1."
WHY? NO! Internally geared hub drives are always less than 1:1. They have reduction gearing inside. The motor spins at a higher speed than the wheel. I would appreciate it, if, in some detail, you explain why you believe hub drives have ratios greater than 1:1 (overdrive)
"It's also important to remember that basically every single mid-drive out there also has it's own internal gears to increase torque in addition to the drivetrain build."
This is not in dispute, at least not by me.
"The mechanical efficiency and advantage about mid-drives is because they drive through the drivetrain and can stay in their power/efficiency band just like an ICE motor with a transmission whether or not it's technically above or below 1:1"
That isn't the claim being made. The claim being made is that they do better on hills because the power is transferred via the bike's gears. This is false in many cases. Also, most good mid drive e-bikes are speed limited. It is only if you can get rid of these speed limiting that you could go any faster using the bike drive train.
Your next point is kind of true, kind of not-true and frankly irrelevant. ALL motors have a peak efficiency. How fast you can go with a given motor is a design decision. Mid drive motors do not try to stay in their most efficient RPM and power output. They generally aren't displayed on the computer or even published. So it ain't like you can try hard to keep the motor, the speed and gear and your own power output matched to the motor to stay in the peak band.
Furthermore, I am NOT a critic of mid drive motors. I think there are many good reasons to get one. For me, price was a big factor. But if money was no object and theft not a problem, I would absolutely be using a mid drive. Most of them are made much better (build quality) than most hub drives.
"This is how even relatively underpowered EU legal Bosch mid drives can be used on cargo bikes and stuff because they're able to use their watts to deliver more power to the road where it matters"
Though I am an American, I have a European spec bike with a 250 watt hub motor and a torque sensor with an out of the box top speed of 25kph (i was able to increase it to 30kph/18.6mph). I have no problem whatsoever climbing the steepest hills in my area. That's on pedal assist 2.
AFAIK, the Bosh motor is very high quality and very efficient. This is one of the reasons I would pick a mid-drive e-bike if money were no object.
loquacious@reddit
This is completely wrong and backwards.
I have a Bafang BBSHD running a 46T to 11-50T cassette, which gets me less than 1:1 in two gears.
Even in near or slightly above 1:1 there's the advantages, and towards the other end of the gear ratios at 46x11t I also get speed advantages over hub drives due to being able to run at RPMs/cadences below field weakening speeds where hub drives spin out and run out of steam, so I'm always able to choose the right gear to match my motor's natural power band in the 80-120 RPM range.
And it can climb right up a cliff with 100 pounds of cargo on it.
Even planetary gear hub drives have negative mechanical advantage not just because they have no gears, but because they're driving the long lever-arm of a wheel rim from the center, and that disadvantage is compounded by static power band and field weakening.
chrispark70@reddit
"This is completely wrong and backwards"
How so?
"I have a Bafang BBSHD running a 46T to 11-50T cassette, which gets me less than 1:1 in two gears."
Good for you. I didn't say no bicycles have under-drive gears. I said most do not.
"Even in near or slightly above 1:1 there's the advantages, and towards the other end of the gear ratios at 46x11t I also get speed advantages over hub drives due to being able to run at RPMs/cadences below field weakening speeds where hub drives spin out and run out of steam, so I'm always able to choose the right gear to match my motor's natural power band in the 80-120 RPM range."
Your speed sensor shuts off assist (or should) at these speeds. Besides, I never said they weren't good at going faster so long as you have the power necessary. I said they don't use the bike's gears to assist in climbing hills.
Bicycle drive trains were and are designed for legs, not electric motors or engines. Legs like low speed high torque. Motors and engines like high speed low torque. This is why nearly all electric motors are geared down. I've seen some equipment with HUGE down gearing. I've personally seen AC motors with a 1-1.5" pulley driving a belt turning a load with a 2 foot pulley on it. Most motors have integrated fan to blow across the windings and need the speed to move enough air to keep the motor cool. They need that cooling despite the fact that they are much better built and more efficient than ANY e-bike motor.
loquacious@reddit
Nah, because cadence/RPM of mid-drive motors isn't directly linked to the motor speed limits. It's sensed from a magnet on the wheel and actual wheel speed, not the motor cadence!
Total motor cadence and any speed limits on mid drives aren't sensed the same way as hub drives because it depends on the gears we're talking about that you seem to think doesn't help or assist mid-drive climbing power even with greater than 1:1 ratios between the chainring and cassette.
Yes, they do. I'm not sure where you're getting this weird idea but even underpowered, speed-limited, torque-sensing EU legal Bosch drives DO use the mechanical advantages of using the gears of the drivetrain.
With most cadence sensing and unlimited mid drives like the BBS02, HD, or other unlimited cadence sensing drives make full use of it even if you're NOT pedaling.
The point we seem to be talking past each other here is whether the internal gears (and much shorter lever-arm physics) of a hub drive are better or worse geared per watt/torque, and I absolutely promise you that they are not unless they're using a totally un-useful permanent planetary "granny gear" built into it designed to only climb hills and stay within the torque/RPM band for that given brushless motor.
Like I'm not quite sure how you're missing this point about mid-drives going through the chain and cassette and how they actually work IRL.
Because mid drives definitely DO assist in climbing hills even when I'm in my 46x11t combination whether I'm pedaling or using a throttle.
The difference in assist compared of a mid drive to a statically internally geared hub drive is actually immediately noticeable, especially on cadence sensing drives or drives where you can adjust the torque sensing down to require very little pedal input.
This is like the whole point of mid-drives. It's directly adding power to your pedal input or powering it directly alone with throttle use through the chain no matter what gear you're in. The only reason to need "granny gears" less than 1:1 is to get EVEN MORE torque.
The only reason why I switched from a bog standard like 11-34t cassette is to get even more torque so that i could full send my BBSHD on throttle alone and get the motor cadence up to 140+ RPM and zoom up steep 10%-plus grade slopes with 100 pounds of groceries on it.
Anyway, I don't really want to keep arguing about this. You're not getting it and I don't want to have to try to explain it again in a different way.
Because I would need to bust out a bunch of diagrams and visual aids showing how the drivetrain interacted with the mid-drive vs. how a hub drive worked.
chrispark70@reddit
[sorry if this is a duplicate. I thought I already responded to this, but I don't see it]
"Nah, because cadence/RPM of mid-drive motors isn't directly linked to the motor speed limits. It's sensed from a magnet on the wheel and actual wheel speed, not the motor cadence!"
Sure, you can defeat it by lying about the size of your wheel (in the computer) or some other way. But the reality is, the power is such that it won't go much faster than about 30 mph for most hub drives. AFAIK, most, if not all are 750 watts or less. Regardless of gearing, it takes X amount of power to go Y speed. This power limitation also limits your climbing speed regardless of mechanical advantage. What it will do by being in the right gear while climbing is keep the motor cool and efficiency higher.
Yes, we may be talking past each other. My point of contention is that with a mid drive, if you don't have a granny gear less than 1:1, going through the drive train doesn't help the motor with going up a hill. It is certainly helping you get up the hill, just as a hub motor will help you get up a hill. But it doesn't have a mechanical advantage. This is the claim that is nearly always made, such as the OP's initial comment.
"Yes, they do. I'm not sure where you're getting this weird idea but even underpowered, speed-limited, torque-sensing EU legal Bosch drives DO use the mechanical advantages of using the gears of the drivetrain."
A one to one system has no mechanical advantage. If your lowest gear is 28/28, the bicycle's drive train has no mechanical advantage. Again, I am not saying that having a mid-drive motor doesn't assist you in climbing hills or maintaining a certain speed. That's the whole point of an e-bike. But what it does not do is increase its own torque by being routed through the drive train unless the drive train itself has mechanical advantage.
Instead of a mid drive motor, imagine you are wearing one of those e-exoskeletons instead (if you haven't heard of these, Sam Pilgrim has a video where he is using one). No matter how much power this exoskeleton is giving your legs, the bike's drive train isn't giving mechanical advantage in a 1:1 gear ratio.
Also, I am not saying hub drives are better. There are lots of good reasons for choosing a mid-drive motor. They are generally better built and more efficient than hub motors. Probably lighter too. On a suspension bike, the weight is sprung whereas a hub drive is unsprung weight. They allows for much stronger wheels too. This is one of the other major reasons they are standard on e-mountain bikes (most hub drives hubs are cast aluminum)
loquacious@reddit
This is where we keep having the communications breakdown, because you keep switching back and forth between two completely different proposals and terms:
A - What sounds like you're stating that a mid-drive doesn't provide any advantage at all over a hub drive and they are both equal when climbing hills with or without human power input.
and B - Insisting and conflating this with the stricter definition of mechanical advantage at less than 1:1 gearing is the only "real" assistance or advantage over a hub drive at all.
The part where we are disagreeing is that hub drives are mechanically exactly the same and providing the same assistance as a mid drive given the same gear range and drive train, and this isn't true at all due to the mechanical differences and torque band differences and how they overlap and work with or against the drivetrain.
To get the same power assist advantages as a mid-drive, the hub drive would have to be a powered IGH where you could change the ratios of the internal gearing on the hub.
Yes, you can get purely mechanical advantage with a hub drive by changing gears like on a normal bike and pedal power, but it's not the same range of mechanical advantage as a mid drive through a drivetrain due to the torque bands of the motor being able to be better matched to the drive train.
Side bar:
Not all mid drives (or hub drives) have any kind of speed limiter, nor are they strictly class 1, 2 or 3 drives. Most of the DIY mid drive kits out there have zero limitations beyond total amps as defined and limited by the controller, BMS and battery cell ratings.
My 52V BBSHD has zero restrictions other than the safety cap of 29 amps on a 30 amp system to keep it from blowing up the controller, and the controller can actually handle some slight fudge factor greater than 30 amps. The battery and BMS is the real 30 amp bottleneck.
There's nothing to defeat or trick, here. The only limitations are the inverse square laws of aerodynamics and how they interface with motor efficiency and peak amps vs torque.
Yes, and no. The difference between a hub and mid drive here is that given the same gear range and wheels, a mid drive can go Y speed for less power than a hub drive due to not running into field weakening problems at higher motor core speeds and the voltage/amperage limitations inherent in all brushless/PWM switched DC motors.
This ability to take advantage of RPM power bands should actually be seen as an electromechanical advantage, and I think this is where we're failing to communicate clearly.
I really and truly can go faster (or steeper!) per given rated watt because of the advantages of a mid-drive through gears because I can keep the RPMs in the power band.
Part of the issue here is that "watts" are actually a horrible way to measure ebike power at the wheel-road interface and are just a generally vague "this is how much power it can use over a given window of time" and not "this is actually how many volts/amps it is using right now".
This is true, but again, the power curves are different with mid vs hub drive due to being able to select the right gear range to match the efficiency/torque/power bands and zones of the motor core.
As a fellow old school analog cyclist that likes pedaling, I sure wish I could just let you ride my Bafang BBSHD build on a Surly Trucker up a steep hill and then directly compare it to hub drive with the same amount of watts and drive train, because it's a hugely and immediately noticeable difference in everything from acceleration from a stop to total speed climbing up hills with or without pedal input.
Not only is it faster and stronger per watt, it's also vastly more controllable than a hub drive bike especially since I can apply all that torque with the throttle alone without any pedaling required at all.
With my setup it's not speed limited at all. Throttle is free use, too.
I have the Eggrider v2 controller which stores two complete 0-9 PAS levels. One is the stock full power OEM settings, and the other one is totally detuned and dialed back for more chill (and legal) riding and lower speed torque and control. I'm driving that through a 11-50t 9 speed, so it's kind of like driving a semi truck in that I have an insane number of "virtual" gears with 18 power levels x 9 gears.
And those power levels on the "detuned" profile are dialed in to work with my drive train steps and jumps between gears, too.
I can actually tune my controller profiles to limit them to a lower total speed (or volts!), yet still draw higher amps for torque, or vice versa, and I can adjust all of this easily on the road with the bluetooth app to match my terrain for the day.
What this means in practice is that I can be riding slow, techy uphill single track with a totally insane amount of low speed, controllable torque that you won't ever get out of a hub drive because it has to run and "cold start" from a dead stop every time and has to faff about in the low end of it's power/torque band to get those low speeds, at the cost of a lot of torque per consumed watt.
With a mid drive I can start up from a cold stop pointed directly up a steep hill in the right low gear (just like an analog bike) and it's instantly within it's higher RPM power bands, and it'll do that all day long at nice, easy to control lower speeds that are very suitable for the terrain so I don't get thrown off my bike or trail due to being able to run high motor/pedal RPMs while maintaining full torque.
Hell, it'll burn straight up a hill in the wrong gear, too, and chug away at it dumping watts as heat just like a hub drive, but I don't do that because I want to protect both my motor and drivetrain. A BBSHD will strip the teeth right off a brand new 11t sprocket if you let it.
Try cold starts aimed up a steep hill on a hub drive and it's straining and dumping watts as wasted heat because it's running too slow to use it's power band.
I really, really wish you could try out my bike because it's a HUGE difference in controllable power, efficiency and ride-ability over hub drives. You'd basically have to have a 3k+ watt hub drive to do the things that my bike can do even without a 46x11-50t drive.
And it's a total blast for climbing rugged, techy trails. I can climb like 3000 feet in a couple of miles with basically zero sweat AND keeping the speed down below 5 MPH for precise torque control. But it'll also easily do 35+ on a smooth, flat road with or without pedaling at all.
It would easily do 40+ with someone smaller and lighter on the same bike, but I'm about as aerodynamic and light weight as a whole barn.
If I could actually run a 3x or 2x front derailleur and rings and go from like a 32t to a 44t to a 52t ring, it would easily get even my fat ass up to 40+ because it wouldn't run itself out of the power band so soon, and the HD has an insane 160nm of torque at the output shaft both due to the motor design and internal gearing.
The fact that it can haul my huge fat ass and two weeks of groceries up steep hills at 15+ MPH (without pedaling!) and do that kind of speed on a flat road all on the same bike is just phenomenal.
You could probably put the same stock 52V BBSHD kit on an aerodynamic, recumbent velocycle with a much bigger chainring and I wouldn't be surprised at all if it could do 70-80+ MPH with enough straight road to burn up because of the electromechanical advantage of power bands and RPMs.
Note: I don't generally go faster than 28 MPH with power. I do occasionally hit 40+ bombing down hills but that's just normal bike stuff and me falling like a brick.
chrispark70@reddit
"The part where we are disagreeing is that hub drives are mechanically exactly the same and providing the same assistance as a mid drive given the same gear range and drive train," and "- What sounds like you're stating that a mid-drive doesn't provide any advantage at all over a hub drive and they are both equal when climbing hills with or without human power input."
I'm not making these claims.
"To get the same power assist advantages as a mid-drive, the hub drive would have to be a powered IGH where you could change the ratios of the internal gearing on the hub."
But you cannot do this with a mid-drive motor if you bike doesn't have the gearing for it.
"Yes, you can get purely mechanical advantage with a hub drive by changing gears like on a normal bike and pedal power, but it's not the same range of mechanical advantage as a mid drive through a drivetrain due to the torque bands of the motor being able to be better matched to the drive train."
In higher gears, assuming you can do this. But really, you don't even know the mid drive's power characteristics. AFAIK, these specifications are generally not published. You can do it by feel, but that's about it and only in torque division, not torque multiplication.
"Try cold starts aimed up a steep hill on a hub drive and it's straining and dumping watts as wasted heat because it's running too slow to use it's power band."
This is simply not true on bike with a 250 watt hub motor. I have a torque sensor only e-bike, no throttle. It needs me to be delivering torque before assist even engages. I don't find it especially slow or hear it straining. Also, I'm not making this comparison.
"The fact that it can haul my huge fat ass and two weeks of groceries up steep hills at 15+ MPH (without pedaling!)"
I cannot do that because I don't have a throttle and the motor doesn't have either the torque or the power. It's only 250 watts and I tend to run in PAS 2 (out of 5). Your bike has much more power than mine.
"You could probably put the same stock 52V BBSHD kit on an aerodynamic, recumbent velocycle with a much bigger chainring and I wouldn't be surprised at all if it could do 70-80+ MPH"
Downhill with an 75mph tailwind. No bike can reach these speeds without either being an extreme downhill or in a box behind a truck keeping the wind resistance down.
Even the wired predator can only reach 62mph with a huge motor (it's like 5kw IIRC). It takes a LOT of power to go that fast. There is no such thing as free work. Moving a mass 80mph down the road requires power. No amount of gearing will ever change the power requirements to overcome the wind and tire/bearing losses. Gears are for efficiency, not free energy. Though with all other things equal, a recumbent will be faster than a traditional bike. But, even a velomobile has a very hard time hitting 80mph on flat ground, even with a motor.
CBus660R@reddit
Sure it is, by not being at the mechanical disadvantage of being in a taller gear.
chrispark70@reddit
Huh? What are you talking about? Hub motors are in shorter gears, not taller ones. All IGH have a reduction inside them (I mean, it's in the name). Anything less than 1:1 (which ALL are) are in torque multiplication (the wheel is rotating slower than the motor).
CBus660R@reddit
You're hung up on whether a gear is greater than 1:1 so you get a torque multiplication. A lower torque reduction is still better than a higher torque reduction and that's what happens with dropping gears on a mid drive bike.
chrispark70@reddit
I don't understand you. Max torque is achieved when you are at your lowest gear ratio.
CBus660R@reddit
Yes, hence why mid drives can take advantage of the variable gearing of the drivetrain.
chrispark70@reddit
But all of the gears on most bicycles are overdrive or 1:1 at best. Mountain bikes are an exception to this rule.
IGHub drives are always in under-drive.
Where going through the bike's drive train really helps a mid drive is high speed, not climbing. If you don't have a speed sensor that will cut you off, you can use the bike's drive train to go as fast as the motor power will allow. Of course, most of the mid-drive motors (all, AFAIK) have speed sensors to cut you off and not really enough power (generally 750 watts) to go much faster than the 28mph cutoff. I don't think there are any mid drive motors with enough power to max out your gearing.
elementarydeardata@reddit
I like mid drives better, but this is true most of the time. I guess you could change the hearing to get a 1:1 but most people aren't going to bother with that.
chrispark70@reddit
Mid drives are better in important ways. I have no issue with mid-drive motors. There are lots of reasons to choose them over a hub drive.
The ONLY thing is I want to inform people that mid-drives do not improve climbing because of the bike's gearing system unless the bike has under-drive gears, which most do not.
elementarydeardata@reddit
The fact that you got 10 downvotes for stating a basic engineering fact is very telling about the groupthink on this sub.
chrispark70@reddit
It is amazing to me that people will sit and argue this point. As you say... groupthink.
gladfelter@reddit
One thing that you may not know is that hub drives do not apply maximum torque at all speeds. If you're going up a steep hill into the wind, much of the energy is turned into heat in the motor controller. I've had my Ride1Up 700 overheat once due to this going up a bare mesa in 30+mph headwinds. I was going about 8mph when it overheated. That won't happen on a mid drive because you're still cranking your legs at the same cadence as usual even on the steepest hill in the hightest wind that you're likely to experience, so the motor is still operating at maximum efficiency.
That said, it's pretty much impossible to overheat hub drives on class 1 or class 2 ebikes with 20" wheels, since the shorter lever arm means that you have greater torque at lower speeds. My 20" hub drive cargo ebike flies up hills, at least when I'm not fully loaded. But 27.5" hub drive ebikes really do have a weakness WRT hills that mid drives do not.
chrispark70@reddit
"But 27.5" hub drive ebikes really do have a weakness WRT hills that mid drives do not"
To whatever extent this may or may not be true (I don't think it is), this has nothing to do with my post. I made one assertion and that is on most bikes, mid drives do not improve climbing due to going through the bicycle drive train. To the extent there is gear reduction, it is inside the mid drive motor.
There is no reason you cannot pedal with a hub motor. I do it all the time. I have no throttle (class 1 EU speced e-bike) and have to pedal to get power (torque sensor).
gladfelter@reddit
What you're not getting is that mid-drive motors already have a lot of internal gearing such that they're in their optimal range at typical cyclist pedalling cadences, which is a fairly narrow range. So the motor is delivering maximum efficiency pretty much all the time with an experienced cyclist in the saddle.
Hub motors have only one gear. Planetary gear hub motors increase low-end torque, but they have to fudge because they also want to enable class 3 speeds. If there are any class-2-only motors, then maybe they'd be better at low speed torque.
So your point about whether the cassette / chainring ratio improves torque is beside the point: mid drives are always operating at near maximum efficiency with an experienced cyclist because that cyclist will always choose the gear that gives their legs maximum efficiency, which is also the motor's maximum efficiency.
Hub drives cannot do this, so bike & motor designers pick some tradeoff torque curve that will fail to be optimal at various speeds. With legal class 3 ebikes, that range will be quite large and there will be very inefficient speeds at the low end since they have to deliver maximum torque near 27mph or the bike won't go at class 3 speeds given the limited motor power under the regulatory regime.
chrispark70@reddit
Dude, you are replying to a comment where I said:
"To the extent there is gear reduction, it is inside the mid drive motor."
and where you replied:
"What you're not getting is that mid-drive motors already have a lot of internal gearing"
So I'm not "getting" what I clearly just said?
Are you replying to things I say or do you imagine what I would say and then replying to that?
"So your point about whether the cassette / chainring ratio improves torque is beside the point:"
Except where I said this is literally my only point. Mid drives do not increase torque and hill climbing abilities around the bike drive train. Full stop.
Most internally geared hub motors cannot vary their gearing. They are ALWAYS in underdrive. Worrying about the top speed is no big deal for most applications. This can be(is) engineered into the motor.
Wind_Advertising-679@reddit
I Concur with you 💯- I had a mid drive, it does feel like a regular bike pedalling, that's about it. I now have a hub motor, with 2 batteries, 60 volts, I can program the boost percentage at each PAS level, way less chain wear. Yes hub motor is better for streets and bike paths and generally not off roading - riding.
tshontikidis@reddit
I haven’t seen anyone mention belt drive trains. If you want to go belt over chain you need to go mid-drive since you will be using an in gear hub.
A belt was a must have for us as we store it outside and do not want to have to worry about constant maintenance, we are not bike people, we just don’t want to drive a car.
O2C@reddit
Belts with single speed bikes and hub motors are pretty common. If anything, belts with mid-drive motors and an IGH in back are rarer.
tshontikidis@reddit
No way are single speed belt drive e-bikes, that aren’t e-moto/cafe style, more common than belt mid-drive. Think of all the Gazelle, Tern, Riese & muller, Specialized, Trek, Cannondale… I could keep going with brands that offer belt drive bikes and none of them are hub. I did some googling and it was hard to find a few hub belt and they were all pretty no name DTC brands.
Pretend_Mud7401@reddit
Ride 1up roadster. V2. Belt drive single speed hub motor.
O2C@reddit
Again, belt drive hubs are more common because no name DTC brands are being pushed and are more common than higher priced big name bikes. The vast majority of ebikes sold are under $2k.
Check Google. The sponsored results for belt driven bikes?
Hub - Rad Power RadKick
Hub - Ride1Up Roadster v3
Hub - Priority Glide
Hub - Tenways CGO600
Mid - Blade 2.0
Hub - Fiido Air
Mid - Vaast Bikes E/1
Mid - Prodigy v2
Hub - Lectric ONE
Hub - Bird A-Frame
If you're going belt over chain, you're more likely to encounter a hub drive than a mid drive. If you're spending more than $5k on your bike, that flips.
Far_Consequence8672@reddit
Should your feet touch the ground while sitting on a bike
Blusmbl@reddit
I have 2 ebikes with hub motors and torque sensors, an Electra Townie Go and just picked up a Velotric Summit 1. I don’t ride in super hilly terrain, but the couple mid drive ebikes I’ve ridden I didn’t really get along with. It’s mostly sloppy shifting on my part but I found it more difficult to change gears without binding, they didn’t reduce power quickly enough for my taste to get a clean shift in.
I’m very happy with the hub motor on the Townie, the Summit’s feels good but I haven’t ridden offroad yet, just pavement.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
If you really want to climb hills fast, put the Summit in cadence mode.
Blusmbl@reddit
Rode it a decent amount today, really like it. Plenty of assist, even at my weight (300). Have used it on boost at 1-2 and can go low 20’s no problem, not using the throttle.
SeattleElectricBike@reddit
Mid drives also last longer, the bikes that are attached to them are usually much higher quality and it's way easier to get the bike worked on at pretty much any shop.
At this point in Ebike innovation, hub motors are just a cheaper way to go, and that's okay, too!
wlexxx2@reddit
and they cost about $800 more
SeattleElectricBike@reddit
Because they are higher quality, work better, last longer and are backed up by actual companies like Bosch and Shimano.
Cheap doesn't mean better. It usually means the opposite.
wlexxx2@reddit
yes that was sort of my point, yes mid drive is better but it;s more $$$ too
if the extra quality was free, there wouldn;t be any rear hub drive
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
The cheap Amazon bikes are almost exclusively hub drives. You are conflating cheap bike durability with hub drive durability.
Hub drives are actually more robust as they are simpler.
wlexxx2@reddit
but usually they are ''built to a price''
meaning every part is as cheap as possible
for some reason no one seems to do that w mid drive
or do they?
who?
SeattleElectricBike@reddit
Agree to disagree.
57hz@reddit
This is a lot of words for one simple concept: a mid-drive motor makes you feel like you’re actually cycling. Hub drives are for transportation only.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Hub drives can use torque sensors. Some of them feel pretty natural. You are uniformed.
Reasonable-Rub2243@reddit
Another factor in favor of mid-drive is it's much easier to fix a rear flat.
Worried_Document8668@reddit
hubs just feel bad and unnatural to me. The power coming from the rear wheel makes it feel both jerky/pushy and disconnected from the pedals for me. Even torque sensor hubs just don't feel like a real bike to me. and they feel way more akward when the motor is off due to the overweight rear wheel.
mid drives deliver power right at the chainring and if the sensors are well programmed, they will pretty much feel like riding a regular bike but with stronger legs. and the ride when the motor is off feels a lot more natural with the use of the regular chainshift.
krissym72@reddit (OP)
Yeah, that’s exactly how a lot of riders describe it - that “push from behind” feeling with a hub motor can be really noticeable, especially on bikes that use cadence sensors instead of torque sensors. Even with better tuning, it still doesn’t always match that smooth, “amplified pedaling” feel you get from a mid-drive.
I think the biggest difference is how connected you feel to the drivetrain. Mid-drives let you use your gears more naturally, so the power delivery just feels more balanced - like you said, stronger legs rather than a motor doing its own thing.
I do get why some people still prefer hubs though - less drivetrain wear, lower cost, and fewer moving parts to service. But for anyone who’s after that authentic cycling feel, mid-drives definitely win in that category.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
The feel gap is closing rapidly. The Velotric Summit, for example, is smooth enough and quiet enough, that I prefer it to my middrive unless I'm doing a dedicated trail ride with challenging terrain. Yes I can still tell the difference but most would not appreciate it.
Fearless-Werewolf-30@reddit
Where does the power come from in a mid drive?
Does it maybe go through the chain to the…. Back wheel?
Your other complaints are valid but this one makes literally no sense from a physics perspective.
The jerkiness has a lot more to do with electronics and torque vs cadence sensing, and a bike where the owner has sprung for an mid drive (more expensive) is more likely to have nicer general electronics and a (much more expensive in the relative sense) torque sensor although obviously mid drive is more intuitive to use and leads to a better balanced bike.
Worried_Document8668@reddit
the power input on a pedal assist mid drive happens right at the crank/chainring, because that's the part that gets moved by the motor. That's why i say a mid drive feels just like pedaling but with stronger legs.
how much power you put on the floor is dictated by gear, wheel traction, surface and so forth, just as with analog pedaling.
And that's the big point: rider input and motor input on a mid-drive happen at the same place in the chain. No disconnect between rider input(watts/rpm) and what the motor does, especially with quality systems like Bosch, Shimano or Specialized
a hubdrive is further down the chain from the rider and i never once found a hubdrive that felt as connected and real.
Complete-Equipment90@reddit
Can you give an example of the bikes you’ve tested that have torque sensor and don’t?
Worried_Document8668@reddit
when i was shopping for my current bike i tested some e-roadbikes from Orbea and Lapierre. Both with different versions of Mahle X Series rearhubs(both cadence and torque sensors).
While certainly efficient on flats the connection between pedals and rear never felt seamless like it does on a mid-drive, making for a ridefeel i didn't like.
worst offender was a trek dual sport that only had a cadence sensor rear hub. absolute e-scooter vibes.
my current bike has a Bosch SX mid drive that has the option of both torque or cadence sensor
Complete-Equipment90@reddit
What is your current bike?
Worried_Document8668@reddit
KTM Gravelator SX-20
BodSmith54321@reddit
I think this is a perfectly acceptable view. Everyone has a preference.
Ornery_Fault2887@reddit
Thanks for sharing this.
BWWFC@reddit
mid drive... becasue i ride a bike so i peddle, always. variable help? yes plz lol
Humble_Key_4259@reddit
what products do you peddle?
ChefGaykwon@reddit
they're a black market e-bike vendor
CCCCLo0oo0ooo0@reddit
a what now? Care to explain?
modus_bonens@reddit
[opens up big trench coat] We got mids, hub, torque, cadence, you name it.
BWWFC@reddit
specialized giant trek cannondale on and off but my stable is a used momentum someone didn't like.
pennies on the dollar win for me
BodSmith54321@reddit
"variable Help".
I think you confusing mid drives work torque sensors
BWWFC@reddit
not sure how a viable mid functions decently without a torque sensor, but sure it's possible i guess
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Hub drives can use torque sensors too and provide the variable (proportional) support.
So yes, he is conflating middrive with torque sensor.
BWWFC@reddit
for sure... but they need a purpose built frame... and that's not really what we are seeing. but more, they are mostly twist to go and that's a vehicle. and should come with all the rules and regulations. imho.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Every model from Aventon, Velotric, and Ride1up uses a "purpose built frame". What are you even talking about?
Only the Revv1 model could be considered moped style.
BWWFC@reddit
where i am, don't see a lot of those except for the ones that are only on the back wheel usually lol.
are they twist to go? that's entering a "vehicle" space and with the sizes of the motors, they could use better wheels/tires/brakes... and riders,
the rub is 0.5mV^(2) ;-p and if a rider doesn't need to put much of any efforts or coordination into getting to "top speed," that allows ppl that really shouldn't be going that fast... to go faster than they can function when the path forward isn't straight and clear. idk the why the need but always, just imho.
BodSmith54321@reddit
Almost every rear hub has a torque sensor these days except the really cheap Amazon direct from China bikes.
BWWFC@reddit
is almost every rear hub (with or without a torque sensor) set up to twist to go and high(er) watts, even the ones not amazon direct from china?
gladfelter@reddit
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Can you say it without sarcasm?
BWWFC@reddit
imho mid drive, is the only motor to consider. why? becasue i ride a bike (the colloquial generic form of the word for bicycle... think of it conceptually). therefor i ~~peddle~~ pedal always (foot-operated lever used for actuating or controlling a mechanism, crank powering various devices, such as a bicycle). and for my experience, just easier mechanically. do i enjoy some amount of help in this endeavor, at a time and variable level of my choosing? yes plz lol but to be sure, not all the time, for me it must be an usable pedal bike first and foremost. so moving anything under a jogging speed... no battery used.
gladfelter@reddit
What's your opinion on hub drives with torque sensor-based assist?
BWWFC@reddit
as a "bike?" hack garbage, esp with most all the frames i see it done to. you asked and it's an opinion of mine, that ties my room together.
as a transportation vehicle? sure i guess, but that's entering the space of pure vehicle (twist to go) and isn't the colloquial "bike." speed has a cost that squares... and to not admit that changes things, is dishonest.
E28forever@reddit
Pedal
wlexxx2@reddit
right
mid is better for almost everything
but it is more expensive
i would say average is about $600 more
brick1972@reddit
I would add to this that if you are using a hub motor especially you want a torque sensor not a cadence sensor. Riding with a hub motor and cadence sensor felt far too herky jerky to me.
The biggest maintenance advantage of a mid-drive is that you can change the rear wheel normally.
youandican@reddit
"The biggest maintenance advantage of a mid-drive is that you can change the rear wheel normally."
Outside of unplugging a couple of wires for the rear wheel how hard is it? Didn't take me long at all to unplug 2 different wires and remove the rear hub when I had to change my tube and tire.
strange-humor@reddit
Is there an easy way to add a torque sensor to a simple Bafang style hub motor? I assume it is just hall effect counting the rotation and seems like you would need to emulate that.
tomxp411@reddit
What you're describing is how a cadence sensor works: it counts rotations and activates the motor when the pedals are moving forward.
A torque sensor requires something more complicated. The bottom brackets I've seen appear to have a center axle wrapped in a load cell or strain gauge, which measures the amount of force the rider applies to the pedals.
So it's not about the speed at which you pedal, it's about how hard you press the cranks.
Anyway - to add a torque sensor, your controller would have to support it. Assuming your controller has a torque sensor input, you'd need to install the sensor, connect the wiring to the controller, and activate the torque sensor input - either through the programming interface or via the control panel.
strange-humor@reddit
Yes, completely understand that, just don't know if there is a way to easily integrate a BB or crank or pedal torque system into existing rotation based setups.
Seems like you would need an Ant+ reader with compatible output as cadence sensor with tuning. Or replacement computer for the ebike that can read the power output type sensors.
Lowley_Worm@reddit
Also a downside of the cheaper cadence sensor bikes is if you have two people riding them it’s very hard to match speeds in a natural way.
boshbosh92@reddit
yeah I found this problem to be very annoying. I had a velotric nomad 1 and my girlfriend had a discover 1 - both cadence and you could never get them going the same speed.
We have since upgraded to a breeze and discover 2 and I love them. I'm 6k miles deep on my discover 2 and she's going strong still
tomxp411@reddit
I am 100% in favor of torque sensors. Once I tried a bike with a torque sensor, I decided right then and there that I never wanted to go back to a cadence sensor bike.
stormdelta@reddit
True, though some hub drives are easier to remove than others. It's a shame Grin's All-Axle is the only through-axle/QR hub motor I've seen, as it's too pricey to easily recommend to most people. It makes managing the rear wheel much easier, especially with the simple waterproof connectors and easy to detach torque arm.
billbixbyakahulk@reddit
Hub motors are better because they apply force directly to the wheel. A mid drive is by design less efficient since it loses most of its energy through the chain and drive-train, which are only efficient within a small band of power output and torque.
There. Another STUPID comment on top of this dumpster fire of stupid comments.
Spiritual_Wafer_2597@reddit
Mid drive all day
TLOtis23@reddit
I own both hub drive and mid-drive bikes. I definitely prefer the feel of a mid-drive, as it is more natural. Even with a torque sensor, my hub drive bike isn't as good for exercising.
That said, for commuting purposes, it can be pretty handy to have a throttle.
Accountbegone69@reddit
We have almost 5k on our 500w hub motor ebike. It's reliable and I like the throttle...haven't tried a mid drive yet. I like the idea of easy access to remove rear wheel. I'm using it for urban travelling so long hills aren't an issue.
gsasquatch@reddit
My main desire for an ebike, is I have a steep hill to contend with.
For that, I thought I wanted mid-drive, although the idea of overpowering a bicycle drive train seemed a bit sketchy, I liked the idea of the gearing for the hill.
A hub motored bike fell into my lap, for a price I couldn't refuse. Underpowered, only 350 watts, but, it was very cheap, kinda cool, so I decided to give it a go.
Going up a 10% grade, pushing my 220lbs, it can do about 5-7mph without my help, like a fast walk/slow jog speed. Good enough for me, requirement met.
Then seeing a hub motor handles my hill satisfactorily, I got a 750watt hub motor on a bigger heavier bike, and yeah, about the same speed up the same hill surprisingly, with the computer saying "1000watts"
My next bike, in process, is a wrong side drive conversion on a regular bike. A big sprocket on the port side of the bike like where a disc for a brake would go that I'll connect to a motor via chain that has a gear reduction of some sort, once I get the mounting figured out. Thinking is, like a mid drive, but leaves the bike powertrain with its shifters etc in tact, simpler and thus more robust. Gearing can be changed if I like, via swapping out $20 sprockets. Initial gearing, I hope will get me up the hill a little faster, 10ish mph perhaps, and I don't care about top speed, because gravity gets me to extra-legal for an ebike speeds anyway.
The motor has a free wheel. No regen, but, should be easier to push or ride the bike normally, where the hub motor does add some drag. Part of the complication of the mid-drive I don't like, is moving the free wheel from the wheel to the crank, which adds to the parts list. Although, to this end, I nabbed a Schwinn Varsity that did this from the factory.
I don't know why yet, more bikes don't use this wrong side drive. There was an old bike the "Curie Ezip" that did this, and it seems like a good idea. The motor I have looks suspiciously similar, but I have a lithium battery for it.
ImplementFast2978@reddit
Torque rear hub just feels more like an actual bike to me coming from riding road bikes ... I tested a cadence drive and was thoroughly turned off. But I only use my ebike for flat city commutes, so there's that.
Plus it looks weird to me when I see someone on a mid drive spinning like crazy but going like 15 mph lol
To each their own.
BodSmith54321@reddit
Gross generalization. Even a 500w hub motor can do fine on hills. Maybe not a steep 2 mile accent in the mountains, but for most people they are perfectly fine.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Even with the qualifiers people still insist on downvoting for some reason.
I wish Reddit tracked upvotes/downvotes by age category with the option of just displaying how the adults feel.
BodSmith54321@reddit
I don't even notice. The facts speak for themselves.
Look at the Lectric Xpress 500w hill climb on EBR test compared to the Specialized Turbo Levo 3. The Xpress beat it by 7 seconds. Now the Xpress probably would have overheated on a 30 minute climb but for relatively short climbs, they do fine.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Yeah and the Summit finishes near the top, tested in torque mode no less. In cadence more I think the Summit would finish Hell Hole in about a minute flat. Completely trouncing almost all middrives.
For some reason people want to ignore peak output of the motor but give credit for using the bike's drivetrain.
Relevant-Group8309@reddit
Thats why im looking at a GT73 pro or x2 im not a hooligan who needs to go 70 mph down a bike lane or sidewalk. 30-40 mph is absolutely acceptable for me on a e-bike. A simple pont A to B.
stormdelta@reddit
Agreed with all of this. I see way too many people here that act like mid-drives are strictly superior, when that's not true.
I run a direct drive hub for my main bike because it's my primary transit, and despite living in Colorado, most of my city is on the plains and is surprisingly flat, though my particular setup can handle hills better than most hubs.
I've had chains snap on me even on regular bicycles here, much less mid-drives, and even more commonly I've had issues with chains getting iced over and slipping, despite my best efforts with lubricant and other mitigations.
And even as an experienced rider, I don't always remember (or am not always able to) shift perfectly. And getting caught in the wrong gear when dealing with traffic is a safety issue in my experience, even on a normal bike. So having a hub motor (that also has a throttle) is preferable when dealing with US city traffic to me.
A direct hub with variable regen is even better maintenance-wise, as it massively reduces brake wear and tear, and gives me redundancy on brakes to boot. I've also found it makes it easier to maximize braking power consistently without locking the wheels (you're still limited by the tire traction of course).
It's a shame torque sensors are so rare on hubs though. Mine has one, but it's not a practical option for most people due to its high price.
Inciteful_Analysis@reddit
Good insights as usual.
Thankfully torque sensors and dual sensors are becoming standard from the established DTC players like Aventon, Ride1up, Lectric, and Velotric.
strange-humor@reddit
Is a torque sensor the same thing as what is used for power measurement with bike computers? i.e. Do you get both functions for one price?
stormdelta@reddit
If by power you mean human power input, a torque sensor could be used to do that yes, and some bikes do.
A torque sensor measures the actual force applied, and needs to be the drivetrain somewhere. This can be in crank or bottom bracket like with many mid-drive motors, it can be on the chain tension like with some Juiced e-bikes, or it can built into the rear hub like with the Grin All-Axle.
Those cheap bike computers that use sensor on the wheel rotation are not torque sensors. At best they can only calculate the RPM of the wheel and get a rough estimate of the speed of the bike. This can give you a very rough idea of power, but it's not nearly as accurate or direct as measuring the force input directly.
No_ego_@reddit
Your intent. Mountain biking, trail riding - mid drive. I ride up 30-4 degree inclines with a mid drive with ease and on 1 leg. Dont believe the hype around mids cant cut it on hills. Basically thats all mid drive motors on mountain bikes are used for - massive leg draining hills.
4-micyclele@reddit
Come the zombie apocalypse, one can convert a rear motor e bike to an analogue one!
My experience with a Bosch equipped Diamondback gravel bike was fantastic. It felt like cruise control on an automobile, kicking in as the slope increased. Extraordinary for exploring back roads in central California coast.
I have two Class 1 rear motor e bikes for street based commuting and fun.
chunkypenguion1991@reddit
It should also mention mid drives take more skill to operate. Idk if they're improved now but my old bafang you had to make sure to change gears under no power or it'd damage the cassette after a few times
loquacious@reddit
Also relatively easy to do with bottom-bracket mid-drives like the Bafang BBS series, TSDZ2, or Cyc drives. In fact with the Cyc drives you could just pop the secondary drive train and it's now a pedal only bike.
Electronic_Cream_780@reddit
I went through all this when I upgraded my etrike. I don't have a car and usually am dragging a trailer with 3 dogs in up some steep hills. I rely on it for everything, shopping, going to different dog walks, hospital appointments...so reliability was top. I ended up with a Heinzmann kit on the front hub. My previous Heinzmann lasted 20 years without a single problem (normal brakes, tyres, chains etc needed repairing and replacing over time) and that was more than worth a bit extra. The guy I got it from also does a lot of cargo bikes for businesses and repeat customers nearly want to go from mid to hub drive. If you are used to driving a car mid drive makes sense, but that is a lot of pressure on the drive train and associated parts. If you don't want them in the workshop half the time, a hub is a far better bet
Reverend_Wrong@reddit
I’ve been quite surprised that the chain on my CYC Photon mid-drive conversion has actually lasted longer than chains on my gravel bike. I’m at nearly 4k miles and chain only beginning to reach 0.5 on my measuring tool. It’s a KMC X10e so it’s designed for e-bikes vs 11 speed chain on the gravel bike which typically last about 2.5k miles. I think the fact the e-bike has fenders may be the biggest factor contributing to the chain’s longevity. It’s a powerful motor and while it doesn’t have a throttle, I’m not reluctant to push it over 1000 watt output at times.
TLDR; mid drives aren’t necessarily that hard on your drivetrain.
Fair-Discipline-1005@reddit
For me,personaly,is better hub motor,better for flat roads where I riding,and throttle... But I like more cadence sensor, Im a litlle bit lazy...
Complete-Equipment90@reddit
OP: can you list the actual bikes?
eternalthree@reddit
I have a small 250 watt rear hub motor on my no throttle e-bike (ride1up cf racer1), just curious is it more efficient on flats at higher speeds and smaller rear cogs? Or is it more efficient on lower gears? What about when riding uphill or downhill?