Steam Hardware & Software Survey: October 2025
Posted by AntonioTombarossa@reddit | hardware | View on Reddit | 124 comments
AMD 9000 series still shows up only on the linux-only table.
Windows 11 got a huge jump thanks to the end lf support for Windows 10.
Fr0stCy@reddit
For the first time in 2 years, I was asked to contribute to this hardware survey. Neat.
Sevastous-of-Caria@reddit
I still dont know who they choose and why. My nvidia laptop got asked once every 6 months. My nvidia old gpu asked twice in a month. And my radeon got never asked from 2 years ownership.
Impossible_Suit_9100@reddit
yeah, my new PC never got it, meanwhile my old one got it multiple times, including once since I bought the new one lol
ShadowRomeo@reddit
AMD Ryzen CPUs continues to keep rising on the chart leaving Intel behind that is shedding lots of its market share away. They have been on their highest market share ever since over 2 decades ago, It's insane to see how the almighty Intel that was deemed to be unbeatable stumble upon its feet.
But watch AMD fans still keep ignoring one aspect and still pointing out that Steam Hardware Survey is rigged / wrong because their newest Radeon GPUs are still not looking great on this survey lol...
Sarcasm aside, I think It is very interesting to see the RTX 3060 being on top again, I think it has something to do with the used market, these GPUs are very cheap right now on used market whereas the 5060 which i will assume probably is already off production therefore not for sale anymore new are looking bad value compared to it.
That is probably the reason why the 3060 once again regained its throne on being the number 1 GPU.
SoTOP@reddit
Either steam survey is bugged for some AMD cards from past two generations or steam survey is correct and there are zero 7900XT, 7600, 9070XT sold.
SoTOP@reddit
As is usual, people write a bunch of theories trying to explain inconsistencies, I debunk them all and but they still upvote them, downvote me and leave thinking they were correct.
Easier to live in denial then admit being wrong.
StickiStickman@reddit
... well yeah, obviously not enough sold to show up?
SoTOP@reddit
Card like RX 7900M, that probably has less than 3000 units sold worldwide, does show up. Are you so oblivious to claim that those 3 cards sold less than 7900M?
StickiStickman@reddit
What are you even talking about? It literally doesn't show up either?
SoTOP@reddit
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/directx/ ctrl f 7900M you will find one entry. You won't find one for any of GPUs I mentioned.
iDontSeedMyTorrents@reddit
Where are you even seeing that?
SoTOP@reddit
That's where I find it too. Yet you won't find cards I mentioned even there.
iDontSeedMyTorrents@reddit
But if you scroll to the bottom, "Other" still has 15.14%. So there are clearly many cards they are not showing, and there seems to be little real order or reason for the cards that are being displayed.
SoTOP@reddit
You can see the same situation in DIRECTX 12 SYSTEMS (WIN10 WITH DX 12 GPU) section, where "other" is only 0.71%. For example China exclusive 9070 GRE does show up there, but 9070XT doesn't.
dedoha@reddit
Shows up at 0.00%. 9070xt is lumped with 9070, 7600 with 7600xt and 7900xt with xtx
SoTOP@reddit
Good theory, back in January I though this could be the answer too, because 7700XT was showing up while 7800XT, which should be the more popular of those two, didn't. But Valve, probably manually, fixed 7800XT entry in April, and while 7700XT did not change much since then, 7800XT shot up in marketshare and is at 0.75% overall after not showing up for 17 months since release.
So this is not the case.
teutorix_aleria@reddit
I do think theres some reporting errors. My steam survey pop up in september didnt register my 9070XT. Not saying they sold millions of units but probably more than steam suggests.
tan_phan_vt@reddit
The 3060 is easily the cheapest and most versatile gpu on the used market. That 12GB vram and generally lowish power consumption makes that card last very long.
krilltucky@reddit
Opposite for my country. the cheapest 3060 i can find is more expensive than a rx7600 and the same price as a 4060.
saboglitched@reddit
The 3060 has 12gb vram while those have 8, giving it an advantage for running small ai models and productivity work. Also, the 7600 doesn't have dlss 4. Given that its only 10% faster in raster than the 3060 according to TPU, DLSS 4 alone easily makes it a superior card as even dlss 4 performance >> fsr 3.1 quality. So it makes sense for it cost more.
jenny_905@reddit
You can even find them new with warranties pretty easily still, production was huge and it remains in stock in many places, price is similar to a 'new' 4060.
constantlymat@reddit
The survey really emphasizes what a kick in the nuts AMD committed with demoting the RDNA 2 cards into maintenance mode.
The 6600 and 6700XT are by far their best performing cards and the bedrock of AMD's customer base.
kulind@reddit
For some reason, AMD seems to think that when people can’t enjoy a game because of driver bugs, they’ll still choose their GPUs.
Cheeze_It@reddit
I have yet to hit any bugs on AMD cards. I've been using AMD since like 2008 or 2009.
l_lawliot@reddit
I have one.
My 6600 randomly starts to idle at ~12W while it's normal idle power draw is ~3.8W. In hwinfo, the vram clock is greyed out so that makes me think it's getting stuck at some high frequency. It fixes itself when I disable and enable VRR in adrenalin settings.
fmjintervention@reddit
Not saying there's no bugs in AMD video drivers, but who the fuck cares about idling at 12W instead of 4W? It's literally 8W difference. There isn't a country on Earth where 8W is going to make a significant difference to your electricity bill. You're looking for bugs for the sake of finding them rather than because it's actually affecting your experience at all.
l_lawliot@reddit
I care. I wouldn't have posted a comment if I didn't. I went for a GPU with low power requirements because electricity is expensive here.
fmjintervention@reddit
Having a look at an electricity cost calculator, let's say your computer idles for 3 hours a day, and you live in the Solomon Islands with the most expensive electricity in the world at $1.03/kWh, that extra 8 watts is costing you... $9.03 per YEAR. This is what you're concerned about? 9 bucks a year absolute worst case scenario?
l_lawliot@reddit
I'm not going to repeat myself again. But for your information, I don't live in the United States or any of the more developed countries where it costs 10 bucks for a sandwich.
Regardless, it's still a bug that hasn't been fixed. I had no such problems with my old GT1030, which by the way had driver support until about 4 months ago.
KARMAAACS@reddit
I literally had an issue with my RX6600 PC where if you plugged in a second monitor (a specific one) into the 6600 you would get a black screen for both monitors, nothing would work to make it respond correctly, even lowering the bit depth, DDUing the driver, switching inputs, lowering refresh rates etc to get more bandwidth, it wouldn't make the multi-monitor setup work ever.
If you however, plugged in just the problematic second monitor on its own it worked with the 6600 at full bandwidth, no problems. But plug them both it and instant black screens.
So I got my 3060 Ti from my other PC and put it in the same PC and plugged those same both monitors in at once, installed the NVIDIA driver and it worked without issue as it should and was expected to.
I tried later with an RX 6800 from a friend of mine when he came over one day for a LAN, same thing. So it wasn't just my RX6600, it is some sort of RDNA2 wide issue.
Truth is, AMD drivers are horrible with multi-monitor and always have been. Had nothing but issues and this is without HDR too. Once you put HDR into the equation I've seen other HDR monitors I have, not work with AMD GPUs when I plug them in on their own. I have to turn off HDR by plugging in a second monitor and then it will work, so basically I just can't use HDR with specific monitors and AMD. I have never had any issue like this with NVIDIA (I'm sure it happens on NVIDIA too). Even when I tested an A750 around release time it worked with those monitors in multi-monitor. AMD only issue, which was weird. So it definitely has bugs.
LrKwi@reddit
I got RX 6600 with free starfield and i had the same issues as you. My main 1440p monitor had freesync but if i tried to turn it on it would shut my secondary 1080p monitor off. I also had the Black screen on both monitors when i tried to turn the pc on , and the only way to fix that was to unplug the main monitors cable from the GPU , restart the pc and wait for the image to show up on my older 1080p BenQ , then replug the cable. It happend almost every other way. I just sold this 6600 lasy july and bought a used 3070 and its awesome.
krilltucky@reddit
Ever since the 25.5.1 adrenalin update a year ago, all Spiderman games will shut down your pc unless you lower the clocks to like 2500 or undervolt to a different number per gpu.
This is easily replicable and is caused by amd pushing your mhz over 200 above stock if there is thermal headroom.
dorting@reddit
Same , even same age started with HD3850
airmantharp@reddit
If you head over to r/radeon, you’ll find many such examples lol
_Lucille_@reddit
"We want affordable GPUs >!(but will only buy nvidia)!<"
I am curious if at some point nvidia will get hit by the antitrust: likely in EU since the US is currently bribable: AMD and Intel have some pretty compelling products but nvidia's stack makes it very difficult for competitors to compete.
soru_baddogai@reddit
Because AMD has a reputation for second class drivers team and buggy software with second-rate features with like 50 dollars difference.
randomkidlol@reddit
governments are too toothless to hit anyone with antitrust these days. gotta keep in mind IBM was hit with one of the largest antitrust investigations in history when they were at their peak of ~70% market share. nvidia is pushing 95% and nobody sees a problem with that.
krilltucky@reddit
Majority of people buy prebuilts and laptops. Most (read:all) prebuilts and laptops have an nvidia gpu. Palit supplies the majority of prebuilds and is purely an nvidia partner.
There is no "cheaper than nvidia" AMD prebuilt or laptop widely available.
AMD focuses their resources on CPUs so they will never cut into that to supply enough GPUs to matter in prebuilts. Amd does not have a deal with Palit even IF they could match Nvidia in gpu volume
Firefox72@reddit
This is now AMD highest CPU share since early 2008.
goulash47@reddit
I'll tell ya as a raptor lake owner that the last couple of years degradation issues have made me much more of a coin flip as to whether I'll get AMD next time, and I haven't been on AMD in about 18 or 20 years.
airmantharp@reddit
I considered RPL coming from a 12700K - but the rat race of memory tuning just to still fail short of X3D SKUs got me to switch.
Zalack@reddit
I made the switch to a 9950x3d and haven’t looked back. It’s a phenomenal CPU.
capybooya@reddit
Intel is now at least reasonably power efficient (best thing I can say of their new gen) and that will probably be enough to continue their domination in a very entrenched market of suppliers for mainly laptops.
airmantharp@reddit
Intel has idle power figured out, and that matters more on mobile than anything else
996forever@reddit
They would need to aggressively win over the laptop market.
With 2026 being all Zen 5 rebrand and ARL being pretty good on laptop, I don't see it happening.
III-V@reddit
AMD has always struggled to get into laptops. I dunno what the heck they're doing.
Michelanvalo@reddit
Not beating the deals that Intel is cutting HP and Dell for processors.
LuluButterFive@reddit
Or having a crappy platform with crappy i/os and wireless connectivity
Klutzy-Residen@reddit
Intel can't sell them at a loss because they need to make money.
What they at least have been good at historically is providing reference designs and assistance to their customers.
Kougar@reddit
Too busy saving money to make money, constantly recycling very old uArches on old process nodes and still reportedly not able to meet volume requirements for better OEM adoption. Some of the 7000 chips were Zen 2, so when you see an AMD badge on a laptop you don't know if it's Zen 2, 3, or 4. But it will certainly never be the current generation, you at least know that much.
Drando_HS@reddit
Not necessarily. Gaming handhelds are eating into gaming laptop marketshare, and the vast majority of those are AMD-based.
996forever@reddit
The actual volume of those are tiny and I mean tiny. Steam deck being the biggest one by far and it’s not cracked 10m in total.
Front_Expression_367@reddit
Not even 5 millions, and especially not so in third-world countries where these handhelds can be extra difficult to afford and you kinda need your laptop to do everything else.
996forever@reddit
Handhelds make no sense unless you have another device for regular stuff and/or gaming.
They’re literally ultrabook internals in a weird form factor. For anyone that wants one device for everything a mid range gaming laptop with 30/40/5060 is way too versatile of a deal. No external monitor needed.
ResponsibleJudge3172@reddit
That too is changing with Lunarlake and now panther lake adoption increasing
ExeusV@reddit
PTL being released
Jumpy-Dinner-5001@reddit
Highly unlikely. Intel still sells way more CPUs in each segment. The highest marketshare (as in new units sold) is about 40% on Desktop CPUs.
Firefox72@reddit
If that was the case AMD wouldn't have gone from 8% in January of 2008 to 42% today.
Ok-Parfait-9856@reddit
The steam survey doesn’t reflect market share at all. Most computers aren’t used for gaming.
Firefox72@reddit
Weird point given you need to install Steam to actually be counted. Why would you install and launch steam if you don't plan to play anything?
Besides the point. My initial point was clearly about the market share on Steam.
DaMan619@reddit
FWIW FireFox has Intel at 80%
Jumpy-Dinner-5001@reddit
why?
ElectronicStretch277@reddit
Because if they sold less than Intel then such a rapid rise would be impossible.
constantlymat@reddit
12th gen was Intel's last great generation. I think it's entirely plausible we see another massive market ship once owners of 12th gen Intel CPUs switch platforms.
Earthborn92@reddit
There are still a good chunk of happy 12th gen owners. I don’t think they’ll all be feeling the need to upgrade until Zen6/Nova Lake. And if Nova lake it good, then you could skip all of the years that AMD was dominant with the x3d chips.
constantlymat@reddit
I mean yeah, the new Intel socket that is rumored to receive 3-4 generations of CPUs, is their one big play that could stop or slow down the blodletting in terms of desktop CPU marketshare.
Especially if it launches at a time when AM5 is coming towards the end of its support cycle.
If you buy into a new platform it is absolutely conceivable that Intel promising platform longevity at a point when AMD cannot, will be an intruiging opportunity.
However, that will only matter if they can substantially close the gap towards the X3D CPUs. If it remains in the double digits percentage points, the new Intel platform longevity will be a lot less impactful.
Exist50@reddit
There is no way in hell the NVL socket gets 4 generations. Where is that "rumor" even coming from? Even 3 gens would be very optimistic, and would mean that Intel wouldn't adopt DDR6 till 2030+. 2 gens of support (NVL and RZL) would probably be the "expected" outcome. Maybe a refresh gen in there somewhere.
Hell, even if Intel wants to support the socket more, they probably wouldn't say that publicly for the risk that some of those planned generations get cancelled, like what happened with the ARL platform. It was supposed to be 3 gens (MTL-S, ARL-S, PTL-S), but all but ARL-S got cancelled.
Berserk72@reddit
3060 at the top again. It makes me wonder if the next 5 years will have even AAA games aiming for medium native 60 on a 3060 or keep developing for the ever shrinking high end.
Unless a miracle happens I don't see the GPU market shifting that much. So will the narrative in 2029 be "unoptimized slop", "elitist gaming", or just ignored due to the GPU divide.
Pamani_@reddit
Isn't the 3060 roughly 2x the series S perf ? If you have a strong enough CPU I could see 60 fps for the generation, provided you use series S settings (pretty low internal res).
Spiral1407@reddit
Consoles are mostly GPU limited this gen (especially the series s) so I doubt it would change much
Pamani_@reddit
My understanding was that the CPU was the reason the heaviest open world games can't run at 60 fps on series X and PS5. If it was a GPU problem they could just run the series S graphics on the series X and get double the fps.
EndlessZone123@reddit
It very much is a per game basis. Sometimes you just can't really reduce CPU uaage, but you Def can just lower resolution.
Helldivers seem to drop to 40-50 fps in performance mode and looking at how it runs on my Pc its a CPU bottleneck.
InflammableAccount@reddit
If it weren't for every braindead company picking UE5 for their engine, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Sure more dev hours for optimisations would help, but I personally blame Epic Games for this slop market.
kikimaru024@reddit
Cross-platform games will target PS5-level hardware as baseline.
The same way they have for the last 5 years.
F9-0021@reddit
Yes, but what people are going to forget is that the base PS5 will run optimized medium settings. So in order to get the same performance on PC with similar hardware, you might have to optimize the settings even further.
krilltucky@reddit
Yeah Sony ports are more demanding than their native ps5 counterparts. Yhe Spiderman games run witb with RT on for all ps modes but good luck doing that on anything lower than a 4060
Different_Return_543@reddit
Gamers and techtubers seem oblivious that games for more than a decade now have consoles as baseline hardware target. PC gaming community would rather be outraged that they can't run games at ultra settings rather than lower them, closer to console settings that at this point I would argue, it would be better if game devs, would just release games with identical settings to console without bothering about any higher setting.
PorchettaM@reddit
I mean, I can see why people aren't cheering while going through what feels like GPU shrinkflation. Pay the same price you used to, to run games at lower and lower settings.
NeroClaudius199907@reddit
The average pc gamer doesn't even know which fps they're playing at. They just use default settings or optimize. Online people on forums are the loud ones.
OwlProper1145@reddit
Thankfully a 3060 is more or less equivalent to a PS5.
BlueGoliath@reddit
Nvidia's unwillingness to release a good $300 GPU is hurting everyone.
Humorless_Snake@reddit
It's not nvidia's responsibility or fault that consumers refuse to switch brand. Not that our vram lord and saviour amd offers anything over 8 gb at $300 specifically.
CarnivoreQA@reddit
how much does b580 actually cost in EU\US with $250 MSRP? I believe that could be a solution if people remembered it exists
Vitosi4ek@reddit
I personally wouldn't buy it because there are persistent rumours of Intel quitting the DGPU business and in this day and age you're buying the software as much as the hardware. Also, in my country it costs exactly as much as a 4060, with practically identical performance but Nvidia having more stable drivers.
And I do actually have an A380 - in a Jellyfin server as a transcoding device, because that application doesn't rely on long-term driver support and can keep chugging basically forever (at least as long as there isn't some brand new codec it doesn't support).
pdp10@reddit
As you say, the Intel dGPUs are fine under Linux with the open-sourced drivers, because those will never be less supported than they are today.
jenny_905@reddit
I have seen them around £200-£230 in the UK. Price varies a lot though, the range right now looks like £215-£300+.
BlueGoliath@reddit
I have doubts even switching brands will matter. The GeForce division seems to be on life support almost.
Different_Return_543@reddit
Based on reddit delusions? And please don't quote gaming divisions financials compared to AI to make a point, companies don't run of redditors logic.
SoTOP@reddit
It's not hurting Nvidia, AMD or Intel. And that's what really matters.
BlueGoliath@reddit
True. Corporations got their pound of flesh so everyone else can fly a kite.
dorting@reddit
The market follow the console. So now the games will start to be more demanding to get closer to the new consoles and the card will no longer be enough
pdp10@reddit
The game market changes in response to market conditions, just like any other. If and when the publishers see healthy profit in optimizing for somewhat older or slower hardware, then not only will it happen, but it will be marketed as such.
Historically, the issue is probably that sellers who aim for high margins will target market segments that they think are willing to pay those high margins. That has often meant targeting those with the fastest, newest hardware. And, according to folk wisdom, that's easier as well as being more profitable:
What game publishers want more than anything in the world is to beat their competitors to market with the most impressive-looking product. That's what sells, or at least what's done best traditionally. Gamedevs cut corners like other programmers, to beat the competitors to market. But they cut them in places that the gaming market isn't supposed to notice, which are different places than the webapp market or media software market will notice.
To answer the question, the narrative in 2029 is likely to explicitly include optimization, assuming that current flattening of the improvement curve and slower market adoption continues.
OwlProper1145@reddit
A 3060 will more or less match a PS5 in terms of fidelity and performance.
StickiStickman@reddit
The 3060 is still a very solid card, especially with DLSS.
Plank_With_A_Nail_In@reddit
It will be exactly the same as last year, some great games, lots of good games and some bad games that doomers solely focus on because they want to be miserable for some reason. Hopefully it will be like 2023 which had some of the best games made released.
Balance-@reddit
As for GPUs, the usual suspects have the largest share: RTX 5060, 5060 Ti and 5070. RX 7600 XT and 7800 XT are the fastest growing AMD GPUs, and not the new 9000 series, which is somehow still nowhere to be found (or is it bundled in some generic AMD category?)
AMD gain 2% CPU market share over Intel, now at 42%, on Windows. On Linux it’s already 67% AMD. That total user base, so the percentage of new sales must be even way higher.
8 core CPUs are slowly taking over 6 core ones. 16, 20 and 24 logical cores are on a slow rise.
OftenSarcastic@reddit
The 9070 and 9070 GRE show up under DX12 systems:
And under linux systems:
KARMAAACS@reddit
But.. but.. HWUnboxed were telling me the 9070 XT was outselling the 5070 Ti and that it was Joever for NVIDIA! /s
jenny_905@reddit
9070 GRE? I must have missed that launch.
OftenSarcastic@reddit
Asia only model at launch, like previous GRE models.
https://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/amd-radeon-rx-9070-gre-china-test.93409/
It's a 9070 XT with 25% stuff chopped off, 48 CU 12GB VRAM.
jenny_905@reddit
Hmm, you would think they would offer that globally given there's a big gap between 9060XT and 9070XT
constantlymat@reddit
Not sure if the relative success of the 5070 is a gut punch for the influence of hardware reviewers or actually a sign of their impact because nvidia was so misleading in its marketing and the AI boom at its peak, that you'd expect even more casual PC users to jump on board than usual if you promise RTX 4090 performance for $549.
iDontSeedMyTorrents@reddit
People just buy what they can afford. It's really that simple.
fmjintervention@reddit
Yep. The average gamer decides they can spend $XYZ on a gaming PC, they go to their local big box tech store and buy whatever the salesman says is best for gaming. Usually going to be an Alienware or Lenovo or HP or other big mainstream brand PC. Most gamers don't actually care about PCs, they just want to play games and a 60 series card will do that just fine.
Personally I can't stand seeing my mates get ripped off so I'm always happy to build them a PC and get them some better value, but most people aren't techy enough to be building their own PCs and don't have a friend who will do that for them.
jenny_905@reddit
I can assure you most people don't watch keynote speeches lol.
5070 is just very well priced for a pretty fast GPU, it's the obvious standout in the price point it targets, has all the features, offers a good upgrade for Pascal and Turing owners etc.
constantlymat@reddit
I doubt they do, but I was on tiktok and YT shorts after the announcement and a handful of short videos highlighting RTX 4090 performance for 5070 price reached hundreds of thousands of likes and millions of views.
And those are just the ones I saw on my algorithm. I think that promise at the time definitely reached market penetration into the casual gaming sphere.
ExplodingFistz@reddit
3060 seems to be aging extremely well with the 12 GB VRAM. Keeps topping the charts
dorting@reddit
At same time on this sub, 8GB is enough!!!!
abbzug@reddit
27% of the Linux user base is from Steam Deck which at least partially explains why so many of them are using AMD cpus.
SoTOP@reddit
For some reason months are out of order. Instead of JUL AUG SEP OCT it's MAY JUL AUG OCT. So the highlighted change is between two months instead of one.
Pamani_@reddit
Could it be they realized there was a sampling error on these months so they discarded them ?
SoTOP@reddit
No, everything is as usual. The only sampling "events" happen with Chinese influx.
Kougar@reddit
Yeah, with the usual wild swings in sampling included. I'm sure it's normal for DX12 GPUs to drop by -1.39%, because suddenly there's a 1.35% gain in DX8 graphics cards.
SoTOP@reddit
This change is over two months. In August DX8 cards were at 6.84% then 7.42% in September and now are at 8.19%. Considering that there are no drastic changes anywhere else(unless I missed them) I do think this might be reporting issue with survey, and not sampling problem.
There might be a situation where steam fails to read proper GPU values and defaults to reporting card as DX8 capable, since it's the lowest common denominator. There obviously is no way 8.2% of all GPUs on steam are only DX8 capable.
Kougar@reddit
And if you look at May, it was 9.60% before dropping to 6.89% in July, which is an even more significant aberration.
Issues like this have been ongoing in the steam survey for years now, in part because Valve only samples a small portion of its userbase. The same wild swings regularly show up within most of the survey data, whether it's mic use, VR headset brand, OS, or individual GPU models because the "representative sample" is too small for any fine accuracy.
Hayden247@reddit
I was checking the survey earlier and it still had September instead of October even tho the main screen said it was now the October data. Not sure if the data has actually changed yet for the GPUs or not lol.
AntonioTombarossa@reddit (OP)
Nice catch! Didn't notice it
InflammableAccount@reddit
With AMD being <50% of the CPU market, and AMD also with the most iGPU-less CPUs, it is awfully suspicious seeing the Steam listing of both "AMD Radeon graphics" listings being higher than both of Intel's integrated graphics.
Really makes me wonder if there was something to the "Steam misreporting some RDNA4 GPUs as iGPUs/Generic Radeon."
BlueGoliath@reddit
can Linux get to 4% by 2026?
Z3r0sama2017@reddit
I did my part once 10 hit eol
Spiral1407@reddit
Damn the 1650 has tanked in ownership, I really need to upgrade
NeroClaudius199907@reddit
$250 3050 will outsell whole of arc and whole of low end rdna4
ShadowRomeo@reddit
AMD CPUs continues to keep rising on the chart leaving Intel behind that is shedding lots of its marketshare away. They have been on their highest marketshare ever since over 2 decades ago, It's insane to see how the almighty Intel that was deemed to be unbeatable stumble upon its feet.
But watch AMD fans still keep ignoring one aspect and still pointing out that Steam Hardware Survey is rigged / wrong because their newest Radeon GPUs are still not looking great on this survey lol...
Sarcasm aside, I think It is very interesting to see the RTX 3060 being on top again, I think it has something to do with the used market, these GPUs are very cheap right now on used market whereas the 5060 which i will assume probably is already off production therefore not for sale anymore new are looking bad value compared to it.
That is probably the reason why the 3060 once again regained its throne on being the number 1 GPU.
dorting@reddit
Still no survey for me 9070, from april