'Worse than starting from scratch': how big is the task of rebuilding Gaza?
Posted by Zosimas@reddit | anime_titties | View on Reddit | 98 comments
Posted by Zosimas@reddit | anime_titties | View on Reddit | 98 comments
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
How is it that no one is talking about Israel being charged for the rebuilding? Since when do we let psychos go crazy on innocents and then say “someone else has to pay to clean up this mess?”
Everyone keeps telling me Israel is has an amazing economy that can weather anything and is the source of amazing innovation. It’s also supposed to be the most moral state in the world. Well, let’s see if that’s true. Let’s collectively say “You broke it, you bought it.” Time to pay for the wanton damage and cruelty that you publicly displayed and embraced.
It’s also time for more war crimes charges on Israeli politicians, generals, colonels etc. no one should be allowed to get away with this level of evil.
Monterenbas@reddit
Because Israel is not gonna be charges for the rebuilding? So what’s the point of talking about hypothetical scenario, that while morally correct, are highly unrealistic?
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
That’s a very strong reaction for something that you dismiss as an impossibility…
Monterenbas@reddit
If the winning side paying reparations to the defeated, is something that never happened in 5000 years of recorded human history, what makes you think that it’s gonna start now, with Israel exactly?
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
External pressure. BDS is gaining traction. As much as Zionists demand it if us, we are no longer the amoral savages of 5,000 years ago.
Monterenbas@reddit
Are we not? What changed?
When did the strong countries ever stopped praying on the weaks?
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
Ask your heroes Ratko Mladic and Slobodan Milosevick if anything has changed…
Monterenbas@reddit
Weak little countries are the ones who get punished, brillant observation.
What happened to the Blair, Bush and Putin tho?
Bodach42@reddit
You might have to look up your history books rarely do the most powerful pay for what they've done.
2009miles@reddit
After WW2 the recently defeated axis was billed for damages caused. Was it anywhere near enough? Probably not, but at least it was something and it had an economic toll on those who caused the damage.
"Nonetheless, Germany was still ordered to pay over 23 billion dollars in reparations. By 1965, it had paid off four billion USD. By 2000, (accounting for interest) it had paid off almost 40 billion USD. Nonetheless, some politicians in countries like Poland, Greece, and Israel claim that they are still owed reparations."
Anony_mouse202@reddit
They were billed because they lost the war and had no way to refuse to pay.
That is not the case with Israel. Good luck getting money out of the side that is militarily and economically superior.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
Morality should factor into these equations, don’t you think? Or is this a case of you believing “might makes right” and you don’t believe in laws or justice?
Anxious_Ad936@reddit
Believing something should happen isn't going to make it so is the point. Law and justice is only a consideration when an entity has the will and the means to enforce it.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
Ancious_Ad936:
You have completely failed to understand the concepts of ‘Law’ and ‘Justice.’ Law and justice isn’t a consideration for one entity, it’s a consideration for all. It’s not up to the stronger party to decide that it’s convenient to discard it and commit a genocide, then adopt it afterwards. It’s up to everyone to ensure it’s enforced.
If a single state or a group of states decides international law is optional it’s ip to the rest of us to point out it’s not and apply whatever levers we have available to force those rogue states back in line. You don’t just shrug your shoulders and say “Israel really wants genocide, we can’t do anything about it.” We both can and should.
Monterenbas@reddit
The entirety of the planet have decided that international laws were optional, following the US invasion of Irak and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
There’s not a single country on earth, that believes in international laws.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
That’s just your Zionism talking. The reality is that people in the US and Europe have finally found out about the absurdly lavish support for Israel from almost all western states and they are disgusted by it.
Quite the opposite of deciding international law is optional, people are demanding it be followed, and that’s very scary for Zionists.
Monterenbas@reddit
Omg, the cope is real. Sorry for you, than you can’t aknowledge the world around you, for how it really is.
The strong do what they please and the weak suffer what they must.
I know it’s an uncomfortable reality, feel free to bury your head in high minded moral principles, if that makes you feel better about it.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
If that is true then why did Israel and the US go ballistic when the ICC issued warrants for the arrest of Netanyahu and Gallant? Why did Israel go crazy when South Africa referred Israel to the ICJ, alleging genocide? Neither of those bodies have an enforcement arm. The US is the strongest. Yet there was outrage. If “the strong do what they please” is indeed true why didn’t Israel simply ignore the ICC and ICJ as irrelevant?
Monterenbas@reddit
Ma bad, if there’s « outrage » then you’re totally right, the ICC is actualy gonna protect the Palestinians, the killing will stop and Israel will evacuate the territory it occupies, any day now. How could I have not seen it…
I’m sure that Netanyahu is trembling, thinking about the ICC, that he can’t ignore. Good job guy, you made it, you save Palestine.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
If Netanyahu is totally fine, why did his last flight to the US skirt European airspace?? It wasn’t concern over a forced landing leading to his arrest, was it?
I know - when someone says something that totally does not bother you the normal, sane and natural reaction is to start screaming about how terrible it is. Everyone does that! Don’t they?
Monterenbas@reddit
How so? Is there anything incorrect in what I said? Are historical facts « zionism talking » now?
Cool story, doesn’t have anything to do, with the fact that Israel is not suddenly gonna hand out tens of billions of dollars to the Palestinians.
loggy_sci@reddit
Assad supporter demanding laws and justice. Can’t make this stuff up.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
It’s not my problem that think morality is a bad thing. Maybe you should ask yourself why having morals is bad.
Triple96@reddit
You're strawmanning but okay.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
Look at his previous replies to me. I’m not strawmanning. That is literally what he has said.
loggy_sci@reddit
You’re worse. An immoral hypocrite who uses morality as weapon but has none himself. You support Assad and deny that he murdered his own people.
2009miles@reddit
There's a very simple solution that will take zero weapons to enforce, all it takes is a little political will, rerouting money sent to Israel, send it to the rebuilding of Gaza instead.
Is it likely to happen? Probably not, but it would literally cost no extra money to anyone, would help Gaza and the Palestinians get back on their feet and punish Israel by not sending them that money.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
That is a good plan.
Monterenbas@reddit
Yes, the defeated side is expected to pay for the reparations, that’s pretty much how war have worked, since the roman time.
Vae Victis - Woe to the vanquished
Anxious_Ad936@reddit
Even the allies were billed for money spent defending them during wartime. I believe the UK finished paying back the USA in about 2006
ShootmansNC@reddit
Germany finished paying WW1 reparations in the 2000's iirc.
Monterenbas@reddit
Never?
bouguerean@reddit
Yeah, but it's time we start.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
This. Let’s stop with the BS double standards and impose penalties for the abusers with powerful friends.
Bommelom@reddit
Who is going to make Israel pay for the rebuilding? They're certainly not going to voluntarily pay, and I don't see any country in the world being sufficiently interested in forcing them to do so even if the US stopped holding its hand over Israel.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
One country? Multiple countries applying pressure, acting in concert? That will do it.
Israeli apologists keep shouting that BDS won’t work, so don’t even try it. It turns out that Israel is actually scared sick of BDS.
mrbigglesworth95@reddit
Because 1) Palestine started the war
2) Palestine lost the war
I would challenge anyone out there to find a single analogous situation in all of history where the winner in such a siege then paid for the reconstruction without also annexing the territory.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
Nope. Zionists keep changing the trigger for wars and self defence. Israel was bombing Gaza 2 weeks before October 7 and was in the 20th year of a brutal and murderous siege.
Yes. Annex the territory. It’s time for a one state solution and Israeli war criminals to spend the rest of their lives behind bars.
Or pay for reconstruction. Israel is clearly in the wrong. Launching a genocide is wrong, as is the wanton destruction they lavished on Palestinians.
mrbigglesworth95@reddit
1) why wouldn't they blockade the polity ruled by a group that calls for their extermination in their, then quite fresh charter?
2) I highly doubt you want them to annex the territory. It is unlikely the civilians would be treated well, to put it lightly.
I would not say clearly in the wrong. I have certainly seen many horrible things that are more or less indefensible; however, it's pretty obvious that the Palestinians and Arab world at large have hated Jews and sought their repression for centuries. As such, I don't blame Israel necessarily for being too willing to put up with groups who seek their annihilation for the crime of existence.
Inb4 they shouldn't exist. 1) ottomans invaded Europe 2) they lose and are conquered in turn 3) Brits give partition deal and offer for first Palestinian state ever 4) they say no, launch a war, etc.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
mrbigglesworth95:
Is this a trick question? Because collective punishment is evil. Starving children is evil. Deciding people should be denied medicine and medical treatment and should be made to suffer in poverty forever because they were born Muslim or Christian is evil.
You realise that before 2023 Israel routinely stopped a lot of even basic medicine and medical equipment entering Gaza? People used to die of treatable medical conditions. How do you defend that or think it’s ok? What would you do if your kids died because someone decided that they didn’t deserve medical treatment?
You are trying hard to be an apologist for cruelty. Surely the most moral state in the world wouldn’t do that?
Leaving them in limbo forever is exactly what Israel wants. Who the hell ease is expected to exist without rights, forever, and never allowed to fight for their rights? This includes the West Bank as well, where settlers and the IDF murder people with impunity to try and drive them off their land.
So you have seen atrocities yet somehow it’s not clear that atrocities are wrong? Are Hamas atrocities similarly morally ambiguous to you?
If the Arab world has hated Jews for centuries why was there such a large Jewish population there, across the whole Middle East? If they hate them now then why are there peace treaties with Egypt, Jordan, UAE, Bahrain and Morocco and such a push for them to make peace with the Palestinians so Saudi Arabia and others can sign on?
You are regurgitating western and Israeli propaganda. The only reason anyone objected to Israel forming is that it trampled the rights of native Arabs in favour of European immigrants. Now that 70 years have passed Israel can make peace but prefers to expand instead. Hence why it has settlements in the West Bank and refuses to either pull out or annex the areas, granting full citizenship to all under its rule. It literally prefers apartheid. Remind me when apartheid is ok?
It’s also occupying parts of Lebanon and Syria - remind me why that is ok? Is it because they have a lot of water and Israel likes stealing stuff?
Very few are arguing they shouldn’t exist. The argument is that permanent belligerent occupation and apartheid are evil, as is the belief that Palestinians, Lebanese and other Arabs don’t have human rights. Is that what you feel? That they are lesser beings and therefore Israel is right in mass murdering them at will to steal land in contravention of international law? Because that seems to be what you are arguing for…
mrbigglesworth95@reddit
> Is this a trick question? Because collective punishment is evil.
Fair enough. The alternative, of course, would be violence, since your neighbor expressly states they want to kill you and therefore will when they have the chance.
> How do you defend that or think it’s ok?
I don't think it's ok. I don't really see what the alternatives are. As a state, your imperative is to defend your people. If you have a neighbor that wants to kill your people, you are obligated to handle that. How else can you handle it when the enemy is too cowardly to show to conventional combat? Say what you will about Russia and Ukraine; at least they both show up in uniform.
>You are trying hard to be an apologist for cruelty. Surely the most moral state in the world wouldn’t do that?
I don't think so. I think that, if Israel absorbs the territory of Gaza, it will expel the conquered people. Who is the most moral state in the world? Probably like.. Thailand maybe? I don't think they are talking right now though. At any rate, history has shown that states aren't moral. People can be moral. States are opportunistic. The ones that commit the least violence are invariably the least capable of expansion of their interests.
>So you have seen atrocities yet somehow it’s not clear that atrocities are wrong? Are Hamas atrocities similarly morally ambiguous to you?
Obviously atrocities are wrong. There are plenty of countless videos from conflicts across the world of such things. Violence makes men do crazy things on all sides. I, personally, don't think these actions of individuals factor much into the right/wrong of state level conflicts.
>If the Arab world has hated Jews for centuries why was there such a large Jewish population there, across the whole Middle East?
Well this is obviously hilarious. This is like, the go to argument for why its not a genocide in Gaza lmao. But to answer your question: not only is the list of massacres against Jewish people throughout the centuries a mile long, you also cannot extract jizya from dead people. The existence and enforcement of jizya is proof enough. The massacres are merely the icing on the cake.
>If they hate them now then why are there peace treaties with Egypt, Jordan, UAE, Bahrain and Morocco and such a push for them to make peace with the Palestinians so Saudi Arabia and others can sign on?
Because realpolitik demands they have to.
>Remind me when apartheid is ok?
According to you, apparently when Arabs do it to jews for over 1000 years lmaooooo
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
mrbigglesworth95:
Why are you assuming there are only two extreme options? To blockade weapons do we have to blockade food, medicine and medical equipment as well? No, we don’t. Israel chose to blockade almost everything in order to make Palestinians’ lives miserable. It’s not an existential threat for Israelis if Palestinians get medicine or medical treatment.
You believe that it’s impossible to defend your people without starving others? It’s impossible to defend your people without denying others basic medicines?
You’re not taking this discussion seriously.
Israel wants the territory without the people. There needs to be a clear message from the west - and the rest of the world, which already agrees - that either they pull out or they annex and give full equality to everyone there. They don’t want to right now.
The individuals giving the orders do.
Can you please list all the groups in the Middle East who have not experienced a massacre or repression?
‘Realpolitik’ demands nothing of the sort. The gulf states and Saudi Arabia own something like a third of the US economy. They don’t need to cosy up to Israel. They want to.
You want to live by the rules of 1,000 years ago? If so, why would Germany have felt guilty for committing genocide? Why would anyone have condemned it? Do you feel that genocide of Jews can be justified?
As I said, you aren’t serious…
mrbigglesworth95@reddit
>Why are you assuming there are only two extreme options
Because when the neighboring polity expresses their desire for the erasure of your existence, you must remove them from power before they do so.
>You believe that it’s impossible to defend your people without starving others?
I believe it is impossible to defend my people while a neighboring state desires our erasure. Pressure must be placed on the neighboring state to change their attitudes and remove their leaders from power.
>hat either they pull out or they annex and give full equality to everyone there.
this is a fantasy. You can't give full rights to people who want to kill you, knowing full well they will be close to, if not the majority. That is just suicide. You can't expect people to commit suicide because it's the nice thing to do.
>Can you please list all the groups in the Middle East who have not experienced a massacre or repression?
I'm going to take this as an admission then that, indeed Muslims have hated jews for 1000 years, right? But on a serious note, I am having a very difficult time finding massacres perpetrated by Jews against Muslims. All I can find are Muslims targeting other sects of Muslims. So I'm going to say that, since the expansion of Islam, Muslims have been treated fairly in the Middle East and have not been targeted with massacres by their fellow, non-Muslim civilians or government.
>You want to live by the rules of 1,000 years ago?
You say I'm not serious then reply with this. Either you said this seriously, in which case you actually can't read. Or you're being obtuse. The point was, for 1000 years, they made Jews second class citizens. This demonstrates their disdain for Jews. How do you not see that? How can you say they liked Jews, but also Jews need to pay more taxes, can't hold government office, and will be violently targeted by the government and civilian pogroms every 20 years or so?
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
mrbigglesworth:
And the only way to do that is to make sure their kids suffer and die from easily curable medical conditions? Interesting…
And the way to do that is to ensure their children suffer and die from easily curable medical conditions?
That is what the white pro-apartheid apologists used to say. They were racist and wrong, but somehow you are not?
So you know nothing about middle eastern history, the crusades, Jewish persecution of Christians, Christian persecution of Jews, Muslims explicitly inviting Jews back into Jerusalem in 637 and freeing them of oppression… Really, you know absolutely nothing of the history of which you so confidently speak. This makes sense. True Zionism relies on ignorance.
More taxes? Can you please tell me how much taxes Jews, Muslims and Christians had to pay? In amounts, not in the absurd “it’s so unfair” BS that avoids all actual frank discussion.
Yes, not allowing Jews to hold high office is terrible and unfair. They only let Jews hold the highest offices in Iraq, the Persian empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Byzantine empire and the various caliphates.
Seriously, though, the only time there was a ban on Jews holding high office was in the Byzantine empire, and that was routinely ignored outside the capital. Look it up if you don’t believe me.
It’s very important to you to bring up this history from 1,000 years ago. It justifies starving children today. Did anyone justify starving Jewish children 1,000 years ago? No, but who cares? As long as you get to watch Palestinian kids starve to death now it makes it all worth it, doesn’t it? After all, you are convinced they hate you. Making their kids starve won’t make them hate you more, will it? No, of course not! Starving children is always the moral thing to do.
mrbigglesworth95@reddit
>And the only way to do that is to make sure their kids suffer and die from easily curable medical conditions
This is likely to happen as an externality during the violent conflict or economic blockade that would be required to extinguish a hostile foreign polity, yes.
>That is what the white pro-apartheid apologists used to say. They were racist and wrong, but somehow you are not?
Well, considering the mountains of evidence we have of Muslim countries in the Middle East treating Jews as second class citizens, I would say I am not wrong, no.
>So you know nothing about middle eastern history, the crusades, Jewish persecution of Christians, Christian persecution of Jews
Non sequitur
>Muslims explicitly inviting Jews back into Jerusalem in 637 and freeing them of oppression
Jizya is oppression
>Really, you know absolutely nothing of the history of which you so confidently speak.
Very ironic
>More taxes? Can you please tell me how much taxes Jews, Muslims and Christians had to pay
They had to pay more than the Muslims in the same country. They had to pay jizya. This is definitionally apartheid.
>Yes, not allowing Jews to hold high office is terrible and unfair
Lmao no they did not. Jews were not allowed to rule over Muslims in any of those societies lmaoooo it's actually hilarious that you call me historically illiterate then bring this shit up. Look up the millet system you absolute buffoon
>t’s very important to you to bring up this history from 1,000 years ago
Alright this is so stupid I just have to stop it here. It's not history from 1000 years ago. It's 1000 years of history. It ended like barely 100 years ago. Not even. Like are you actually simple? How did you not understand that?
thrice_twice_once@reddit
Whoa whoa
whoa.
Are you antisemtic or something?
No. We only ask Russia to rebuild Ukraine.
How dare you ask Israel for consequences to their actions. Are you Hitler or something?!
You need to check yourself man.
Bommelom@reddit
I mean, Russia is probably not going to be paying for the rebuilding of Ukraine either.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
😉
meister2983@reddit
Because Israel won. Winners don't pay; the losers do. What sort of silly question is this?
Perhaps Israel could offer this as a carrot to persuade Hamas to fully disarm (or the Gazan people to force them to), but realistically the trust deficit is so high the palestinians wouldn't take Israeli aid
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
So you are going with “might makes right?”
meister2983@reddit
That's how the world works
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
Amazing morality lesson from another ardent Zionist.
Namika@reddit
Just because it's true doesn't mean we support it.
There are murderers in the world, factually true. I wish that it wasn't the case, but that's just being ignorant.
Might makes right. It wish that it wasn't the case, but it is.
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
By capitulating and not even trying to argue you make it a little bit worse…
A lot of people say “might makes right” until they are in the receiving end. Then morals and law and right and wrong make an appearance.
meister2983@reddit
Just copium. Doesn't change the nature of reality
Namika@reddit
I'm from Poland, we lost a third of our entire population in the second world war.
I'm aware how the world works.
Mundane_Molasses6850@reddit
If the ceasefire lasts, that's the next step we all have to take. We have to put global pressure on Israel to fully rebuild Gaza and offer reparations.
-----
Since 1948, US support for Israel has been immoral, leading to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the $8 trillion war on terror (equal to 20 million homes in wealth), and the 9/11 attacks. Take action, and boycott Israel. Details here.
ijzerwater@reddit
spoiler - it won't last, Israel is already looking for ways to blame Hamas for that, probably for failing to find the last Israel bodies from under the rubble
Own_Thing_4364@reddit
Why don't you send them an invoice?
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
I want the whole world to…
imunfair@reddit
Even better, I suspect Israel will profit handsomely - they'll likely be paid by the west via reconstruction funds and the Israeli construction firms will make bank. I also won't be surprised if they build a nice part of Gaza for Israelis and a little ghetto off to the corner for the Palestinians. Seems like every time Israel gets its claws in an area the amount of Palestinian owned land shrinks drastically.
bouguerean@reddit
This.
Gaza has always been a good deal for Israel's economy. They blockade everything going in and out of there, impose pretty ridiculously stringent limitations on other countries imports and then tariff the hell out of the rest, but allow Israeli companies an expedited process to easily make their products available for purchase in Gaza (often marked up).
Even when they weren't abusing and bombing Gaza to hell, they literally had it in its pocket as a captive market for Israeli goods.
They're going to further ghettoize it, steal as much of the fertile land as they can. I wonder if they even kept any of this in mind when they were destroying the place, bc dealing with the UXBs alone is going to be impossible and tragic.
Revlar@reddit
Israel and the USA will be on the hook for what they've destroyed. This fake ceasefire is not the end
Own_Thing_4364@reddit
Do people really believe something so profoundly naive?
Revlar@reddit
It's not naive. You will do everything in your power to avoid the outcome, and the world will have to work hard to break you, but we will eventually. As soon as Trump dies, all of this impunity will disappear
Own_Thing_4364@reddit
Nothing like idle threats by the "pro-peace" fools to show you've really gone mask off.
YoloOnTsla@reddit
Rebuild??? Israel isn’t stopping until they have 5 star resorts on that Gaza coastline.
Israel has already broken the ceasefire, Hamas is already executing people in the streets, it’s only a matter of time before it ramps up again.
Tman1027@reddit
Hamas is killing gangs that collaborated with Israel during its Genocide.
loggy_sci@reddit
Leftists love a good murderous purge, even when it’s done by right wing jihadists
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
So if a group of people work with your genociders and assist in the destruction of your people, are you supposed to let them be?
loggy_sci@reddit
You have zero evidence that these people are collaborators, and Hamas didn’t bother with any kind of legal process. They executed them in the street. That is what you support.
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
There were news reports talking about them and their collaborationism back when they started attacking civilians at aid convoys and that was atleast 1-2 months back(the timeframe might be wrong as my sense of time is a bit wonky sometimes).
loggy_sci@reddit
YOU HAVE NO PROOF THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE COLLABORATORS. Not surprising that an Indian would support extrajudicial killings since your government tries to kill citizens of other countries without bothering with a trial.
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Forces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81w09t8IFz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRxaf91WXT0
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/06/netanyahu-defends-arming-palestinian-clans-accused-of-ties-with-jihadist-groups
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/2/hamas-run-court-gives-gaza-gang-leader-abu-shabab-10-days-to-surrender
The band were given a chance to surrender
Here's your proof
loggy_sci@reddit
Bullshit biased YouTube links, a wiki link and some articles from June. Do you have anything relevant to share? No, you don’t. You just accept the word of terrorists who are murdering dissenters in the street.
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
Ofc you won't accept anything that doesn't fit your propaganda. The group itself admits to and even Israel has admitted to supporting them. And whats the issue with it being from June 2025? The group has been attacking civilians at aid sites and this started months back.
AmputatorBot@reddit
It looks like you shared some AMP links. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web. Fully cached AMP pages (like the ones you shared), are especially problematic.
Maybe check out the canonical pages instead:
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/middle-east
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
^(I'm a bot | )^(Why & About)^( | )^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
Are you talking about that Canadian Khalistani guy? Well I don't think killing him was quite necessary, nor am I a fan of Modi. But the 2 cases are very different. The Khalistani fellow was calling for terrorism against India and for Punjab to break away, for which he should ideally have been imprisoned after trial, not killed. But the ones Hamas executed were collaborators. Think of them as the Slavic and Baltic collaborators who joined Germany and the SS in ww2.
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Forces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81w09t8IFz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRxaf91WXT0
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/06/netanyahu-defends-arming-palestinian-clans-accused-of-ties-with-jihadist-groups
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/2/hamas-run-court-gives-gaza-gang-leader-abu-shabab-10-days-to-surrender
The band were given a chance to surrender
Here's your proof
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Forces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81w09t8IFz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRxaf91WXT0
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/06/netanyahu-defends-arming-palestinian-clans-accused-of-ties-with-jihadist-groups
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/2/hamas-run-court-gives-gaza-gang-leader-abu-shabab-10-days-to-surrender
The band were given a chance to surrender
Here's your proof
AmputatorBot@reddit
It looks like you shared some AMP links. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web. Fully cached AMP pages (like the ones you shared), are especially problematic.
Maybe check out the canonical pages instead:
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/middle-east
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
^(I'm a bot | )^(Why & About)^( | )^(Summon: u/AmputatorBot)
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Forces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81w09t8IFz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRxaf91WXT0
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/06/netanyahu-defends-arming-palestinian-clans-accused-of-ties-with-jihadist-groups
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/2/hamas-run-court-gives-gaza-gang-leader-abu-shabab-10-days-to-surrender
The band were given a chance to surrender
Here's your proof
Tman1027@reddit
Unfortunately, this is what happens when a genocidal ethnostate destroys civil order. These people cant be arrested, imprisoned and tried for their crimes because there are no more jails or courts.
You cant risk having a group that will collaborate with the genociders when they restart the genocide.
loggy_sci@reddit
You have literally zero evidence they these people are collaborators other than the words of a bunch of murderous terrorists who don’t bother with trails and just execute these people in public.
Tman1027@reddit
Abu Shabab and Israel bragged about collaborating...
DorimeAmeno12@reddit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Forces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81w09t8IFz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRxaf91WXT0
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.arabnews.com/node/2607119/amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2025/8/12/is-israel-using-gaza-tribal-militias-to-help-ethnic-cleansing
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/06/netanyahu-defends-arming-palestinian-clans-accused-of-ties-with-jihadist-groups
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/2/hamas-run-court-gives-gaza-gang-leader-abu-shabab-10-days-to-surrender
The band were given a chance to surrender
If anyone talks about Hamas executing 'innocent gangs' just link this comment
This is who they killed
Vedagi_@reddit
Everyone talks about peace, while it's only a casefire.
Am i the only one who understands this, or really most people will take it from the media and call it "peace" as well?
There are examples of casefires lasting as peace, however each conflict needs to be viewd on separetly, and since Hamas goal is to destroy Israel, kill civilians, jews, terrorism, and Israel wants to destroy Hamas at any cost..
I'm taking bets.
thrice_twice_once@reddit
Is that why they block baby food and snipe children? Because they want to destroy Hamas?
token-black-dude@reddit
It's not even a ceasefire, it's a publicity stunt.
bouguerean@reddit
Yep. Trump's recent remarks on Hamas upholding the deal was so chilling, bc it was so clear what it was intent on doing.
What was creepiest though is that Trump is not really capable of planning anything to this extent, so it was clearly Bibi making him dance.
Makes Netanyahu massive grin in their photo op announcing the ceasefire that much more awful.
Level_Hour6480@reddit
Israel is known for disrespecting ceasefires.
papasan_mamasan@reddit
Israel didn’t even sign the agreement.
The deal was signed by the US, Egypt, turkey and qatar
HockeyHocki@reddit
Trump decided its a peace deal at the start line instead of the finish. The rest of the world are humouring him. You can bet no palestinians are selling their tents any time soon
SpontaneousFlame@reddit
You have to sanitise and whitewash Israel at every opportunity or you will be called names like “antisemitic.” Of course, they will call you that anyway, sooner or later, so it doesn’t matter, but some news organisations chase after Israel anyway, hoping to eventually get a pat on the head once they have lied enough, misrepresented enough and covered enough for Israel.
NeedleworkerFew2839@reddit
So, what do you plan to do with your $7000?
Phenergan_boy@reddit
The IDF is still shooting at Palestinians and manipulating the flow of aids. How is it a ceasefire but an empty agreement? It’s honestly sickening.
elihu@reddit
If the Palestinians are allowed to import food, basic necessities, building materials and tools, they will (slowly) rebuild. If they aren't, or if they fighting is resumed, or they're forced out of the territory by Israel, they won't.
AutoModerator@reddit
The link you have provided contains keywords for topics associated with an active conflict, and has automatically been flaired accordingly. If the flair was not updated, the link submitter MUST do so. Due to submissions regarding active conflicts generating more contrasting discussion, comments will only be available to users who have set a subreddit user flair, and must strictly comply with subreddit rules. Posters who change the assigned post flair without permission will be temporarily banned. Commenters who violate Reddiquette and civility rules will be summarily banned.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.