Landing is going to happen one way or another. Having a problem after you touch down? Thats another thing. If you could eliminate a risk, why wouldn't you?.
A mate sent me a photo of when he was on a plane with a tyre worse than this once. One of the pilots happened to be doing a walk around at the time and I asked if he was aware of it and he said āOh yes!ā was the reply.
Showed it to a maintenance guy who told me it wasnāt as bad as running a car tyre down to the canvas though it would be up for replacement.
Plane then took off and landed without incident so all good.
Your comment or post has been automatically removed from /r/aviation. Posts/Comments from new accounts are automatically removed by our automated systems. We, and many other large subreddits, do this to combat spam, spambots, and other activities that are not condusive to the sub. In the meantime, participate on Reddit to build your acouunt age and this restriction will go away. Also, please familiarize yourself with this subreddit's rules, which you can find in the sidebar or by clicking this link. Do not contact the moderation team unless you feel you have received this message/action in error. We will not manually approve comments or posts from new accounts.
As an aircraft mechanic that worked F-35ās, this one would be a no go lol that gash could not be super deep, but itāll get much worse on landing, better switch it to be on the safe side
Well then, that's one flight and a submitted technical deviation request begging for 100 more with no repeat inspections if my experience is anything to go by.
We had the same stipulation for tires. If away from MOB and the tire was U/S, you had a maximum of 2 landings. However that also depended on how bad it was. No deviation required it was already in the TOs.
The deviation is for when you go beyond a manual/TO, for example an airline asking if they can have 30 more flights for an aircraft with a failed compressor blade.
Yesā¦.A&P/IA and maintenance test pilot for where I work. That tire is fineā¦if you know how to landā¦that tire will last 100 more landings. If you land like a student pilotā¦no, itās time for a new 10 ply!
Kind of interesting on how the cords is showing with still visible grooves. Anyhow, that worn would be flagged to be replaced during next weekly. With cord showing, during next longer turn around / night.
On some military aircraft they actually have certain allowance for cord layers having worn trough, but that also makes them single use cycle unlike these commenrcial airline tyres that can go trough several rethreading cycles.
That tire has a few more landings before it shreds. With the way these airlines are operating they will get everything out of it before it explodes and cause and accident. Cough, cough, Delta⦠š
Are you concerned about being pulled over? I have 37 years in the airline industry as a LAME or B1/A&P if you prefer and still can't understand why pilots freak out at a bit of canvas. There is a shitload of ply's to get through before you reach nitrogen! Are you concerned about cornering? That's not what they are for, it's round and will hold braking.
Yeah but given the condition of the tire you are going to have a ton of understeer. I would box now for a new set of boots and try and use the fresh rubber to make up the lost time.
was going to say the same thing. this tire is shitty but you got a few layers of cord before itās completely fucked. that being said, itās worth changing
My concern was the cut more than the cords showing, tbh. If this was a walkaround at the end of the flight schedule for the day? Might as well toss a new one on. Otherwise I'd let it go and make sure there's a note for it to be checked at the next stop
At the end of the day, if everything is good according to the book, it's good, and I'll argue it all day long. I remember checking some sketchy looking tires when I was an Super Hornet mechanic, and having to back up my junior sailors whenever someone tried second guessing their call on the flight line. Don't care if it's ugly looking if it's within wear/leak/damage limits. Send it.
Always nitrogen. Nitrogen is inert, which is handy in the case of really overheated brakes and tyres, and it doesnt change as much volume-wise when it heats up.
Dry air is (usually) acceptable if you don't have nitrogen.
The biggest factor for thermal expansion is the water content of the gas mixture, not the 19% oxygen of dry air.
Another concern is potential corrosion if you air up in Guam, where it's hot and humid as hell all the time and then fly to say Fairbanks I'm the winter where it's cold as shit and the water condenses.
If they are all doing it have you ever considered thereās a reason? You ever had a tire explode on you while landing? I have. We are not concerned about cornering we are concerned about a high speed rejected takeoff maneuver followed by a tire separation and loss of control event. I had ruptured once and pieces of it ripped through the wing. You know whats in the wing? Did you ever see the footage of the concord on fire? Pilots are not freaking out. They are doing what they are trained to do which is reporting tire damage or imperfections to maintenance so someone qualified can tell is if its ok to fly. We are not mechanics. Our manuals have some guidance as to whats allowable and it says if in doubt write it up.
If they are all doing it have you ever considered thereās a reason?
Yes, when I walk into the aircraft before the pilots know I'm there I hear stuff like "man I hope they don't have one and I can go home" and "do you think we can make it back in time to watch the game?"
Aviation tires have something called Max Wear Limit, which is how many thread layers or can show before it's deemed unsafe to use. Some tires like most of the ones I use have a max wear limit of 4 threads. On the picture it seems only 1 thread is present, if MWL is more than 1 and it's not raining season, I'd say it's safe
It depends. If I am at my base probably would call maintenance and wait for their input. If flying the return leg, it's probably fine to go (although not with loads near MTOW or MLW).
As long as the wings and engine are ok.. who cares? Tyres on planes arenāt that important.. theyāre like little spinny Lego wheels that just go for the ride.
This. All these people saying this is a bad tire have clearly never evaluated a tire. Maybe these little guys have different limits but on heavies we were allowed to go to at least the 4th fabric layer or 12 continuous inches of no visible tread. This tire has tread all the way around, its not even close. Gouge limits were always comical. In 10 years of maintenance not one time did I ever encounter a cut or gouge that was out of limit.
I believe you know the answer to this, but you want someone to tell you itās okay because you want to fly anyway.
If cords are showing in a tire itās time to replace them. That tire has seen hundreds of landings, youāve gotten your moneys worth out of that one. In an emergency Iād be willing to fly on it, but in that moment thatās a necessary risk Iād be willing to take.
Depends on the airplane. Am I concerned about it blowing out? No. Iām concerned more about traction on a contaminated runway in a heavy, high performance aircraft.
Depends on what it's on. Something like a King Air, send it but change at earliest possibility. Something with a higher landing speed like a 737, I'd prefer to change it.
As a Line Maintenance guy, showing cord is good enough to replace it if you have time.
Saw this on the nose gear of the Tu-154 I was about to board in Rostov-na-Donu headed for Moscow back in the 1980s (yes, O.G. Aeroflot was every bit as terrifying as rumors would have it). Sure enough, soon as the nose gear touched one of those tires blew and I got to enjoy the skills of a highly-trained Soviet pilot as he kept the wings level and the airplane somewhere in the vicinity of centerline at landing speed.
The scissor-lift bus things they sent out for us on the taxiway were pretty cool though.
Write it in the book as ātire needs to checkedā maintenance comes and measures. If it is okay they let you go if it is not they change the tire.
Company might pressure everyone to keep the operation going but when it is written and has to be signed off very rarely anyone takes the risk.
I wrote down a paint damage on the fan blade in an out station at Africa. They spent 1 hour measuring the thing before letting it go. If i just said could you check if it is okay and didnāt write it down most likely they would say it is okay to fly and let it get fixed at home base.
Heavy crew chief for 10 years. I'd measure just to be sure but the gouge looks within limits to me, as does the exposed fabric. I would write the depth of the gouge and the length of the exposed cord on the sidewall in chalk so passing QA or the pilots know it was checked.
Def not. Tire is showing cord. Thatās a no go item. Looks like MX is doing a tire change on a turn. At least itās not winter time and 17 degrees outside.
Well, clearly if you want to land and taxi safely you kind of need them. If a belly landing and trashing plane is your style, then have at it. I tend to like to be able to taxi to my parking spot after landing. Call me crazy
There are standards in the manuals for what can show. There are limitations but some cord can show for airliners, but they are limited to a set number of landings then replaced.
Definitely better than no tire. So, send it. Hopefully this got sent to maintenance personnel and not just Reddit. But itās fine, get it replaced at the next opportunity.
I can see the write up my maintenance would issue word for word⦠ātire deferred 10 landingsā
Thatās airline world though. Have a talk with maintenance, I wouldnāt do pattern work where Iām pounding landing after landing, but a cross country with 1-2 landings on dry runway in the GA environment Iād not think too hard against it.
That looks like a double bogie on a large aircraft. If it was a single engine piston sure but on a larger aircraft which that looks like especially with what appears to be a gravel kit definitely not. One pointy rock and there goes your air pressure.
Depends if Iām at a maintenance base or somewhere with a good hotel⦠Iād take this home if maintenance told me it was good for one leg and the crosswinds werenāt too gnarly.
Chord showing - weād be changing that all day long.
If itās Downroute with no Mx, I understand a pilot may use their discretion to get it back, but itās out of AMM limits so itās getting changed as soon as they sign that tech log back to us.
The correct answer is what does the manual say? But I wouldnāt be concerned if that was on my plane. The steel reinforcing ply is the one you need to be concerned with. Not because safety but because they wonāt be able to retread the tire.
Cross country, without even thinking. Might chat with maintenance before I took it up for a pattern work flight. Its in pretty good shape overall but is showing cord.Ā
Head-Reindeer-4082@reddit
Only if enemy forces were closing in and this plane was the only means of escape.
bonfraier@reddit
flying, yes... landing, that's a totally different matter
CounterSimple3771@reddit
I'd probably limit myself to taxi and take-off with it. Tires can be such a drag.
TNpepe@reddit
Ryanair theme stars playing
Penki-@reddit
I don't see how this could stop you from landing. You don't really need wheels at all to land, they only are necessary if you want to fly again.
yt1300pilot@reddit
Landing is going to happen one way or another. Having a problem after you touch down? Thats another thing. If you could eliminate a risk, why wouldn't you?.
PoniesPlayingPoker@reddit
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you
Merely-a-Flesh-Wound@reddit
r/wooosh
Zepper33@reddit
š
doubleUsee@reddit
really the only thing you need for landing is land.
Penki-@reddit
Dont you think that you should be more open minded?
doubleUsee@reddit
I will die on this hill; a water landing shouldn't be called a landing but a watering.
Penki-@reddit
od hill to die on. Not that you are wrong on landing part, but on the word choice to replace it, it should be either sliding, slipping or sailing
KBED1185@reddit
lol talking about word choice - whereād you grab āodā from?
Penki-@reddit
from my odd second language skills. Thanks for pointing this out as this was not the first time I used od instead of odd
LoggerHead1960@reddit
Dang. Exactly what I thought.
aitorbk@reddit
Taking off is optional, but once you do so, landing is mandatory.
cwajgapls@reddit
āReturning to earthāā¦sure. What goes up must come down. But you donāt have to ālandā. You can ācrashā too
ValuableShoulder5059@reddit
Landing was only mandatory until the parachute was invented.
Clark_W_Griswold-Jr@reddit
Even the parachute has to land though. š¤
Huugboy@reddit
Well no, it still lands whether you jumped out or not..
ValuableShoulder5059@reddit
If you are no longer PIC or on board, below or in front of it, not your problem.
TheAgedProfessor@reddit
There's a whole 'nother tire on the other side of the axle. It'll be fiiiiiiine. /s
Indy500Fan16@reddit
r/BeatMeToIt
KB4MTO@reddit
Beat me to it š
Mole-NLD@reddit
r/BeatMeToIt
Mole-NLD@reddit
r/beatmymeattoit
Mole-NLD@reddit
r/butfuckedabirdtoit
Mole-NLD@reddit
r/youdidWHATTOABIRD
Prof_Slappopotamus@reddit
You gotta hit the drop down and swap your alts, dawg.
disneyDaf@reddit
Indiana Jones approves.
SleepingProcess@reddit
When he landed In SNA on a taxi way? :)
StryngzAndWyngz@reddit
āWas that airliner supposed to be there?ā -Indiana Jones (or some guy who looks a lot like him)
ryanturner328@reddit
how many plies are those tires? on the aircraft that i work on if you can count 5 plies gone then it requires a change.
two-plus-cardboard@reddit
Itās not gonna land well
flyinboxes@reddit
Iāve taken worse š¤·āāļø
rocketshipkiwi@reddit
A mate sent me a photo of when he was on a plane with a tyre worse than this once. One of the pilots happened to be doing a walk around at the time and I asked if he was aware of it and he said āOh yes!ā was the reply.
Showed it to a maintenance guy who told me it wasnāt as bad as running a car tyre down to the canvas though it would be up for replacement.
Plane then took off and landed without incident so all good.
Fly4Vino@reddit
"Plane then took off and landed without incident so all good."
5 of 6 Russian roulette players are also winners
planko13@reddit
Tire will be fine, but running it like this often prevents the tire manufacturer from retreading it, costing the airline $$.
deleted_by_reddit@reddit
[removed]
AutoModerator@reddit
Your comment or post has been automatically removed from /r/aviation. Posts/Comments from new accounts are automatically removed by our automated systems. We, and many other large subreddits, do this to combat spam, spambots, and other activities that are not condusive to the sub. In the meantime, participate on Reddit to build your acouunt age and this restriction will go away. Also, please familiarize yourself with this subreddit's rules, which you can find in the sidebar or by clicking this link. Do not contact the moderation team unless you feel you have received this message/action in error. We will not manually approve comments or posts from new accounts.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Fly4Vino@reddit
Appears to be through two layers of fabric NO
PassengerMuted9060@reddit
Itās just one cord. I would take it but probably not do a ton of transition work.
qdichris@reddit
Fly? Yes. Land? No.
discombobulated38x@reddit
What does the aircraft maintenance manual say? I'd base it on that.
Madmaxdriver2@reddit
This is the way
Mr_Hino@reddit
As an aircraft mechanic that worked F-35ās, this one would be a no go lol that gash could not be super deep, but itāll get much worse on landing, better switch it to be on the safe side
Flying-Toto@reddit
Manual will say it's unserviceable BUT, If you are out station with no wheel, you can perform on flight.
discombobulated38x@reddit
Well then, that's one flight and a submitted technical deviation request begging for 100 more with no repeat inspections if my experience is anything to go by.
angrypanda83@reddit
We had the same stipulation for tires. If away from MOB and the tire was U/S, you had a maximum of 2 landings. However that also depended on how bad it was. No deviation required it was already in the TOs.
discombobulated38x@reddit
The deviation is for when you go beyond a manual/TO, for example an airline asking if they can have 30 more flights for an aircraft with a failed compressor blade.
biggusfootusnz@reddit
What if the crew "happened" to find it when they got back to base?
discombobulated38x@reddit
Well then they raise a variance request, because they've done their one flight, and any other course of action is criminal negligence.
If the inspection hasn't been logged they're already chancing getting fired.
Alarmed-Inflation931@reddit
This should always be the question.
PreparationWeird2086@reddit
Is it within limits?
willits1725@reddit
Send it..
koltontrombly47@reddit
Idk is that cord Iām seeing? I bet it could definitely do a 1 time ferry flight in good weather conditions to a repair station
Zestyclose_Sell_9460@reddit
Yesā¦.A&P/IA and maintenance test pilot for where I work. That tire is fineā¦if you know how to landā¦that tire will last 100 more landings. If you land like a student pilotā¦no, itās time for a new 10 ply!
flying-is-awesome@reddit
Absolutely not, multiple areas of chord showing and the gashes indicate a pretty hard side loading of the airplane.
wellthatsjustyouropi@reddit
Your not driving to Vegas hell yeah I wouldā¦
cycles_commute@reddit
In the Navy we would use the tire until you could see 3 plies. And we where landing on carriers. But yeah, whatever the manual says.
ThatHellacopterGuy@reddit
Whatās the AMM say?
ltsmash1200@reddit
Fly? Yes. Land? No.
This_Elk_1460@reddit
I don't think you have to worry about it while you're flying
zaraandrade@reddit
next landing is going to be an adventure
girl_incognito@reddit
What is the airworthiness standard for your tires? Theyre either airworthy or they're not.
Reddit cant answer the above for you but I can answer it for me because I know what the standard is for my tires.
SoulOfTheDragon@reddit
Kind of interesting on how the cords is showing with still visible grooves. Anyhow, that worn would be flagged to be replaced during next weekly. With cord showing, during next longer turn around / night.
On some military aircraft they actually have certain allowance for cord layers having worn trough, but that also makes them single use cycle unlike these commenrcial airline tyres that can go trough several rethreading cycles.
Potential_Lawyer131@reddit
That tire has a few more landings before it shreds. With the way these airlines are operating they will get everything out of it before it explodes and cause and accident. Cough, cough, Delta⦠š
MinuteConscious45@reddit
i would. I mean itās not like the tire would pop š¤
RepairHorror1501@reddit
Are you concerned about being pulled over? I have 37 years in the airline industry as a LAME or B1/A&P if you prefer and still can't understand why pilots freak out at a bit of canvas. There is a shitload of ply's to get through before you reach nitrogen! Are you concerned about cornering? That's not what they are for, it's round and will hold braking.
enataca@reddit
Yeah but this thing will hydroplane so easily on the highway
Buc-eesGuy@reddit
Itās important to follow the racing line when taxiing.
nightputting@reddit
My CFI has instructed me otherwise, despite me saying ātower told me no delay!ā
besidethewoods@reddit
Yeah but given the condition of the tire you are going to have a ton of understeer. I would box now for a new set of boots and try and use the fresh rubber to make up the lost time.
ManonMacru@reddit
/r/formuladank is leaking
stupefy100@reddit
Must be the water
randy24681012@reddit
Oscar, Landoās plane has a bald tire. Please shave down your tires itās only fair.
Bluevette1437@reddit
Iām gonna put Michelin Cup 2 Rs on a Cessna 150
Puzzleheaded_Load_72@reddit
Gotta hit that apex
motivatedtuna@reddit
was going to say the same thing. this tire is shitty but you got a few layers of cord before itās completely fucked. that being said, itās worth changing
John_the_Piper@reddit
My concern was the cut more than the cords showing, tbh. If this was a walkaround at the end of the flight schedule for the day? Might as well toss a new one on. Otherwise I'd let it go and make sure there's a note for it to be checked at the next stop
Mendo-D@reddit
This is basically the answer. Youāre allowed 3 or 4 plies deep. I donāt think that slice is that deep though.
John_the_Piper@reddit
At the end of the day, if everything is good according to the book, it's good, and I'll argue it all day long. I remember checking some sketchy looking tires when I was an Super Hornet mechanic, and having to back up my junior sailors whenever someone tried second guessing their call on the flight line. Don't care if it's ugly looking if it's within wear/leak/damage limits. Send it.
MaterialInevitable83@reddit
Would be regular air in this case, right? Or does that depend on the operator
Legs11@reddit
Always nitrogen. Nitrogen is inert, which is handy in the case of really overheated brakes and tyres, and it doesnt change as much volume-wise when it heats up.
More_Card_8147@reddit
Dry air is (usually) acceptable if you don't have nitrogen.
The biggest factor for thermal expansion is the water content of the gas mixture, not the 19% oxygen of dry air.
Another concern is potential corrosion if you air up in Guam, where it's hot and humid as hell all the time and then fly to say Fairbanks I'm the winter where it's cold as shit and the water condenses.
spectrumero@reddit
I can't tell what kind of aircraft this is from the photo, but if it's light GA, it'll be plain old air.
TheRealDeoan@reddit
Well mostly
Any_Day_4467@reddit
It's okay, it comes out as soon as the third linen is visible.
Weasil24@reddit
If they are all doing it have you ever considered thereās a reason? You ever had a tire explode on you while landing? I have. We are not concerned about cornering we are concerned about a high speed rejected takeoff maneuver followed by a tire separation and loss of control event. I had ruptured once and pieces of it ripped through the wing. You know whats in the wing? Did you ever see the footage of the concord on fire? Pilots are not freaking out. They are doing what they are trained to do which is reporting tire damage or imperfections to maintenance so someone qualified can tell is if its ok to fly. We are not mechanics. Our manuals have some guidance as to whats allowable and it says if in doubt write it up.
polarisdelta@reddit
Yes, when I walk into the aircraft before the pilots know I'm there I hear stuff like "man I hope they don't have one and I can go home" and "do you think we can make it back in time to watch the game?"
Ecthelion-O-Fountain@reddit
Threads showing are fine, but I would call you for this because I donāt know if the slice is ok.
ocasis@reddit (OP)
Even if it goes all the way through you got a second tire!
mtfreestyler@reddit
We can do 3 sectors to get home on our MEL
RestaurantFamous2399@reddit
Agreed, it's got a skid or two left on it!
hammster33@reddit
Race car tires. It's fine. Makes taxiing more speedy
Rodzp@reddit
Aviation tires have something called Max Wear Limit, which is how many thread layers or can show before it's deemed unsafe to use. Some tires like most of the ones I use have a max wear limit of 4 threads. On the picture it seems only 1 thread is present, if MWL is more than 1 and it's not raining season, I'd say it's safe
GrassachusettsOG@reddit
First we must know, are you an African or European swallow?
ManufacturerThick961@reddit
Nope
Molecular_Pudding@reddit
It depends. If I am at my base probably would call maintenance and wait for their input. If flying the return leg, it's probably fine to go (although not with loads near MTOW or MLW).
Lolopfe1511@reddit
Yes prolly
elkab0ng@reddit
If Iāve got my jump rig on and Iām just paying for altitude? You betcha.
Airbus_HEMS_Pilot@reddit
Nice try Mr. FAA
Valuable-Speaker-312@reddit
No way in hell would i fly with that tire.
Square_Fee_6050@reddit
First layer of cord body⦠not an issue.. check the cut depth
Fisherman_30@reddit
Nope. That tire is done.
Square_Fee_6050@reddit
Yes
sftwareguy@reddit
two words.. duct tape
nobody8936@reddit
As long as the wings and engine are ok.. who cares? Tyres on planes arenāt that important.. theyāre like little spinny Lego wheels that just go for the ride.
FormerAircraftMech@reddit
Needs to be changed, sure, but you're good till you get to a maintenance station
Dangerous-School2958@reddit
From b what I can see, it would pass the criteria on a Buff.
HammerOfSledge@reddit
Whatās the MWL? Says on the side of the tire. Our 16s have 9s mostly. We let them go until 6th cord visible.
AlphaThree@reddit
This. All these people saying this is a bad tire have clearly never evaluated a tire. Maybe these little guys have different limits but on heavies we were allowed to go to at least the 4th fabric layer or 12 continuous inches of no visible tread. This tire has tread all the way around, its not even close. Gouge limits were always comical. In 10 years of maintenance not one time did I ever encounter a cut or gouge that was out of limit.
Jet_Fixxxer@reddit
How many landings and what's the CMM say about cord showing?
My military days you're good until.3 cords showing. That was for a 32 ply.
Senior_Lock1016@reddit
Yeah, put some grease from the gear on the visible thread and it's fine for mainbase
Used_Lawyer_7410@reddit
If youāre asking, its probably not the best idea.
someguyinaplace@reddit
At least once I would. Ā
whitecollarpizzaman@reddit
I had to double check I wasnāt on the trucking subreddit for a second.
Clark_W_Griswold-Jr@reddit
I believe you know the answer to this, but you want someone to tell you itās okay because you want to fly anyway.
If cords are showing in a tire itās time to replace them. That tire has seen hundreds of landings, youāve gotten your moneys worth out of that one. In an emergency Iād be willing to fly on it, but in that moment thatās a necessary risk Iād be willing to take.
fountainsofvarnoth@reddit
Depends on the airplane. Am I concerned about it blowing out? No. Iām concerned more about traction on a contaminated runway in a heavy, high performance aircraft.
On a piston single? Iād take it flying
JamesMcGillEsq@reddit
Outstation last leg day 4?
We are going.
Day 1 in a base?
Ain't a chance in hell.
Cool-Contribution292@reddit
Pffftā¦ š¤£š¤£
T38 Crew Chiefs
Major_Employ_1971@reddit
Nope cord showing. Bad idea!
brealytrent@reddit
Depends. I'd it's a strike eagle, send it. If it's a Cessna 150, probably not.
threemilesfinal@reddit
Depends on what it's on. Something like a King Air, send it but change at earliest possibility. Something with a higher landing speed like a 737, I'd prefer to change it.
As a Line Maintenance guy, showing cord is good enough to replace it if you have time.
pdp_8@reddit
Saw this on the nose gear of the Tu-154 I was about to board in Rostov-na-Donu headed for Moscow back in the 1980s (yes, O.G. Aeroflot was every bit as terrifying as rumors would have it). Sure enough, soon as the nose gear touched one of those tires blew and I got to enjoy the skills of a highly-trained Soviet pilot as he kept the wings level and the airplane somewhere in the vicinity of centerline at landing speed.
The scissor-lift bus things they sent out for us on the taxiway were pretty cool though.
saml01@reddit
Looks like a pretty beefy landing gear which makes me think its not a trainer. So I would say no.
I would say no regardless, this is one of those situations where you get a flat and end up being the one paying for it.
poppacappo@reddit
Flying yes. Taxiing, taking off and landing, no!
Mechanic_Stephan@reddit
Fuck no to the no no no
HurkertheLurker@reddit
Only if it was a short trip.
satapotatoharddrive4@reddit
Would hate to have to pull over mid trip and get out the spare.
HurkertheLurker@reddit
And no one wants that!
iDiotOn2wheels@reddit
Erm⦠what?
HurkertheLurker@reddit
Stand to reason itāll wear out quicker in a long journey. Canāt argue with physics.
OldCarry4838@reddit
I hope this is sarcasm, but these days I can never be sure ...
Numb_Nut34@reddit
What does the MM say? If itās out of limits, then you legally canāt. No cowboy shit
Competitive_Bird4195@reddit
Sure. It's not even showing any cords. That tire has a lot of life left.
totesuncommon@reddit
Used airliner tires are repurposed for use in boat travelifts. The ones in my marina all have more tread than this.
Silmarlion@reddit
Write it in the book as ātire needs to checkedā maintenance comes and measures. If it is okay they let you go if it is not they change the tire.
Company might pressure everyone to keep the operation going but when it is written and has to be signed off very rarely anyone takes the risk.
I wrote down a paint damage on the fan blade in an out station at Africa. They spent 1 hour measuring the thing before letting it go. If i just said could you check if it is okay and didnāt write it down most likely they would say it is okay to fly and let it get fixed at home base.
KMD59@reddit
Nope
AlphaThree@reddit
Heavy crew chief for 10 years. I'd measure just to be sure but the gouge looks within limits to me, as does the exposed fabric. I would write the depth of the gouge and the length of the exposed cord on the sidewall in chalk so passing QA or the pilots know it was checked.
punkslaot@reddit
Its depends how deep it is and if it's going through the ply at all. There are guidelines for when you can and can't take this flying.
Pat0san@reddit
And I really freak when I see people check the depth with a screwdriverā¦.
BackgroundGrade@reddit
That one is from the famed Italian tire company Baldini.
sargentmyself@reddit
No, one patch of piles, sure, one cut like that, maybe. Two patches and a cut? Just change it, it don't take that long.
Skyremmer102@reddit
I'd replace it personally. Especially with the massive gash in it.
The manual will tell you more.
Street-Outside6528@reddit
Write it yo pussy
elwood199@reddit
Itās bottom of any tread, exposed cord, and bulges, cuts?
Feeling_Title_9287@reddit
Exposed wires=no fly
Get those replaced immediately
C152-Captain@reddit
Our pilots would reject that
USCAV19D@reddit
Yes
Because I fly a helicopter.
Sweet-Composer2899@reddit
Sure if you stay in the air forever
Big_Significance_775@reddit
LFG
Lady_Speedbird@reddit
No
jftm999@reddit
You can take off and land with this cut. If by chance you see the color white color underneath, that's when you need to call maintenance to check.
akroses161@reddit
7/32 averaged across 3spots? No cord showing? AMM says youre good.
12358132134@reddit
Yes, but the tire should be replaced soon.
ArchiStanton@reddit
10 landings or first explosion whichever is first
TheDave78@reddit
No.
TaskMastered92@reddit
Def not. Tire is showing cord. Thatās a no go item. Looks like MX is doing a tire change on a turn. At least itās not winter time and 17 degrees outside.
Neat_Diamond_8553@reddit
Sell it to spirit airlines and be done with it
jdelaossa@reddit
Nope!! Treads are exposed⦠that tire and the one next to it should be replaced
Neat_Diamond_8553@reddit
If you would have rolled the tire in rubber cement and a long section of pea gravel youād have a Carolina winter recap
Exciting-Zombie8449@reddit
Flying? Absolutely. Landing? Not so much.
BlatirA@reddit
A tire doesn't fly, it rolls
ComputerSaysNo2025@reddit
You donāt need tires to fly.
Dry-Ticket999@reddit
Need them to land?
High_AspectRatio@reddit
You don't really need anything to land tbh. Taking off again, that's a different story
Dry-Ticket999@reddit
Well, clearly if you want to land and taxi safely you kind of need them. If a belly landing and trashing plane is your style, then have at it. I tend to like to be able to taxi to my parking spot after landing. Call me crazy
High_AspectRatio@reddit
Just a joke my guy
Dry-Ticket999@reddit
I got it.
Competitive-Way-1577@reddit
Nope, treads are visible. Not recommended at all.
Lharper3rd@reddit
Usually okay if not into the second ply of the tire and if the cut is not deep; check the AMM. However it should be changed precautionary.
StartingToLoveIMSA@reddit
No problem flyingā¦.getting on the ground, maybeā¦
MarkoPCoaltrain68@reddit
Yes. Each tire type have a rating with usually 2-3 cord layer allowed to be showing.
sneijder@reddit
Iāve seen a Saudi B767 (ā¦I think B767) agree to depart with cords showing.
PIC looked confused when it was highlighted (might have been his landing ā¦)
SubarcticFarmer@reddit
There are standards in the manuals for what can show. There are limitations but some cord can show for airliners, but they are limited to a set number of landings then replaced.
PrettyPromenade@reddit
Is landing life or death? Because you're about to make it so.
mtblack412@reddit
Send it! Itās got one more left in it.
al3xand3rslad3r@reddit
Those cords are barely showing. Get in the plane and go -Ops probably
Erilik@reddit
Itās boing it can be released for flight
Shteygosawroose@reddit
Yeah I would!
I wouldn't take it landing though.
MeBollasDellero@reddit
Would you let your wife and kids leave the house with a car tire like that?
ThewayoftheAj@reddit
r/tiresaretheenemy
VariableFunction@reddit
If we can rotate the flaps and stabilizer for more downforce, sure why not.
5th-timearound@reddit
Itās a little heavy, might have to check that one out
nikola312@reddit
Definitely better than no tire. So, send it. Hopefully this got sent to maintenance personnel and not just Reddit. But itās fine, get it replaced at the next opportunity.
homeinthesky@reddit
I can see the write up my maintenance would issue word for word⦠ātire deferred 10 landingsā
Thatās airline world though. Have a talk with maintenance, I wouldnāt do pattern work where Iām pounding landing after landing, but a cross country with 1-2 landings on dry runway in the GA environment Iād not think too hard against it.
CPTMotrin@reddit
That looks like there is a cut to the secondary bias ply thread. Yes, itās part of a dual gear, but I wouldnāt push my luck.
kytulu@reddit
If this was a plane at my flight school, we would replace the tire.
Digiee-fosho@reddit
The only reason I would board that aircraft is to tell everyone that its grounded until the tire is replaced
FlyingHigh67@reddit
Yes, itās fine.
bikingfury@reddit
You just have to touch down very softly and pre spin the wheels.
7stroke@reddit
As long as she holds together until V1
yt1300pilot@reddit
Flying yes, taking off and landing, no.
jimflys@reddit
āIf you have to ask, replace itā.
CarGullible5691@reddit
Absolutely not.
wggn@reddit
you can land it at least once
Wonderful_Weather116@reddit
That looks like a double bogie on a large aircraft. If it was a single engine piston sure but on a larger aircraft which that looks like especially with what appears to be a gravel kit definitely not. One pointy rock and there goes your air pressure.
allstcrs@reddit
lucky pebble? what am i looking at here
bizzlej278@reddit
Depends if it would fit in your hand luggage?
MEINSHNAKE@reddit
Depends if Iām at a maintenance base or somewhere with a good hotel⦠Iād take this home if maintenance told me it was good for one leg and the crosswinds werenāt too gnarly.
Godess_Ilias@reddit
all planes land eventually
Trance2536@reddit
Showing cord yes. In my world if I try to let that go, they will touch down with brakes next flight, then we will have to buy a wheel and tire lol
StPauliBoi@reddit
Yes
TiredTraveler87@reddit
Is this r/Shittyaskflying?
hexaddress@reddit
I'd fly it, but I would also give it a close look on every preflight, and add it to the maintenance list.
sunshinedave@reddit
Chord showing - weād be changing that all day long.
If itās Downroute with no Mx, I understand a pilot may use their discretion to get it back, but itās out of AMM limits so itās getting changed as soon as they sign that tech log back to us.
Strict_Lettuce3233@reddit
I like how they gouged it to see how much tread is left. Well Mac we have another 30 flights left in her . Those tires are tough as all heck.
Greg-stardotstar@reddit
That wheel needs to be retyred.
Av8Xx@reddit
The correct answer is what does the manual say? But I wouldnāt be concerned if that was on my plane. The steel reinforcing ply is the one you need to be concerned with. Not because safety but because they wonāt be able to retread the tire.
BigfatDan1@reddit
As we used to say in the air force, "it'll do a trip" š¤£
Intelligent_Lock61@reddit
Just replace it, don't bei lazy, just be safe!
GeneratedUserHandle@reddit
How many ply is the tire? How many cords can show?
Daniel_JacksonPhD@reddit
My first thought was "why's that watermelon gray?" so perhaps not, no flying today?
AZrzr800ntl@reddit
Yes, ok for an in-service aircraft. Must be changed at the next RON.
Crowhawk@reddit
You could take that flying all day long. Without issues. It's when you take it back down on the runway that it's likely to cause problems.
SadPhase2589@reddit
Iāve sent many tires off like that in the USAF in dry weather conditions. I donāt even see any cords yet.
FirstWorldProblems17@reddit
No, it needs to get changed
ReplyResponsible2228@reddit
No. But then again I am not a pilot so thatās why.
Traditional_Half_788@reddit
YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT BUSTER! AND I SHOULD KNOW!
Dangerous_Mud4749@reddit
If there was an MEL, apply it and go flying.
If not, Iād talk to a LAME and take their advice either way.
Comfortable-Dish1236@reddit
No MELās on tires. However, there are programs for tracking to allow the aircraft to fly a certain number of cycles before replacement is required.
basonjourne98@reddit
Itās in the plug zone. So five minutes at a local tyre shop and youāll be good to know.
Aliasandco@reddit
What about this one?
ProfessionalWing8378@reddit
Forward to MCO.
JPAV8R@reddit
Whatās the engineer gotta say about it?
Will they put it in writing if itās a yes?
astarguy1991@reddit
defer it at reaching wear limit to get it to the next station
phaederus@reddit
Risk management; low cost item that could easily turn into a high cost, even lethal problem. To me it's a no brainer to not fly in that.
NippleGobblin@reddit
Sure, why not.
smaad@reddit
Gimme the flight number I want my ex on it asap.
New-Scientist5133@reddit
Your ex lets you books her flights?
smaad@reddit
When it's a surprise yes and maybe the true surprise gonna come at the landing
PiratePilot@reddit
I donāt know anything about that tireās specs. Sorry. Canāt help you.
New-Scientist5133@reddit
Thanks for letting us know
Yunicito@reddit
Try to avoid rough landings and get it replaced at your next convenience
Ok-Action-7699@reddit
Well, yes, inside cargo bay.
Nebnotrab1965@reddit
Check the cut depth limit printed on the side wall
Luftgekuhlt_driver@reddit
Iād RTB before writing it up. Advise mx prior to departure.
DerSilan@reddit
I'll give it two more legs.
EasternBetty7799@reddit
Nothing a bit of speed tape could not fix.Ā
ad9581@reddit
Maybe someone who's Tired can help you š„
Autoxquattro@reddit
Nope, its showing cords and almost no depth to those cords.
El_Androi@reddit
That's a race tyre.
OkCommand4818@reddit
New if you pay for them, urgent change if someone else pays
kingairguy@reddit
Thru flight,-yes, RON-no.
TheGreatPeacher@reddit
We always said if you can't see tire wire then you're good
TheGreatPeacher@reddit
We always said if you can't see tire wire then you're good
InnerBreath2884@reddit
It looks safe for now, but get it checked and/or replaced before long
InitiativePale859@reddit
Pretty slik
ConsiderationFun3620@reddit
Fly it. Looks less than 12ā
Dangorth6@reddit
Sure, but to be safe the tire will have its wear limits and cut depths.
theglassishalf@reddit
I'm not an A&P ... but don't the tires have published specs for damage? If they are out of spec, replace them.
Dry-Marketing-6798@reddit
No.
Dry-Marketing-6798@reddit
No.
Big_Assignment5949@reddit
Cross country, without even thinking. Might chat with maintenance before I took it up for a pattern work flight. Its in pretty good shape overall but is showing cord.Ā