[-]

effugium1@reddit

I was into all of it, but my cutoff is the FUCK album, it’s boring to me today, apart from “Poundcake.” “Right Now” is lame and makes me think of Crystal Pepsi. I still listen to 5150 and 0U812. My favorite has always been the debut, though.

[-]

Gorrmb69@reddit

Van Halen and it’s not even close. Van Hagar was more poppy, which they may have already moved a little bit with 1984. There’s no way they would have achieved as much or more with Sammy from the beginning. Diamond Dave was a huge part of their success. Great frontman with a lot of charisma.

[-]

kapshus@reddit

Original VH was a force of nature. They had fun, the kind of excessive, goofy, substance abusing fun that R&R is all about. Sammy brought healthy diets, more melodies and everything that screams mature, adult partying. Different vibe.

Remembering a new VH video hitting on MTV and seeing the nutty Pretty Woman or those flying kicks from DLR, cmon, that was peak VH.

[-]

doubleohzerooo0@reddit

Yeah, I'm on team VH.

But isn't the original lineup more Gen Jones? Van Hagar is more GenX.

[-]

Gorrmb69@reddit

No way, born in 69 and listened to Van Halen from the late 70’s on. There probably wasn’t a bigger act when they released 1984. DLR was the coolest guy on the continent.

[-]

NGJohn@reddit

No. According to this sub, Gen X starts in 1961. The first year of Gen X would've been 17 when Van Halen was released. Even if you go by the standard range that begins in 1965, the oldest Gen X-er would've been 13, plenty old enough to get into Van Halen.

Also, Gen Jones is not an actual thing. It was made up by a TV producer named Jonathan Pontell so that he could--surprise!--sell shit to people who wanted to feel special and bought into his shtick.

[-]

Gorrmb69@reddit

Baby Boomers generation’s last year is 64. Gen X began in 65.

[-]

EasyBit2319@reddit

Its all made up to sell shite. Gen Jones just as real as any of the marketing.

[-]

escargotini@reddit

This song describes my feelings perfectly - Nerf Herder - Van Halen

[-]

ProjectAshamed8193@reddit

Hagar for the smarter lyrics DLR for the pure rock joy

[-]

Own_Mirror7458@reddit (OP)

Love the passion. Just looking for a discussion that is not medically based on this forum.

We're better than that! Keep em coming.

[-]

AMGRN@reddit

Well I told my husband once that I liked the Van Hagar songs just as much as the DLR songs and he told me if I ever said it again he’d divorce me lol.

I think he was kidding?

[-]

Lost-in-the-dark-@reddit

I was brainwashed into liking Van Halen by my 2nd ex. I preferred Hager due to his more sophisticated musical singing & writing. He couldn’t argue with the. He saw Roth on stage many times, dude couldn’t remember most of the songs because he was shit faced. Never had that happen with Hager. Think they got their first Grammy via Hager.

I think women preferred Hager. Most men idolized Roth. Smh. He was gross to me.

[-]

InstantlyTremendous@reddit

Better singer - of course.

More sophisticated writing - are you serious??

[-]

Lost-in-the-dark-@reddit

Yes. As serious as a heart attack.

[-]

InstantlyTremendous@reddit

Wham bam, Amsterdam. That Sammy Hagar?

[-]

Lost-in-the-dark-@reddit

When compared to Roth’s? Yes. And his singing was consistent. Add that he was a professional singer & never got so drunk that he forgot the words to songs he wrote.

Van Halen won their first & only Grammy, the for F.U.C.K. album. This was Hager’s.

[-]

Freightshaker000@reddit

Is your husband single? Asking as a man.

[-]

NGJohn@reddit

Your husband is a good man.

[-]

ToasterBath4613@reddit

How long till somebody says ‘your choice is on the Epstein list’?? 🤣🤣🤣

[-]

gozer87@reddit

Van Halen is better, but neither sucks.

[-]

Mixednutbag@reddit

I like Sammy. He seems like a cool guy. But for me Van Halen is Roth.

[-]

EasyBit2319@reddit

This is a joke, right? Van Hagar was an embarrassment

[-]

ComprehensiveLife597@reddit

Hagar was technically a better singer but the songs that DLR sang were cooler. DLR was a more entertaining showman.

[-]

TheFlaEd@reddit

The issue that's never addressed are the two phases of Eddie. The Van Halen songs were , for the most part, better. Eddie went into his synth phase with Van Hagar and the guitar work wasn't up front the way we wanted it to be. That being said, I'm still team Van Hagar. I always found Dave to be annoying. So did the rest of the band.

[-]

Obvious-Way-846@reddit

I’m in the minority, but I like Hagar.

[-]

retroafric@reddit

Neither.

Never liked ‘em.

[-]

stevis78@reddit

Van Hagar

[-]

RiotDad@reddit

Van Halen and it’s not even close imho. Hagar gets hokey real fast. Early Van Halen albums are just masterpieces and even 1984 has massive bangers on it.

[-]

Due-Leek7901@reddit

It's an age thing. No way anyone cognizant enough to really experience first six albums converted when Sammy joined. Just no way.

Now, with all the water under the bridge now, it's different. Dave is full clown... Or something... mode now. Hard to reconcile what he is. And I imagine Sammy's just an older version of himself. So through that lense, I didn't know.

And the Dave reunion was shit

But Van Halen was first six albums. If those never happened and we just had the Sammy albums, Van Halen would not be talked about like they're talked about now. They'd be like Europe or something.

[-]

leolicious24@reddit

Van Halen….in 5th grade when 1984 came out it was an experience!

[-]

Rockosayz@reddit

Van Halen

[-]

Realistic_Back_9198@reddit

Little known fact: Sammy Hagar is now so old, he finally *can* drive 55.

[-]

harc70@reddit

Van Halen, no contest

[-]

Rocksurf80@reddit

Van Hagar, When Its love was the track that made me love Van Halen

[-]

Mr_Stike@reddit

I was 13 and it blew my mind. I saw them with Sammy in 86, 89 and 91. The show in 91 was Hagar's birthday, they had evidently been partying all day and they sucked.

I can't recall the last time I listened to any of the Hagar era albums (I actively dislike some of those songs-Dreams? Yechh) but all these years later I still love the Roth era albums.

[-]

DPax_23@reddit

Diamond Dave

[-]

imscruffythejanitor@reddit

Crystal Pepsi? Fuck that. Van Halen

[-]

homeslce@reddit

Is this seriously even a question? Van Halen was legend…Van Hagar was meh…yes Van Halen had run its course and I understand the breakup but that doesn’t mean that Van Hagar is in the same league

[-]

itgoesineasy@reddit

Van Halen! No way things were right without Dave

[-]

PeachieSpeechy22@reddit

Sammy was the best thing for Van Halen. Took them from we are kinda popular being goofy and just doing covers to super stardom. They would have never reached the highs they did with DLR. Sammy brought out the best in Eddie by allowing him to show his talent. Van Hagar by far!!

[-]

ComicDoughnut@reddit

Kinda popular? Their first album and 1984 both sold over 15 million copies each. None of the Hagar albums got close to that. They were huge before Hagar.

[-]

PeachieSpeechy22@reddit

Then all Dave wanted to do was snort coke and do covers. So yeah sooo much better with him.

[-]

ComicDoughnut@reddit

If you want to argue that they were better with Hagar, that's a matter of opinion. To say that they were kinda popular with Roth and Hagar brought them to super stardom is both insane and just flat wrong. And yes, they were better with Roth.

[-]

raistlinwizard1@reddit

Van Halen all the way...who could forget, "You Really Got Me!"...

[-]

stabbingrabbit@reddit

You have laid down the gauntlet. Shall you choose swords or pistols for the duel.

[-]

DasBearkicker2112@reddit

Van Halen… I remember the exact point on the planet I was standing when I heard VH I. Van Hagar doesn’t remind me of anything.

[-]

Fit_Beautiful6625@reddit

Like them both

[-]

Carinyosa99@reddit

I have never understood the appeal of David Lee Roth. I wasn't a big fan of the band with either lead, but I liked Sammy Hagar better.

[-]

GoingHeeled@reddit

Van Halen! Van Hagar moved to the soft rock category as my parent’s music. Van Halen was more fun.

[-]

SmokedLimburger@reddit

Wow OP. Way to chose violence.

[-]

Successful-Sense-270@reddit

Right? I married a Hagar unknowingly. We just avoid the subject.

[-]

Titania_2016@reddit

Condolences, it must be difficult life.

[-]

Successful-Sense-270@reddit

20 years. If I murdered someone is be on parole by now.

[-]

SmokedLimburger@reddit

Exactly. Why talk about it when we can just repress it? It’s just how things are done.

[-]

NGJohn@reddit

Pick your battles.

[-]

AMGRN@reddit

I just choked on my soda 🤣🤣🤣

[-]

lotus_ink@reddit

Doesn’t matter. Liked em both. It was all about EVH anyway.

[-]

BeginningPhilosophy2@reddit

What?!

[-]

KieranJalucian@reddit

both

[-]

Project807@reddit

I saw Van Hagar in concert. No energy whatsoever from anyone but the bassist. Eddie shredded but was a complete statue on stage.

[-]

Civil_Fall_3914@reddit

Hagar

[-]

Aggressive-Bath-1906@reddit

I am on Team Van Hagar. They were just a more mature sounding band. I still like the original VH, but I listen to the Hagar albums much, much more.

[-]

Upper-Profession2196@reddit

Van Halen, I don't recognize the other thing.

[-]

LordZany@reddit

They both suck

[-]

Fit-Yogurtcloset3023@reddit

Van Halen ALL THE WAY!!! Hagar was total poseur! Van Halen was no longer a thing after David Lee Roth. No comparison really. Actually makes me feel a little upset just having to read this question. “I don’t feeeel tardy”

[-]

TimHuntsman@reddit

Both and Gary on VHiii. Good music.

[-]

HoochieKoochieMan@reddit

This. Much love for Gary.

[-]

Titania_2016@reddit

Yeah, I don't know much about Gary but I do feel.He got a short end of the stick.Because there's no way he can win.In this competition. Put them in a different group.He did probably done a lot better. But then, I i'm leaving know about him because of VH, so there's that too.

[-]

HoochieKoochieMan@reddit

Extreme has some good hits. More than words, Cum and play… solid songs.

[-]

kocknoker@reddit

Im a sammy fan but both rock

[-]

Unique_Anteater5667@reddit

This discussion is as important as who was better Led Zeppelin or The Firm. Van Hagar doesn’t represent Led Zeppelin in this argument, if you were wondering.

[-]

Reachforthesky777@reddit

I wasn't into either. Not throwing any shade or hate, they just never clicked with me. I do love that so many people connected with their music, though.

[-]

Big_Historian_1548@reddit

Let’s see……. Though I don’t dislike Sammy, personally, I think that there’s just zero comparison in terms of their music. DLR w/VH was revolutionary and killed it musically, lyrically and vocally (and yes, I love Diver Down too). Compare 1st albums after Dave left: Eat Em and Smile vs. 5150. VH might have headed in a new direction that Eddie needed, but IMO Dave wins that first round battle, giving even more credence to his time with VH.

[-]

Accomplished_Ant_371@reddit

Hagar for musicality and band cohesion. DLR for personality and image.

[-]

TripMaster478@reddit

Halen. Paid very little attention to them after the split.

[-]

Samhain-1843@reddit

I’ll add. Hearing Sammy Hagar shout out 5150 repeatedly was just annoying

[-]

Samhain-1843@reddit

Once DLR left, Van Halen ceased to exist for me.

[-]

StopLookListenDecide@reddit

Two different bands. Like them both quite a bit

[-]

I_Am_Exaybachay@reddit

Diamond Dave baby!

[-]

greytgreyatx@reddit

He's just a gigolo...

[-]

Catharpin363@reddit

Hummala bebhuhla zeebuhla boobuhla hummala bebhuhla zeebuhla bop

[-]

DiscountAcrobatic356@reddit

Dave - dude had charisma up the ying yang. Chicks loved him. I loved chicks. Checkmate.

And, Eddie young and always with a goofy shit eating grin on his face as he unleashed another mind melting solo.

[-]

missdawn1970@reddit

"Goofy shit eating grin" is a perfect description. I loved his smile.

[-]

Basic_Scale_5882@reddit

Blasphemy!

[-]

ThreeIfByBike@reddit

Glad to see so much DLR love. That version of the band was incredible and fun. Van Hagar is adult contemporary rock, which is fine if that's what you're in to.

[-]

RiffRandellsBF@reddit

DLR was never fake. Dude's still skipping through the Ego-Denial Zone to this day.

[-]

Titania_2016@reddit

Kudos to him for that. It's got to be great to never grow up!

[-]

-Ancalagon-@reddit

Dave was a better frontman and Sammy a better singer/musician. Glad I got to experience both. Gary sucked.

[-]

MaximumJones@reddit

This. Dave REALLY put on a show, but Sammy is one of the greatest singers in rock music. I liked both bands for entirely different reasons.

And to me they were truly two completely separate bands and even musical styles.

[-]

Titania_2016@reddit

I agree. I find personally, I really enjoy the original Van Halen and all its schlock. But Van Hagar had some really good songs.They just lacked- the oomph. Hands down Sammy's definitely the better singer, but man- you can't beat Dave as a front man.

[-]

attaboy_stampy@reddit

Very fair comparison.

[-]

Ok-Maize-284@reddit

Agreed. Gary didn’t suck though, he sucked in that role. He’s actually quite talented I think

[-]

thepuncroc@reddit

Talent seconded. Intuink it's also fair to say that him failing in "that role" had as much to do with the rest of the band being inflexible.

Like, Extreme had a lot of range, Nuno is a force of nature easily on par with (ahem surpassing) EVH... I don't think Gary was the problem, i do think they were trying to bake a cake when they should've realized they were pie.

[-]

Mirenithil@reddit

I agree on both counts re: Dave being a better frontman and Sammy being a better singer. I'm Team Sammy because I value singing skill over showmanship, but respect to both.

[-]

renegade7717@reddit

Van Halen

[-]

percolated_1@reddit

Both. I dug DLR’s solo records too, especially Skyscraper.

[-]

Moat-or-Boat@reddit

Van Halen hands down. It's not even a competition.

[-]

MovingTarget-@reddit

The fact that the second had to retain the "Van" shows you which one had the lasting influence

[-]

FredSanford4@reddit

They were both know as Van Halen due to the brothers. Van Hagar is used to differentiate which one someone is talking about. They never advertised themselves as Van Hagar.

[-]

attaboy_stampy@reddit

I mean, you still had the 2 guys with the actual name

[-]

Hot-Celebration5855@reddit

What if it was called Sammy Halen?

[-]

unclejoe1917@reddit

Van Halen was an extremely influential hard rock band with a massively charismatic singer. Van Hagar was power pop, even weaker than post-Pyromania Def Leppard.

[-]

Few_Whereas5206@reddit

Both great. Over time I favored Van Hagar.

[-]

RandomObserver13@reddit

I can appreciate both eras but honestly VH jumped the shark somewhat with 1984 when they added all the synths. Everybody was all about Jump and I was sitting there saying um, Panama is the best song on this album. Then I discovered Ride the Lightning and moved on. Wasn’t sure what to expect with 5150 but I still remember popping it in the tape player and hearing “Hello, baby!” and realized it was going to be good. Despite all the heavy synth Dreams is still one of my favorite songs, though Summer Nights is a very close 2nd.

I also should say I bought Eat ‘em and Smile and Skyscraper and played them quite a bit. Skyscraper is an epic road trip album and still have many memories associated with it. Steve Vai is underappreciated as a guitarist.

[-]

GooseNYC@reddit

Van Halen, be serious.

[-]

Super_Ad4363@reddit

Both. Each brought a new dynamic to the band.

[-]

alvehyanna@reddit

Agreed. 90s needed a different sound and attitude. David was great for his time and is a classic.
If I HAD to pick, Sammy, but only cause I'm a young X'r and while I like the big-hair rock band days, 1989 is when I started really paying attention to music.

[-]

Substantial-Toe96@reddit

I’ll wait. Til your Hagar drowns.

[-]

Upset_Peace_6739@reddit

More like Van Neither for me.

[-]

Gwilym_Ysgarlad@reddit

Van Halen. While Van Hagar was more commercially successful, Van Halen were more real rock n' roll.

[-]

Boshie2000@reddit

Van Herman

[-]

9inez@reddit

VH died with “Jump.” Nothing else needs to be said.

[-]

The_Illhearted@reddit

Van Hagar

[-]

Particular-Loan5123@reddit

That’s when I decided to go alternative

[-]

feder_online@reddit

Two different bands...

[-]

grumpvet87@reddit

I am a guitarist and grew up worshiping Eddy.

I like both David and Sammy. David was glam, and perfect for the times. Sammy was great for a new version of the band and was a good complement.

I refuse to pick between the 2 different versions

[-]

therelybare5@reddit

Is this a monthly question or what? I’m actually tired of answering it!

[-]

Alternative-Neat-123@reddit

gif

[-]

robm1967@reddit

Ok, Van Halen was great, girls flashed the band more than any other concert. W/Sammy, he wasn't the showman DLR was but a great musician. Can't lose either way.

[-]

Catharpin363@reddit

Gotta hand it to these Russian bots, they're getting better and better at using a few lines of text to make Americans want to fight each other

[-]

Own_Resource4445@reddit

Team Sammy, by a country Mile

[-]

curiousleen@reddit

I’m a Hagar girl

[-]

rameyrat@reddit

I'm on Team Hagar but I sure would miss Dave if forced to choose one or the other. They're two different bands to me and both are so damn good!

[-]

Komaisnotsalty@reddit

OMG, original VH was just OG GOAT level shit (did I get that right??? I need a Gen Z to proofread that slop).

Love Sammy though. I'm kind've slutty when it comes to music - I like it all, even when others hate it.

Unless they're off-key or just totally suck and are unoriginal, bring it. I'll listen to anything once.

[-]

Lost-in-the-dark-@reddit

Hager. The music writing during that time was spectacular. Roth was a good time, but Hager was musically more sophisticated.

[-]

gohdnuorg@reddit

Agreed. I was 10 in 1986 and wore out that 5150 tape. My mom put OU812 in my easter basket. So yeah, team hagar. HOWEVER when I was 8, i remember holding a tape recorder up to the console tv to record the audio of JUMP. believe it or not, i'm not a huge fan, but that is definitely where my musical journey began.

[-]

PlaxicoCN@reddit

Two different eras of a great band. You sound like someone asking "LASAGNA OR NACHOS?!?"

[-]

bsunwelcome@reddit

Original, before they got synthesizers (pre-1984). Panama, Jump, etc were so overplayed I'm still sick of them! The only iteration of Hagar I like is Montrose.

[-]

FrostnJack@reddit

Both. Pretty sure I have every album around here somewhere—DLR through VH

[-]

Last_Banana9505@reddit

DLR over Sammy.
The Sammy era held so much promise, but to me, it only delivered AOR/yacht rock. There was some good stuff with the red rocker but tracks like 'why can't this be love' left me uninspired.
Compared to 'ain't talkin bout love', this one makes me want to chug a brew, grab a guitar and rock out.

[-]

NGJohn@reddit

These are exactly the two songs I use to explain why I listen to Van Halen and not Van Hagar.

[-]

Tiny-Albatross518@reddit

Diamond Dave. 1984’s jump… on mtv

[-]

posaune123@reddit

Had to see if I was in r/unpopular opinion

Van Halen with David Lee Roth was more 80's Than Pac-Man

[-]

kristtt67@reddit

Both

[-]

GlassMotor7387@reddit

Both. Both are good bands, but you have to separate them. Take them as two distinct and separate bands and they are both pretty awesome.

[-]

Head_Effect3728@reddit

Hmmmm, you really got me with this one. I love DLR, but we ain't talkin about love. Hagar was a man on a mission and he finished what he started. Right now, I'd have to say both singers were the best of both worlds, but if push comes to shove, I'm taking Hagar.

[-]

SeanSixString@reddit

I love Sammy and Van Hagar … I think Hagar is the better musician and singer … but I’m Van Halen on the strength of 1984 alone.

[-]

thembones44@reddit

Depends, if you like more hard rock and cover tunes, the Roth era. If you like softer hard rock and ballads, Hager era.

Honestly, if you look at YouTube videos of the DLR concerts, sorry but they suck. He barely sings most of the time, is more interested in jumping around. I get it, but as good as a front man he was, the concerts were sad. Band is playing their asses off and hes behind or out of the lyric structure, just not a good singer, live that it, IMO.

Sammy era had its limitations also. He was another one running around on stage, could do without his solo stuff thrown in there.

Great band either era, liked them both. Just an opinion.

[-]

jmakioka@reddit

Hagar is undeniably the better song writer, but the energy with Roth was undeniable.

I prefer Roth Van Halen.

The albums with him are legendary and I understand how it got tiring for them so the energy was different with Hagar. They sought that out and got exactly what they wanted / needed.

[-]

w3woody@reddit

Journey.

[-]

Dogstar_9@reddit

Hagar for vocals.

But, Ed's groundbreaking guitar work came in the Roth era.

[-]

Ok_Common_1355@reddit

Van Halen of course!

[-]

ExpertRegister1353@reddit

They all suck.

[-]

Western-Host1384@reddit

IMO, two completely different bands. Both awesome.

[-]

Fillmore80@reddit

Van Halen without a doubt! They call it Van Hagar for a reason...

[-]

cofclabman@reddit

Both. They were different, but I enjoyed both.

[-]

justfukkingtired@reddit

Halen all day every day…but one of my favorite song and video is Right Now…30+ years later still a favorite.

Right now it’s what’s happening.

[-]

Mysterious-Dealer649@reddit

Dave’s first solo album and 5150 were battling it out when I got my license and was driving around literally all day for awhile. I had both of them at the time but looking back it’s Van Halen with Dave all day every day

[-]

bookant@reddit

Halen and it's not close.

[-]

Randeth@reddit

I never cared about the showmanship that Dave brought to the band. I liked many of their songs, but Sammy's era was so much better musically.

[-]

genx_horsegirl@reddit

Van Hagar who??

Dave, my dude. Every day every way.

[-]

Lumbercounter@reddit

I remember thinking Eddie’s guitar was back in the lead when the first Van Hagar album came out. Dave was just getting too over the top for me.

[-]

FluxusFlotsam@reddit

people who prefer Van Hagar fuck through the dick hole in boxers

[-]

BIGscott250@reddit

I wore out both 1984 and 5150 cassettes. But imma go with Sammy.

[-]

MattonArsenal@reddit

I’ll never forget this conversation… Several drinks in at my wedding reception, I don’t know why but this question came up with a good friend of mine. He just looked at me and said “I reach down between my legs, ease the seat back… THAT is your answer.”

[-]

btqlover@reddit

Van Halen all the way. Better show live. Better vocalist. Better production.

[-]

Prestigious_Sweet_95@reddit

Both

[-]

GentleBob72@reddit

Love em both

[-]

attaboy_stampy@reddit

I so love original recipe Van Halen to this day, but 5150 is still maybe my favorite album. One of a small handful of cassettes that I actually wore out in high school. I love love love 5150 and OU812.

I don't know which one I'd say I prefer though. It's kind of an equal blend. I love the original group, but there some real turds on the albums too. Whereas I think I love almost every song on 5150 and OU812, and I like the majority of For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge. It's like I have a higher appreciation percentage of the songs of the Van Hagar era.

[-]

Illustrious-Pea-7105@reddit

Both suck

[-]

TallyAlex@reddit

Live Without a Net was the best concert I've ever been to until a couple of years ago when I caught Dropkick Murphys in Boston on St. Patrick's Day.

Van Halen with Sammy fronting. Dave was and is a clown.

[-]

SkunkMonkey72@reddit

I'll gi with the original " Atomic Punk"

[-]

Ray_The_Engineer@reddit

Give me original VH every day and twice on Sundays.

Van Hagar was fine, some good, fun stuff there, but the music they put out on the first few albums was unique and has stood the test of time.

[-]

Stompboxer1@reddit

I'm probably going to get raked over the coals for this one, but I didn't like either of them.

[-]

bodhi471@reddit

Solidly Van Halen, though I liked Sammy Hagars work, diamond Dave had an edge that Sammy didn't have.

[-]

eatsleepdive@reddit

C'mon gimme a break

[-]

TimelyExternal5769@reddit

One break, comin' up!

[-]

DiscountAcrobatic356@reddit

Unchained….

[-]

missdawn1970@reddit

Nothin stays the same...

[-]

Remy0507@reddit

Both were great in their own way.

[-]

Old_Use7058@reddit

Dave is the only answer

[-]

missdawn1970@reddit

Van Hagar had some great music, but DLR's vibe was what made VH great. I saw Van Halen with Sammy Hagar at Monsters of Rock '88, and my friends and I left early because it just wasn't Van Halen without Dave.

[-]

The_J_Bird@reddit

Definitely Van Halen. David Lee was a fool to quit the band.

[-]

exhaustedexcess@reddit

Van Hagar

Sammy Hagar was a musician in his own right. David Lee Roth was good but not as good I thought

[-]

MyriVerse2@reddit

I don't even like calling Van Hagar a rock band. They can piss off to Cabo Wabo.

[-]

badgko@reddit

Both

[-]

justino@reddit

gif

[-]

chrispd01@reddit

Just when I thought Van Halen couldn’t be a worse band it became Van Hagar …

[-]

HippieJed@reddit

Saw them with both front men. I enjoyed the Sammy shows more. Dave and his ego was crazy. Sammy just rocked and had a blast

[-]

PheesGee@reddit

Van Halen all the way

[-]

zoot_boy@reddit

Bruh

[-]

Virtual_Mechanic2936@reddit

Van Halen. I like Sammy Hagar, but David Lee Roth is a straight-up show.

[-]

LookOutMuppets@reddit

I prefer Hagar, but I can appreciate them both.

[-]

DeNiroPacino@reddit

Sammy Hager is a talented musician no doubt, but I never warmed to Van Halen Mark II. Roth infused that band with magic. All four of them together were magnificent. They made five albums that will live forever.

[-]

Advanced_Tax174@reddit

Is this a joke?

[-]

lectroid@reddit

Clearly rage bait.

[-]

UpOrDownItsUpToYou@reddit

I think they wrote better so far with Hagar but I was always kinda meh regardless of the singer.

[-]

LibertyMike@reddit

Van Halen. I liked many songs from Sammy's time in the band, but I don't think their albums were as good overall.

[-]

FUWS@reddit

I bet OP prefers Three Stooges with Shemp over Curly.

[-]

Own_Mirror7458@reddit (OP)

Nah. Benny Hill all the way!

[-]

ohyesiam1234@reddit

Van Halen. They jumped the shark with Hagar.

[-]

Massive_Look8179@reddit

VAN HALEN!!!! Hot for teacher man.

[-]

PeorgieT75@reddit

I’m not a huge fan, I only really like the debut album, so Dave.

[-]

Shut_It_Donny@reddit

I appreciate Van Hagar, but Van Halen was more “pure” rock.

Van Hagar suffers because Eddie fell in love with synth. If those hits were guitar songs… who can say. I just did not care for so much synthesizer from a guitar legend.

[-]

NorthAmericanSlacker@reddit

Who cares?

[-]

CaptainlockheedME262@reddit

Van Halen ended with 1984. The other band doesn’t exist.

[-]

QuttiDeBachi@reddit

1984 vs 5150

Both albums kick ass can’t decide

[-]

nekkid_farts@reddit

You can't really compare the two, because they're two totally separate forms of music. Van Halen had a completely different sound than van hagar. I liked them both but for separate reasons.

[-]

watchwatertilitboils@reddit

I guess you're not Gen X, because no Gen Xer would ever ask that question. lol

[-]

Sufficient_Stop8381@reddit

I like both. OG VH for the classics, even though I thought DLR wasn’t as good a singer but it worked for that era. Sammy could sing and play guitar and they had some good tunes from the Hagar era too.

[-]

RottenSalad@reddit

Both. I just treat them (in my mind) as different bands altogether. They were also from different eras of music. I don't think Van Halen could have adapted to that, nor could Van Hagar have managed in the late 70's early 80's.

[-]

ailyara@reddit

Neither. The only thing I like about VH is the aweseome synth opening to Jump, everything else sucks.

[-]

New-Specific4225@reddit

Van Halen by a mile. Roth era is the OG and is what I consider their best albums.

[-]

Hot-Butterfly-8024@reddit

Dave post-VH became an EMT and worked in NYC, started open water ocean kayaking, moved to Japan to study under a kendo master. Literally because that’s what and who he is. I like Sammy. His solo work and stuff with Montrose is badass. He is not even remotely the same species of frontman as Dave, and there is simply no way he was ever going to fill his ballet shoes.

[-]

UnrealizedDreams90@reddit

Yes.

I consider them basically two different bands. Different singers, styles, and Eddie's songwriting matured a lot.

If I had to choose, Van Hagar by a narrow margin. I was just getting into music after 1984 came out, so that's what I was exposed to first. Plus, the songwriting is better.

[-]

No_Hovercraft_821@reddit

While I do like some of Sammy's solo work, VH without DLR just isn't Van Halen.

[-]

Busy_Paint_5680@reddit

Sammy Hagar is the man. Twice, three times the musician DLR is/was.

[-]

JJQuantum@reddit

Van Halen was better music all day. I liked Van Hagar but it was music made for the industry, to just make a buck. They were no longer rebels at that point.

[-]

10202632@reddit

Are you serious? No contest! DLR all the way!

[-]

WilliePullout@reddit

Halen

[-]

RemlikDahc@reddit

OU812???

[-]

ryancementhead@reddit

I never hear Van Hagar on any of the rock station here, but Van Halen is still on high rotation.

[-]

Aromatic_Revolution4@reddit

Van Halen was a rock band

Van Hagar was a pop band

[-]

Edward_the_Dog@reddit

It's a false choice. You can like and appreciate both.

[-]

ChronoMonkeyX@reddit

You can, but people can also have a preference.

[-]

ChronoMonkeyX@reddit

Never was a huge fan, but thee feelings songs I enjoy are with Dave, and I never liked hagar's voice.

[-]

Strangewhine88@reddit

Halen.

[-]

Low-Palpitation-9916@reddit

Van Halen, but I saw Van Hagar on the tour with Alice in Chains opening for them and that's still one of the best concerts I've ever attended.

[-]

Panem-et-circenses25@reddit

Same. It was my first concert, in 1991. Great show, but DLR forever

[-]

Panem-et-circenses25@reddit

Van Halen is and always will be eternal with DLR. anyone else is a knock off

[-]

ubermick@reddit

Different vibes. Van Halen is cooler, but as I got older felt Van Hagar is better music.

[-]

spintool1995@reddit

I wasn't a huge fan of either, but the DLR version had more songs I remember, and I loved the Hot for Teacher video.

[-]

Splatford@reddit

Halen all the way ...to be honest Hagar had some good tracks but the entire feel of the bands were completely different

https://i.redd.it/faw18s2wr8uf1.gif

[-]

Livid_Bag_4374@reddit

Van Hagar. DLR can't sing his way out of a paper bag. Sammy is so much more the musician.

[-]

Desperate_Gold6670@reddit

Easy. Van Halen.

[-]

rei1004@reddit

Van Halen ❤️

[-]

Amazing_Effective758@reddit

You must be a doucher

[-]

Electronic-Ear2329@reddit

Like both - 1984 was my first concert. Also a Sammy/Montrose fan beforehand, so probably played a role in being more accepting of the new direction/sound - can see perspectives from both sides of the fanbase

[-]

RiffRandellsBF@reddit

Two different bands. Like them both.

[-]

pinballrocker@reddit

Neither, fuck butt rock

[-]

QuiJon70@reddit

Buy the time I was paying attention DLR was a comedian up has been. Hazard kept that band relevant in a way they never were again even after fucking him over bringing back Roth. (Who couldnt sing for shit anymore like a sadder axl rose)

So frankly the entire guitar playing world learned how to play like Eddie. So im gonna say van Halen as a group became nothing after dropping sammy.

[-]