Based, but people here are focusing too much on Nixon here. The CIA acts in the interests of capitalism, and it's noticeable. My favorite example is 1950s Guatemala; they had a socialist president that was doing good for the country. His policies damaged an American fruit brand, which lobbied the government to remove him from office. The CIA overthrew Jacobo Arbenz and replaced him with a dictator, which launched the country into a 40 year civil war in which an estimated 200k lives were lost.
Because of a fucking fruit company with too much money.
Lol comical misunderstanding of Nixon here, his motivations, and those of the “monied interests”. Ol dick was a sleazy striver, but he actually stood up to the CIA (telling dick helms he didn’t want to have to get into that “whole bay of pigs thing” aka the jfk hit), and that pretty much ended him.
Highly suggest reading Rick perlstein, Carl oglesby, peter dale scott, etc. if anyone’s interested.
Notably got replaced by Gerald ford (on the Warren commission w/ Dulles), followed by Carter (who gave us Paul volker & Zbigniew Brzezinski) - the ford/carter admins ushered in the neoliberal turn; and then of course the Reagan / bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld cabal cemented it. This well’s a lot deeper than you think.
Fr, but this is what happens when people think they can talk about history in a serious manner when their only education is playing Paradox games (they don’t understand how Hitler lost, just paradrop onto London lmao)
You spent 4+ years at a Uni for elitist education but you're too stupid to realize the fucking reddit comments section of r/greentext probably isn't the place to write an essay about the importance of higher education.
Your Int score might be high, but your wisdom and charisma are pretty shitty bro.
The pre vs post WW2 difference as simply as I can imagine it is that the mid to late 20th century saw the birth of the American political empire and it's status as the de facto hegemon of the West/First World.
And Empires, no matter the founding doctrine, always tend to devolve into the political chaos of empires, you can't have that much power concentrated within a government and sphere of influence without the development of controlling interests, factionalist autocratic systems, and market oligopolies. Tyranny and elite stratification is effectively a constant along with the diminishment of any form of democratic popular agency.
>previous presidents were great
>Nixon and every president after was corrupt and self-serving
This only works when you ignore all of the corrupt and self-serving presidents before Nixon
"No no guys, the billionaires giving politicians money to ignore the actual concerns of their constituents is free speech! It's totally not corruption."
And here I'm in the comments section, to hear the opinions and counter points of the experts.
https://preview.redd.it/nglyled8u6of1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3bbd020833eb32c94777dfcf353bb43e6af7e4fa
I thought Jackson was famous for reallocating surplus Indians from Georgia to Indian-starved Oklahoma [by the most economical means possible](https://i.imgur.com/ENvxe6t.png)
Nixon was highly exceptional in his behavior but not for any of this abject nonsense about the supposed purity of the white house, which in truth had been marred with varying levels of controversy for almost a century. The true unique aspect of Nixon wasn't that he was corrupt, its that he was a political realist. Many gamed the system, but only really to further their own personal desires, with the actual political world remaining bogged into idealism, but Nixon was a cold hearted strategist of a kind rarely seen in america who actually used his corruption to get things done. Reagan may have been in power during iran-contra but its people like Nixon who really run things
People give Nixon way too much credit. He wasn't the first president to break the law, he was just the first one where he got caught in a major way by the public.
The whitewashing of Nixon in the public consciousness is utterly unforgivable. What he and his team of goons did should be more well known and taught more prominently, but it isn’t and it never will be.
It was a mistake and terrible precedent, but not the cause. It’s like trump pardoning most of his cabinet and family in his first term. It was bad, but hardly stands out compared to everything else his admin did, basically par for the course
30 Comments
tardersos@reddit
djlatigo@reddit
ClF3ismyspiritanimal@reddit
tomtheconqerur@reddit
Ok_Implement_555@reddit
Spice002@reddit
tomtheconqerur@reddit
magnuman307@reddit
Brasil1126@reddit
orangutanDOTorg@reddit
tennessee_jedi@reddit
NetStaIker@reddit
UndeadRabbi@reddit
demonotreme@reddit
Internal_Day8004@reddit
TheeScribe2@reddit
NetStaIker@reddit
torolf_212@reddit
EncyclicalUnderpass@reddit
AaduTHOMA72@reddit
ParticularConcept548@reddit
Visccas@reddit
Futureman999@reddit
CornginaFlegemark@reddit
dirschau@reddit
I_am_Reptoid_King@reddit
ReturnRadio@reddit
captaincw_4010@reddit
Bigwilliam360@reddit
champagne_papaya@reddit